Peterbot Argues with Aussie Antics, Eomzo & More about what Makes a Tier 1 Pro Player

[@Robinson508]

he’s 100% correct. Top players should be considered t1 based off how they are performing. Not based off how they have performed previously

[@ominousSHELL]

Yeah, Peterbot is making a good point. Tier 1 players are highly adaptable to new meta, giving them consistent placement on the leaderboard.

[@wolfmaes5839]

I dont like Peter and his way of being but you are right he has a point

[@cry-shadow9636]

My question to him would be is tayson a T1. Because he played horrible this year but is clearly a tier one player.

[@MrSelioss]

​@@cry-shadow9636Tayson can adapt and he has been placing higher recently and he's one of the best in the world with over 1mil earned

[@kemjiezeka4891]

@@MrSeliossright now Tayson is not teir 1 pro he’s no done very well this year

[@tutiadhd]

Peterbot making the most sense in the call is disheartening LOL

[@imanimcfadden3561]

i mean with this topic of conversation its kinda expected ngl

[@VentocxldXO]

He always does he’s the best on the game he knows how shxt works

[@copicmarker1021]

peter is generally sensible so I'm not surprised really

[@Merbrls228]

hes smart when it comes to fornite logic, i bet if he didnt grind pro fortnite he could actually be a really successful person(i know he is now but like job-wise)

[@ryku]

impressive that yk stuff

[@Lquifi780]

Pro players are players that make a living from earning in a game. T1 is the best of the best, peterbot is right

[@Taxman123]

so theres 0 pros in Asia and Middle East?

[@Lquifi780]

@ when did I say that? If there are people playing and making a living off earning in Fortnite and they play in Asia or the Middle East, they are pros

[@Person3-j4r]

*Chapter 5 - Tier 1 Pros:* Peterbot (2nd, 1st, 1st | 1st) - 385k (425k w/EWC) Pollo (2nd, 1st, 1st | 1st) - 385k Cold (1st, 5th, 3rd | 27th) - 137k (237k w/EWC) Acorn (1st, 5th, 3rd | 27th) - 137k (147k w/EWC) Avviv (3rd, 7th, 7th | 14th) - 77k Bugha (3rd, 13th, 7th | 14th) - 65.75k Trashy (7th, 4th, 16th | 36th) - 53k Skqttles (7th, 4th, DQ | DQ) - 45k BB (24th, 8th, 2nd | 9th) - 79.75k Rapid (24th, 8th, 2nd | 9th) - 79.75k Boltz (27th, 6th, 8th | 7th) - 64k Brycx (19th, 6th, 8th | 7th) - 65.5k Reet (5th, 2nd, 22nd | 12th) - 84.25k Ritual (5th, 2nd, 22nd | 12th) - 84.25k (195.25k w/EWC)

[@777citrus]

@@Lquifi780 i think hes saying that because in asia and middle east there isnt enough prize pool to make a living, so what would the best of the best there be called?

[@Lquifi780]

@@777citrus I’d call that a waste of time trying to be the best if you can’t make a living off it. Unless they make money from streaming or KZbin as well, I’d call it a waste of time, get a different job that pays better.

[@acidiccod9361]

Peterbot is making sense every one is trying to blame it on his ego and make it seem as if he doesn’t know what he’s talking about. I agree with Peter on this. Clearly everyone in that call except for Faxuty and Aussie are tier 1 pros but if we are talking about the best players at the game right now there are only a select few tier 1s and their placements would show that.

[@acidiccod9361]

To Peter’s point (no glazing) he is a tier 1 no one in that call is on his level so therefore they would not be a tier 1 cause that would mean they are just as good as Peter if not better and none of them are.

[@bink97]

“like what??” every other sentence 😂

[@syriosf]

Pretty much the players that are expected to win or do good are current tier 1s based on recent placements. The others like rise and reet are technically tier 1 skill wise but not currently because of recent placements

[@doggofv]

What rise was saying about making a living off the game is considered a t1 PLAYER. Within the pros, a tier 1 PRO is what peter said, top 7 grands in recents times

[@Dark_Teleport]

has anyone seen my son BoltzZzero0o anywhere? i been looking for him.

