for people interested in this subject fermilab has a relatively large channel here on youtube. they go one step further than this documentary while avoiding the heavy math.
@SolaceEasy7 ай бұрын
Even Bananas
@Drerny11157 ай бұрын
@@SolaceEasy Thank you, sheepshotguns42
@chrisnichols98766 ай бұрын
So Complicated and Absolutely Fascinating 💚💫💙💥💜
@sheepwshotguns425 ай бұрын
@@donlouden8850 that kind of depends on you and what you're interested in. you can go to the channel and sort videos by popular then check out whatever catches your eye. youtube doesn't allow links.
@laughingoutloud57424 ай бұрын
Cool - thanks! ❤️✌️
@nilsnyman6767Ай бұрын
NOVA has been on TV since 1974 and I have watched every single one I've ever come across since I was a child. They never disappoint.
@fredkilner22995 күн бұрын
I can't believe I never saw BBC The Sky at Night hosted by Patrick Moore on USA TV. I heard about the show when it was in the news he got sick from eating a goose egg. You can re live the old Mariner and Viking and other missions by watching that show.
@stephenkalatucka62137 ай бұрын
A neutron walks into a bar and orders a beer. He asks the bartender "What do I owe you?" The bartender says, "For you, no charge."
@mr.winkie7 ай бұрын
😂
@TubelessXP7 ай бұрын
Never trust an atom ~ they make up everything!
@Sunspot1225.6 ай бұрын
A bit cliche, but enjoyable.
@Canard7124 ай бұрын
He's revered.
@mrhassell4 ай бұрын
1 up Quark, 2 down Quark, carry on, Baryon, get your Hadron!
@VERYEXCITED8 ай бұрын
Neutrinos would be a good name for a science-themed pizza restaurant.
@chadwick6348 ай бұрын
😎🤙
@kraneiathedancingdryad63338 ай бұрын
Come to Lead, SD. There's a neutrino lab here .. and a place called Pizza Lab! lol
What I find fascinating, are the instruments used to detect all the particles!!! Let alone the discovery of the particals themselves. To simply put it, WOW!!! Just simply WOW!
@davidirizarry62163 ай бұрын
The instruments they use are just as fascinating as the discovery itself..⚛️.
@frankdimeglio8216Ай бұрын
@@davidirizarry6216Consider what is the FOURTH dimension. Consider TIME AND time dilation ON BALANCE. Gravity/acceleration involves what is balanced inertia. This explains E=MC2 AND F=ma. This CLEARLY explains the cosmological redshift. I have CLEARLY solved what is the coronal heating “problem”. Consider what is the FOURTH dimension, as two AND three dimensional SPACE are BALANCED. Consider what is the man (AND what is THE EYE) who is standing on what is THE EARTH/ground !!!! (Touch AND feeling BLEND.) Gravity/acceleration involves what is balanced inertia, as SPACE is electromagnetic/gravitational on/in balance. TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity ON/IN BALANCE. Consistent with what are E=MC2 AND F=ma, gravity/acceleration involves what is balanced inertia; AS TIME dilation is CLEARLY and necessarily proven to be electromagnetic/gravitational ON/IN BALANCE. Great. (Consider TIME AND time dilation ON BALANCE.) This CLEARLY proves what is THE FOURTH dimension (ON BALANCE). Great. WHAT IS E=MC2 is taken directly from F=ma, as gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are linked AND BALANCED opposites; as the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Consider TIME AND time dilation ON BALANCE, as gravity/acceleration involves what is balanced inertia; AS the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches the revolution; AS WHAT IS THE MOON will (and does) move away very, very, very slightly in relation to WHAT IS THE EARTH/ground. Now, notice what is the BLUE sky. Complete combustion is consistent with WHAT IS E=MC2. CLEARLY, I have proven what is the fourth dimension. Magnificent !!!! (BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand.) By Frank Martin DiMeglio
@SuperElwira21 күн бұрын
I think is not particles it is a stages...
@SuenosDeLaNoche8 ай бұрын
Brain food YUMMY! Thank you Nova/PBS. Always serving up something good.
@seekter-kafa5 ай бұрын
junk food, increasingly so
@jorge109288 ай бұрын
As always, another excellent NOVA episode. Thank you PBS!
