PANASONIC LUMIX DMC FZ2000 2500 FULL HANDS ON REVIEW WITH SAMPLE FOOTAGE AND PHOTOS: Jacques Gaines

[@MrVara411]

FANTASTIC review of this camera. Even though this review is 6 years old, this camera remains relevant today. You hit on just about all the essential talking points in a very levelled, insightful manner. Thank you!

[@JacquesGaines]

Thank you. It has indeed been a while now.

[@carauctiontalk]

@@JacquesGainesdo you still us it?

[@TheVedicObserver]

Hi Jacques! ...in minute 7:00 you're showing the lens cap that keeps falling off.....OK...That's what you have to do : Fit the lens cap nicely...and then turn it around clockwise about 90º or so....and you'll see it stays!...Problem solved!

[@JacquesGaines]

+TheVedicObserver Oh man thank you

[@dirkbullet]

thanks for the tip, it seems to work.

[@TheVedicObserver]

You're welcome!..It is on the user's manual!...but most people don't bother to read it!... ha ha

[@gcprost]

Yeah, I'm the kinda guy who would miss that too. Gerry

[@KevinDufflev]

I use a hoya uv filter and the lens cap fits and stays really well !

[@Monieapolis]

Awesome!!! This is it! The Lumix FZ1000 / FZ2000 might just be the best ALL AROUND package camera that I'm looking for without worrying about changing lens.

[@stringermedia5875]

I have been using this camera since it came out over my GH4 and my first camera GH3. I use this in a cage and it has served me well as a stringer. I mainly changed to a bridge camera after first using the FZ1000 because I got tired buying $700 lenses and because I don't have time to be switching lens or carrying them around. And the results are the same if not better as I shoot only video. I would ignore negative reviews from youtube channels because I don't believe in nitpicking. It is an upgrade of the FZ1000 and all issues from the FZ1000 have been fixed except for the fact that it still isn't weather proof. The lens cap fits fine in my FZ2500. Your suppose to pinch the pressure buttons while putting on. You may have received a bad cap?? This camera is 100% comparable to GH4. Actually it is better in my opinion.

[@JacquesGaines]

Thanks

[@dr.alihanoosh5763]

Stringer Media, Hi, I have a question if you don’t mind. I read your comment and I know what you mean by tired of switching lenses. I’m considering buying either the Fz1000 or Fz2000 for the same reason. My question is: since you used both cameras, do you think it’s worth it to buy the newer model? Or is the Fz1000 good enough? I like to take pictures a lot, but I’m mainly interested in it for video and light weight travel camera( compared to my DSLR). Thanks

[@chawquee]

BUY FZ2500 MUCH BETTER AND CHEAPER NOW 875 USD FROM AMAZON

[@KaseyAtkins]

you mentioned you use the fz2500 in cage--i'm having some difficulty finding a specific cage for this. May I ask, what cage you use? A link possibly? cheers.

[@CNW_FILMS]

I second that about a cage link for this camera. @@KaseyAtkins

[@keithbrown454]

Wow!! Damn excellent video and breakdown of the Panasonic Lumiz FZ2500. Very thorough, detailed, and decisive. Bar none, one of the very best videos, if not the best video on this particular camera. Thank you sir!

[@JacquesGaines]

Thank you

[@williamking7420]

In spite of it's arguably sharper lens, unfortunately Sony doesn't have articulated lcd, no touchscreen, no built-in nd filters, a convoluted menu system and some focusing issues. So these were deal breakers for me and the reasons why I purchased an fz2500.

[@JacquesGaines]

+William King I cannot disagree with a word you just said

[@coperniciaalba180]

Hi, does this camera overheat like sonys when filming? I´m looking for a camera to film rugby matches (but trying hard not to go for a camcorder). I will not be using 4K but whatever is underneath...full HD? Do you think this would be thE camera to film sports instead of a camcorder? (trying to avoid rolling shutter, moiree...I don´t know how to call the horrible distortion around high pace moving people. I have read the reason for this in cameras is the CMOS sensor while the amcorders have CCD sensors and more focusing points and the focusing isnt only contrast focusin...something like that). Much love. You are good with your videos, definitively. suscribed.

[@JacquesGaines]

+Copernicia Alba No overheating on the Panny

[@coperniciaalba180]

thankyou Jacques, very kind of you to be answering here. So I assume all the pannys are like this, no overheating..the fz300, 200, 1000

[@voyager139]

No over heating issues that I know of regarding `any` Panasonic cameras, seems more of a problem regarding larger sensor cameras/DSLR`s above micro 4/3 size sensors!!

[@armpauloferreira]

Great review. I am too one of those commenters here who have a FZ300. It's an amazing camera an it's really like that description you gave to this FZ2000/2500: amazing for video but less good for photography. It's too my definition and it seems like it's becoming the trend for all these Lumix bridge camera. What i say too is, from my perspective, FZ300 was an enhanced version of FZ1000 but with a smaller sensor and now i feel that every enhancements made on FZ2000 was made starting from FZ300 but with a bigger sensor. They are physically almost the same... even buttons, grip and overall design looks the same. I would have love too if my FZ300 had this tripod hole on center and away from that opening to battery/SD card. I'm also too more interested in video than on photo but as a begginer i need both... and normally on low-light conditions, or indoors... about dance stuff and sometimes from distance. FZ300 is not perfect but was the one my money could buy and i had to choose very wiseful. Those Lumix bridge cameras are a great choose and choice for that. As always, i love see your videos talking about this stuff. Keep that good work... and show more of your circus and dance projects (what you do is similar with my stuff)... it's inspirational!

[@JacquesGaines]

Cool Thanks! What is most important is that you are using what you have

[@voyager139]

I can assure you that I have seen some stunning Photos taken with the fz300 in various Forums, there is some folks doing utterly fabulous macro insect shots with it also, its not about Sensor size in my opinion, its how one can be creative, study to get the best out of `any` camera, sure the smaller Sensors are more prone to noise in low light, but hey, lightbulbs are inexpensive, lol, all you do is work around the problems of the smaller Sensors, I have the fz2000, sure its not perfect, what camera is? I love it, best camera I have ever owned so far, and I have had many over the years, I am sure the fz300 will serve you well, its a totally super piece of equipment, happy snapping and videoing my friend!!

[@markantonysen8794]

The FZ300 is not in the same ball-park - I know orginally looked at the camera and ended up running with a FZ1000 instead. For me the FZ1000 was a 2nd camera for me to use while I wait to obtain the what will be my primary still camera. I wanted something great for video, with the Mic input etc; Sounds like will not look at upgrading any time soon to the FZ2500 though can see the advantages if don't have a camera yet.

[@highdough2712]

Great review. Much appreciated. I've had the FZ1000 for a couple of years and love it, and just got the FZ2500 for work last week. In many ways, it feels like a completely different camera and I'm surprised at how much I have to learn despite owning it's predecessor. One example is that I wanted to film something in slow motion and after several minutes, came to the conclusion that it didn't shoot at as fast a speed as the FZ1000 (120 fps), but after watching this review, I seem to be wrong about that. I'm going to need to sit down with it for a few hours and figure it out more. I mostly do video work, but also needed a camera for photos.

