Perspective: Uniform Civil Code | 01 June, 2022

[@_amalik]

These debates have so much to offer. This program should be extended to an hour.

[@rituparnasamal3399]

Firoz Bakht Ahmed sir.. well said sir!!! Such progressive thinking is the need of hour. I hope everyone understand your perspective.

[@jaydipPatel-xt9ev]

Hello

[@abhishekmehta4338]

@@jaydipPatel-xt9ev Bhai hi-hello chhod...padhai pe dhyan de ..kal paper hai

[@harishbagul900]

Good anchor teena madam with credibility with transparency and accountability.

[@shaktisingh0608]

Article 44 is just a Directive principle whereas Article 25 is a Fundamental right. Also under article 25 necessary restrictions have been provided on the ground of public order, morality, decency etc. Both Nehru ji and Baba sahib Ambedkar ji were in favour of UCC however while implementing UCC it must be noted that article 25-28 and 29 and 30 are not voilated also it has been rightly said that diversity is our uniqueness and thus it must be preserved.

[@Sachinkumar-hy3ti]

Yes different community following their own laws no matter how much inequality is there..

[@bipinrana8853]

There should be muslim women on panel .....their views also important on this matter

[@sahilbangarwa4729]

WHY ....

[@durgeshsingh-vv4it]

tum bna lo panel

[@bipinrana8853]

Bhai mai e sirf apni ek advice rakhi.....mai kon hota hu panel bnane wala....

[@srk3219]

Their should be important for this law Bcoz it is politicise by women's issues, but how ironic that govt doesn't want to discuss with our own people!!

[@Boylift007]

Good advice there should be a women also

[@shivanisharma11-r1u]

thank u teena jha ma'am . for this crucial topic related to exam

[@divalight2996]

Also bann politicians to visit any religious place as a politician. While doing their political campaigns. They can do personal visit without media.

[@Muleslover]

Much needed

[@HunterNaga59]

UCC comes under DPSP and it is not mandatory for the states to implement it. Secondly, According to 42nd constitutional amendment act, the supreme court held that "secularism" is a basic structure of the constitution and it cannot be amended by the parliament..

[@priyanshu9769]

DIVERSITY IN UNITY OR UNITY IN DIVERSITY "Unity comes from togetherness and togetherness is from unanimous decision." The above lines clearly indicates the power of uniquesnes especially when there is no doubt and confusion. India is a country where very large and different classes of people lives. We have vast population with religions attached with it , we are glad enough to have grown at the extent in this diversified nature of the people . This diversification is also stuffed with different religious practices , customs and laws which is somethimes lead to social chaos and disorder and for the very reason the govt of India is planning to adopt a kind of civil code that would be common in nature , which in other world is said as uniform civil code. Well , the country is set to launch a uniformity in civil code but we also know changes are always attached with resistance and that is something palpable at the moment. Thus the critics are - First as per various leaders especially from the muslim community is opposing this as it would bring the cultural significance to standstill . Second critic is that the country is known for its unity in diversity which will be ruined. Third it would be a kind of interference in religion in addition to force to convert law and order of religion which is prohibited as per the constitution. Forth there is a clear resistance from Naga committee as well , the committee is requesting the govt to not implement this because there personal law is different than other parts of the country and it would bring a sudden confusion and blur of law and order. Well critics aside , the main motto of the govt to form uniformity in law and order of the country which is so different that it highlights diversity in unity rather than unity in diversity and if the nation can follow a common criminal law than why not the personal law which is so different that the court sometimes have to take proper side for example there is a case of triple talakh where a woman had to move away from her husband even if he said so under a pressure , the man in such case can only reunite with the women if she marries other man and who than divorse her , this is because if religious law attached with them . This kind of law is there in different religions which doesn't have any weightage thus the govt is purposing a common of all laws ie picking some best thing from every religion and create a uniform law which is feasible and justified. Therefore there should be such kind of framework and after the formation of uniform law , it mi6st be discussed to all religious leaders and unanimously formed , the will bring peace in the country and the world as a whole.

[@chandansinghpatni]

indeed a well known perspective of this! good one analysis 👏

[@isharai8553]

Grt 👍

[@CR-me2lt]

Bring peace ??

