I’d be scared shitless with those 5 eyeballs staring down at me.
@qudeapp71914 жыл бұрын
haha good one
@stevebatt12114 жыл бұрын
@@markbowen9084 He did a fair bit of googling himself
@dromeus214 жыл бұрын
An odyssey
@dothebartman91564 жыл бұрын
@@stevebatt1211 "heh heh heh. hear what i said tone?"
@jamiestewart484 жыл бұрын
@@dothebartman9156 Did you ever get checked for Tourettes?
@rafaelbernardo31324 жыл бұрын
Dick was upset that they wouldn't talk to him about the film, but they're kinda giving him a first hand experience of what the film is.
@anotherjoshua25 күн бұрын
No, they’re giving him a first-hand experience of what it’s like to have three annoying drunks on the show.
@langdonboom4 жыл бұрын
I always considered this the unofficial sequel to Husbands.
@stephaniestanley80414 жыл бұрын
These men were gorgeous
@AlvahGoldbrook4 жыл бұрын
Criterion Collection is releasing „Husbands“ on 26 May: www.criterion.com/films/28827-husbands
@SuperRobertoClemente4 жыл бұрын
they're clearly all still in character! method acting...
@martinhyizna32993 жыл бұрын
brilliant and hysterical
@Crezelltree42613 жыл бұрын
Crazy but fun.
@sugardaddy47144 жыл бұрын
Trying to imagine how modern hosts would have handled this... Conan would've joined the fun and outcrazied them. Fallon would've fake laughed at first and progressively descended into deep depression.
@armenianchik3 жыл бұрын
Would have loved to seen Conan interacting and having fun with them!
@amazingm25163 жыл бұрын
Hahahahaha Fallon
@Crezelltree42613 жыл бұрын
Fallon couldn't hang.
@tracylf54092 жыл бұрын
Ferguson would have had a BLAST!
@jerryoshea31162 жыл бұрын
Yes Conan would have been fine(Ferguson also👍)...The others could never have coped!..way too real&"off the cuff"..
@jesusmvr13 жыл бұрын
I guess this is the kind of freedom you get when you’re not bound to the studio system. This wouldn’t bode well for advertisers or a shareholder meeting. But this is the freedom the independent film makers carved out for themselves- Cassavetes in particular.
@chrisharry34752 жыл бұрын
Best take
@himmyhendrix8452 жыл бұрын
Well said
@AintMls0011 ай бұрын
True
@neilbainbridge87193 жыл бұрын
You gotta give it to Dick. He was up against 3 great friends all in the joke & he was the outsider. As for John, Ben & Peter, I love them all. God I miss this type of entertainment.
@PlasmaCoolantLeak Жыл бұрын
Just like the "Rat Pack."
@salis-salis5 ай бұрын
I always point to this exact episode when people talk about what's lacking in Late Night the last decade ❤
@brettfavreify5 жыл бұрын
Smoking, drinking and under the influence on a TV talk show. I miss those days.
@geneobrien89075 жыл бұрын
@brettfaverify true that!
@CyberspacedLoner5 жыл бұрын
less hysterical times ?
@SueBeaWho5 жыл бұрын
Whoever u are brettfavreify...I LOVE ya!! by the way GO PACK GO!! (born and bred in Green Bay lol)
@markmartin66634 жыл бұрын
I'm sorry and sad you see it that way.
@johnnyplatis4 жыл бұрын
@James Henderson you are a certified idiot.
@danielfenner54994 жыл бұрын
What I love about these guys is how they have no boundaries with each other. They just act on every impulse towards each other and they just roll with it. It takes years to master that type of friendship
@jamespfitz2 жыл бұрын
Dude, they were DRUNK
@AntwhaleNearfar2 жыл бұрын
@@jamespfitz 🤣😆 facts. I’ve seen three guys who just met at a bat act the exact same way.
@laurenceschwartz8606 Жыл бұрын
They're drunk.
@juniorjames7076 Жыл бұрын
@@laurenceschwartz8606 They're high!!! .........and a little drunk.
@user-SBURCHILL7 ай бұрын
The friendship is artificial...that is with clarity...Cassavetes method is the relationship and the unhappiness, and inner loathing of "Husbands" is the alchemy that this performance symbolizes. Cavetts instincts are insurmountable....not a flinch, not a stutter, not a missed beat or syncopated arrhythmia...that reflects a composed reflection of Cassavetes and how boundaries are somewhat a method consequence of Cassavetes. The unpleasantness of Husbands is and are these men. If Directors are tyrants by inner cynicism...Cavetts Circus Master disposition is all round, and round....