[@JacquesGaines]

Thanx. I believe many of the features have shifted place in the menu. This gives us the impression stuff has been taken away. But yes, the workflow has changed quite a bit.

[@highdough2712]

+Jacques Gaines Photography Thanks to your video, I found the high speed frame rate, but it is most definitely not nearly as intuitive or user friendly as the FZ1000.

[@HamiltonSRink]

Turn off the image stabilization, and use a tripod, for a modest increase in sharpness.

[@JacquesGaines]

Thanks for the tip

[@juliansemilian6964]

Thank you for your insightful and thorough review, Jacques!

[@gcprost]

I have a GH4 and when I travel I use my 14-140 mm f3.5 to 5.6. Normally I have an ND filter and polarizer. On a recent trip to Jamaica, I forgot my filters. What a pain! I had to shoot my daytime videos at ridiculous apertures. I was also looking for more reach. On a boat trip on the Black Water river there were crocs and neat birds. I could have used the FZ2500. After your review though, I'm thinking I just might might buy the longer glass. I don't know. I'll keep pondering until my next trip because the GH4 does everything I need for my daily work. Gerry in Calgary.

[@HomesickMac]

Oh man, don't ask _me_ if this camera is good for stills, I'm totally sold on that function as well. I guess you're talking from the true professional point of view. I myself am coming from a NIKON D5300 which is a really good entry level DSLR stills camera with OK HD1080 video. So, for me the switch to the "all in one" solution like FZ2000 is a step up, and yes, even for stills. Not that the quality of stills is/should be better in any way than on the Nikon, but the combination of everything you've mentioned about the camera - and I'll point out the zoom specially here, the FZ2000 does an in overall better job for me. I take it with me and have it for both stills and videos, I can zoom in like hell and that lens isn't that bad for what I need it for. I also like the bulky shape and have no problems in holding it in my hands for a long time, I'm fine with that. One more (sneaky) reason I don't care too much if the FZ2000 isn't _that_ good for stills, is that I also own a Lumix GX8 which, when equipped with a good lens and because of it's larger sensor (albeit still 20MP just as the FZ2000) is my solution for better photos when needed. I've got it with a very capable kit zoom lens but I also bought a used wide angle prime (14mm) by Panasonic - and I'm at home with that so far, when I need the angle and some nice landscape photos. The GX8 is also on the heavier side for it's size but I love that as well, it's sturdy and wonderful to hold. I've just finished a corporate photo shoot where I planned to use the GX8 but ended up doing everything on the FZ2000. Some stuff should be zoomed in, some shots needed the classic 85mm portrait focal length to start with and, I just had it on the tripod and either changed the settings or amount of zooming, and I still got some very nice results. It's more that I ended up realising I needed stronger softboxes and maybe should get me some speedlights as well, but that's another story and for the times I get more jobs like this. Jacques, I find your reviews to be excellent and with the right dose of judgement, always pointing that it's "only" your opinion, it's always a good tempo in your videos so even non-native-english audience can follow, a true shame you don't have more subscribers. Peace!

[@rarendra7176]

I own Nikon D5300 too and been thinking of selling it along with a couple of my lenses and replace them all with fz2500 which Im gonna use mainly for run & gun documentary. Ive been hesitated until i watched this video and saw your comment, I think Im convinced now! so thank you both..

[@mrevonomis]

Great video, very helpful. thanks very much.

[@bitwise2832]

Good quick review. There are many other features, as you mentioned, that are covered in other vlogs. Upgrading from my FZ200, moving to 4k, for videos and stills, of my kids events. As an all in one, I think this will work for Dad duty.

[@JacquesGaines]

In every way possible. And then some!

[@JohnonaBike]

Great review - thank you. I am looking at this second had (from shop with warranty) and wonder if this is still good for video in 2024 ? I was also looking at the Panasonic HC-VXF990EBK

[@JacquesGaines]

If you can, go even further back and purchase the FZ1000. It is just as capable with better optics and bells and whistles you wont mind sacrificing

[@busterblond1]

Loved the review. Shocked that a flagship video camera does not allow external power supply or does it?

[@JacquesGaines]

It does via a battery emmulator. It is called a DC coupler. It even provides a little door so that you can put the wire through

[@MarieLou3M]

Just bought this camera yesterday. It's pretty awesome. It looks big but it's light easy for travelling. It's the best auto zoom I've tried. It zooms in and out slowly and smoothly using the zoom lever near the shutter button. For wide angle shots my GH5 provides 12-60mm and for telephoto FZ2500 provides 24-480mm. Thanks Panasonic, muahh.

[@STABONRECORDS]

hey, I really admire those set of cameras you have, the GH5 and fz2500 but my biggest worry is on the GH5. how can one get a telephoto lens that is not costing more the camera body.lol. it kills me when i think of the lens cost even though i have never bought any.

[@raymondcook8364]

Great review Jacques. I am a nature/wildlife enthusiast and am disabled with 2 previous head injuries. Sequence steps are my stumbling block. If I shoot in the P mode where the shutter speed and aperture are corrected, mostly I should only have to focus, am I correct under normal conditions? Are there any short cuts you can share with me to make using the FZ2500 simpler and enjoyable?

[@JacquesGaines]

Well. I strongly suggest using the intelligent auto on this camera as it is very "smart". You should also look into making sure that you can finger pick your focus zone on the screen. Hope that helps

[@greghoiem5498]

Good review - however, for those of us with even minor hearing issues the background music is distracting to say the least. Had to go back several times to actually be able to filter the words from the music.

[@JacquesGaines]

Was it that loud?

[@greghoiem5498]

Jacques Gaines Photography for me it was

[@JacquesGaines]

Sorry to hear that. I have always found videos with no soundtrack a tad boring. However, once the music is bad, it destroys the video. It is a delicate balance. I might just get rid of music altogether on these types of vids from now on

[@tkarlmann]

I had to stop playback of this video twice because I thought some rain or other was hitting my ceiling. Nope, it was your video sounds. No likey.

[@MyJeanf]

Great review Jacques . I currently have a gh5 and a g80 as a B Cam for my Documentary Production. I am thinking of selling my G80 and buy a FZ2500 as the b cam but am unsure about the one inch sensor. What would your advice be. The FZ2500 as do many pro like no need to buy lense ,Nd filters which might be good when I don't want to carry my GH5 wits it's cage, vines lensesetc,I could just take the fz2500 and have an all in one package. But I am still concerned that I would be loosing image quality any thoughts would've appreciated

[@JacquesGaines]

On the the fz2500 I would be less concerned about the sensor and more concerned about the lens. Unfortunately, the lens isnt that great. In my humble opinion I think your best bet is to look at either the fz1000 mark2 or the rx10 mark2. Things are a little complicated as you say you need nd filters though

[@MyJeanf]

@@JacquesGaines thank you . Your reply help.me a lot. Enjoyed the video. 😊

[@RichShumaker]

I have an FZ1000 and I find the far end to be mushy for sure. I use the digital zoom with jpeg just so I can get closer and those images really fall apart for me when I look at them on the playback. I should make sure I have it on the highest JPEG now that I say that. Have you seen or tried the new Panasonic FZ80? I would be interested to see if the FZ80 has enough to make it worth the loss of all the stuff the FZ2500 has. Great Review. I will sum it up in a few words 'If you Shoot 4K video and use Panasonic then get this camera', heheh. Thanks again for all that you do.

