Pauper League - UB Sneaky Terror | I’M HUNGRY!! LET’S SNACK!!!

SUBSCRIBE TO MY CHANNEL:
www.youtube.co...
FOLLOW ME ON TWITCH:
/ snapboltgames
Channel Link:
/ snapbolt
Follow me on Twitter:
@Snap_Bolt_Games
Welcome back to Snap Bolt Games. Back for another pauper league with UB Sneaky Terror here at / snapbolt !
I hope you enjoy the content! Thanks so much for watching!
Decklist:
www.streamdeck...
#MTG #MagicTheGathering #Pauper #mtgpauper

[@kronyn555]

Cast Down is needed, and in my opinion, you should use the Snackers like they were Phoenixes and try to Brainstorm them into play on your opponent turn.

[@iTzDritte]

More Snap Bolt, let’s GO!

[@SnapBolt]

Let’s GO

[@benlittle5543]

Snap bolt! Snap bolt!

[@celeste5724]

you should play the paupergeddon finalists! the madness list is super streamlined and neat and i think that's really cool

[@SnapBolt]

@@celeste5724 yeah, that deck is really impressive now. In paupergeddon when that affinity player gained 7 with reckoners bargain the madness player grinded right through it!

[@CloudBorne]

Sneaky Terror is such a good deckname!

[@SnapBolt]

@@CloudBorne totally

[@wiloj]

You used to have a jund tokens brew. I wonder if anything from mhs could go in there. Or the jund glee shell with some other cards from that brew. I miss that deck

[@SnapBolt]

@@wiloj yeah, maybe there is some hybrid jund tokens glee shell 🤔

[@anoobindisguise4337]

Careful study does triple duty of digging for terrors, reanimating snackers, and binning snackers/deeps. Seems pretty good?

[@SnapBolt]

@@anoobindisguise4337 yeah, might be good. I’d have to test it. I was worried that it leaves you down a card but maybe discarding and returning snackers makes up for it

[@diogovieiradasilva]

Great to see ub getting the love it deserves, max I suggest taking a look at Michael Jacobs' build who went 5-1 at the creators showdown with a really cool version, but further away from the traditional ub.

[@SnapBolt]

@@diogovieiradasilva yup, I remember seeing that list, and I mention potentially playing the modern age like him a few times. Perhaps his list is better

[@diogovieiradasilva]

@@SnapBolt UB terror is my favorite deck, I'm testing what I can to see if the deck performs well again.

[@spark1128]

I hope that Jund chrysalis deck becomes popular becauseI thought it looked really cool

[@SnapBolt]

@@spark1128 it was a really cool deck!

[@MrFereshteyeh]

Nice! New video. I like the 15 lands plus Lorien.

[@SnapBolt]

@@MrFereshteyeh yeah, with all the cantrips, hard casting Lorien is totally doable in this build

[@MrFereshteyeh]

@@SnapBolt I agree. I like playing less lands, and your list seems solid.

[@alexpaww]

I love your videos! If I could suggest one thing to make the viewing experience better: Timestamps for the individual matches would be amazing :) Maybe with the opponents deck name.

[@SnapBolt]

@@alexpaww I get this request a lot, I want to start doing it but it takes a fair amount of time to add them in in ‘post production’ which is why I haven’t done it yet. Time is tight!

[@SnapBolt]

@@alexpaww but glad you are enjoying the content!

[@alexpaww]

@@SnapBolt I totally understand! If it means we get to see more videos from you it's fine as well :D

[@somanytears]

Very frustrating first match to watch. Felt like opponent had everything on every turn.

[@SnapBolt]

@@somanytears definitely felt like that for me too because they did. Lots of nicely timed answers into multiple boarding parties

[@NickAlsup]

That jund deck grinds

[@SnapBolt]

@@NickAlsup certainly cast a lot of boarding partys! That deck was sweet

[@hexennacht.]

We're testing the same deck at the same time. Annoyed with stranded Snackers in hand I tried Merfolk Pupil because it sounded sweet as a mill hit, but ultimately cut the 8 self mill effects for Modern Age and Careful Study. Neither are card positive but Modern Age blocks opposing 2/1 flyers or beats, and Careful Study hits the 3 card a turn threshold better than the 8 millers. Thoughts?