[@dco1019]

someone making a living should simply be a pro and there nothing be tier 1 about it.

[@maximonure5413]

so a top 8 grands in recent times is not a T1 pro?

[@negogen1406]

@@maximonure5413no it aint

[@doggofv]

@maximonure5413 no. If you get one 8th in grands you might still be a t1 player if its reet or something, but probably not currently a t1 pro

[@seanyzay]

I agree with pete lowkey. Think about any other sport, tier 1's are the guys at the top. There's a reason sports usually only rank the top 10-15 players. Just like in the NBA top players change by the season. Some last longer than others but each season they change. Should be the same in e-sports.

[@xdclanomegalul2915]

Peterbot is making sense here. Tier One players changes from time to time. It's like Michael Jordan was a Tier One player before however, can you still call him a Tier One player right now compared to other players?

[@connorriley7511]

Right like TFue and Cloak are Fortnite legends and were both tier 1 pros, but neither of them are currently a t1 pro. Benjy was a t1 pro and isn’t anymore he’s a Valorant pro… Bugha won the Fortnite WC, but is inconsistent in FNCS Grands, he’ll place top 10 first round and not place top 10 second round.

[@stomped-xi2ef]

exactly but people don’t wanna accept the truth 😂😂

[@Person3-j4r]

@@connorriley7511 Bugha is still T1 (3rd, 13th, 7th | 14th) last chapter

[@AbdulIbrahim-x4m]

yeah all time hes t1 easily but if you placed him in 2010s-currently even if he was in his prime he averaging 25 max

[@Person3-j4r]

@@AbdulIbrahim-x4m Bugha's Career FNCS Stats: Total Played: 23 Placements: [26, 21, 5, 40, 4, 3, 5, 21, 8, 1, 1, 1, 3, 2, 36, 16, 5, 2, 23, 3, 13, 7, 14] Mean: 11.304347826086957 Standard Deviation: 11.242136508258621 Best: 1 Titles: 3 Top 3s: 8 Top 5s: 12 Top 10s: 14 Total Earnings: 522350

[@iPeanutJelly]

T1 is all about consistency in tournaments. If you arent consistently top 8 then you are t2. Its that simple. Its just like how all other esports work

[@Dark_Teleport]

has anyone seen my son BoltzZzero0o anywhere? i been looking for him.

[@Dogwalker447]

Yea it’s just the Fortnite community throws the word pro around like crazy. They think if you made earnings you’re a pro lmao

[@closestriker]

⁠@@Dogwalker447straight up

[@ylost2331]

i agree but, i think it should extend to top 15, top8 is too strict

[@Person3-j4r]

@@ylost2331 No. There are only 50 teams in duos, so top 10 is top 20%. Top 15 is top 30% which is too lenient.

[@c0xkies]

Bro its like calling Tfue is a tier 1 pro, no he "was" a tier 1 pro. There is a thing called "falling off", you can easily fall off the next season or even the next month. Rise bases it on income and has a lower expectation which is fair, but they have to understand is peterbot is one of the best players ever in history so of course his expectation will be high and i agree that tier 1 should be players who seemingly have a good chance of winning it all, rather than guranteeing an earning spot, tier 1 should be considered the best of the best that can win it and rise to me doesn't seem like a contender.

[@JimmyBusher]

yeah a t1 player needs to have a minimum of top 10 to top 5 plscement in grands for 90% of the chapter, we reslly dilute the title of t1 when like a majority of pros have really fallen into the tier 2 like mero for example, in his prime he was a tier one but after chapter 5 and his recent performance hes gone down into a tier 2 which isnt bad but the difference is big

[@axolr1]

Didnt rise get top 1 fncs trails?

[@user-mx4nt2et6p]

Peter is tier 1 but calling him one of the best this early is crazy people have many more top 1’s then Peter so stop glazing so hard.