[@JacquesGaines]

Thank you. As for your summary, remember that the ALL-I and various bit depth availabilities in plain HD are also great. What scares me about the FZ80 is the sensor size. I tasted full frame and find it hard to go back. As for jpeg fine? I would suggest you start working in RAW and get a Lynda course in Lightroom. It is what saves this camera for me in low light. My two cents. Glad you liked

[@NorthOlbo]

Great review!

[@JacquesGaines]

Hehe! Thanks

[@TheMrBennito]

hello Jacques thanks for your entertaining and informative review, as always, Just q question, the 'mushy' lens. Is it the lens itself or are those photos a matter of autofocus not functioning properly? This camera has both manual and autofocus right? Same result when focusing manually? thanks

[@JacquesGaines]

Yup same results. Do not get me wrong. Images are sharp. It is just a little off kilt. Cannot really explain it. That is why I used the word mushy. I got really spoiled with my Sigma 50mm f1.4 ART and I cannot seem to shake the memory of those images off. Still an excellent lens though

[@TheMrBennito]

thanks for the fast reply, Jacques. I have read a lot of contradicting commentaries on the 2500 lens. I checked the FZ 2000/2500 stills on Flickr, I am specifically interested in bird photography & without pixelpeeping and all that, I see fantastic bird pictures over there. Lots of detail, beautiful colors.Very convincing.

[@JacquesGaines]

You might be better served with the RX10 mark3 or 2. It just has a better lens. It is a good lens but not stellar

[@andrewsrenson1212]

normally i drive a stick shift and "hate" automatics...but when it comes to cameras, i go straight for the "iA" function! it's why i like the fz2500: on, point, shoot & walk away with high quality images or vid in the card

[@JacquesGaines]

But do you ALWAYS get great shots?

[@andrewsrenson1212]

yep! that's how i roll

[@davidwiltshire4959]

Hey at 4min 50sec you are comparing the FZ against a Canon DSLR with 16-35mm zoom lens. (A little unfair). By comparison the FZ is both lighter and smaller than a DSLR with say 24-105 or 100-400mm lens. I sold all my Canon DSLR's and lens kit and bought this one FZ camera which does pretty much everything most people would want. Certainly does everything I want and without lugging a 120lbs of photo gear around all the time. I no longer suffer chronic back pain.🤪 Like your video though.👍

[@JacquesGaines]

Agreed

[@rodneymcgiveron]

G'day Jacques , Love your reviews ..very honest , not trying to market the subject , just telling it like it is .I'm very much an amateur ..but I love doing some videography stuff for our school where I work . I own three elderly Panasonic camcorders . All are mini DV cameras . The oldest is a DS 38 I've had for yonks . The favourite one is a 3CCD panasonic GS 330 and the third one is another 3CCD panasonic GS 150 . Also awaiting an "as new,never used " Sony HD handycam that no-one bid on and picked it up for $70 here in Australia..Also decided to buy my first DSLR early this year ..Canon 600D ..Not very good with anything but love trying ..Keep your fun vids coming please ..They're awesome .

[@JacquesGaines]

Thank you Rodney. By the way. Here is my advice to you. Hop on that 600D and learn the ins and outs of it. You will love what it can produce video wise and photo wise. It will motivate you to sell the rest as well. Nice collection by the way.

[@rodneymcgiveron]

@@JacquesGaines Thanks Jacques ...I will try the Canon as per your advice .Only intended to use it for stills photography but on your recommendation I will try it for sure . It's only got about 1200 photo count on it , that's how low use it is . I have the 18-55 and 55-250 Canon lenses . I suppose I'd need at least a 32 GB memory card would I ? . Re the Panasonics , I'm quite attached to them and didn't pay a lot for them . The NV GS 330 cost me $385 only bidder on EBAY, the NV GS 150 $100 on EBAY and the DS 38 I bought way back in about 2002 was new , about $750 I think . The GS's are both 3CCD on to DV tape as you'd know . They are fun to use . Forgot to mention I also own a vintage Panasonic Hi 8 , a Sony Video 8 which was my very first camcorder AND as of Christmas Eve my first ever palm corder , a little Sony DCR SX43 e .. Used it yesterday ...Cost me $70 , used once by previous owner . EBAY is a dangerous place for me . I have a couple of Samsung point and shoot cameras and a Fujifilm camera as well ..They all work too . Just a fun hobby . I work at a High School and make videos for our annual Arts On Tour shows , Presentation and Graduation Day and other special days here and there . Two tripods , a SLIK 5000 and a Manfrotto . Thanks again.

[@gabrielalamberti5860]

wow. amazing review! this definitely let me know that the fz300 is for me. ty

[@JacquesGaines]

Cool

[@mauriceaustin3657]

I am kind of new to the digital photography world. Or at least having a camera that isn't a point and shoot. I researched a lot before picking up on FZ2500. I wanted something 4k but yet still gave stunning photos. Without having to carry several different lenses with me. I use it for overlanding off-road video work. I am struggling with it though. Some days it/I work correctly and others days I may as well throw it into the creek. But I know it is what I am doing and not the camera. I enjoy the camera for its solid feel in my larger then normal hands. I don't mind the weight at all. I believe it helps stabilize it better.

[@Lizerator]

Great review, thanks

[@JacquesGaines]

Very welcome

[@v8muscle]

Thank you for this review! Currently trying to decide between the FZ2500 and the RX10 IV. I am coming from an FZ200 and I mainly want it for shooting drag racing videos from both the stands and the sidelines. My main complaint now is that the nighttime videos on the FZ200 are very poor where the action is not directly under the lights. Also trying to pan in the low light conditions is very blurry. Is there any advantage that the RX10 IV would have for my application over the FZ2500? Are the low light video performances similar?

[@JacquesGaines]

You might want to read the comments below. After the many years of using the FZ2500 and finally getting rid of it, it might be wise for you to get the Fz2000. For optics, it is a much better camera. It doesn't have as many bells and whistles but that is the advantage of the FZ2000. It has less and makes sure that each works correctly. That is my two cents.

[@v8muscle]

@JacquesGaines I can't seem to find it... some sites say the FZ2000 is known as the FZ2500 in the USA (where I am).

[@JacquesGaines]

No. It was the fz2000 go to marketplace and save yourself some coin

[@JohnonaBike]

@@v8muscle Yeah I am the same I cannot find one ?? - online it says "The Panasonic FZ2000 and the Panasonic FZ2500 are identical cameras that only differ by name. Panasonic sells the camera in different regions of the world using an alternative designation because of marketing and warranty considerations. Hence, there is not much to differentiate the two

[@barandcross]

What is the manual focus like during a zip zoom? If you auto focus on a far distant subject at maximum zoom, then switch to manual focus mode and fast zoom out to wide and back in again at close up, does the lens maintain focus throughout the range and hold it at the wide angle end? Almost performing like a par focal lens ( although I think the lens itself is not actually a par focal lens?) Thanks

[@technomage116]

Regarding the lens cap...I've left my lens cap off the fz-1000 for 4 or 5 years and carried it in my backpack with all sorts of stuff. Never got a scratch on the lense. Maybe some shmutz, but nothing that wasn't easy to clean off with hot breath and a soft t-shirt.

