Ludvig Åberg | Swing Theory | Driver, iron

[@kentg1864]

Before I made the mistake of video recording my swing. I thought this is what it looked ljke

[@laronda10]

Just clip this and edit in your outfit. Then come back to it when you need a lil confidence boost

[@user-xn7uh5ch2z]

Favorite golf swing on tour. So elegant

[@zachcal4328]

It really is fantastic to watch every single time

[@dixzylolz]

And not 5mn prep for each shot unlike some others

[@jessecooper9795]

It's basically 2000 Tiger Woods swing

[@d-man9759]

the best golf swing I've seen in my life. love this player ! back him every tournament

[@benweigelt]

Been waiting for this one since he turned pro! Great stuff as always!

[@JBSchroth]

Dear Lord, please cause all golf commentators everywhere to forget the phrase "ever so slightly" from now until the end of all time, amen.

[@claytonstrader5432]

One of the best videos I’ve ever watched

[@jungyupark3913]

I have been waiting this for a long time, thanks PGA TOUR!

[@atamagashock]

He has such a bright future, love watching him play.

[@mattf2689]

Swing is so so smooth. Looks so easy yet I can’t even come close to replicating.

[@zporteso3493]

His flexibility and core strength is really good and he is a tall guy. If you want to replicate his swing you first need the foundation of flexibility and core strength then you can work on technique. Not the other way around

[@filipnordkvist]

King Ludde 🇸🇪✌🏻

[@bryanfurry7061]

Primo stuff there 🔥

[@jessehudson1318]

That’s a very strong grip looking at the face and left wrist at the top.

[@MasterL0ck]

Babe wake up new swing theory dropped

[@JT-ii9qn]

Go Aberg! 👆🏼

[@purpleicu_840]

best swing on tour

[@Singlebarrel2323]

If anyone is up next it’s Ludvig

[@lkae4]

Reminds me of Adam Scott, a little taller and smoother. He could have a very long career indeed and much success.

[@antoniomoreira127]

Hard to find a better swing to teach to those who are now starting to play the game

[@vicpnut1]

Forgive my ignorance, whats “86” total driving and SG:OFF-THE TEE 0.532? what do those numbers represent ?

[@regd6060]

shots gained off the tee

[@TheTurfrex]

Ah yes, my friends... The Mike Malaska move!

[@lennartsandberg1568]

Some problems with the left foot

[@AdilKhan-gd2sc]

Le Majestic....but see left knee trouble as he grows older

[@Jackielikeskillersmiles]

King LUDA 🎉😊

[@kangja9338]

5:58

[@HolyGrailOfGolf]

How does Immelman know what Aberg is doing if Aberg himself doesn't actually know. The truth is Immelman is literally making it all up. Aberg hasn't actually told him anything at all, so it's all speculation under the guise of knowledge. Sure, Immelman knows what a good swing looks like but not what truly creates it. He's only evaluating the results and not the cause. You CANNOT create these optimal positions by active intent! Every position is actually an effect of a cause that happen earlier in the swing. So, the entire idea that you can do the same by trying is simply ridiculous. In reality you have to perform the motion earlier in the swing that causes that position to happen and until you can do that attempting to actively create these positions is futile.

[@PoeJanice]

Martin Larry Taylor Sandra Moore Jose

[@Robert-ts2ef]

What a load of cobblers these commentators talk, all pro golfers have different swings that are unique to them to their body type, flexibility and idiosyncrasies. Anyone can draw lines on a static golfer and get them to supposedly show something of interest. A load of garbage.

[@TO-rf2li]

Still waiting to take anything away from one of these "technical analysis".

[@justalogician]

Of course there are variations, but to think that it isn't worthwhile to look at examples of great swings so you can compare it to others (and your own) is like saying there's no point in studying Da Vinci if you're a painter because Da Vinci has his own style. There are things 99% of PGA Tour players do that are worth studying as an amateur. Nobody can tell you exactly why a swing is good or bad, but if you're doing something nobody at a pro level does then odds are that's a good thing for you to work on.

[@waynesorensen7071]

I think he rushes a lot of his shots and could avoid some errors if he prepped a bit longer on each.

[@elcaballo99]

Says the guy not on tour lol.

[@PoeJanice]

Hernandez Carol Wilson Anthony Robinson Dorothy

[@LionelMessi-ct7tu]

Will you PLEASE stop drawing lines on the videos! They mean absolutely nothing, nil, zilch, nada, zero, zip, Jack, sod all, so just stop it.

[@WhoTFisPaulFinebaum]

This is where golf instruction gets confusing. His wrist at he top is not extended. Extended means to draw out to full length. His wrist at the top is "cupped', not sure if pronated or supinated can be applied here, but extended is incorrect. Instructors need to be more technically and grammatically correct so as not to confuse students.

[@mikebarnard2689]

Look up on Google wrist extension and flexion. You may be surprised to know you are dead wrong. Extension is cupped and flexion is bowed. Perhaps engage brain before typing next time , genius. 😃

[@waynesorensen7071]

I believe the terms are extension or flexion. Rahm has wicked flexion at the top of his swing.

[@arjswanson]

He didn’t err with his terminology. It’s anatomically correct (at least in a medical context) to say what he’s doing with his lead wrist is “extension”. In a golf context this would be a “cupped” lead wrist, as opposed to a “bowed” wrist which is the anatomical equivalent of “flexion.”