@expe8085 жыл бұрын
When you think you're funny but you're actually drunk
@SpaceCattttt5 жыл бұрын
Yeah, but John dropping his cigar as he was trying to light it, was pretty funny.
@stephaniestanley80414 жыл бұрын
These guys were so hot
@benm85014 жыл бұрын
I'll take that over the P.R exercises most talks shows are.
@patricias51224 жыл бұрын
The best comment I’ve read in a long time. Can only hope they were deeply embarrassed later....but probably not.
@garrettramirez4284 жыл бұрын
Dick was drunk??
@ndines62374 жыл бұрын
You know how when everyone else is drunk and you’re sober, you find them totally annoying?
@teadrinkerfication91604 жыл бұрын
YES!!
@fayewestwood41933 жыл бұрын
@@jessesmith8388 they’re right
@kev3d3 жыл бұрын
Teetotalers seldom keep company, and fewer friends.
@Crezelltree42613 жыл бұрын
@@jessesmith8388 At least they truly knew how to have a good time.The ones today are off to the hospital after 3 shots.
@Crezelltree42613 жыл бұрын
Yes,if You are some sheltered monk who don't know how to handle guys like this.
@dermotosullivan30653 жыл бұрын
"Do you have an hour?" "No, but it will certainly seem like it"
@simonjones77272 жыл бұрын
Yes, LOL!
@pseudo-films1164 ай бұрын
this is what “a night with the boys” really is
@davidsanderson59183 жыл бұрын
NOW I've seen Husbands (and really enjoyed it), watching this interview again in the special features makes a WHOLE lot more sense. I'll whisper it......*the movie ISN'T finished*.......*if it's Cassavetes, it's NEVER finished.* :) Incidentally buy the Criterion bluray. This clip is fifteen minutes too short here. The next fifteen minutes is even better, especially what Falk says.
@simonjones77272 жыл бұрын
I enjoyed it too, and it is about as far from "mainstream" cinema, even mainstream art cinema, as it is possible to imagine. It was challenging in 1970 and is still challenging today as it represents a direction that conventional film and TV has yet to take, Audiences still prefer directors to provide underlying motives to explain why characters behave as they do, and to use set up to tell them what they should be feeling. Cassavetes abjured all that, so all you have is the actor, their performance and how "available" they are to the actor opposite them.
@lemon4758Ай бұрын
Is the criterion supplement just the full interview without ads?
@martm2165 жыл бұрын
Dick Cavett is a class act. I think Peter Falk had started doing 'Columbo' by this time?
@crapstermcduck65935 жыл бұрын
First movie two years before that.
@martm2165 жыл бұрын
@@crapstermcduck6593 ah! Thanks mate.
@mortengottschalck4 жыл бұрын
First Coumbo episode aired almost exactly a year after this.
@HermesLVDiva19764 жыл бұрын
Morten Gottschalck what year was this? Columbo first aired 1971.
@johnmanier79684 жыл бұрын
This episode aired on September 18, 1970. Falk’s first Columbo movie aired February 20, 1968. The next one aired March 1, 1971, and it premiered as a regular series September 15, 1971. So Falk was not best known for Columbo at this time.
@jackie76103 жыл бұрын
I think it’s great. Everything about this is the 70s. I miss the 70s. I miss the booziness and the cigarettes and the whole crazy polyester ride. Thank you for posting this. And I will always love Peter Falk, warts and all.
@musicisgoodforthesoul9993 жыл бұрын
Love that description of the 70's!
@those_eyes3 жыл бұрын
Warts???
@yearginclarke3 жыл бұрын
@@those_eyes Yes, warts.
@TelevisionCrews Жыл бұрын
@@yearginclarke why? Where?
@yearginclarke Жыл бұрын
@@TelevisionCrews I think I was drunk and don't know what I meant by that comment, reading it now. Perhaps I was being sarcastic? IDK to be honest.
@BaddaBing200111 ай бұрын
Ladies and Gentlemen this video is truly legendary. Gazzara, Falk and Cassavetes are all toasted out of their mind. I frequent this video often when I want to remind myself why I quit drinking.