[@bobf.morinsr.6231]

Great video. Question- using custom function. Set up group of settings for video, If I want to change WB will (AUTO WB)stay to new setting.. In CF2 I change WB to 3200k. If i turn camera ofF and back on it goes back to original setting.(AUTO WB) Is there a way to have the change staY ? BOB

[@coperniciaalba180]

Hi Jacques, nice name. Does anybody know which would be the Canon version of this FZ2500? Or some other brand? I really need to avoid interchangeable lens cameras, for the total weight, for the price of having a perfect lens for every use/situation. I really like the fact the FZ2500 it is more of a camcorder (even though pricey, I dont know it´s really worth what they are asking for), cause that´s what I know I will be doing this year (filming rugby matches). How lovely would it be to have something in the price range of a canon T5 but already with a better range lens than its kit lens...won´t do for me

[@aronisink1]

Canon xc10 or the newer xc15 a bit pricy though. $2000-$2400. EOSHD gives it high regards..

[@JacquesGaines]

+george aronis Sony RX10 i, ii, iii as well

[@coperniciaalba180]

I should have put "except for the Sonys" ... have heard people saying it simply shuts off on them. And I live in hot humid weather...oopps, having to film for all the camera lets me at a time

[@kingsrook14]

How about Nikon p950 and p1000 picture quality?

[@adventurelens001]

Thanks for this Jacques. I've had the camera for a few months now and HATE the lens cap! It's actually lost at this very moment, haha! The other complaint is the battery. It dies so quick when doing video and Panasonic doesn't have an extra available on their site.

[@Fedorevsky]

Turn it 90 degrees after putting it on. Then it sits perfectly. They actually mention this in the manual.

[@seanpbarry]

Hi Jacques, really love this review. Considering the FZ2500 now myself. 4yrs later does this camera still hold up for video or have you moved on? I am looking for a travel camera but despite the bulkiness of the FZ2500 having everything in one balances out. Video work is my priority and I like the zoom, ND and other video features in this SLR body. Please let me know if it has been a work horse and is still an important camera in your kit today. Thanks, love your work!

[@JacquesGaines]

Hello Sean. no. I got rid of it. For video, it still holds well with the rest. You can check some of the sample footage I have on my channel. For photos it is a different story. As the review said, the IQ of the lens is just mediocre. If you need an all in one, you might want to consider some of the blogger cameras. They have really evolved, give spectacular video and are stunning at stills. Models I would consider are the Sony ZV1, their RX line. The Canon G7X mark 2 or 3 (I love that camera) Check out my review on that thing. It is a wolf in sheep's clothing. If you do not mind an interchangeable lens, the latest Fuji XS10 is amazing. I am reviewing it now. hope that helps.

[@seanpbarry]

@@JacquesGaines thanks for your message, I really appreciate your viewpoint. I have been considering the FZ2000 specifically for video. It seems Panasonic really include video features like frame timestamp for syncing footage, the autofocus on slow zoom, and Wi-Fi connection for monitor. It seems everyone else has a priority for photography first. The extra work I can do in camera saves me editing time. I just don't see any other dslr that comes close to video settings like built in ND filters. If it's solid for video work I can suffer the lower IQ for photography. My focus is totally video and coming from a graphic design/photography background I feel more comfortable with a dslr and that fits in a small backpack with my mini2 drone and insta360 kit. Your video work impressed me, despite the FZ-2000 reviews saying poor in low light, your circus footage in low light was wonderful crisp and in focus video. Again thanks on your input, I really should have clarified my focus was 99% video and 1% photos.

[@JacquesGaines]

Cool man. Just remember that if you get one, never go over 1200 ISO. And as I like to say. If your footage is dark, its OK!

[@mrraffle81]

First subber(do u still recommend this cam today ?

[@tkarlmann]

When you showed the "bad" photo of the FZ2500, you showed what looked like bandaids brightly lit with bad color fringing. Can't color fringing be corrected? Is there a separate program to do this?

[@frank1fm634]

thanks.

[@JacquesGaines]

You're welcome

[@JuganautTimelapse]

Excellent video. Excellent camera !

[@JacquesGaines]

Thank you

[@powerbatterychannel4315]

Dear Jacques, maybe you know how to remove the front lens of this camera? Mine has some spots from inside, but it's a problem to disassemble it.

[@JacquesGaines]

I have no clue

[@powerbatterychannel4315]

@@JacquesGaines Ok, thanks anyway!

[@markshepherd8497]

I recently shot 2k HD video with the Z2500 at 500 iso and there was a GREAT amount of noise dancing in the black areas. It was very noticable.

[@JacquesGaines]

What codec were you shooting in? Mov? MP4?

[@markshepherd8497]

MOV

[@markshepherd8497]

I made an interior test today in UHD 4K MOV at 500 ISO and 1000 ISO and it was unusable with the amount of noise in the shadows and dark areas. Outdoors with ISO 125 the video is stunning with NO noise.

[@markshepherd8497]

I was using the MOV codex . Today I did an indoor test of UHD 4K MOV codex at both 500 ISO and 1000 ISO and there was excessive "dancing" noise in the shadow and dark areas. It was unusable video for any professional purposes. When I shoot outdoors at ISO 125 the 4k and 2K video is stunning and sharp and noise free.

[@NewsOneLive]

I was shooting in MOV. I recently shot an interior test a ISO 500 and ISO 1000 in 2K . It was UN USUABLE because of the noise in the shadow areas and the blacks. Using this camera outdoors at ISO 125 at 4K and 2K produces stunning professional results. I would expect much better low light performance from a 1 inch chip. What is the problem?

[@bodyboardingchronicles602]

Can this platform be used to video in 4k take a still photo and Wi-Fi? Thank you sir!

[@JacquesGaines]

Yes

[@dirkbullet]

Good Review . I am an a beginner in filmmaking. I have the Lumix G7 and also the FZ 2000. the latter,seemed shockingly large in comparison. Both are great cameras. On the FZ I really find the built in ND filter extremely useful. ( No ND filter built into the G7) and I like the variable frame rates. The slow motion is very good. (120fs 1080p on PAL). Both G7 and FZ 2000 are very good for doing timelapse,even making it into a video in camera,ready to export. As for photo's, it is a big step up from the other bridge cameras I've owned ( Fuji/Olympus). I considered the Sony RX 10 m3, but it just didn't seem as ' COMPLETE' as the FZ 2000.I have had the G7 for 6 months and the FZ 2000 for about a month so I am still learning.