[@NomercyMohau14]

⁠​⁠@@user-mx4nt2et6pyou know there's only 4 people with more fncs wins than Peter. So he definitely is one of the best

[@user-mx4nt2et6p]

@ wrong is 13 people with more fncs wins

[@karzoz]

peters definetly right, you wouldnt call any of the chapter 1-2 pros tier 1s because of how much they earned like 4-5 years ago.

[@elliot-v1q]

no glaze pete is right people throw around teir 1 so much it means nothing if fax is teir 1. Anyone who earns can be considered a professional player for that season, and teir 4 should be like basically no earnings or 1 tourney win in a season so they are a comp player teir 3 should be players who earn in every tournament like cash and eval cups they play but cant qual grands consistently. teir 2 is consistent grands qualification and teir 1 should be consistent good placements (top 10 for duos top 5 for trios). So basically teir 4 is on the board for earnings and teir 3 is like significant consistant earnings, teir 2 is on the board for grands placements and teir 1 is significant consistent placements and thats all it should be its simple no twitch streams or anything because we're talking about competitive battle royale placements.

[@bzah9973]

yes this makes the most sense. ("teir" is spelt tier btw)

[@JimmyBusher]

@elliot-v1q a tier 4 player is not a real thing that's just a comp player in that regard, tier 3 pros qual for every grands and get within the top 10 last teams placement, tier 2 are a higher echelon and can be a middle team to like top 10 as their best placement every grands, t1 are like the top 10 best players that can just win the whole thing and keep up a top 5 placement for 90% of the chapter

[@FNMomentz]

There’s also no such word as “spelt” @bzah9973

[@IbrahimAhmed-mu5pg]

@FNMomentzyes there is thats the british phrase american phrase is spelled

[@power3279]

@FNMomentz Typical NA drone

[@NOhomo543]

T1 is hard to evaluate in a battle Royale. In the normal sense, Peter is wrong here. T1 are players who are overall good, not just recently good. But in terms of BR when there’s only few at the top, he might be right.

[@imvainz8769]

Peter is right they are getting being a pro = making money and a living out off the game and being t1 = meaning the best out of all the pros.

[@ConcettaImgram]

This is what im talking about yall are smart and not like kids saying peter got a ego he telling the truth u not a tier 1 pro and haven't place to 10 in grands in 4 years

[@Person3-j4r]

Faxuty thinking he's even a T5 pro player 😭

[@hugoal6440]

Agree with the point that a tier 1 has to place like top 6 in grands but we are ranking players individually in a duos(now trios) format, so if there is a very good pro in a team but they dont place good because his teammate is a lot worst, doesnt it means that the good pro is not a tier1 because of his teammate?? I think that we cant just rank people for their placements because of this

[@qwerqwer-o5t]

yeah i agree, its really hard when either of the teammates can sell.

[@michab3472]

I agree with his reasoning that placement is important and history doesnt matter thaaaat much but generally t1 val is like 200 players and with peters definition it would be like 22 players (8 na 8 eu and like 6 from the minor regions) and fortnite has a bigger comp scene like in such a large game t1 cant be that little players

[@Terrify2teed2x]

And btw can we get more vids of reet pete and fax calls

[@637dextroh]

Peterbot is talking facts

[@primeluca2375]

Honestly the t1 i know from esports mean competing in the highest levels of tournaments, consistently if you will. So every player making it to grands is a t1. The tiers are levels of competition right? So the highest level of comp is t1 so therefore everyone competing there is t1

[@primeluca2375]

Now obbiously you can rank the highest competing players in tears in terms of performance like on tierlistmaker style right but in cs for example nobody does that like donk isnt t1 and techno4k is t2 right? So when one talks about "T1 Fortnite competition level" that would mean there is diffrent levels of competition within a single competiton if only some top 10 are t1. Could be wrong though not sure how it is in most esports exactly now that i think about it but it kinda depends bc there is no straight forward definition of t1.