@Thomas-xn4tk4 жыл бұрын
It’s a shame they didn’t air the whole interview. After Cassevetes put Falk on his shoulders and they came back from commercial, they stopped horsing around. They were still tossed obviously but began to reveal what the film meant to them, why they that it was important, etc. It seems this KZbin channel (of which I am greatly appreciative for so many insights into the past) decided to cut it out because it didn’t fit the narrative of them being crazy. They ended the show much more subdued and forthright. It’s a shame most people won’t see the actual interview portion. I found it elsewhere on KZbin. I encourage you to watch it.
@jpaulglobal3 жыл бұрын
I would love to see the full show. Can you provide the link TM?
@Yountica3 жыл бұрын
Right....”didn’t fit the narrative”. They are being drunk idiots. I think that speaks for itself.
@Dajla3 жыл бұрын
Interesting thanks!
@startmakingsense20713 жыл бұрын
I think it's through no fault of their own (the custodians of the programme, nor the gents appearing on the show). Nor do I blame them. A lot of people don't have time to sit down and listen to a one-hour interview. Actually, let me rephrase that, they may have the time but they don't have the willpower. A successful social media account knows this and ends up asking 'how then can we get people hooked?' Furthermore, I presume the answer lies in the creation of accessible 'moments' - for 15 minutes, we are able to engage with the famous names who have since left this world, to know what it might feel like to be sitting amongst that studio audience - in return we keep clicking and generating coin for the channel, for KZbin, or both. Time is money, and as the account sells us verisimilitude, we in turn sell them our engagement. As we form our opinions, so should we acknowledge the ways in which the content provider makes conscious efforts to slant their product to influence that opinion. For that, I commend your point. What I take issue with is your concern for 'most people'. One should be able to readily acknowledge that The Dick Cavett Show KZbin Channel does not equal The Dick Cavett Show. But this channel has over 85mil combined views. I'll wager there's a figure to rival the amount of viewers DC had in a single night, although we must take synchronicity, or lack thereof, into account. When you say "it's a shame most people won't watch the full interview" are you implying there's a link between viewing figures and credibility? That if more people watch this edited clip than the original, then their impression of the event is somehow skewered? Sure, this is but a quarter slice of the cake, but that isn't the be and end all. Dick's courageously timid "We'll be right back" ratifies this. But your comment makes me think...to what extent are we entitled to our own interpretation? Does context ensure credibility ('you weren't there man')? How can we be certain that what we are witnessing now is any less true than what people would have watched in 1970? The only thing that separates now from then is the number of times you've blinked; some people call it hindsight. In all, I think I would advise you not to throw the baby out with the bathwater. While we may not always have access to the larger conversations these clips belong to, we will always have these moments, nonetheless. That, and gatekeeping sucks.
@startmakingsense20713 жыл бұрын
I think it's through no fault of their own (the custodians of the programme, nor the gents appearing on the show). Nor do I blame them. A lot of people don't have time to sit down and listen to a one-hour interview. Actually, let me rephrase that, they may have the time but they don't have the willpower. A successful social media account knows this and ends up asking 'how then can we get people hooked?' Furthermore, I presume the answer lies in the creation of accessible 'moments' - for 15 minutes, we are able to engage with the famous names who have since left this world, to know what it might feel like to be sitting amongst that studio audience - in return we keep clicking and generating coin for the channel, for KZbin, or both. Time is money, and as the account sells us verisimilitude, we in turn sell them our engagement. As we form our opinions, so should we acknowledge the ways in which the content provider makes conscious efforts to slant their product to influence that opinion. For that, I commend your point. What I take issue with is your concern for 'most people'. One should be able to readily acknowledge that The Dick Cavett Show KZbin Channel does not equal The Dick Cavett Show. But this channel has over 85mil combined views. I'll wager there's a figure to rival the amount of viewers DC had in a single night, although we must take synchronicity, or lack thereof, into account. When you say "it's a shame most people won't watch the full interview" are you implying there's a link between viewing figures and credibility? That if more people watch this edited clip than the original, then their impression of the event is somehow skewered? Sure, this is but a quarter slice of the cake, but that isn't the be and end all. Dick's courageously timid "We'll be right back" ratifies this. But your comment makes me think...to what extent are we entitled to our own interpretation? Does context ensure credibility ('you weren't there man')? How can we be certain that what we are witnessing now is any less true than what people would have watched in 1970? The only thing that separates now from then is the number of times you've blinked; some people call it hindsight. In all, I think I would advise you not to throw the baby out with the bathwater. While we may not always have access to the larger conversations these clips belong to, we will always have these moments, nonetheless. That, and gatekeeping sucks.
