Parrot in the Fog: Pheneomenal Palindrome Puzzle

[@effiebriest1278]

Very lovely straightforward puzzle with a fantastically smooth flow.

[@anaayoung9142]

8:27 for me. Very nice. Another fun one line fog puzzle!! 🤩

[@breid3492]

Q.What is the jungles favourite sudoko constraint? A. A parroty line! 🎉

[@mrpokefan8369]

11:59 here. What a nice and easy puzzle, thanks Sleuth-

[@chrisbrogan3307]

Very pretty puzzle

[@boydegg]

17:21 that was fun and I always love a fog sudoku.

[@christopherpolito5826]

9:03 for me. I love good fog of war puzzles.

[@PorkChops_Johnson]

16:33 for me. At 16:09 you could have ruled out a 6 because there's already a 6 in column 6 (row 1).

[@Sinisest1121]

13:08 for me. You clearly moved way harder path. My path was average 1 star sudoku without any kind of unusual methods.

[@phoenixaki3458]

16:54, break-in was nice and it flowed almost too easily for a bit after, minus some pencil mark analysis near the end to finish it off

[@niyazali7983]

12:20 for me. Possibly could have shaved half a minute or so if I bothered to colour the palindrome, but pretty happy with my time.

[@joebeuk]

Hi, At 11:14, why can't the cell be an 8? Thanks

[@3InTheCorner]

Poor marking that lead to a lucky deduction. It happens. At that point only 2 could have been placed from the 248.

[@asderd2464]

11:17 for me fun puzzle

[@marcosdiez7263]

Thanks for the puzzle. But today I'm puzzled: at13:39 you had placed 147 as the candidates for r3c5, allowing to rule out digits not shaded with r6c1, but then 174 weren't the only candidates, the 8 was a candidate as well, so you should have ended up with 48 as valid candidates for both cells. What am I missing?

[@kvom01]

34:21

[@mahdimortada6356]

solver 1129. 11:25

[@TonyNaggs]

My dude, you were ignoring sudoku in box 7, and generally in the columns when you were doing clever things with colouring the palindrome triplets.

[@jonbrowne]

18:07 to solve. Got quite tricky towards the end with the sudoku!

[@agoristtaxadvice]

Wait- at about 11:20 you label a square as being 147- I don't see how you know that square can't be an 8. That's correct, but I don't see how you could know that.

[@ryuuguu01]

Same question. I had it as 48 and it took a long time to resolve that.

[@MesaperProductions]

24:05 #1073

[@Timlagor]

Somehow I didn't realise that you're using AI for the thumbnails. 🤢

[@SudokuSleuth]

Interesting. What have it away this time?

[@Timlagor]

​@@SudokuSleuth You talked about using AI for something else. It's obvious really but I just didn't think of it for some reason. In case it wasn't clear I strongly disapprove. It's destroying the planet and based on stealing people's work.