[@rishirajsinghchhabra7740]

A similar idea was brought by Akbar which later took the form of a new religion “Din-I-illahi” but this did not cater significant following and thus failed miserably. Taking best things out of all personal laws is a very subjective approach. Ideas are not painted as black and white and thus there should be given time and require expertise to achieve a mature uniform civil law. Also bringing consensus seems unachievable. Best that can be achieved is majority support from within the different communities. Jai Hind🇮🇳

[@navjotsingh7556]

This is beautiful channel for information about india and Indian problem to know thanku so much the team of Sansad TV to work bhind this 30min show 💜❤ 🙆‍♂️

[@AFCATACADEMY]

Best programme

[@v.6286]

What an EXCELLENT debate 👏

[@myinterestedexperiments2219]

All India best News

[@kingsmaker9046]

Very informative tysm stv

[@durgeshsingh-vv4it]

It is interesting to see that this debate only talking about muslim, it seems like hindus are highly advance

[@ravindrapratapsinghshekhaw4562]

John Vallamattom vs UoI 2003: Apex court said that - UCC will help the cause of national integration by removing all differences based on ideology

[@sksoni4382]

This is very useful discussion done by novel panalist

[@manjusingh7964]

Thank-you 😊🙏

[@rahulmallick5150]

UCC should be implemented...

[@ganesh236]

Thank madam

[@Jackson-wxj]

What a debate ❤️❤️ UCC is necessary

[@tausifraza6362]

there is a need for unity in diversity and not uniformity of diversity.

[@akprashant353]

but if wants justice you will come to court so only a compulsory marriage registration by sign the certificate will dispersed diversity , it is not stopping anyone's rituals to perform at anyone's respective places

[@VickySingh-tb6vw]

UCC is much necessary for security of our country

[@akprashant353]

😏😏🥱🥱 how its about security , people are praising rapists murderers is not security issue for you??????

[@rashisharma9925]

its been 7 decades since we hv gained independence nd we r still following the same rules nd then ppl talk abt progressive society

[@H.S2000]

Have u watched vikas Divya kirti sir's lecture on UCC?

[@H.S2000]

@Rashi Sit is 8-9 hour long discussion on UCC

[@anonymousaspirant421]

Having a union law on the matter is the need of the hour. Hope it goes well in the states in which it is being offered and not become a bone of contention due to politicisation, as it usually happens over each and every progressive step that the government take in india nowadays be it farm laws, caa, 370, surgical strike,gyanvapi stone padding....!!

[@ravindarias]

Am first viewer from Ravindar IAS Academy

[@shabnamkhatoon5698]

Ucc pure Bharat mein lagu hona chahie❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤

[@chandankumarchand1289]

Fundamental rights have been earlier limited to elevate the status of downtrodden.... further fundamental rights are not sacrosanct....most of the personal laws are gender biased and oppressive in nature...so they should be eliminated with the time. Also indian constitution prescribes positive secularism that means government can make positive changes in the religious matters. Further on the name of tradition oppressive practices can't be continued.

[@JATSOLDIER01]

We Want UCC

[@Me_AkashJadhav]

UCC should be implemented as early as possible

[@srk3219]

Sapne me Soch rhe Firoz Sir

[@martinlumbah5853]

We will against this law till we die

[@Moha123914]

Females n judges should have must included in the penal

[@MOTIVATIONALINDIAN]

law of land should be followed instead of Islamic sariya , sanathan law.

[@akprashant353]

true

[@ajurana3963]

Can I merry others cast ... religion girls and can I convert my religion if it's came to power....??

[@akprashant353]

yes you can merry any of caste or religion and you can convert to any of religion but make sure you are not forced to convert your religion , you may go as casteless also

[@Satyam_Kumar1405]

UCC is very important

[@nationfirst984]

Can u explain what is the benifit? May I have to buy some dress or ?

[@Satyam_Kumar1405]

@@nationfirst984 listen the debate carefully

[@ravinder5938]

Guys plz tell me that from where we can get summary of these issues

[@akprashant353]

@@nationfirst984 just it will be easy for court to make evidences that both partners were married and whenever they needed to break there marriage they have to reach court not just by saying vocally , means everyone's marriage will become an legal tender . and same with the land issue , if somebody's land issue then court will solve with common rule rather then personal laws

[@mahabharat589]

Ek policy for retired MP,s Not to stay in india after retirement .......... Moved to any country .......sooooonnn .......

[@jawalaprasad3361]

UCC AND POPULATION CONTROL BILL IS THE NEED OF HOUR.

[@MayaNirwan]

Yes..

[@amoghvastrad3352]

It’s not called section. It’s Article

[@sabeenarayeen732]

Top news start kijiye mam please

[@KannadaDictionaryWithEnglish]