@lmlm_4 жыл бұрын
10 times more entertaining than any talk show today!
@747heavyboeing3 Жыл бұрын
Any of them had more talent than today's hosts combined
@r.edward5701 Жыл бұрын
Two year old statement,still as true today as it was then
@yearginclarke Жыл бұрын
@@r.edward5701 2 years isn't that long of a time. Sometimes I reply to comments 5-10 years old, depending on the topic and context. And people go "why are you replying to an OLD comment?" Age of the comment shouldn't matter. My opinions, in most cases, don't change that often. So something that I said 10 years ago will probably line up with what I think now. And if not I am more than happy to point out how my views have changed, rather than be like "how dare you reply to an OLD comment!".
@Eleventhearlofmars Жыл бұрын
@@yearginclarkeyeah, that’s something I just don’t get. The comments age shouldn’t matter.
@AintMls0011 ай бұрын
@@yearginclarkeagree
@scottbowers90614 жыл бұрын
How intimidating this interview must've been for Mr. Cavett
@rd-pd8xb4 жыл бұрын
Ben Gazzara directed the best ‘Columbo’ episode ever: “A Friend in Deed”.
@leegsy4 жыл бұрын
A friend with weed is better.
@edwardscott24984 жыл бұрын
Also the episode Troubled Waters
@davidadams23954 жыл бұрын
@@leegsy Yes, Placebo.
@shaggywagshaggywag4 жыл бұрын
Yes! Definitely one of my favorite episodes!
@yoshitakaoda65333 жыл бұрын
@@leegsy you made my day😂
@joliguimapou5 жыл бұрын
For those who criticize Cassavetes, Gazzara and Falk. I saw the full interview and the three guests began more polite and more cooperative after that. They understood that Cavett was kind of disappointed and they were conscious of their behavior. They saw the professionnal patience of their host and decided to be more serious and more kind to him. But, after all, this was the best promotion of this wonderful film "Husbands", the three were like their characters in the piece. That was intentional and, at the same time, there were themselves. P.S.: sorry for my english!
@DaveSCameron5 жыл бұрын
Well said my American cousin, too often folks jump to erroneous conclusions.
@vulteiuscatellus41054 жыл бұрын
Guillaume: So they sobered up... So what? None of that redeems their actions or excuses the fact that they were disruptive in the first place. There is NO excuse for drinking and acting like a macho douchebag in this circumstance. There was no need for them to "be in character" (aka indulge themselves to drink and be idiots) to promote their mess of a movie that's a sympathetic character study of three macho douchebags. And even if there were, that doesn't excuse the fact that they're drunk on a talkshow. They could've "been in character" without drinking. As actors, they could've just -- you know -- acted! "But it's a beautiful film about how being a manly man leaves you emotionally stunted and spiritually poor" Then why spend so much time sympathizing with the characters? Why does Cassavetes drag the film out the way he does? Why is Cassavetes clearly indulging his own macho stupidity by showing up on a talkshow with two actor friends of his, clearly drunk out of their minds? If it's all supposed to show that "being a manly man" is a waste of time, then why waste people's time explaining that?
@douglaslusky60524 жыл бұрын
Thanks for that interpretation and background.
@egglady26 күн бұрын
You are correct, in the full interview they become more cooperative and start talking more about the picture.
@anotherjoshua25 күн бұрын
Wasn’t intentional. They were drunk.
@karenscigliano97875 ай бұрын
This was so screwball and rare for a DC talk 😮show--😂 exactly the same feeling these 3 give you in the film. Like watching 3 high school boys😅
@spiritinthematerialworld2 жыл бұрын
this is the EPITOME of not taking yourself seriously (and these guys could, if they wanted to)! they just made me like them even MORE. what an inspiration.
@eddiebd40883 жыл бұрын
Cassavettes was a brilliant film maker. Also a raging alcoholic, which killed him at 59.
@bobtaylor1702 жыл бұрын
I think the hepatitis he contracted from the water he drank while making a movie in Mexico in 1966 didn't help.
@funnylittlecreature10 ай бұрын
This is true!