[@JacquesGaines]

Stick with it. I think you will find both have their uses

[@voyager139]

The Panasonic LUMIX FZ2500 offers a hybrid mix if photo and 4K video capture features that make up its backbone. The FZ2500 is built around a large 1-inch 20.1 Megapixel sensor and bright 20X LEICA VARIO-ELMART F2.8-4.5 lens. Video professional will enjoy features like “CINELIKE D” and “CINELIKE V” for cinema-like gradation, V-Log L upgradability, time code, live HDMI output (4:2:2/8 bit or 4:2:2/10 bit), lens ND filter controls, custom video GUI, and a system frequency selectable from 59.94 Hz (NTSC), 50.00 Hz (PAL), or 24.00 Hz (CINEMA). Combining all that with edit worthy MP4 (LPCM) and MOV, bit rates extended up to 200 Mbps (ALL-Intra) or 100 Mbps (IPB), and no recording duration limit, and it’s a video producer’s dream camera. Traditional photo enthusiast benefit from all this 4K video prowess because Panasonic’s 4K technology has changed photography for the better with new creative tools like 4K PHOTO, Focus Stacking, and Focus Stacking built-in. I traded up from the Fz 1000 to the FZ 2000 (UK), and can make the following observations: Basically the same 1" Sensor as the FZ 1000, The image quality for still photography is equal and more than satisfactory. The extra 80 mm does have some impact, although 600 mm would've been nice. The extra optical zoom extends the range to a very usable 960 mm and still returns a clean and usable JPEG. The fz2000 expands upon the already excellent control interface and user experience of its predecessor. Function buttons, dials, touchscreen adjustments all enhance Panasonic's useability. The 4K photo functions are a huge advance on the FZ 1000: pre-burst, full function bracketing and stacking open up a whole new possibilities for every kind and style of photography. ND filters are obviously a `major` new feature. I'm not currently using the camera for video, but I plan to do so extensively in the future, and it's nice to know that the FZ 2000 is cutting edge in that respect. It is superb for bird shots, `very` high hit rate, superb fast focusing system, Bottom line: if you buy the FZ 1000, you will love it and never know or care what you're missing. If you buy the FZ 2000, you will be thankful that you did it every time you access its advanced features.

[@modrisklingenbergs]

thanx! I bought fz300 almoust year ago, i'ts my first camera for filming. do not like small sensor and manual focusing. can you show how manual focus ring works on fz2500? Nobody talks ABOUT IT, BUT IT IS VERY IMPORTANT ASPECT! :)

[@JacquesGaines]

Works like a charm FOR FOCUS BY WIRE. It is the nature of the beast on these types of focuses. They will never be as good as a REAL focus. That being said, focus ring isn't that bad

[@voyager139]

Quite good actually, major improvement with the 2 rings round the lens over the older fz1000 single ring!!

[@Gichanasa]

Jacques, I am very impressed by the low-light shots you are showing here. I have the GH4, GX8, Metabones XL with Sigma 18-35/F1.8(which is unfortunately not so usable for video due to the clicking servo motor noise during auto-focus) and still suffer during low-light shooting. Would you say the FZ2000's low light capability is as good or better than the Metabones speed booster solution for the GH4/GX8?

[@JacquesGaines]

Not. not necessarily. I will probably be clarifying the shots I showed in the video for the following reason. These "low light shots" are a tad misleading. With my experience in these circus shows, I have developed a workflow where I meter the subject and do not care about the ambient. So subject, the most important part of the image, is sharp as a tack. All my "LOW LIGHT" shots I show, overall, are dark, but subject wise they are actually quite bright. Some shots are relatively low light but I should have actually grilled the camera with actual low lumens to see what would happen. So to answer your question, using a bit of tried and true logic where larger sensor equals better low light performance, I would stick to the speed booster and the four thirds sensor GH4 or GX8. With some experience with the product, the results will be much better.

[@CJOKERtw]

Hi Jacques, I would like to know if there is a way to manually control the iris of the FZ2500 steplessly just like an ENG camcorder. If they can let us map the either of the two rings for iris control that would be amazing.

[@JacquesGaines]

+CJOKERtw If there is , I am unaware of it

[@CJOKERtw]

So, there's no way to control iris smoothly like the ENG camera, right?

[@rizzlerazzleuno4733]

Really like the scope of your videos. I need a 4K video camera but I also would like a good stills camera. Most of the reviews rate the Sony RX10-IV over the FZ2500, but do complain about its price and missing the articulating LCD and built-in ND. Have you used/tested the Sony RX10-IV? If I could afford two cameras I would get a Panasonic UX180 for video and a Fijifilm XT-3 with the kit kens for still photos. I see a year ago you recommended the RX10-II instead of the IV. Would you recommend the Sony II over the FZ? Thanks.

[@JacquesGaines]

Still recommend the RX10 mark2 over the FZ2500. FZ optics are really so so. But you might want to think of the XT3 option. Its video options are borderline cinema quality. If you are not stuck on getting the superzoom option then the XT3 with even the kit 18-55 is a no brainer IMHO

[@rizzlerazzleuno4733]

@@JacquesGaines Thank you for the advice.

[@markototev]

As this camera is now similarly priced to the compact Lumix TZ200, is it still a better choice for a casual user or should I just go for the more compact TZ 200 model instead of this bulky beast? Not into the video as much, but I do want something that can produce non-mushy zoomed in photos as well asgood close up detail and overall great zoom.

[@JohnonaBike]

I have read that this does not have stabilisation in 4K do you know if it has it in 2K ?

[@JacquesGaines]

I am not sure. I have since sold the one I had. Sorry I could not help

[@JohnonaBike]

@@JacquesGaines OK thank you for replying

[@JacquesGaines]

My pleasure

[@andrewbalcombe1338]

Hi Jacques, with the release of the Sony RX10 mk 4 i've been keen to run a comparison with between it and the FZ2500. I'm a stock shooter so the stills quality is important. I also want to add stock footage to my portfolio. Unfortunately once again, there has to be a compromise. Better lens, but no ND filter for the Sony. Worse lens, but ND filter for the Panny. I guess the extra reach (600mm)and the better IQ of the Sony will swing it their way for me and I will have to screw one of those annoying ND filters on the lens. Great review and thanks for the frank and informed opinions.

[@JacquesGaines]

remember. The less the zoom range, the better the optical quality. You might want to think of the RX10 mark2. It has built in ND and excellent photo quality. 1198 at B and H . The mark 2 is also the only lens with the fixed f 2.8 aperture all the way through. As for zoom range, consider using your feet?

[@andrewbalcombe1338]

Thanks a lot for the reply Jacques, I want the range of a 600mm too :-) critters often won't let you creep up on them to within 200mm range. I know, because I have a canon 60D with a 70-200 2.8. But the canon's rear screen is a pig for video, and I much prefer an evf. The Sony RX10-4 seems like an all in one stock and travel package with extra reach for wildlife. I will have to test the lens, however, to see how sharp it gets at 100 percent. And see how the back illuminated sensor handles. Thanks for the recommendation. If I didn't have something in that range I think it would have been an excellent alternative. Cheers for now!

[@videoworks7731]

thanks nice review

[@michaelgribbins1187]

Great video! Been looking at buying the FZ2000 as my first camera. I mainly work within sport, shooting player / manager interviews and promo's at Football Clubs (UK). Would you recommend it for that style of work? Cheers!

[@JacquesGaines]

Yes I would because you are getting something that, if you master it, will give you great results.

[@michaelgribbins1187]

Jacques Gaines Photography brilliant. Think this has more or less made my mind up, FZ2000 seems like the best choice for my price range. Thank you for the advice!

[@star43ch]

Your video is very helpful! I am looking for a travel camera, but after your comments about size and lens extension, I think this bridge camera is too bulky for my purpose. Also, I am mainly interested in still photos and secondarily, video. I have been using a Canon SX50 for travel, but I want a camera with a bigger sensor and higher quality images. I am considering the Canon G3X. What do you recommend?