@tonyduncan98524 ай бұрын
If a neutrino has mass then it is subject to gravity. "Dark matter" is therefore the NEUTRINO ATMOSPHERE of galaxies, and no longer a mystery. What a relief!
@mikkel7154 ай бұрын
Even optimistic mass of neutrinos put the total mass of these ghost particles to about the same as all the stars. Probably smaller. Anyway much smaller than dark matter. But good idea.
@tonyduncan98524 ай бұрын
@@mikkel715 I hope you included the original neutrinos created at the point of, and following, the singularity. Our arrow of time, and our causality, and our original neutrinos, were powered by antimatter creation, from our point of view. Neutrinos are good at hanging about in the cosmos. Not perfect, but good . . . but big galaxy-sized black holes are still stuffed with them.
@mikkel7154 ай бұрын
@@tonyduncan9852 Yes, even included the massless neutrinos into the equation..
@tonyduncan98524 ай бұрын
@@mikkel715 Well then we're missing something else as well. That singularity . . .
@sean46617 ай бұрын
"Right Now on ..." "NOVA" " !! Consistently the best Docs along with Frontline.
@johnleca7 ай бұрын
I am currently working on a gauge that measures nothing but I am having trouble calibrating it. Great video.
@RO-uz4oi7 ай бұрын
That's because there is no nothing!
@jennjarrod33784 ай бұрын
@@RO-uz4oi then we should be able to detect it.
@rudihoffman28174 ай бұрын
LOL! Great comment for this video measuring REALLY subtle nonthings!
@12thmaths543 ай бұрын
After death goes everyone in dark world
@thagrintch8 ай бұрын
What a beautiful documentary. Thank you, Nova for enlightening the world with these beautiful scientific discoveries. We are learning more about our world and with new discoveries come more question. That's the beauty of science.
@AAWCreations_768 ай бұрын
Thank you so much PBS. I love Nova and have watched it since I was a kid. I learn so much! 😊❤❤
@miinyoo7 ай бұрын
Props to the editor. This takes something interesting and elevates it. Great work. Ian Strang and Henry Fraser. o7.
@Jason-vn5xj7 ай бұрын
0:45 “…and astonishing experiments that keep defying the laws of physics.” Uh no. Literally, the opposite.
@diamondperidot8 ай бұрын
I’m first! Let the learning begin.
@veritas41photo8 ай бұрын
First? You proud of that? Why?
@BenTrem423 ай бұрын
Simply fabulous. *_"Wu Li Masters"_*_ are jumping more than ever!_ thanks so much ...
@DeweyLauridsen50008 ай бұрын
I stayed up to watch this!!! Damn I love science. I am always a excited dork over this sort of thing, as well as the new telescope, and quantum physics. I think to myself, we are alive to see all this awsome things happen and discovering new things!!! 😎🤓😏😀. Dewey L
@SuperElwira21 күн бұрын
Atom bomb is exciting? What you are talking about? People are totally blind. Chemistry is also pesticides, meds, plastic trash. Medicine is Pharm industry and experiments on the animals, plants and people...
@wtfdfw6 ай бұрын
NOVA! YOU GUYS HAVE THE POTENTIAL TO CREATE ONE OF THE BEST SPACE DOC TO SLEEP" CHANNELS ON KZbin RIGHT NOW!
@pierheadjump8 ай бұрын
⚓️ Thanks PBS 🌈
@rudihoffman28174 ай бұрын
What a cool and nicely done video. bravo to NOVA!
@jamesraymond11584 ай бұрын
The most obvious question about Bruno Pontecorvo, not answered in the documentary, was did did regret defecting. Googling that question brought me to an interview with his son Tito in Physics Today. Although Bruno never told his children whether he regretted defecting, his son made it clear that his father hated the Soviet Union but was prevented from leaving by his communist bosses. According to Tito, Bruno naively thought he would be allowed to travel. Based on this article, Bruno must have regretted defecting soon after he entered the Soviet Union.
@seansteel3326Ай бұрын
For a scientist, the best reward is getting the resources he needs to do research and the Soviet Union gave him that. Travelling is secondary.
@SuperElwira21 күн бұрын
Scientists was kidnapped or bombed, they have no choice. In Russia free choice never exists!
@DeAlpineBro3 ай бұрын
I'm glad that Ray Davis is getting the recognition he deserves.
@douglasjohnson43823 ай бұрын
He helped work out all the kinks.