@KClouisville4 сағат бұрын
@@bobtaylor170 Yeah, he was probably a highly functional alcoholic....but he would have likely lived at least a decade or so longer if he hadn't drank on top of the hepatitis. His liver was too damaged by the hepatitis to be drinking.
@watchman11784 жыл бұрын
3:07 "This is the reason I didn't join a fraternity." LMAO! Great comment, Mr. Cavett.
@sitdown39834 жыл бұрын
Absolutely agree!
@jeffreysalter36504 жыл бұрын
Three extraordinary actors no wonder they bonded together. Genuine as people as well.
@robertcollins51613 жыл бұрын
Three real jerks--no wonder they bonded so well. Grow up, Jeff.
@chrisharry34752 жыл бұрын
@@robertcollins5161 Have a sense of humor ya stiff
@ellas92062 жыл бұрын
@@robertcollins5161 Forget the acting. If you were aware as to the humanity/the human qualities of the 3, you wouldn't have said that. John was making films about interracial love before the Civil Rights movement. You mention growing up. I suggest to you, adults do some research before commenting, especially before they go onto calling people jerks
@garethjones5084 Жыл бұрын
@@robertcollins5161 seems to me you the jerk as you put it
@funnylittlecreature11 ай бұрын
@@robertcollins5161how about you get that stick out of your ass, rob? how about that?
@ndines62374 жыл бұрын
Yes, the bar is open backstage!
@HiddenFormula5 жыл бұрын
They're acting like obnoxious drunks, but it's still pretty funny to watch. Enjoyed it more than listening to the usual pretentious, narcissistic Hollywood stars.
@SunnyGirlFlorida4 жыл бұрын
Dick Cavett didn't appreciate it and said they were his worst guests.
@ed957553 жыл бұрын
I think that's a fair appraisal
@kkennedy34663 жыл бұрын
They weren’t “acting” that way they WERE that way, especially Cassavetes.
@rgk9ruler777 Жыл бұрын
They were all drunk!!!
@zovalentine73053 жыл бұрын
John Cassavetes 9 December 1929 ~ 3 February 1989 Rest in powerful peace ⚘
@ianbauer47033 жыл бұрын
Falk, Cassavetes, Gazzara -- Lords of the manor, each one.
@Synthpoptroubadour3 жыл бұрын
'powerful peace'?
@laurennoel51763 жыл бұрын
I love that i share a birthday with John Cassavetes 😊
@vexedvixen Жыл бұрын
@@ianbauer4703 Lovely statement. ♥
@jimdartouzos21275 жыл бұрын
Love Falk & Cassavetes. ...and Cavett...some how held it all together ....oh well...at least nobody got hurt.
@MrPlooky5 жыл бұрын
I love the boom mics, Lol
@sergioserrano57044 ай бұрын
What I love about Cassavetes was that his movies were a literal F-U to Hollywood.
@carlcopeland7024 жыл бұрын
It’s clear they all agreed to go on the show as their Husband’s characters.
@captainhardon4 жыл бұрын
i wish i had friends
@txfreethinker2 жыл бұрын
"This is why I didn't join a fraternity." Classic. 😂✅
@alexcampbell3032 Жыл бұрын
Dick certainly joined a "Fratenity", That's why they made fun of him by rolling up their trouser legs.
@vexedvixen Жыл бұрын
@@alexcampbell3032 Oh! Because Cavett was a Mason? I thought it was such a goof, wondering what that was all about. lol, I get it now. Thanks!
@TheStockwell Жыл бұрын
So, Mr. Cavett, the Marx Brothers had a reunion on your show - and you got to be Zeppo! 😸 This was in 1970. The pilot episode of "Colombo" had aired two years earlier. One year after the Cavett episode, a second "Colombo" episode aired. A year after *that,* the show became a series - at which point Falk was pretty much set up for life.
@zovalentine73053 жыл бұрын
Ben Gazzara 28 August 1930 ~ 3 February 2012 Rest in powerful peace ⚘
@krisscanlon40515 ай бұрын
When men were men including Cavett...good to see them all so young
@Crezelltree42613 жыл бұрын
Cool how the band played along to the hijinks perfectly.Straight professionals.
@ferociousgumby5 жыл бұрын
Oh, God, THIS one. Wrestling on the floor, Dick walking out. . . they don't make talk shows like this any more.