[@stomped-xi2ef]

a tier 1 is the very very top of competitive, meaning they consistently do the best at grands not just qual for it. peterbot is right 😂

[@Person3-j4r]

@@primeluca2375 Wrong, if just make grands, you are a T3/T4 pro

[@Davferguson]

@10:40 what Pete says is the whole thing. It's not a skill thing, like he isn't shit talking Muz when he says he's not a Tier 1.. he just doesn't place like a Tier 1. Rise just isn't hearing what he is saying

[@GamingxProductions]

Funny when he brought up clix....peter did a couple clix ramps

[@MrRayadodcorazon]

Peterbot is right! Look at other sports. MLB: Othani Soto t1 SOCCER: Haaland Mbappe Vini Belingham t1 NFL: Mahomes Allen t1 NBA: Doncic Greek Freek t1 a perfect example is someone like lebron, the GOAT is he still t1 compared to doncic? Of course not. But hes still the goat.

[@Flaxety]

Bro said soccer and nfl

[@piano7449]

Tier 1 should be the few most skilled players, however skill is determined. If it’s just off grands, any player of the top players can have a bad grands

[@Pez1x]

As a retired Tier 1 with 100k Earned, he is right.. Tier 1 is someone who makes a living from tournaments related besides content, it's always not that many we can consider a tier 1.. Placing top 8 maximum every grands, qual for every cup and placing in that cup from top 1 to top 8 is considered tier 1.

[@Kaiiiii2078]

I think t1 should change every chapter and it should be ranked by who was most conistent in comp placements in that chapter

[@Terrify2teed2x]

Reet peter and aussie lowk just making sense but i see their points

[@harrykrause2879]

The point of these in the first place is to decide skill. If someone is tier 1 but doesn't have good placements, then if they are actually top of the top they should still be considered a top player. I think pete is setting the bar way too hard for placements as well. But if we are using that as the deciding factor; top 7? That is the best for sure but it misses a lot of amazing players that in my eyes shouldn't be considered tier 2

[@MxttFn]

I think that is the best way to put it

[@KPepper.]

js like nfl qbs, ur tier 1s are strictly the best RIGHT NOW. theirs only like 3 tier 1 qbs rn and thats lamar and josh allen and maybbe jayden daniels

[@cranberryJOOSE]

The cash cups I can see Peters point.. $100 for 4 hours of grinding isn't worth it. Last season, I qualify, and then go out... because the potential of $100 isn't worth losing my evening over. Cash cups should be less people qualifying, and more prize money.

[@576kg8]

Nah I think you're just rich. A lot of people would love to have that $100.

[@cranberryJOOSE]

@576kg8 4 hours of sweating for a small chance at $100? If you look at past cash cup winners, it's very rare that you see the same people unless they're pros. Honestly, you have more chance of putting $20 on a 5-1 bet to make $100 profit. I'm not rich, btw, and I'm not out there putting $20 on a 5-1 bet, I'm just saying.. chances are higher

[@brxcket]

@@576kg8if anything, u should be playing cash cups to improve, not the money. $100 isn’t that much for four hours, that’s like slightly more than minimum wage.

[@TheAceVB]

I feel like he disagreed with Aussie and then agreed with him after tho. Like Aussie said t1s aren’t surprising with a fncs win but he wasn’t placing that well before his win so I don’t think it would be surprising not to call him t1 before that win (this is based off of him saying no one thought that he would place top 30. I’m not sure of his placements during that period.) He also backs up Aussies statement saying talking to rise about him and eomzo. I might be wrong and am open to critiques.😊

[@steven8269]

T1 in esports means placing top 8 consistently as a pro. Eomzo is not t1 because he doesn’t place as consistently compared to let’s say Peter who is like a consistent top 5 placer but eomzo placed good in a couple and then a few outside the top 10.