@MikeU1288 ай бұрын
36:00 - "Throughout the 1950s and '60, clues from experiments performed at CERN, alongside Fermilab..." Uhh... ground wasn't broken at Fermilab until the end of 1968, and the Main Ring accelerator wasn't fully operational until 1972.
@jmc80767 ай бұрын
“Fermilab - originally called the National Accelerator Laboratory - began operations in Illinois on June 15, 1967. “ From CERN official website: “On 17 May 1954, the first shovel of earth was dug on the Meyrin site in Switzerland under the eyes of Geneva officials and members of CERN staff.” “The 600 MeV Synchrocyclotron (SC), built in 1957, was CERN’s first accelerator. It provided beams for CERN’s first experiments in particle and nuclear physics.” “The Proton Synchrotron (PS) accelerated protons for the first time on 24 November 1959, becoming for a brief period the world’s highest energy particle accelerator.”
@baruchben-david41966 ай бұрын
home.cern/about/who-we-are/our-history
@chrislong39387 ай бұрын
Nova is always such a great show!!!
@JohnDiGiovanni-yh6ys7 ай бұрын
Thanks for the free episode of Nova. 👍.
@x5-acousticguitarstuff.23 ай бұрын
This Video was absolutely RUINED by KZbin Ads. Nice work KZbin or should I say AD-TUBE.
@ImpmanPDX6 ай бұрын
So many new physicists to follow!
@accutronitisthe2nd958 ай бұрын
Mind BLOWN!!!
@LeonelLimon-nj7tu6 ай бұрын
Using Time as a component; Past Neutrino, Present Neutrino & Future Neutrino. The oscillating factors of the Neutrino.
@tcf70tyrannosapiensbonsaiАй бұрын
If the smallest particle can be divided into smaller ones, it was wrong to calling it the Atom. This was just a bluff to make their stuff sound more futuristic.
@dougr.23982 ай бұрын
Super-K is really Super-Kamiokande. I was friendly with Frank Close until I disclosed to him why I believe that nuclear fusion belongs in the sun and not on earth. That has to do with Goldhaber and Teller’s giant dipole resonance and the energies released in the fusion process
@dougr.23986 күн бұрын
He claimed not to understand what I meant by fusion being dirtier than fission as a result. There’s a publication in there if it can be quantified. Maybe even a doctoral dissertation
@dmimz76917 ай бұрын
If things keep violating the laws of physics, doesn’t that mean the laws are wrong? Or is that just unimaginable…
@RO-uz4oi7 ай бұрын
It means we are expanding our understanding to a next level; like adding time as a fourth dimension.
@82spiders4 ай бұрын
You should read more about what science is. Everything in science is always contingent on the result of the next experiment. See if you can get through the book The Structure of Scientific Revolution, You will be more informed than 99.5% of humans. Thesis, antithesis, consensus. Thomas Kuhn.
@ciii7074 ай бұрын
Phrases like "violates all laws of physics" are pure clickbait. Others are "amazing discovery" and "turns science upside down," but there are too many to list.
@YourExcellency3 ай бұрын
Now, you have me questioning reality. I never thought of it this way. Great question.
@Inquisite10313 ай бұрын
9/10 times ur theories are wrong not the laws, it is very very very very rare that established laws are wrong, but if u manage to do it u will become world famous, and there's a Nobel prize for u, good luck.
@nathanmadonna94727 ай бұрын
Cool Worlds channel has a great video on how neutrinos might stop nuclear bombs. Might. 😃
@m3talHalide-rt2fz6 ай бұрын
Saying particles interact with each other perpetuates a model so oversimplified its limiting. What is described in the standard model are discrete patterns of excitation of quantum fields. Most quantum fields interact with each other, some dont. Trying to explain everything with point-like representations of those fields is silly. As we perceive them, they are only the final result of field interactions we do not perceive. Like describing what's happening in the cpu of a computer only looking at a handful of the screen's pixels, at random intervals.
@ukadsense-l3q2 ай бұрын
Этот канал действительно шарит в арбитраже. Всегда интересно смотреть
@kushlyfe102216 күн бұрын
best narrator ever.