@jamesfeldman42344 жыл бұрын
This show reminds me of one of Johnny Carson's shows when his guests were Bob Hope, Dean Martin, and George Gobel. Like this Dick Cavett show, things got a little wild, and Johnny quipped at the end, "At what point did I lose control of the show?" kzbin.info/www/bejne/ppPTlGCEf62WkJo. In both cases, the shows work as entertainment. However, given Dick's thoughtful style of interviewing, I can understand if he felt frustrated that his guests were not more cooperative with letting him take the lead.
@watchman11784 жыл бұрын
With all due respect to this segment, that Carson show with Dean Martin, Bob Hope, and George Goebel was EPIC. Possibly the best episode of a late-night talk show ever.
@gianca604 жыл бұрын
Do watch the movie Husbands, it's great.
@rhicatrimm2 жыл бұрын
dang people in these comments are mad
@stellarforte74332 ай бұрын
dfghjklkjhgf this is HYSTERICAL! I love it!!! It feels like when my mom asks my siblings and I a question and we all simultaneously do a Bit and laugh the whole time, all the while she's getting more and more angry lol
@Hollowshape3 жыл бұрын
This interview is just like a Cassavettes film!
@zovalentine73053 жыл бұрын
Peter Falk 16 September 1927 ~ 23 June 2011 Rest in powerful peace ⚘
@SpaceCattttt5 жыл бұрын
Well, Dick outlived them all...
@alanwilson84072 жыл бұрын
I almost said that.
@funnylittlecreature11 ай бұрын
LMAO 😂
@D.D.-ud9zt5 ай бұрын
The Grim Reaper came for him years ago, but he bored him to death.
@merlinjames595410 ай бұрын
This is actually the best possible way to promote *that* film
@declined73 жыл бұрын
I had a group of friends like this in Middle school. They wouldn't let us partner up during group assignments
@Kee145146 ай бұрын
The lads
@Emulous7910 ай бұрын
What lunatics 😆
@fraserbailey63472 жыл бұрын
Brilliant stuff! The three of them piling on to each other on the floor is, essentially, what the film is about.
@simonjones77272 жыл бұрын
So great to see this, and you can stream the whole thing on Shout TV too. One of the great chat show car crashes of all times, and it is oddly like watching Husbands itself, the same bewilderment for the viewer when there is nothing in the set up to tell you what you should be feeling about the characters, their motivation or what is going to happen next. The three guests do come across as reasonably well refreshed too. When this first went out I was just a few weeks old, so this is in my lifetime, just. The 60s and 70s were wild, you have to say. Makes modern chat shows where celebrities appear to tell their "anecdote" and plug product look very, very tame.
@joshdominguez18808 ай бұрын
So Husbands is a documentary?
@charlo8664Ай бұрын
What a silly interview. What’s up with the silent treatment? I am not a Dick Cavett fan but what these actors childish antics did to Cavett isn’t right.
@KClouisville4 сағат бұрын
It's not the whole interview. They were drunk and kind of doing a bit at first.....after the break it got back to being more of a traditional TV interview (though they were still drunk...lol).
@cooleslaw3 жыл бұрын
Still better than nearly every modern talk show.
@steve1611724 жыл бұрын
THE BEST ACTORS
@Crezelltree42614 жыл бұрын
These guys are drunk.And funny as all get out.Still absolutely talented.
@sledzeppelin3 жыл бұрын
They seem to amuse each other, but nobody else.
@pod8312 жыл бұрын
@@sledzeppelin So the audience laughter is obviously faked.
@sledzeppelin2 жыл бұрын
@@pod831 It doesn’t sound like the good kind of laughter to me.
@funnylittlecreature11 ай бұрын
@@sledzeppelinI thought it funny!
@ianjohnson458 Жыл бұрын
Husbands is a great flick.
@cbalducc2 жыл бұрын
This clip may be funny but it’s also sad as John drank himself to death. You can see how his looks deteriorated from this point on. I’d hate to think John’s wife Gena Rowlands and his friends stood by a watched him self-destruct.
@carlcarlson1369 Жыл бұрын
Great actors they are not with this no more. Peter Falk John cassavetes Ben gazzara fabulous actors
@deanouellette18685 жыл бұрын
Wow, I never expected Falk to be so abrasive and Gazzara to be so amused. Maybe they decided to code-switch. And Cassavettes does thank Cavett "for being a good sport."
@vulteiuscatellus41054 жыл бұрын
Like most drunken douchebags do. Clearly, if you say you're just having fun, that excuses everything.
