Paul Davies - Are the Laws of Nature Constant?

[@johnsmith1474]

I haven't heard a man make more clear sense. Lovely!

[@holgerjrgensen2166]

The Laws and Principles of Life, is Eternal, local and temporary laws and principles, is based on Eternal Laws and Principles.

[@kevinfitzmaurice-brown1683]

For fun. 1. There can be no perfection. 2.infinite change precludes the possibility of number one. And infinite change is necessary for all existence in order to exist. Simple if perfection were to exist there would be no need for change. If there is no change there is no purpose in existence and perfection becomes a paradox and will not ever exist. He is right about there not being 'strict laws' of course not, its a human concept and not possible. The laws are inflexible. But without constant change there can be no ' laws' because the laws require change and the ability to understand change in order to define such laws. Another paradox.

[@vhawk1951kl]

Given that "perfect means no more than finished completed or accomplished, it is rather difficult to suggest that nothing is completed or accomplished or finished

[@kimsahl8555]

Laws of Nature is integrated in the phenomena (is the phenomena constant the laws is constant).

[@perttiheinikko3780]

thanks a lot, these videos are just great!

[@rodneynorfolk9737]

not laws

[@johnsmith1474]

Get your GED.

[@rodneynorfolk9737]

not constant

[@johnsmith1474]

Get your GED.

[@jotunman627]

there are a lot of things in universe we can never know

[@waerlogauk]

It is likely that there are things we can never know but since we can never know which the things are that we can never know, we should not stop trying to find out more.

[@WalkinonWalls]

There is a simple factor he keeps over looking, that the laws of nature are systematic in nature and would require a sub dimensional processing point. This validates the idea of both simulation theory and the possibility of a God existing through such a dimensional shift.

[@johnsmith1474]

Guffaw.

[@ToxicallyMasculinelol]

man how many times are you gonna ask this man the same question

[@raymondsantiago2411]

WHAT ARE THE IMPLICATIONS?!?!?!?!?!??!??

[@arthurwieczorek4894]

Are the regularities of nature regular? What Laws of Nature are non-contexual?

[@ravichanana3148]

The laws don't hold in 'extreme' conditions of say temperature and pressure.

[@ianp3112]

Are we talking 'big bang extreme'? If not, then yes the laws hold true! If you don't understand them, then well, not much left to say! Cheers

[@PaulMarostica]

To Paul Davies: I am continually amazed that some physicists assume such things as quantum superposition and entanglement exist. If this is physics, not fantasy, then by what physical mechanism do those physicists assume those states instantaneously begin, possibly communicate, and end? The assumptions of my unifying physics theory, matter theory, explain more fundamental physics observables more logically than relativity theory and quantum theory combined, and they do not imply the existence of any such states. You can find my videos using the search keywords: matter theory marostica.

[@vhawk1951kl]

Really, exactly how much direct immediate personal experience (as direct immediate and personal as pain) have you of what you call "quantum entanglement" how do you recognise quantum entanglement when you encounter it? What you mean by "exists"? It's all right, I know you have no idea whatsoever and are about to demonstrate that by signally failing to set out exactly what you mean by "exist" If I were you I would not use words such as real exist or mean, but you have not the faintest idea what you mean by any of them.

[@KpxUrz5745]

It seems that, when it comes to the important deep questions about reality, the universe, consciousness, etc --- that even the brightest minds and scientists never have any answers. It remains all talk and speculation, with the suggestions (perhaps very false) that we can hold out some glimmer of hope for answers in the future. I will not be holding my breath.

[@hgracern]

Yes, something outside of the universe but we don’t want it is, says Davies. Yes, this fits with consciousness principle. Thanks. Xx

[@ifyoueverfind78]

what is concioussness principle?

[@jamesruscheinski8602]

Is there any relationship of laws of nature to quantum mechanics?

[@jamesruscheinski8602]

Other than cosmological constant and maybe a few others, can some of the laws of nature vary slightly from one galaxy to another? Did any laws of nature come into effect after the cosmic microwave background?

[@vhawk1951kl]

Would that be the same "cosmological constant" as that to which Einstein referred as his biggest ever blunder?No doubt you appreciate that "cosmological constant" is simply gibberish - utterly meaningless.Cosmos is simply a cognate or synonym of the equally meaningless universe

[@vhawk1951kl]

If the are not, they are not laws

[@baraskparas9559]

Good on you Paul. When exceptions and errors are apparent some critical thinking, some questions are needed. Why don't we start with he crap of Cavendish and G instead of the esoteric quantum entanglement.

[@Inertia888]

Why Phi?

[@ifyoueverfind78]

if there are these laws, these math equations, of which he first says from mother nature.....how could mother nature not be a designer? put it this way, me or paul davies can understand the laws, but we can t create them. then a super intelligent mind must be able to have then designed such laws....I see no way around this.

[@urielstud]

VG

[@myothersoul1953]

8:45 Yea, that's the problem Platism, the reducing things out of the real into the ideal never really works. The geniuses of quantum mechanics is it works in the real world. The silliness of quantum mechanics are the woo woo interpretations people spawn from it. Idealism and dualism, spirits and creators have never produced useful reliable descriptions of anything.

[@johnsmith1474]

You apparently were not listening? Davies gave example of the reality of the Platonic realm: the triangle, which only exists as Platonic reality. And as we know, the triangle "works in the real world" ie to calculate the forces in a bridge for instance. I think you missed much of this presentation's point.

[@davidlara993]

You were definetly not listening, and you should try to study both science and you will see how those methaphysics aspects are supposed, so, in fact, they make science what science is.

[@ezbody]

The platonic object people use most often is the stupidity object.

