I am at the beginning of my "investment journey", planning to put 85K into dividend stocks so that I will be making up to 30% per year in dividend returns. Any advice?
@LieselKaroline3 ай бұрын
Investing without proper guidance can lead to mistakes and losses. I've learned this from my own experience.If you're new to investing or don't have much time, it's best to get advice from an expert.
@ConradFriedrichj1z3 ай бұрын
The issue is people have the "I want to do it myself mentality" but not equipped enough for a crash, hence get burnt. Ideally, advisors are reps for investing jobs, and at first-hand encounter, my portfolio has yielded over 300% since 2020 just after the pandemic to date.
@AlbrechtChristoph0163 ай бұрын
Glad to have stumbled on this comment, Please who is the consultant that assist you and if you don't mind, how do I get in touch with them?
@ConradFriedrichj1z3 ай бұрын
My CFA NICOLE ANASTASIA PLUMLEE a renowned figure in her line of work. I recommend researching her credentials further... She has many years of experience and is a valuable resource for anyone looking to navigate the financial market..
@AlbrechtChristoph0163 ай бұрын
I just googled her and I'm really impressed with her credentials; I reached out to her since I need all the assistance I can get. I just scheduled a caII.
@divyt801310 ай бұрын
This guy saving every part of my life
@TrevX20013 жыл бұрын
Things missed here: EPS is dimensionally $'s /share (net income/outstanding shares). Additionally-- it should be pointed out that company A and B are both considered to be within the same part of the market... Target vs Walmart, Apple vs Microsoft, comparing Target Vs. Microsoft off of P/E and determining if one is "undervalued" is utterly asinine and a waste of time. Certain parts of the market tend to have a range for expected P/Es; which brings me to the point that they both could be considered undervalued or overvalued and you shouldnt make it relative to each other, but to the industry expectations in which they fall. This is how analyst and buys make the decision of being ok with a particular P/E or not. Doesnt matter if its 20 and 10 if the industries p/e is lower than 10... by standard they both over valued. Why would you buy either if that's the only thesis?
@Milzzz-m6t4 ай бұрын
Best explanation! Thank you
@johnwaters78472 жыл бұрын
PEG ratio is a very good indicator of an undervalue stock, usually I like to see that is below 1. However I have 3 metrics I like to analize. -Current/quick ratio -Debt to equity ratio -Book value: 2 or less (except technology sector)
@cyric20103 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the vid. Your explanation is clear and concise.
@gemini_5373 жыл бұрын
I feel it is more reasonable to calculate PE/(1+EGR), because that gives an estimate of the future PE. In the example, B is still relatively undervalued, because if the stock prices don't change, B still has a lower PE.
@1pwNz0mb13Z4 жыл бұрын
Clear and simple!
@JorgeRamos-xw6dy2 жыл бұрын
Nice and simple explanation. Thank you!!!
@rem65815 жыл бұрын
my name jeff this helped so much thanka yu
@Brad-qw1te5 жыл бұрын
Wtf
@andreasbengtsson6974 жыл бұрын
You go Jeff don't ever let anyone get you down man I believe in you!
@Selo.K.4 ай бұрын
Is EGR the comparison from last two years, or is it an expectation for the next year ?
@muhammadhamid3108 Жыл бұрын
Awsome content, Thank you so much
@anothername27302 жыл бұрын
Great video, thanks!!
@TXLionHeart4 жыл бұрын
What does a negative PEG ratio imply? For example, I'm looking at a company with a trailing P/E ratio of 21, and a forward P/E ratio of 19. Yet, the PEG is -25.27. Doesn't the lower forward P/E ratio imply anticipated earnings growth? Why is the PEG ratio negative?
@cheshstyles4 жыл бұрын
Could be negative growth
@cheshstyles4 жыл бұрын
The stock could be oversold for example, lowering the p/e. But maybe it's over sold because earnings are decreasing (again for example) Also I am not (yet) an expert just my 2 cents
@TXLionHeart4 жыл бұрын
@@cheshstyles Maybe I didn't write my question clearly. I'm curious how a stock can have a negative PEG ratio if the lower forward P/E implies earnings growth (because both trailing and forward P/Es use the current stock price). So, ignoring whether or not a stock is oversold, how can a PEG ratio be negative if the market is assuming earnings growth and earnings are currently positive?
@cheshstyles4 жыл бұрын
@@TXLionHeart p/e is price to earnings. If the price and earnings both drop, but the earnings drop more, then the p/e ratio drops. If the earnings growth is negative, the output of the peg would be negative
@cheshstyles4 жыл бұрын
Let's say the stock costs 20 and earns 1 per share. P/E is 20. Then the price drops to 9 and the forward earnings is .5. Your p/e is 18 (9÷.5). If your growth is negative (drops from 1 to .5) your peg would be negative
@zalt88462 жыл бұрын
where do you get the growth rate
@anupamdas23525 ай бұрын
Nice comparison
@forestw7855 жыл бұрын
I spent far too long trying to come up with a pegging joke and all I got for it is this
@DavidInSydney14 жыл бұрын
Been there done that 😢
@iwian643 жыл бұрын
What is high and what is low? Is 100 high or 20 ?
@MillatinaN4 жыл бұрын
This is confusing.. 20/20% supposed to be 100 and 100/5% is 200 no?🤔
@qwerty1129344 жыл бұрын
I was confused as well, but apparently all the data indicate that we should ignore the % in the caculation.
@ameenahmed64374 жыл бұрын
@@qwerty112934 because its always multiplied by 100 when you calculate a percentage of something. so here its the other way around.
@tech40283 жыл бұрын
It is exactly what you wrote & it makes totally sense. Think about it. Paying a P/E of 20 (with 20% EGR) is much better than paying a P/E of 100 (!!!) with 5% EGR. Conclusion: The lower the PEG, the better (or the cheaper). Does that make sense to you? Do you have any other questions?
@tech40283 жыл бұрын
Misunderstood your Q. Doesnt matter whether u see 20% as 20 or 0.2 in this case. Relation to each other will remain the same. One thing is important, though. STAY CONSISTENT.
@Tamara-ju3lh3 жыл бұрын
You're supposed to take growth and multiply it by 100. He skipped that for some reason but I'm studying for the CPA exam and that's the official formula. Otherwise I would have been lost too.
@kingtigercrownestate9102 Жыл бұрын
He divided company A by 20% and company B by only 5% Where did he com up with those two seemingly random and very different percentages?