Part 2 CDS View Performance | Measure S/4HANA CDS runtime performance using ST05

[@joycisco]

Thank you Anubhav for sharing your hard core knowledge .

[@ashlehsashekhawat5006]

Video is awesome it helps a lot The trainer is very efficient and cooperative

[@vaishalityagi2813]

Many thanks for the video I have seen many online videos but this training was one of the most dynamic. I hope to see more videos.

[@nd60311]

Thanks Anubhav. Explained very nicely.

[@goldiedevarapalli6161]

Thank you. Helps a lot. BUT Suprise - after applying dataclass/servicequality/sizecategory - performance of CDS views degraded - time taking increased a lot. Can anyone help me out why time taking process increased.

[@rz8679]

Thanks a lot for this interesting topic. Would you please explain how to find the memory. Leak issue for the CDS (as mentioned in part 1)? Thanks

[@kevinzhang3203]

Hi Anubhav, Thanks a lot for this topic. However I saw an opposite result in case you trace ST05 with these annotations first, then remove the annotations and trace ST05 again. The time cost of CDS views with annotation is more than the one without annotation. Is it expected?

[@RanjithKumar-bt5kw]

If we give wrong values like suppose I am uising master data tables in CDS,but I used DataClass : TRANDACTIONAL etc. Can this lead to performance issue, because of wrong values?

[@Laharikasmoments]

👍