[@40focals22]

Peterbot hurting peoples feelings lol

[@vuhie]

Rise bouta cry

[@m.mustafamirza7996]

TBH Peter is right this time and makes sense, everyone is getting offended by him cuz he’s telling the truth and I’m not glazing but somehow this time Pete’s right

[@ghostjason878]

I honestly think anyone who consistently makes grands and places top 15+ in cash cups all season can be t1

[@lxm1tsski2]

Pollo having more earned on central then Pete is crazy #1 I thought would be pete

[@ceasarrr-sb8xp]

he had did better in trios

[@vertachi8066]

a year ago nobody in the comments would of agreed with peter if he said this

[@ecciq]

Everytime i see this fax guy he’s either getting carried or being insufferable

[@lxm1tsski2]

Peter makes 100% sense you js ain’t listening

[@gstar4784]

Wouldn't a tier 1 pro be someone who catches on to the new metas and stays at the top 5-10

[@cowboi9042]

t1 is if u consistently get like top 5-7 maybe 10 constantly and well known for said placements otherwise ur t2

[@vsvpslim]

Not pete kwing everyones earnings and placements by heart

[@banwtw]

LMAOO

[@blizyon30fps86]

i mean comp fn is basically his life

[@BobWasentHere23]

is he on 1720x1080?

[@MrMinecraftboy101]

is it considered t1 to live with your parents and play fortnite all day???

[@grozagroza3]

None of em do that

[@ecciq]

if that makes you one of the best players in the game, yes.

[@Person3-j4r]

they all live by themselves 🤡

[@Peterbothater69]

Peterbot talking about "playing on easy mode" is the most ironic shit ever. Like look on the mirror dude 😭🙏

[@qwerqwer-o5t]

Peter definition of Tier 1 is strange imo. I think making a living/quailing for grands every season is tier 1. Sure some people are better than others in the tier 1 player base. But not to the point where they are in their own league and easily win everything. There is always a battle for 1st place. Maybe there is a different word for what Peter is saying. Like Tier 0 lol. the best of the best. hall of fame for that year.

[@danielmagri2871]

No bro the best of the best, the hall of fame are tier one. These guys are mad biased

[@blizyon30fps86]

making a living qualifies you as a pro, not necessarily tier 1

[@qwerqwer-o5t]

@@blizyon30fps86 based on tournaments. not content.

[@zzzanca]

every competitive game has tier 1 as the main competitive “league”, tier 2 the 2nd and 3 are basic good players that haven’t been picked up saying that, tier 1 is basically everyone who consistently qual to grands, simple

[@Dogwalker447]

Nah tier one is the best FNCS players tier 2 is consistently qual for FNCS and tier 3 is Quals for FNCS and has 10k+ earned

[@negogen1406]

@@Dogwalker447 so clix t3? Gets carried every grands🤡

[@Dogwalker447]

@@negogen1406 clix is tier one since he placed top 5 in the last couple FNCS… doesn’t matter if he got carried lmao.

[@Person3-j4r]

@@negogen1406 Clix 4th, 14th, 4th, 11th (globals). That's $75,750 in earnings. Definitely T1.

[@Person3-j4r]

Incorrect. Qualifying for grands makes you a T3/T4

[@CraggyVODS]

So top 10 in grands means t1. What about oce? Same rules but muz is best oce

[@quaffiea]

Fax just glazes all his friends. Eomzo is not tier 1 💀

[@parker1277]

How bro he literally is so consistent

[@quaffiea]

@@parker1277 major 1 Eomzo had an 8th , major 2 10th , major 3 15th, those aren’t tier 1 pro placements in grand finals

[@quaffiea]

@@parker1277 Eomzo is a great player no doubt, and he is a consistent player, but being a tier 1 pro means another thing entirely

[@JimmyBusher]

​@@quaffieafacts a t1 gets top 5 in grands for atleast 90% of the chapter or potentially wins the title

[@SuperHeroJay]

@@quaffiea So who do you consider as a tier 1 pro

[@dres]

The message is getting lost here because of the messenger…

[@dres]

He’s saying T1 players are those who have been EXPECTED TO & DO CONSISTENTLY PERFORM HIGH AT TOURNAMENTS WHICH INCLUDES the NEW players who are hyped up during that CURRENT SEASON

[@bouledepoil3720]

Saying only 10 players are considered tier 1 is wild, in what sport are there only 10 people in tier 1...Qualifying to major events consistently is t1

[@Person3-j4r]

Qualifying for Grands makes you a pro, albeit a T3/T4

[@SuperCityMania]

who’s here after Eomzo AND Rise outplaced Peter in FNCS div 1 💀💀

[@lxm1tsski2]

But Peter still wins grands

[@jv4fl]

Div 1 doesnt mean anything

[@blizyon30fps86]

@@lxm1tsski2 its div 1 lol nobody cares

[@Person3-j4r]

Who cares? Every one knows Peter will win grand finals.