@isatousarr70444 ай бұрын
The quest to understand neutrinos often dubbed "particles unknown" is one of the most intriguing challenges in modern physics. Neutrinos are incredibly elusive, interacting very weakly with matter, which makes them difficult to detect despite their abundance in the universe. They play a crucial role in processes such as stellar nucleosynthesis and supernova explosions. By studying neutrinos, scientists aim to uncover more about fundamental particle physics, the mechanisms of energy production in stars, and even the nature of dark matter. What are the most significant challenges in detecting and studying neutrinos, and how have recent advancements in technology and experimental methods improved our ability to understand these elusive particles? Additionally, what could discoveries about neutrinos reveal about the fundamental forces and particles that govern the universe?
@carlossoto-e2vАй бұрын
this documentary is really impressive and the visuals are stunning! however, i can't help but feel that the focus on neutrinos might overshadow other fascinating particle physics topics that deserve more attention. what do you all think?
@Prisoner_8447 ай бұрын
The most exciting things would be to learn to talk to the messenger and also to learn dark matter and what is it and gravity. Both mind boggle me just how amazing they are. Wish I could live long enough to see the day science discovers these things. May be different generations from now. Or the near future. But would be so satisfying to reach source.
@camilleespinas28984 ай бұрын
I think of all the hours and hours of sacrifice that goes into research.
@Ryan2567 ай бұрын
Original air date: October 6, 2021
@georgeflitzer71607 ай бұрын
Well all this brought tears to my eyes.
@georgeflitzer71607 ай бұрын
Honest to god!
@arthurriaf80527 ай бұрын
If you consider the universe is full of neutrinos, photons, radiation and gravity waves all mixed together for billions of years I'd expect some interaction between all these different things. Dark mater and dark energy could be the result of these interactions. Since we just discovered the Higgs boson and didn't even know it might exist 75 years ago I'll bet ther's more to the story than we can even imagine!
@patricktilton53777 ай бұрын
The Firesign Theater, on an album that came out in the '70s, did a spoof of noir detective stories titled "The Case of the Missing Neutrino" -- which I haven't heard in well over 40 frigging years. I wonder if it's here on KZbin somewhere . . . ?
@baruchben-david41966 ай бұрын
No anchovies? I'm sorry, I spell my name 'Danger'.
@hankclay1376Ай бұрын
If dark matter exists, shouldn't we have plenty of it right here, on earth, around earth, etc? Is it only in certain spots in the universe? Why wouldn't it basically be everywhere if it is 80 or 90% of everything that exists as they said in this video?
@Fallopianjunglejuice8 сағат бұрын
Definitely Interesting
@PatrickHayes-j2p7 ай бұрын
NOVA for president!😂
@byronvyronvyronos2 ай бұрын
PROGRESS FOR THE BETTER AND BEST YET TO COME,,,,,,,,,,
@harmonylight11372 ай бұрын
I recently have been watching older, released apocalyptic movies, which has led me down this neutrino research rabbit hole!
@alankovacik19287 ай бұрын
Just when the standard theory is well defined, reality bites you back 🔙 🔙 with the sterile neutrino.
@rbb97537 ай бұрын
Basically, they’re asking for it with that name.
@PNW-Twelve8 ай бұрын
2:29 - *"Remarkable Particles"* Nice
@judgementhallcollections81688 ай бұрын
So, neutrinos, and possibly other mystery particles are what are involved in 'acting' on the behavior of the double slit experiment
@thebogsofmordor73567 ай бұрын
Hmmm no. I don't think so.
@DrachenGothik6667 ай бұрын
The double slit experiment used photons, not neutrinos. That experiment was devised in 1909, before neutrinos were even postulated in 1930.
@mikkel7154 ай бұрын
When it is discovered that neutrinos are massless, even though they oscillate, standard particle physics will need to be rewritten once again because of this elusive particle. The neutrino will simply laugh and say, "Try to catch me".
@jedgould55317 ай бұрын
Why are lasers representing neutrinos?
@JohnMacFergus-oz5cpАй бұрын
Thank you PBS! Please help us little particles!
@arthurjones95808 ай бұрын
Very cool Nova!
@johnpmilheiser59915 ай бұрын
Every second ìs a 6 day week & Every minute to us is a year at the atomic level
@Iam6of394 ай бұрын
I've recorded them, I've trained myself to see them. It comes in 4 forms, most of the time very active sometimes vibrating what appears to be very slowly but in reality it's extremely fast.
@georgeflitzer71607 ай бұрын
Fascinating!!!