[@SnapBolt]

@@hexennacht. don’t think that’s the best way to go. I could see cutting all the scours/mental notes and playing a more controlling build but I don’t really like cutting them for careful study modern age. If anything, cutting consider for the modern age and being more like the list from the pauper creator tournament sounds better.

[@thesuperfan99]

CONTENT HYPE!

[@SnapBolt]

@@thesuperfan99 Hype!

[@theyoganath3073]

FWIW I think the MArauders are there cause you can sac a token. That play won me a prerelease match lol. So maybe thats why.

[@SnapBolt]

@@theyoganath3073 yup, thought about that later. You’re totally right - great card

[@galacticpresident3502]

I think you guys need to read marauder again ;)

[@SnapBolt]

@@galacticpresident3502 they meant can’t sac a token

[@galacticpresident3502]

@@SnapBolt Ok, that makes more sense. Sorry! Thanks for the league, that Jund deck in R1 performed surprisingly strong.

[@SnapBolt]

@@galacticpresident3502 yeah! We got junded out there. Removal into thorn wrecked us

[@flosiporosi7827]

One or two radical ideas would also be radical

[@SnapBolt]

@@flosiporosi7827 it would be radical yes, and pretty clunky

[@sebastianw.1735]

Molten Gatekeeper is the best wincon in the combo glee deck

[@SnapBolt]

@@sebastianw.1735 yeah, but munitions seems like it can be a good value card too, especially if you have a bunch of wellsprings

[@alexpinca2163]

Play some Ponder instead of consider, feels so much better, think of this while rewatching the video

[@SnapBolt]

@@alexpinca2163 perhaps stronger, but the instant can be really nice with spell pierce / counterspell. Maybe that was more important when I had 4 spell pierce

[@vegetin01]

Geez. What is it, Christmas?

[@SnapBolt]

@@vegetin01 🙂🙂

[@DonDee123]

Cool deck 👍

[@SnapBolt]

@@DonDee123 thanks arco

[@Usernameneverseen]

I like MTGO weird "balance" mechanic of making infinite combos harder to play by virtue of lots of clicks & the nature of the clock, which changes the meta immensely and I'm in favour of it for pauper. Infinite combos are neat but being the mainstay becomes boring fast.

[@SnapBolt]

@@Usernameneverseen interesting take, I would personally like to be able to set up infinite loops to make magic online more closely mirror paper play but that’s probably not happening anytime soon. For now, I play magic online given the time constraints and try and build my decks accordingly

[@andreashk2tm]

Sick!

[@SnapBolt]

@@andreashk2tm sicK

[@daybreak817]

Why are you doing this to me? First you show us this cool mardu ephemerate list that I have to finish building, then you show a version of dimir terrors with snackers played in a way that isn't convoluted that I need to build now too? Unfair! ggs

[@SnapBolt]

@@daybreak817 that’s what I do! (At least what I strive to do)

[@benlittle5543]

Omnomnomnom Eat em up

[@SnapBolt]

@@benlittle5543 snack time

[@todeshorst1697]

nice

[@SnapBolt]

@@todeshorst1697 sicK

[@baple]

Have you ever seen that one paper content creator that puts all this effort into his intro but then plays casual matches that give you no idea how the deck actually performs?

[@SnapBolt]

@@baple not sure what you’re talking about. Are you talking about me sarcastically? Or pauperganda? Since he has crazy intros and doesn’t usually play leagues

[@seancolletti7973]

@@SnapBolt They're definitely talking about Pauperganda, but he's stated a bunch of times he doesn't do leagues for his channel anymore because there was too much stream sniping going on. It DOES mean the matches are slightly less competitive and/or indicative of the meta, since more people are brewing in the open matches. But he's clearly an important part of the pauper community, and it's nice to have a variety of content.

[@BubbleOBill]

Comment for algorithm hype!

[@SnapBolt]

@@BubbleOBill hype 😎