[@JacquesGaines]

Canon G7x mark2 is a wonder or the latest M50

[@star43ch]

Thanks for the recs! I will check them out at my local camera store. I forgot to mention I am looking for a travel camera with a good zoom range, that’s why I had settled on the Canon g3 & fz2500.

[@royjohnsonvideo]

Thanks for the revue. I had exactly the same problem with the lens cap. It kept falling off. I bought a new one off EBay for £1.09.Problem solved, sticks like SH*** to a blanket. Looks like Panasonic can't make lens caps. Love the camera though...

[@JacquesGaines]

SH** will definitely stick to a blanket. Thanks for the cue. I will check it out

[@AnaMuriel]

For photography it is not so good, but for me an amateur photographer is it good? The internal microphone is good for live events? Or is it better to get an external microphone?

[@JacquesGaines]

Well this one is very good. It has an internal limiter which actually brings down the volume for better sound but it is always good to have external audio feeding into the mic jack if you ask me. Hmm. Crazy as it sounds. I got a video for that too kzbin.info/www/bejne/iYrZYXuva7qhppo

[@JacquesGaines]

For both photography and video they are excellent but save yourself some money and get the FZ1000

[@AnaMuriel]

Jacques Gaines Photography FZ1000? I thought FZ2000 was an improved version of FZ1000.

[@JacquesGaines]

It is but you have to need video for it to be worth it. The optics are not great. They are good but not an upgrade at all. Also, the fact that the lens pops out drives me crazy. The FZ1000 if you need great video and excellent pictures. The FZ2000 if you need fantastic video and so so pictures. The Fz2500 might not justify the expense.

[@jaycairo5160]

Great Vid! ..... IDK i'm still on the fence on if i should get the G85 or this cam for video... the vid quality on the g85 seems a tad better and that wide lens they have look sweet. but the features on this cam is great but the build is quite big with lens... #Undecided

[@JacquesGaines]

Most importantly, you are locked on a mediocre lens vwith the FZ, go with the G85. I did a video on how I returned my G85 because of a lens noise but it has been fixed with a firmware update. The G85 will definitely not disappoint with stills and its modular in the sense that you can go out and get the glass you want. No low pass filter on the G85 as well.

[@jaycairo5160]

thanks bro! gonna do that #G85itis

[@madsstenhouse6661]

Nice video man! :D

[@JacquesGaines]

Thanx! It is still chugging along. I will be taking it out for stills very soon. Stay tuned

[@madsstenhouse6661]

Im also looking at Lumix GH5 :D Is it good to travel with and things like that?

[@JacquesGaines]

Unfortunately, I have never used it

[@Hibikirein]

thanks I bought fz1000 to save some money I'm more on photography

[@JacquesGaines]

Cool!

[@arthurgphotography]

It's still a beast, sharpness rivals my prime lenses for my sony a6000 for stills and i think it handles noise at high iso exceptionally well.

[@chip67art]

Great webcam

[@alevi9340]

How good is this camera vs the Canon 90D,I 'm planning to use it mostly in photo no video, for wedding events and sport...Thank you

[@JacquesGaines]

Do not get this camera for photo. It is good but the lens is really not very good. The 90D is a beast. Absolutely amazing. You might want to also think of the EOS M6 mark2 which is a 90D in mirrorless form. The kit glass is exceptional too. I do not know how many times I say this but never, never, never get enticed by a large zoom range. The smaller the zoom range the better the optical quality, plain and simple.

[@alevi9340]

thank you very much for your advice very helpful

[@dronetheworld4k67]

i asked this many times, r u aware of a reliable gimbal that can zoom smoothly for the fz2500 and support settings like iso etc from gimbal ? if u know any reliable gimbal for this camera plz let us know....

[@JacquesGaines]

I am not. Sorry

[@johnnydospassos5167]

Hy Jacques, Do you know if FZ2500 model got HDMI LIVE mode and keep sending video signal trough the HDMI out put during filming ? ( My DMC-FZ300 LUMIX shutdown the monitor and give me a nice black window !!! ....Same limitation on GH7 !! )

[@JacquesGaines]

Yes it does have that. It also offers it CLEAN. Meaning with no menus and available to capture to external devices like the Atomos

[@johnnydospassos5167]

@@JacquesGaines Thanks

[@-thereciter3854]

How to use dolly zoom in fz 2500???

[@JacquesGaines]

I am not sure anymore. I no longer own this camera

[@misterpimlott6330]

Does the lens hood on the fz1000 fit on the fz2500?

[@JacquesGaines]

Good question. I am not aware

[@lovelybeautips]

Hello, Thank you for sharing this video and your knowledge ! Do you think it OK to use the F2000 for tutorial video like you (but with more light) ? And do I need to buy a lens for this type of video? Please let me know :)

[@JacquesGaines]

You mean to film yourself? This is a great camera. About half of the videos you see of me in my basement are done with the FZ2500. It is a great camera for that.

[@lovelybeautips]

Yes to film myself, OK great then. Is the camera just good or do I have to buy a lens?

[@JacquesGaines]

No lens. This is a super zoom 24-480mm range

[@drnashed393]

Greetings from Berlin, I like your green Glasses very much, could you please tell me which brand is it, may be I can find one in Germany. Thanks in advance

[@JacquesGaines]

Too funny. I got those at a place in Quebec city called Les branchées. I do not even know if they still exist really. Unfortunately, they are not with me anymore so I cannot even look at the brand they were. Sorry I could not help any more than that.

[@drnashed393]

@@JacquesGaines thanks a lot for your quick answer. I will keep watching your new Glasses design.

[@michaelstevens9650]

Regarding lens cap I through it away and put on CP filter for protection, but my real beef is you fell for the deceptive "holding focus while zooming" shot. Try it, it does not hold focus and continuous AF hunts. Otherwise i can't fault it.

[@JacquesGaines]

I agree. Mine does not hold focus either

[@ryanwilliams4892]

What button do you press to switch in between variable frame rates while recording? Also, do you notice that videos may come out with a lot of noise when filming in slower motion? Because I have and I am not sure why

[@JacquesGaines]

You need to go into the menu and near the variable frame rate choice there is the choice of slow/quick. Before doing that, make sure that you have a frame rate that accepts VFR. They do not all have it. Once that is done. Once you press record you are in normal recording. If you want to speed up or slow down, it is the two buttons F1 and F2 (on the side of the lens) that control fast or slow look. As for VFR causing noise, well at this price range, it is what you get. A lot of artifacts really. I still stick to my theory that at these prices slo mo will always kind be mediocre

[@ryanwilliams4892]

For me, F1 and F2 are slow zoom t and slow zoom w. I picked a VFR and turned slow/quick motion on, but it's not letting me switch in between frame rates while recording, only zooming in and out with those functions

[@JacquesGaines]

OK I do not know why that might be occuring

[@aronisink1]

Totally agree about the mushy lens.. I had the Sony rx10m3 the lens was spectacular.. . Loved the Sony except for the no touch no flip screen and returned it when I heard the Pani was coming out.. Had the Pani and was very disappointed in the lens for stills.. Why do they make an almost perfect camera..

