Peoples History Of Punjab Part IV: Dr Manzur Ejaz with Wajid Ali Syed

[@madnsg]

CORRECTION PLEASE. Today I heard it myself and found that there is a big error in this episode: The ancestor of Kurus, I have mentioned many times, is Bhaisham not Bheem, one of the five Pandu brothers. May be at old age one starts missing names. :)))))))

[@pswproduction8900]

Great ❤

[@jasjitsingh8539]

Relieved Mahabhartha series and with new perspective!!

[@husanpreetkaur2066]

Nice👍👍

[@saqipak]

Very informative. Learned a lot from it. In heer waris shah it is said women were cause of fight between koru and pandu. How and when did that happen.

[@usmanahmadtube]

this is extremely important conversation on history of Punjab , it has never been done like this before specially by native of the land . would really be more helpful if the timeline is mentioned more often. Between conversation era/centuary is not mentioned enough , hence the listener tends to get confused over time period being discussed.

[@kulwant747]

True

[@sukhvinderchhina5437]

Very wrong description of Guru Teg Bahadur, Hind di chadar. The lesson doesn't talk about Kashmiri Pandits

[@groundshaker6516]

Thanks

[@rajneeshsharma566]

So was Mahabharat translated later by elite society into Sanskrit,because it was originally written in Sanskrit by Rishi Vyas ? It seems you have some loose threads in your interpretation throughout your episodes on history of Punjab.

[@madnsg]

I have written Punjab's history in entirely new paradigm. You have to listen to it with impartial mind otherwise, you will be evaluating it in old paradigm. In my view, previously written histories are fictions and mythological. I have used all available Hindu sources and quoted them. However, I don't claim to be an authority or the last word on this subject. This is just an effort to uncover the reality.

[@rajneeshsharma566]

Well,i follow all your episodes and listen it with interest, specially on punjabi poets.I suppose you have different parameters to interpret the DNA theory.Finding one's rootes through DNA is definitely a scientific way,but inferences and conclusions drawn from DNA reports vary from person to person according to his covinience and bias.There are some people and rather DNA scientists who have different interpretations. Rest assured ,i am impartial,which i am naturally is, being a citizen of a country having variagated cultures languages, religions and values.

[@hamzanr]

@@madnsg Sir, is your book available in market?

[@jagdeepbhullar1483]

Sir , u did not pick the point

[@RanjitSingh-bp7mb]

Sir dasso ki jatt kaon san

[@justvarun]

It’s not bhim it’s bhishm. Bhishm took vow of celibacy. But other facts around or are correct

[@ajeyklg]

Very rational and thought provoking construct. Your narrative opens new windows for researchers. But you could have avoided mentioning names of the characters... All the proper nouns in the epic itself may not be historical...

[@gurpanthsingh7267]

جناب، تسیں اک پیریئڈ وچوں چھڈّ گئے اوہ سی رامائن دا۔ اس بارے وی گلّ کرو.... اوہ مہامبھارت توں کوئی 11-12 سو سال پہلاں ہویا سی۔ شکریہ جی، میں پنجاب، (ہندوستان) توں ہاں

[@gurpartapsingh2704]

This is a very good informative program. Unfortunately, I find presentation is very poor.

[@nitipaul8794]

The narrator is very incoherent and confused and has little knowledge of Mahabharaya. He is trying to make up thimgs. Useless.

[@jonnyjonny8206]

lol babe ne hindu dharam diya jara patt dittiya , totally baised view point