@kabaduck7 ай бұрын
Interesting ramification of the mass of the neutrino is, if we can create instrumentation for neutrinos sufficient we will be able to probe gravity at a particle level using the neutrinos. Of course these instruments are probably 10 to 20 years away but eventually the secrets of gravity at a quantum level will be revealed.
@davidliverman47425 ай бұрын
Love this stuff!
@tobyw95737 ай бұрын
I've never seen such complex layouts of nuclear explosions. New interactions!
@rubberlegs152 ай бұрын
Thank you 😊
@FloydMaxwell7 ай бұрын
The "Standard Model" isn't standard, and isn't a model
@alog220 күн бұрын
these things points to our creator, how he works in our lives
@joependleton62934 ай бұрын
Nice that neutrino play different tunes durin their journey through & around the maelstrom of the cosmos, they have purpose!
@PrashantNanda3 ай бұрын
Making balance between entangled strings cross points to each other of energy so some energy loses to fulfill others and just we will give those cross points name as particles but it’s specific designed pattern to observe
@WebenHad7 ай бұрын
Neutrinos..A great name for a Breakfast Cereal
@lostcat9lives3227 ай бұрын
Guaranteed Weight Loss!
@6wildone36916 күн бұрын
Is it possible to see Neutrinos with the naked eye? How did they see them in the first place? and how big are these Neutrinos size? What powers the Neutrinos?
@throttlebuff2 ай бұрын
So do neutrinos have mass or not?
@ddunvideo7 ай бұрын
Thanks for the insight ❤
@MicChacon8 ай бұрын
My favorite flavor of Neutrino is strawberry.
@MichaelJonesC-4-78 ай бұрын
That's only because you haven't yet tasted the butterscotch. _yum!_
@SolaceEasy7 ай бұрын
Banana.
@85holley7 ай бұрын
Strawberry Neutrino - excellent girl band name
@tommychook45523 ай бұрын
YEP WE ARE JUST playing with the tip of the iceberg ?
@tnductai8 ай бұрын
awesome vid!
@baruchben-david41966 ай бұрын
I'm confused about the claim that something that is massless cannot oscillate. Doesn't light oscillate? And isn't light massless? I don't understand...
@mikkel7154 ай бұрын
Quantum mechanics, not the theory of relativity or the passage of time, actually explains this. Oscillation is a phenomenon specific to quantum mechanics.
@brainspatula5 ай бұрын
How many neutrinos would a gravity drive output?
@rogerrolex69813 күн бұрын
Question is what have they found and what are they doing with all this in Antarctica!!!!!! 🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯
@Steelers-rk3ig2 ай бұрын
Welcome to the Truman show, the 95% in aliens watching us in this zoo.
@georgeflitzer71607 ай бұрын
Ty NOVA!!
@mr.winkie7 ай бұрын
How do we know neutrinos exist when we have yet to observe one non-synthetically?
@colincampbell7677 ай бұрын
We haven't observed any of the parts of an atom directly.
@Youtubeuser1aa5 ай бұрын
Because you can observe them period.
@DrDeuteron5 ай бұрын
What does non synthetically mean.
@DrDeuteron5 ай бұрын
@@colincampbell767no, we have. Quarks even.
@colincampbell7675 ай бұрын
@@DrDeuteron Really? When have we 'seen' a quark?
@Yesica19932 ай бұрын
I'm barely 3 minutes in. But imagine thinking that all of this came to be, on its own, through time and chance, with no intelligence behind it? This is the world that the God of the Bible has designed. And yet people like this will CONTINUE to deny it! Edit: And here we go. 3:53 What exactly are these particles? What is its role in the evolution of our universe? And, I'm done.
@roddneyfett4445 ай бұрын
After the proof of Neutrinos, Beta radiation was known to be electrons with Anti-Neutrinos. The full energy equation made sense.
@Zuklaak8 ай бұрын
For the tail end of this VOD, it might be oscillations in the experiment.
@MichaelJonesC-4-78 ай бұрын
There! I just saw one! Did anyone else see that?!
@SolaceEasy7 ай бұрын
They cause flashes in the eyes, even more for astronauts.
@DrachenGothik6667 ай бұрын
@@SolaceEasy Our eyes are not neutrino detectors. We can't see them with our eyes. It takes specialized equipment to detect them, & then only secondarily after they've hit an atom.