[@kimsahl8555]

The fundamental physics is the same ever, and so is the laws.

[@BradHolkesvig]

All the laws that govern the illusions that we perceive with our created senses will change after we die in this world. In the next age, gravity won't be an issue because we will be floating and flying without any fear of dying. We will even experience life in many different kinds of bodies.

[@BradHolkesvig]

***** The scientists are the one's who haven't heard the voice of our Creator and learned how we're created. They simply lie because they do not have the knowledge required to know how we all came into being.

[@andresfelipehiguera785]

+Brad Holkesvig nonsense.

[@BradHolkesvig]

Andrés Felipe Higuera These guys you're watching in these videos are the ones speaking nonsense because they do not know our Creator or have been taught by Him. We are experiencing life in a simulation that was created with a Creator's voice. He had one of His prophets write this thousands of years ago; Psalm 33 8: Let all the earth fear the LORD, let all the inhabitants of the world stand in awe of him! 9: For he spoke, and it came to be; he commanded, and it stood forth.

[@friedrichschopenhauer2900]

Not you again. Obnoxious pest.

[@BradHolkesvig]

Immanuel Kant I'm the only one who knows how we're created so it's best to listen to Me carefully and learn all the details it takes to understand who I AM and who you are.

[@ronnie9187]

I burst out laughing. I saw God as a consumer with a shopping trolley who buys natural laws to build a universe. But beautifully told to give us laymen an idea of the relationship between natural laws and our existing universe.

[@vhawk1951kl]

What is the universe - apart from imaginary?

[@stevenh6589]

Can’t wait till humans learn other galaxies have different natures than this Milky Way .

[@quinto190]

He is on the right track, but Hans-Peter Dürr is far ahead in that.

[@PrivateSi]

Liquid Crystal Space -- Bottom-Up Universe Thought Experiment.. Colloidal Crystal Constraints: 3D, minimal base rules + parts. No singularities with the infinite possible Like charges repel, unlike attract. A -ve ether balances close-packed +ve lattice cells Cell volume of Ether -6, Cell +6. Pulls 6 opposites to light speed in 1 cell length Escape velocity = light speed (C) tied to the constant time light takes to move between cells Tunneling: stretched, faster than light front, light speed or slower rear Tunneling cells form in phase extrons+holons that often annihilate to regular='empty' lattice Tunneling particles reform elsewhere and their original space 'heals' as regular empty lattice Particles: Inflows repel. 6 equatorial and 2x3 polar flows (-6 if poles flow in, +6 if out) Extron - extra cell compresses the lattice, pulls in ether that repels as rays Holon - Ether-rich lattice hole stretches the lattice, pulls in cells that repel as rays Dipolons: extron + holon.. Diextron: +ve + -ve extron.. Diholon: +ve + -ve holon 3D polar flows are more concentrated than flat equatorial flows so effect particles more Moving extrons push cells that -ve ethereal space behind pulls in with an inertia-providing kick Particles make lattice and holon flow waves that can interfere and alter a particle path Strong gravity may force (some) particle outflows to repel back to its inflows in various patterns Charge / Entanglement: -ve inflows, +ve outflows. Polar flow count. Lattice, holon, extron charge Close flows attract or repel, regional gravity fields affect velocity and direction Holon charge flow is one unit so changing spin/flow direction or cutting it effects it all at once Dipolon / Matter-Antimatter: Gravity shrinks cells, lowering phase difference resolution Close out of phase extron+holon pairs form dipolons, in phase annihilate and radiate excess ether A feeding black hole's core extrons+holons are forced in phase and annihilate. A universe grows Black Hole Universes / Recursive Conformity: Big Bang = black holes colliding and merging light speed core shell extron+holon charge flow+vibes stop and gravity blurs phases. Annihilation Total energy and matter potential is conserved. No fine tuning, universes follow the same rules Level n +/- particle lattice fields or cubic lattice of joined holons (+ free particles) feasible Mass / Gravity / Dark Energy: lattice charge balance, charge inflow, entanglement, universe shell Mass is (the number of) out of place lattice cells. An object's extrons + holon charge flow Mass pulls in ether dragging mass. Lattice vibes up to 1 cell radius and light speed effect matter Outflows bounce in all directions, inflows lead to the center. Outflows tend to join inflows Mass uses up ether so void cell repulsion increases. Open universes expand, closed shrink matter Universe grows, shell thins, excess ether radiates, lattice expands. Shell gravity cancels inside Photon / Light / Time: relatively quantum.. lattice compression-expansion blobs ripple holon flows Lattice shock wave. Compressed, +ve mass/charge front and stretched, -ve rear. No mass overall Holon charge flow transverse waves. No mass but holon flow has mass and 2D adds effective area Moves between cells in a constant time (+ universe expansion) as denser lattice takes more energy Gravity shrinks and acceleration compresses the lattice so both absolutely slow light locally Units shrink too and acceleration slows kinetic processes so vacuum light speed measures C locally Velocity stretches kinetic processes in time as they travel more to complete. Clocks run slower The Standard Model: the possibilities are numerous Many particle collision scatterings may be holes and chunks of lattice too large to stabilise 'healing' to in phase extrons+holons and/then empty regular space.

[@No_OneV]

Red pill or Blue pill hmm

[@HenryJasonVarga]

Finally a smart person

[@tedbates1236]

According to Jeremiah 31:35-36 and 33:25-28 the laws, of physics are fixed throughout time.

[@ezbody]

How could we forget the great genius Scientist and physics professor Jeremiah!

[@randykuhns4515]

The laws of nature obey God, thus unchangeable,....

[@mvts1]

Hahahahahaha funny