@jamespfitz2 жыл бұрын
Drunks being drunks. We've all met these guys.
@formerastronaut7 ай бұрын
I have a feeling they made a bet before they went out on who could get the biggest reaction from Dick and the audience.
@rifftipton77095 жыл бұрын
Smoke 'em if you got 'em.
@dutchmountainsnake53795 жыл бұрын
riff tipton drift it if you got it.
@dayjohnston69195 жыл бұрын
One of the greatest episode of the show up there in the top 5
@jubalcalif91005 жыл бұрын
Amen to that ! I rank it right up there with the episode where Soupy Sales taught Dick how to suck eggs !
@jacob29716 ай бұрын
Husbands under the influence
@funnylittlecreature5 ай бұрын
That's just Husbands!!!
@jacob29715 ай бұрын
@@funnylittlecreature 🤣🤣🤣
@ricoz2016 Жыл бұрын
The Night Victor Franko, Lt. Columbo and Cosmo Vittelli walked in... 3 NY actors who were obviously very close friends at various stages of their careers. Although they all started in the 50's Falk was stuck playing bit parts as quirky, violent characters until his breakout role as Columbo. He did the pilot in 1968 but the series would not start until '71 so was probably the least-known of the trio to the general audience. Gazzara was established in both TV & film by this taping and Cassavettes had a productive career as both actor and director. I love these 3 men in just about EVERYTHING they're ever done, and I can see how much they loved each other in this 'interview'. Finally, great job Cavett just treading water lol behind Johnny, his show was a treasure.
@juniorjames7076 Жыл бұрын
I'm Generation X (53) so I barely caught the tail end of this kind of late night talk show in the late '70s, secretly looking for a late night monster movie or cartoon (local stations DID play cartoons late at night once in awhile) while parents were asleep. Too young to really get what was being said, but still watched cuz most time nothing else was on and wanting, in my own way, to better understand the adult world. Boy I truly miss this era of television when even this silly conversation is more serious and interesting than ANY of the crap that passes for televised discussion today.
@ricoz2016 Жыл бұрын
@@juniorjames7076 You're not alone in that sentiment- my teen-aged summers included classics on the Late,Late show and they did have a profound impact on my tastes as an adult.
@alexcampbell3032 Жыл бұрын
But Dick did join a "Fraternity". That's why they made fun of him by rolling up their trouser legs.
@ImpersonationFilms4 жыл бұрын
Pretty sure they’re in their characters they portrayed in Husbands. How they are acting is what the movie is about, that’s the whole joke, that’s why they keep ignoring Dick when he asks what’s the movie about.
@jvallas4 жыл бұрын
Doesn’t make it worth watching.
@ImpersonationFilms4 жыл бұрын
Judy Vallas you must be fun at parties.
@jamesdrynan2 жыл бұрын
They were admittedly putting on the dog for Cavett. He handled them well despite their tomfoolery.
@declined74 жыл бұрын
I'm new here. Never realized that Columbo and the dude from Roadhouse were such funny charming and brilliant people.
@Sakja4 жыл бұрын
Ben was really drunk.
@lisalovett60804 жыл бұрын
All of them were!
@m.asquino740310 ай бұрын
Can you imagine these 3 going on Jimmy Kimmel. 😂
@marcomartinez86084 жыл бұрын
Please post the Norman Mailer/Cassavetes interview referenced on this show
@RichardM7404 жыл бұрын
This just became my favorite talk show episode EVER!
@ZEU90922 жыл бұрын
Obviously the perfect bonus to "HUSBANDS" dvd (or whatever fucking disc) !!
@ericsalles14245 жыл бұрын
This is perhaps one of my favorite episodes.
@alanboodibabudaho9789 Жыл бұрын
the freaking band hitting those drums when three of them are doing voguing drops lmaf
@michaelbruchas66634 жыл бұрын
What a trio of great talent!
@sledzeppelin3 жыл бұрын
Who acted like annoying clowns.
@42kellys4 жыл бұрын
This is the funniest show I have ever seen and there was not a single swear word in it! They were delightful. Hilarious! Where is the other half hour of it? or these guys are not in it? Can you upload it please? Thanks.
@sund0wner5242 жыл бұрын
"Are you guys all smashed?" as Gazzara proceeds to say that Cassavetes never drinks, lmao. Just watched Husbands last night and this is a perfect substitution for the 85 minutes Cassavetes was forced to trim.