[@JacquesGaines]

I do not know. A big disappointment for me. Ending up to be a fantastic video camera with OK stills capability

[@coperniciaalba180]

but what about over heating in the sony...the sensor I believe, don´t know, but it stops working on people

[@coperniciaalba180]

does it have a CCD sensor or why is it so good with video? no rolling shutter? filming rugby matches here...would it be better to get a canon T5 or a Nikin D3300 or something else?... I was hoping to get something useful in compact (because I can´t carry anything heavy for long...talking about pics, since for filming it will be on tripod) but have gotten nowhere uptil now

[@aronisink1]

If your doing video Nikon is really bad with tracking subjects in motion. Canon T71, 77d, 70d, 80d, 7dm2 all have duel pixel auto focus system that no other camera co can match except for Sony..

[@coperniciaalba180]

Thanks! Knew about one Nikon having that problemm now I know it´s in general with tracking subjects in motion. Would you happen to know of a zoom fixed-lens camara with duel pixel auto focus sytem? would be really good for my arms, wrists and hands (a little fibromyalgia here) . Also for practicity and because I live in a country where I could be mugged going from one place to another so be less the bulk, the better. I would pick Sony again...but the ones with nice video all over heat, shut-off. Have a nice afternoon and thanks :)

[@BalticSeaRoundSailWinga]

I am just starting with Videos and wonder which ssd you would recoment and is there any Blog/Vlog that Couleur Teich me to geht the best out of this camera?

[@JacquesGaines]

I suggest a decently fash SD card sort of like a SDXC class10 would make sence. As for blogs I do not know

[@jarrodbarker]

Which lens hood did you add to it

[@JacquesGaines]

The one that comes with the camera

[@MrCaptainDietrich]

i want to use it for photos and videos

[@kamalabadipour1532]

Dear Jacques, how can i change of frame rates while filming?

[@JacquesGaines]

While filming? I tbelieve that the only way to do that is in the sudden slo mo mode. I do not have the camera anymore so I cannot help you on that. I know that, with a slight loss in video bit depth, it is possible though. Hope that helps.

[@jimo5564]

I'm a FZ1000 owner, a happy one. I'm not really into video, so I stopped when you got there. I really like the Lumix cameras, but if I want to upgrade to the next best still camera anyone know what that might be?

[@JacquesGaines]

Do not get the fz2500 if you do stills. You might want to check the RX10 line by Sony

[@jimo5564]

@@JacquesGaines Thanks for replying. I can't live without a fully articulating screen....

[@JacquesGaines]

Do you have to have the super zoom? If not, there is a whole other range of great cameras out there

[@jimo5564]

@@JacquesGaines No, not a super zoom, but something 'bridge' like. The littler cameras are taken care of because I have the Sony RX100 II. At 74, I like the larger cameras. Thank you.

[@misterpimlott6330]

On my fz1000 the only thing that broke was the battery door lol, but the battery stayed in

[@JacquesGaines]

could you order the part?

[@misterpimlott6330]

@@JacquesGaines pretty sure you could its a very easy camera to open up

[@m29ele]

I currently own a RX10 mk1 and i'm seriously thinking about upgrading, but i keep hearing that the FZ2000/2500 is huge, so is it that much more bigger than the RX10 mk1?

[@JacquesGaines]

Not really. They are in the same class. Bottom line. The FZ2500 is a great video camera. For stills? Not so much. Are you happy with the stills quality form the RX10?

[@m29ele]

yes i'm more than happy with the stills from my RX10, so is the FZ2000 about as good for stills or worse?

[@K.g.2510]

I am sorry my dear Jacques but if you allow me 😊... post focus is not gadgetry, it allows to have same same as bokeh that otherwise would be impossible to obtain with such a lens. A statue on a place for instance with buildings at the back, the focus being made on the statue, the buildings on the back will look more blurred, and it wont be the same picture at all, but please no offence, I love your revue👍 I own the FZ 2500 happy not to have bought the 1000 after reading some bad revues about the 2500. Plus being not a big video amateur I was amazed by the videos one can do with this camera so I will probably make somme more too.

[@JacquesGaines]

Salut Georges. Please understand that I mean gadgetry in a good sense. The post focus is some cool ass stuff. So much so I plan to do a couple of videos of my experience on it on my channel. It is just for the sake of the review, that I decided that bottle necks like ergonomics and and optics were what I wanted to concentrate on. I should have said "technological extras" though. Point taken. But you know that you can still get Bokeh (low depth of field) with this camera without using the post focus function. What is cool is that post focus allows you to decide after the fact. Something macro photographers are just going to friggen love

[@PromoMoviescomau]

Lens on Canon XC10 much better/crisper. Unfortunate, as I would have bought this as a B-Cam. Will keep GX85 for B-cam for now (but hate the 29min record limit!) Thanks for your review!

[@JacquesGaines]

I think that it is a good move

[@GauravVirdi22]

Nice review. At one point you say Fz2500 is great for video n still photography but in comments you say its not good for stills n better go for Sony Rx seriess. My budget does not permit me to buy expensive Sony Rx series cameras. Would you suggest some other good bridge camera for still photography and which can do 4k video. Exclude Sony plz.

[@JacquesGaines]

The new Canon G line G7X mark3 and G5X mark2 optics are great and it comes in a small package

[@nolifuncion]

Is this camera still good to buy in 2018? Thx

[@JacquesGaines]

for stills? Blah. No. For video? Hell yeah! But if you do not need high bit rate video you might want to look at its smaller brother, the Fz1000. Which is great. The Sony RX live is way better for stills.

[@nolifuncion]

thanks!

[@Andres-eh4rq]

Hello! Guys! I am a beginner... I am looking for a camera both good quality pictures(4k if possible) and 4k video. I've checked the tutorials panasonic lumix dmc-fz1000 and dmc-fz2000. Which one do you recommend for both pics and video? Or other brands? My budget is not the highest.. that's why I am checking this 2.

[@pgulysse1]

Good Review Jacques. Thanks a lot. *-*-* 1.- Do you have info on an upgrade of this Camera : Panasonic Lumix DMC FZ 3000/3500? *-*-* 2.- Professional like you have access to more info. Can you make a review/comparison: A.- 1" Sensor : Lumix FZ 1000 mark 2 - Leica V-Lux Type 114 - Sony RX10 mark IV B.- 1/2.3 Sensor : Canon Powershot SX 70 HX, Sony HX400V, Nikon B700, Lumix FZ80/82 Trying to convince friends who want to slowly jump in photography that the Bridges are good options as well.

[@JacquesGaines]

The FZ2500 was just discontinued. They have recently come out with the FZ1000 mark2. But no news as to an upgrade on the 2500. I think that Panasonic has closed the book on bridges in general.

[@pgulysse1]

@@JacquesGaines ThanksJacques. Means th FZ1000 M2 is going to be probably the only Bridge Camera for Lumix, like V-Lux Typ 114 for Leica.

[@chasevineland1508]

It’s big but I guess Red cameras are Titanics. In the DSLR world, any lens over 400 regardless of being 2.8 to 5.6, those lens are the size of small bazookas. I’m seriously considering this camera... simplifying my life from multi-lens 35mm dslr, multi-lens med, large format film cameras, and a plethora of video cameras over the last two decades.