[@TorynPalmer]

Wait I played with a dude named falcon Peterbot in pgs a few days ago and didn’t know this was his real name and I won….

[@sevendoubleodex]

peterbot made sense until he said muz isn’t t1 lolll

[@ocean12886]

t1 players are rn not previously lol

[@zoomfv]

top 10 pr leaderboard

[@yglr5499]

i get the point but why is peter randomly changing the common definition of t1

[@iamnumber125k]

All these guys egos getting hurt so bad

[@topfers]

fortnite accents

[@AyoBodee]

Ong

[@treepot2647]

peterbot is the ultimate fortnite kid that’s why no one can beat him 😂

[@AyoBodee]

@@treepot2647 bro will be lonely by the time he’s 21

[@Jotarosson]

They literally all sound different

[@nightatwork]

who is the grown man unable to have a discussion without shouting

[@movimikey]

Just openly talking about teaming to trade surge..... "Lan was unfortunate.... the team we were cheating with decided not to anymore... LoL"

[@VentocxldXO]

Anyone ever peep they allways baby Eomzo 💀

[@cheezzz422]

Is fax mad😭 he’s not in T1

[@yupcb]

Rise ego is so fkin fragile LMFAO

[@tabzc9]

I think 8 is to littl maybe 12. and like in brazil its not top 12 maybe top 18

[@Skxpper]

I FEEL IKE IF THEY MAKE GRAND STHEY AUTO T1

[@MagoDen]

If you’re T5-10 FNCS ONLY consistently then you’re T1 player.

[@aspect394]

faxuty saying hes a t1💀💀

[@JMoney615]

All these kids sound the same, I can’t tell who is talking

[@wattfv]

T1 is player in top 10 consistently and has earned enough for it to be considered a stable income / profit from solely competition income

[@kemjiezeka4891]

Why are they all arguing it when he’s right 😂 how can they be t1 pros because they made top 5 a year agi

[@HitchyBruh]

Muzz is definitely T1

[@ImDrakko]

nah

[@Mellow_101]

No.

[@kobe4576]

In terms of skill yes. Placements no if muz wins fncs or globals he would be the GOAT overseas player in fn cs his past acolades before chapter 4-5 are top notch I can’t lie.

[@kobe4576]

In terms of skill yes. Placements no if muz wins fncs or globals he would be the GOAT overseas player in fn cs his past acolades before chapter 4-5 are top notch I can’t lie.

[@ecciq]

@@kobe4576skills are pointless if you can’t apply them to get top placements tbh

[@Matt-vd4sg]

faxuty saying he in any tier 😂

[@TdogCute]

So Cold who has less earnings this year than eomzo is a tier one but eomzo isnt??? Eomzo is ONE HUNDRED PERCENT a tier 1.

[@Person3-j4r]

Cold placed 1st, 5th, 3rd, won EWC and earned $237,000 USD this year Eomzo placed 8th, 10th, 15th and earned only $21,750 USD What a clown you are 🤡

[@Person3-j4r]

You seem to be out of touch with the comp community. You tried using Cold as an example, and it tells me you clearly don't know who he is. Cold was the best player in the world from C3S8 to C5S2 (when Peter surpassed him), and he is currently the second overall best player in the world and the best fragger.