@johntrickey41884 жыл бұрын
If you don't love this there is something wrong with you.
@stephaniestanley80414 жыл бұрын
A free for all.
@timothydurkin68004 жыл бұрын
I hate it, it’s super uncomfortable and I was embarrassed for the guests.
@stefanie38314 жыл бұрын
@John Trickey Unlike you the majority of people isn't mentally ill and finds it awkward and painful.
@stevebatt12114 жыл бұрын
Something wrong, as in you're not hammered? I love a drink too but the way these guys got on was disrespectful to Dick, who's a fair and open minded guy. A car crash!
@jvallas4 жыл бұрын
I quit watching after the first two minutes. This is not the way I wanted to remember Peter Falk.
@gregggyf Жыл бұрын
I find it funny and interesting how Peter Falk is staring at the audience at times. I just now viewed it and as much as I like the actors, it is slightly painful to watch.
@iancrombie88622 жыл бұрын
A complete waste of 45 mins and Husbands was pretentious,middle class crap!
@AllenFreemanMediaGuru4 жыл бұрын
funniest line: “I had an opportunity to go into the stock market business about 4 years ago”-Dick Cavett
@alma85085 жыл бұрын
I saw this already it's honestly really hilarious, but also honestly really childish and silly. Like normally I'd go extremely angry with such behavior but considering that this was the behavioral norm of the three (especially Cassavetes, in here he might've been actually rather timid) I'm not surprised, they're really hard to control. Love this episode anyways. Also, major props for Dick for ethically putting up with their bullshit.
@douglaslusky60524 жыл бұрын
Indeed, I felt myself tiring of their antics, yet I wonder if the trio was not trying to tell Dick they had agreed not to answer any pat questions.
@simonjones77272 жыл бұрын
It is very like Husbands itself, a film that has always divided opinion. You can see why many people find it self indulgent and puerile, but I was re-watching the scenes between Jenny Runacre and John Cassavetes recently and, uncomfortable though it is to watch (which it is) it is also interesting. There is nothing in the set up to tell the audience what to think; no soundtrack, no imagery to set up metaphor or hint at meaning. You are just left to scour the way the characters are behaving to try and work out what they are feeling or might do next. It is nerve-wracking, but it is also intriguingly different from conventional cinema (even much art cinema). More akin to Warhol and Chantal Akerman movies. They may well have been drunk, but it is quite subversive too.
@kennethrussell1158 Жыл бұрын
Alma, it was a different time then.
@compsecure774 жыл бұрын
Cassavetes had no time for the Hollywood hoopla and didn't really like LA. The movies he made like Dirty Dozen The Killers etc he only made them to finance his independent filmaking.
@jvallas4 жыл бұрын
Then he should have turned down this interview.
@alanwilson84072 жыл бұрын
I used to think Cassavettes was almost great.Time and careful observation of his work showed him to be somewhat of a hack. Falk did genius stuff with the Columbo character.
@Lisa11114 жыл бұрын
Boys 🤣 love em' ❤️
5 жыл бұрын
drunks are boring.
@jefmay30535 жыл бұрын
YOURE BORING
5 жыл бұрын
no, wrong.
@REDMAN2985 жыл бұрын
@ that`s correct, you`re a douche nozzle.
@jubalcalif91005 жыл бұрын
Their drunken antics did get old after awhile. Amazing how funny drunks think they are when actually their antics usually become sad and obnoxious.... :-(
@HoosierGarage4 жыл бұрын
Don't mind all these alcoholics getting defensive.
@ferociousgumby3 жыл бұрын
Actually, I saw the movie Husbands and it was a lot like this. No one was sober, ever.
@brigittetaylor16463 жыл бұрын
Damn, this was good. LOL
@dilwich4 жыл бұрын
The secret is knowing when to stop . . .
@richardhardy58788 ай бұрын
Oh,….the good ol’ days….
@funnylittlecreature5 ай бұрын
me and my homies on a saturday night
@fernandorodriguez5159 ай бұрын
ID on Peter Falk's shoes?
@carlcarlson1369 Жыл бұрын
Dick Cavett held his own with these children bahaha
@johndettra89583 жыл бұрын
These guys were nuttier than the rat pack.
@joycejean-baptiste43553 жыл бұрын
Wow, everybody smoked back then. The norm, even doctors and cowboys and beautiful actresses.