[@MrPetebuster1]

excellent follow up review, I sent mine back as I'm more a stills man, and I find the fz300 does everything I need and even though the fz2000 has a bigger sensor the fz300 images are sharper and the 2000 lacks the focal range but if your a video person its a good option and though I questioned you in your last I've been able to test rx10iii and much better iq, all in all I think the fz2000 is a bit of a disappointment unless your solely a video shooter

[@JacquesGaines]

Amen!

[@coperniciaalba180]

FZ300 is discontinued right? And it´s the other one without the 30 minute video shut down right?

[@coperniciaalba180]

it´s mushy only on the long end right?

[@JacquesGaines]

+Copernicia Alba All over the place. With a really small sweet spot near 50 to 70mm

[@coperniciaalba180]

you really rock Jacques. I have saved me from just "trying it out"...being I wouldn´t be able to send it back to amazon in my case... Great day for you

[@JacquesGaines]

Glad I could help

[@leonardwertheimer4233]

Jacques, your email also saved me from purchasing the FZ2000/2500. I shoot no video and am exclusively concerned about the quality of stills. I currently use a Sony RX10ii, and if Sony glass is better, I'll stick with Sony.

[@MaxMitchellVideos]

Thanks for your review. I'm a pro videographer who shoots usually with 3 cameras. I had purchased 3 FZ1000s when software came out (Plural eyes) that could sync sound in post. That allowed me to dump my HEAVY pro video camera for something a lot, lot lighter. In fact, I could buy 3 FZ1000's for less than one of those video cameras and use separate sound recorder. I loved the FZ1000s right out of the box. Like the bridge camera fixed lens. I'm usually working really fast and don't hve the luxury of changing lenses. I destroyed one of my FZ1000s falling in a swimming pool on a shoot and it was not fixable so I bought an FZ2500. Love the upgrade. Especially the ND filters and the headphone jack. Still learning about this camera but I love it.

[@manuelnvd]

Fair.

[@homerholmes]

I'm surprised to see the quality of your low light footage. I'm very disappointed with the low light on this camera. Yes I know it's only a 1inch sensor but the fact that there is what I consider unusable noise in a well lite office at ios400? Is my camera broken or am I missing something? If I tried to use my fz25000 shooting that dark circus scene I would dare say it would just be a mushy pile of noise. Any ideas or should i return it?

[@JacquesGaines]

Are you in AI mode or any sort of automatic mode? Also, with this camera, everything is pretty well usable all the way to 800. You are not the first person telling me this. I got the same problem with one person on the FZ1000. What is going on? Please let me know a bit more about your settings.

[@homerholmes]

Wow fast reply thanks Jacques! I'm shooting all manual. Shooting wide open at f2.8 at 4K25p (pal area), have tried picture profiles Standard, cine-d, cine-v etc. I have even tried outputting 10bit 4:2:2 to my Atomos shogun inferno that I use with my Panasonic DVX200 and it's still a mushy pile of noise. Sure I can de noise in post but you loose sharpness. I brought the fz2500 to be a B roll camera to the dvx200 but so far I'm not happy to use it on a shoot as the image quality is bad. I can even see the pixel noise on the LCD before I press record!

[@JacquesGaines]

Something is definitely wrong. I am shooting manual, in cam memory card with STANDARD as a profile. Something is wrong here

[@homerholmes]

Jacques Gaines Photography, Very interesting! Wish we lived in the same country, could be interesting to take your and my camera out and shoot the exact same scene and settings and compare the images. It's such a pity as I really really want to love this camera. It has absolutely everything you could ever want for a decent shoot built in! Thanks for your reply, I appreciate it and your very informative videos!

[@MrCaptainDietrich]

i want to talk videos and photos of nature and views sunsets and more what camara must i choos pleas help jacques gaines thank you

[@שרוןהבר]

You say the fZ2000 has not as good glass for image quality as the FZ1000? Haven't seen yet any comparicon for stills. Seems I will stick with my FZ1000

[@JacquesGaines]

Stick to it. Stills on both are great but you are not upgrading with this camera for stills

[@שרוןהבר]

Thanks bro!

[@danielpersoneni6853]

Pourrait on avoir dessous titres en français SVP ???

[@JacquesGaines]

J'aimerais beaucoup mettre des sous-titres en français. Par contre, le temps me manque énormément. Ça prend une journée produire une vidéo de ce genre. Ma langue première est l'anglais alors, j'y vais pour ce qui est facile pour moi. Désolé

[@MrNYCman530]

Many people have said that the FZ1000 and FZ1000 ll produce sharper photos than the FZ2500

[@JacquesGaines]

They are absolutely correct.

[@MrCaptainDietrich]

i makeing youtube videos and more must i go for 2500 panasonic

[@JacquesGaines]

It is a good camera for this but if you blog, you might want to thing of other lower weight models. G7X mark2, Canon M50 is a dream with a larger sensor. etc

[@AbdiPianoChannel]

My Fz 2500 thinks that she is a compact video camera. I kept telling fz 2500 her real identity but she totally refused to believe me.

[@JacquesGaines]

Hehe😝

[@paschimpurfilms958]

4k setting image

[@JacquesGaines]

Pardon my ignorance but is this a question?

[@DayPartyExperience]

vimeo.com/211097385 finally did a dj take with the fz2500 camera I have my green screen and white screen for the real shoot this coming this week thanks for all the advice again.

[@JacquesGaines]

Rodney Day. The video is great buy your beats! Yo sheaa is da bomb! You feel like supplying music for my blogs. Man you got it! DM my asss pleeeaaaase.

[@DayPartyExperience]

I will send you some tracks for sure I have a cinema kit that I'm putting together now I will check out some of your videos and keep it in line with your theme be on the look out soon.

[@robcardena6786]

Did you ever figure out how to use the lense cap?? It is so easy and locks on very strong. You have to use your fingers to pinch lens in front of cap. I never saw you do this. For a camera guy you should know this simple task. I said to myself "this guy is stupid. He doesn't really know to pinch the cap pinchers??"

[@JacquesGaines]

+Rob Cardena To think that I would not pinch the front is insane. But on KZbin anything can happen. Yes I pinched the front. I believe that my cap is defective or everyone has low expectations of how well a cap should hold. Mine holds but not well at all. But you are free to still think I am stupid. . . he he

[@diazfilms]

Thank you Jacques for this vid! Been eagerly waiting since you announced it :-) I use this camera for short films. I feel that it's more of a "filmmaker" fixed lens camera. And i prefer fixed lenses, because that is what works for me. Also since it has built in nd filters its perfect for my needs. I will invest in the v-log upgrade a bit later. here's a clip of when i first got the camera. right out the box. settings were auto everything kzbin.info/www/bejne/e3a1ZJyqndSIoJY and heres a clip of a short film work in progress kzbin.info/www/bejne/jpmsfYCQiZ58r5o

[@JacquesGaines]

Looked at your stuff. Pretty amazing what you got straight out of the box. You also are great at establishing mood. Too cool!

[@diazfilms]

The Movingicon wow! thanks so much for the encouragement and checking them out! I really appreciate that 👍