[@Person3-j4r]

Cold placed 1st, 5th, 3rd, won EWC and earned $237,000 USD Eomzo placed 8th, 10th, 15th and earned $21,750 USD Where did you come up with that idea? 🤡

[@cheezzz422]

Fax is not a T1 😭😭

[@bw3451]

Avivv and trashy are t1 based on that

[@codialthof7509]

They said muz ain't tier 1?😂 he said not fncs wise.. bro won 3 fncs and a Lan lol

[@bailey7657]

Disagree hard. T1 is equivalent to the best 1-2 players on a cs/valorant team imo

[@IrideLastMtb]

we just gotta stop using the term T1 tbh it literally means nothing, everyone has their own definintion of it , there's no T1 league in fortnite

[@sevendoubleodex]

t1 should not be 8 people it should be full time competitive players including those signed to play competitively

[@justxp]

you have 3 good grands placements and 4 years of fortnite... meanwhile peterbot has 17 years on this plant and hit puberty 0 times

[@cartermcrae5425]

Lol a pro is someone that is “paid” to play by somebody. Period. The word “pro” get thrown around a lot for tax purposes, it becomes your job and things are written off lol. Tier 1 and whatever is just some shit kids make up that is completely irrelevant

[@Pres100]

These “friends” u make from fortnite are not real friends 😭

[@jusflix1]

peter bot has that pound for pound mentality doesnt matter your potenial yorui teir is based of your placements

[@Sweaty2998]

I feel like clix is t1, is he bot?

[@ImDrakko]

pete said he was

[@cowboi9042]

hes t1

[@MrSelioss]

Hes t1 but he's inconsistent sometimes since he focuses on content like last season and even yesterday he missed a good amt of trio ccs

[@sleezy0x]

peterbot is acc making no sense i think hes tweaking he also just throwing strays at legit everyone when hes been carried by mythic every season

[@Silvers-Stuff]

lol i killed reet like 3 times in martoz tf

[@SoleAddictions]

When rise just wins FNCS Trials in 1st place with clix and muz both lmfao.

[@birdisnottheword3887]

Fncs trials are an opens tournament btw

[@HitchyBruh]

@@birdisnottheword3887still a good feat but top 10 in grands is still better yeah

[@XX-cb2db]

@@HitchyBruh not that good off a feat

[@bbrayden_2886]

Y’all know for a fact at this point bugha is not top 8😭bros washed

[@yozah4830]

He is, last 3 fncs placements are 7th, 11th, and 3rd

[@blizyon30fps86]

he's not washed

[@blixx420]

To put it simply, ninja used to be the best. Now? He could never qualify to grands. He’s ass. Is he still a T1? No, then it changes. Peter is 100% right

[@Kynefic]

if anyone actually considers fauxity a pro at all im kms

[@MrMinecraftboy101]

i'm ngl the only reason peter talking cus he just won grands i hope he gets a reality check soon

[@MrMinecraftboy101]

even if what he's saying does make sense it's still not justifiable to tell a bunch of pros that they are worse than they think

[@stomped-xi2ef]

he’s won 3 straight grands with one being a global. he’s the best current player in the game, and he is 100% right. a tier 1 is someone who is current at the top of the comp leaderboards consistently not just in the past

[@arax1705]

drone

[@Wevler]

@@MrMinecraftboy101it is when it’s true he absolutely embarrassed the entire pro scene the past 2 seasons as well as globals

[@Person3-j4r]

Peter literally runs the NAC region like it's in the palm of his hand, he has every right to give his opinion

[@bryce56]

“Tier 1” doesnt mean anything and it really doesnt matter as much as these people are acting like it does. I lost brain cells listening to this.

[@Person3-j4r]

it does

[@bryce56]

@@Person3-j4r loll

[@Person3-j4r]

@@bryce56 lol

[@alexj.denton7453]

For me tier 1 is who has the most fun ❤

[@MandeepSZN]

Wtf

[@xxsettingsxx401]

tier 1 are the friends we made along the way

[@MandeepSZN]

@xxsettingsxx401 w

[@HimhaLV]

@@MandeepSZN 🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@576kg8]

I gave you a dislike

[@Trippb0]

First

[@IQGHXSTT]

All Peter bot is "like what" doesnt make sense

[@stomped-xi2ef]

because all the other mfs were making horrible takes, so he’s like “like what?” because it makes the person reevaluate their opinion when they sound stupid