@StuntDonk4 ай бұрын
Too many cheap commercials
@kraneiathedancingdryad63338 ай бұрын
I live in Lead, SD... We have a lab that is going to "catch" some neutrinos that Fermi lab will be sending 😁
@stevengill17368 ай бұрын
I love the thought that with 3D neutrino detectors you could map them, like, " see, there's the sun over there....and those little dots are nuclear power plants..."
@Animamundi-bn7yt7 ай бұрын
ARE our Guide…. 100% No higher religion than truth 💥 ⭐️ 🌎 🕊
@tcf70tyrannosapiensbonsaiАй бұрын
Science wasn't supposed to produce truth!
@sweetiebabysalmon4 ай бұрын
love it ❤❤
@johnishikawa22008 ай бұрын
I want to say that somewhere I heard that a supernova happening somewhere in the Milky Way galaxy would set off our neutrino detectors , maybe shortly after we saw the flash of the supernova .
@aajmgopher8 ай бұрын
Close. We’d detect the neutrinos first. They’d leave the collapsing core and sail through the rest of the star, virtually unimpeded. Meanwhile the shockwave from the collapsing core, that tears the star apart, would take as much as an hour or two to reach the surface. Only at that point would the supernova become apparent visually.
@johnishikawa22008 ай бұрын
That's going to be interesting - our neutrino detectors going nuts , giving us a heads up that a supernova has happened somewhere . And we are building these detectors thanks to the theorists like Fermi and Pauli , and also to the experimenters like Raines , Cowans , and that other guy . Pretty interesting !
@colincampbell7677 ай бұрын
I'm an amateur astronomer. If there's a supernova, the gravity waves and neutrinos from the explosion would arrive a few hours before the light does. I'm signed up to get an alert if there is a simultaneous detection of gravity waves and neutrinos from the same direction.
@johnishikawa22007 ай бұрын
@colincampbell767 : What a spectacular and dramatic confirmation of several current theories THAT would be - amateur astronomers like you being alerted that the flash of a supernova is imminent ! Everyone contributing - the theorists with their calculations , predicting the existence of neutrinos and gravity waves , and the experimenters building the instruments to observe them . Very exciting . You amateur supernova hunters are making a major contribution , like Koichi Itagaki in Japan when he found the supernova in the " pinwheel galaxy " last May . But that one happened 21 million years ago , so perhaps too far to set off neutrino and gravity wave alarms way over here !
@DrDeuteron5 ай бұрын
@@johnishikawa2200if it’s close enough, the gravitational waves should show up too.
@JohnSweazyАй бұрын
I can’t wait to find out what quarks are made of!
@ujjwalkumar69794 ай бұрын
Very nice video
@gerrydornez37236 ай бұрын
Humans give each other awards for discovery without acknowledging God is evil
@fredkilner22995 күн бұрын
I loved Nova but on USA TV never saw BBC The Sky at Night show hosted by Patrick Moore. All the old Mariner, Viking and other Missions will have Sky At Night shows which cover them.
@fattyz17 ай бұрын
We need to find more particles / we need to keep a lot of people working.
@johnpmilheiser59915 ай бұрын
Vehicles or vessels - Neutrenos
@lostpianist3 ай бұрын
Neutrinos, the powerhouse of the cell.
@jeanpaulfelix40954 ай бұрын
I am so glad man spends all this money and time on this stuff. Homelessness, poverty and education are so overrated.
@rubi5888 ай бұрын
Fermi looking 49 at 26 13:43
@johnpmilheiser59915 ай бұрын
Time is 518,000 times faster at the atomic level. However, time is relative in perception
@ReginaJune8 ай бұрын
3:22 The God Particle: If the Universe Is the Answer, What Is the Question? is a 1993 book by Nobel Prize-winning physicist Leon M. Lederman and science writer Dick Teresi. The book is about the Higgs boson, a subatomic particle that scientists believe gives everything in the universe its mass. The book's title comes from the idea that the discovery of the Higgs boson is crucial to understanding the structure of matter.... Wikipedia, +2 more
@FredGraceАй бұрын
Paul Pantone inventor jailed has the GEET fuel processor that transmutates the elements releasing the neutron and quantum particles that shield you from inertia
@larsrunic2 ай бұрын
if neutrinos react to each other and change, a stream of neutrinos would change more quickly.