Pete Mandik on Materialism, Quine, and Religious Mysticism

  Рет қаралды 1,077

Real Atheology

Real Atheology

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 21
@andystewart9701
@andystewart9701 6 ай бұрын
Great interview! Some of the discussion on religion brought to my mind Schellenberg’s work on skeptical faith and some pragmatist views of religion especially the aesthetic and poetic views of religion of the philosopher Santayana. He was an atheist but called himself an aesthetic Catholic. He saw religion as like poetry, not true or false but religions could be better or worse. As a pragmatist and naturalist he saw religion as like poetry and creative art or literature and just as meaningful. Great channel And interview!
@awsmith1007
@awsmith1007 6 ай бұрын
Wonderful discussion. Feel like I understand Pete’s views a bit better. Seems like a really nice guy all around
@ideacastilluminate
@ideacastilluminate 6 ай бұрын
Great conversation, I see Pete on Twixter a lot but didn't know much about him, thanks for this episode. Benjamin looks and sounds a lot like Charles Haid.
@MaxPayne-fi1mz
@MaxPayne-fi1mz 2 ай бұрын
Hi. What has happened to some famous christian channels from discussing Analytic Philosophy to some politics?
@ryanward6230
@ryanward6230 6 ай бұрын
Wireheads... We're almost there, no? I mean these "phones", man. All middlemen are on [at least] two continua: chemical addictiveness and another factor we can call disorder (as an antonym of homeostasis). Mind-altering opiates are high on both continua, but pleasure buttons are low on both. And the little devices we are addicted to are also low on both, and thus insidiously addictive - in a way that has been so normalized as to resemble control, agency.
@ryanward6230
@ryanward6230 6 ай бұрын
What happens when I slide my willpower to 100% while contemplating two or more mutually exclusive desires? Is it what happens when an android is presented with a paradox?
@PeteMandik
@PeteMandik 6 ай бұрын
they freeze up until death. basic “Buridan’s donkey” type situation en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buridan's_ass
@ryanward6230
@ryanward6230 6 ай бұрын
Are desires about slider position second-order desires, or are they something else? Anyway, long before I get to bloody stumps, wouldn't I desire to lower my willpower slider?
@ryanward6230
@ryanward6230 6 ай бұрын
Oh also, you mentioned sliders for courage and calm. But this begs the questions - not all characteristics are of a similar nature, right? Or are they? Are there sliders then for creativity, perception, imagination, other attributes that make up "intellect", "competence"? Are all mental attributes accessible through sliders? Are they all equally accessible relative to each other? And are they equally accessible to all people? (Do people with an aptitude for courage have a higher maximum, or is courage superlative in the way you described willpower? Is creativity like this? What would "maximum" imagination look like? 😵‍💫)
@PeteMandik
@PeteMandik 6 ай бұрын
@@ryanward6230 usually “second order desire” denotes desires about desires. Anyway, if there even is such a thing as “willpower” is a big “if”, but it’s usually seen as an oomf separate from desire. you and i can both desire to quit smoking, but you have more “sticktoitiveness”, resolve, or grit than i do. that’s willpower. so max WP means you never give up your dreams until you succeed or die
@PeteMandik
@PeteMandik 6 ай бұрын
@@ryanward6230 anything variable is slideable. that doesn’t mean it has a common mechanism. we just slap a common UI on top of the mess.
@alanjones5639
@alanjones5639 6 ай бұрын
“Knowledge-as a noun-is a misleading term, as there is never a finally fixed or finished state of knowing or body of knowledge. Knowing-as a verb-signifies the more or less successful reduction of indeterminacy in a problematic situation. As such, any claim to knowledge must always be subject to critical reconsideration, in light of newly arising conditions.” From the introduction of Mind in Nature: John Dewey, Cognitive Science, and a Naturalistic Philosophy for Living by Mark L. Johnson and Jay Schulkin, The MIT Press, 2023. Have naturalist philosophers noted that the creation of a "metaphysical gap" from a "knowledge gap" is a metaphysical argument? Any helping me understand why naturalist philosophers would wish to naturalize (redefine) terms like "metaphysics" (John Dewey's "empirical metaphysics") and "spirituality" (Robert Solomon)? How might such attempts be helpful?
@hiker-uy1bi
@hiker-uy1bi 6 ай бұрын
Two hour philosophical conversation with no timestamps. Brutal. What audience are you going for with this?
@nyworker
@nyworker 6 ай бұрын
Inmates
@real_pattern
@real_pattern 5 ай бұрын
me 😈😈
@briankayaker1
@briankayaker1 6 ай бұрын
I assume when he says “meditative states” around 1:25:00 he means shrooms😅
@nyworker
@nyworker 6 ай бұрын
Everybody is a materialist even though materialism does not exist. Thats Russelian Monism in a Skullshell.
@James-ll3jb
@James-ll3jb 6 ай бұрын
Spacetime [therefore materialism] is dead.
@James-ll3jb
@James-ll3jb 6 ай бұрын
Sadly this conversation is 99% useless b.s. It's a pity they didn't have time to share lasagna recipes😅
Objective Idealism and Presuppositionalist Apologetics
21:15
Real Atheology
Рет қаралды 1,4 М.
Richard Brown & Pete Mandik -Has Science Refuted Idealism?
1:33:06
My scorpion was taken away from me 😢
00:55
TyphoonFast 5
Рет қаралды 2,7 МЛН
Hume the Atheist? A Humean Case against Theism with Paul Russell
1:21:09
Consciousness Live! S3 Ep5 -Discussion with Pete Mandik
2:44:19
onemorebrown
Рет қаралды 1,2 М.
Willard V. O. Quine - Two Dogmas of Empiricism
57:53
Victor Gijsbers
Рет қаралды 17 М.
Philip Clayton on Panentheism, Science, Idealism, and much more!
1:26:10
Monistic Idealism
Рет қаралды 1 М.
Why Evidence isn't Everything   |   Intrinsic Probability
11:27
Real Atheology
Рет қаралды 1,2 М.
A Dialogue on Theodicy with @christianidealism7868
4:00:30
Real Atheology
Рет қаралды 1 М.
How Do We Know What We Know? Philosophy of Science
1:08:23
Fraser Cain
Рет қаралды 17 М.
My scorpion was taken away from me 😢
00:55
TyphoonFast 5
Рет қаралды 2,7 МЛН