Why Uniform Civil Code is necessary? Wakf Act 1995, Has many draconian provisions, section 52 & 53 which can declare anyone has encroached & under these sections can order the person to leave with the help of DM SSP, Can that be done by Non Muslims? Do they have these privileges? There are limitations for Hindu deities to knock the doors of Court, it is having limitations with time, whereas WAKF board has no time limitations according to section 108, Is this not the violation of human rights & Equality in connection to various faiths? According to section 89 one has to send a notice to WAKF board before filing a case, it is just like parallel Government. Have you ever heard of sending notice to before filing a case? According to my knowledge it happens if a person is filing a case against Government. Section 4 & 5 WAKF Act, according to this there will be a survey of land that will be done on timely basis, whose expenses are to be bore by tax payers of India. 1991 worship Act, which is also non secular, In continuation, If there are any issues faced by Churches, Temples, Gurudwara it has register a complaint with Police, Whereas WAKF can order the police if there are any discrepancy according to the board & police has to abide by it. Is this true with your respective cases, introspect. WAKF Act, section 40 gives the power to the board in connection to declaration of any of the property as its own. Can a normal citizen do this? Here please correct me if I'm wrong with authentic sources. If there are legal issues faced by Non Muslims then they are suppose to fight in WAKF tribunal which is run by Sharia Kaanoon can they ever get Justice? I don't know, if true please enlighten me with the verdicts so given. So WAKF tribunal is an authority, hence in future if a person gets a verdict from it in favour of him/her & can challenge the opposing verdict given in the same case given by Supreme Court of India, till date it has not been done, but what is the guarantee that it is not done in future? Think. Keeping all these powers in hand, WAKF board is asking the petitioners of Mathura & Kaashi Temple that they should not fight it in Civil court but in Sharia Court A.K.A WAKF board. This is the outcome of the powers so given to the WAKF board. It also has provision of public servant in section 101. All these information so put here are according to the best of knowledge sources, anybody is free to correct me with authentic sources. Thanks....

[@tungsten118]

Shame on u, state backed media.. 😡😡😡

[@Moha123914]

Mam Islamic countries r neither Democratic nor Secular so we should not compare our with such countries but do According to our needs not others. Diversity n plurality must be considered

[@omkarpandeyRWA]

Diversity in the world 🌍

[@MerryTree-ce5ok]

Uniform Civil Code nahii chaahiye, bas Hinduo, Sikh, Jain, Christians, Parsi aur Buddhists ko bhii Muslims kii tarah 4 shaadii karne kii Aazaadii dii jaayein kyukii yeh Muslims kii 4 shaadii ke Rights baakii Dharma waalo kii Right to Equality ke khilaaf hai.

[@Dr_Gulati]

Women is most impacted stakeholders and you debate without any women participation in debate 😂😂😂

[@muditgupta5020]

ना कोई मुस्लिम है ना कोई दूसरा अल्लाह आएगा दुनिया मे आकाशी किताब कुरान के बहुत ही चर्चे सुने अब आकाशीय शब्द भी सुन लो पृथ्वी पर 4लड्डू हैं लड्डू गोपाल भगवान श्री कृष्ण का उपनाम अल्लाह है पृथ्वी गोल है तेरी आंखें गोल है लड्डू गोपाल मेरा नाम है

[@fulldistancegoing2801]

No female as a panelist …😳

[@h1g2a3r4]

Interestingly Mr.Junaid is of the opinion that when Muslims are in minority in a country they seek equal rights but where Muslims are in majority in 56 Muslim countries the minority there are not allowed any input in social legal or political processes. Therefore India must ignore the rights of the majority as well (Tit for Tat)

[@mehnaz9031]

Don't call it filthy......... Controversial

[@divalight2996]

PM modi is not that great or good as he is trying to praise him modi is a worst pm of Indian political history.

[@shishramchoudhary7070]

Hindi me bhi lao

[@yj9032]

UCC = Hindu Brahmanical Law

[@adityamane2002]

You need to read about UCC first

[@adityamane2002]

Constitution written by respected B. R . Ambedkar he is written in constitution

[@Sam-by2fm]

You brought Ratam who're complete right wing JMI different ideology this is not a serious debate it's like the other news channel never expect from you!!!

[@Satyam_Kumar1405]

Katwa ho kya 😂

[@yj9032]

Ro chaddi ro

[@peterprakash5047]

🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳💞💞💞💞👏👏👏👏👏👏💪💪💪💪💪👍👍👍👍👍👍🙏🙏🙏🙏

[@rudalibellator1739]

Only those muslims are opposing who believe in turning India into dar ul Islam from dar ul hurb further reinforcing fear among Hindu community...mere 4 aur unke 45,sabke haath me AK -47

[@otakuelai4761]

And don’t think about Hindu Raj too. That saffron stick is as dangerous as AK.

[@akprashant353]

@@otakuelai4761 true

[@JasrajSuthar]

You will inherit half of what your wives leave if they are childless. But if they have children, then ˹your share is˺ one-fourth of the estate-after the fulfilment of bequests and debts. And your wives will inherit one-fourth of what you leave if you are childless. Quran 4-12

[@akprashant353]

actually that fair enough but same is implementing on legal tender and everything will be registered to make more fair and clearer view

[@MrMd.Muslim]

Ram's father had three wives.krishna had 1600 gf,god Shiva had more than one wife why?