Pwede na din na dagdag at variety sa depensa . Pero Dagdagan nyo ng 500 piraso ng MLRS ( himars, gmars, puls , k239 chunmoo ) na may kasamang 1,000 ATACMS, 1,000 PRSM, 1,000 CTM-90 missiles. Lagyan nyo din ng tig 3 surface to air missile defense battery systems bawat region simula ilocos hangang palawan . DAVIDS SLING, C-DOME , BARRACK MX, ARROW-3.
@teamodrt90342 ай бұрын
God bless the philippines😊
@TheMowst2 ай бұрын
Thanks for your comment, please like and susbcribe for more updates
@DiosdadoCuevas2 ай бұрын
Mag dag dag pa ng mga brhamos misiles
@TheMowst2 ай бұрын
It depend on the Military budget of the AFP, please like and subscribe for more updates.
@Echelon6732 ай бұрын
9 Batteries of BRAHMOS Missiles are very much suited for Philippine + 9 batteries of Anti-Air Missile System and also 9 batteries of MLRS. This will bring a big boost and a game changer to Chinas greedy ambitious behavior in the region and brings the balance of power. A stronger Philippines will ensure a long lasting peace in this region.
@TheMowst2 ай бұрын
Thanks for your comment, please like and susbcribe for more updates
@GinaPancito2 ай бұрын
Dapat maglagay din sa likod banda pacific wag magtiwala Ng nakaharap lang sa WPS maganda na Yung palibot,para secured un bansa natin
@DaniloManuntag-ex9pw2 ай бұрын
Kailangan maraming Brahmos missiles para sa maraming barko ng kalaban, pero they will cost so much. Prefer ko ang mga mobile Typhon missile systems, tomahawk missiles, HIMARS, at long range dark eagle hypersonic missiles na aabot hanggang Three Gorges dam.
@user-uc9qt1mc5i2 ай бұрын
Bro, sorry to disappoint you bro, but Tomahawks are definitely off-limits to us, as per MTCR regulations, we are only allowed to procure missiles with ranges not exceeding 290km.( That's what we got for our Brahmos missiles, a range of around 290 km.)
@TheMowst2 ай бұрын
Thank you for your comment, please like and subscribe
@user-uc9qt1mc5i2 ай бұрын
@@DaniloManuntag-ex9pw The Philippines cannot procure missiles(any type) with a range of over 290 km. This is an MTCR regulation and we aren't a member of that organization.
@isacr40632 ай бұрын
Tomahawk is slow and can be easily shot down. And they are not cheap. Who told you they were?
@user-uc9qt1mc5i2 ай бұрын
@@isacr4063 Yes, you're right, they're kinda slow, sub-sonic speed, but they've been upgraded with better guidance systems, etc. over the years. Can they be easily shot down by air defense systems? Partly yes, coz majority of all cruise missiles can or maybe intercepted by ADS including the Tomahawk, maybe except for a few other Cruise missiles that move too fast and cannot be "jammed" electronically, aiming to confuse the guidance system. Tomahawks are better employed in "SALVO ATTACKS," meaning instead of using 1 or 2 Tomahawks, using 4 to 8 missiles will increase greatly the probability of hitting their targets. Japan has so much confidence in the Tomahawk, they bought about 400 Block 4 & 5 Tomahawk Cruise missiles for about $ 1.7 Billion dollars in 2023/2024. The Australian s did the same thing too. Too bad because of MTCR ( Missile Technology Control Regime) rules, we can't have or acquire them.
@kulawong-or5cq2 ай бұрын
Need this Brahmos in Palawan and Pag-asa island
@TheMowst2 ай бұрын
Thank you for your comment, Please like and subscribe for more updates
@RobertoQuinawayan2 ай бұрын
Bakit kc tinatawag mo soutchina sea? Kung sa pilipinas yan? Dapat WEST PHILIPPINE SEA!!
@andreitupaz83072 ай бұрын
True
@deancavander2 ай бұрын
I would rather use a mobile launcher for the missiles instead of a fixed land base subject to precision attack by enemy missiles or bombs. Mobile launchers are constantly moving from one location to another which is hard to pinpoint.
@user-uc9qt1mc5i2 ай бұрын
True, if you have an extensive road network, and not much traffic, it MAY work, but if they(Brahmos launchers) get stuck in traffic, then it could be lights out for them. Let's say were in a conflict situation, we're under attack, thus our launcher trucks should be mobile, moving and not stationary, in order to navigate more swiftly through public roads, they're gonna need lots of "Police Escorts" on motorcycles, and helicopters to better observe traffic conditions from a much higher vantage point, which would pave the way for our brahmos launcher trucks to move faster. But this team of police escorts should be a dedicated group, on constant standby, to be ready to deploy fast, as fast as "Firefighters." They could also have an "integrated traffic lights command & control system,"(deployed in places/areas where brahmos launchers are.)where they can control all the road intersections by traffic lights control. (manipulation)
@jaydenmende22952 ай бұрын
I think the bramos base is protected by the spyder air defence system by israel.,🙂
@jaydenmende22952 ай бұрын
And we already have it.,🙂
@jaydenmende22952 ай бұрын
3 battery of spyder aswel like the 3 batteries of bramos misile system.,
@user-uc9qt1mc5i2 ай бұрын
@@jaydenmende2295 Maybe they are, maybe they aren't. But against Chinese ballistic missiles like the DF-21 or the DF-26, which is hypersonic( travelling between 1.7 to 3+ km/second) those Spyder ADS missiles MAY not be able to intercept them, we could be lucky if we hit a single ballistic missile or two.
@erickgo77642 ай бұрын
Someone tell us if brahmos or any other missiles do not get expired as time goes by? We might not use it for the longest time if the the target change its course and decided to choose a friendly path
@ramongabutina80152 ай бұрын
China has an installed missile system in the phils' doorstep Spratly Islands.
@blackspade17402 ай бұрын
Nahhh I don't think those "made in china" missile system even works... Their made in china air defense system in Pakistan wasn't able to detect and intercept when India's brahmos when it hits Pakistan
@TonyChua-y3q28 күн бұрын
Bramos missile kulang 3 batteries kulang na kulang at 3 batteries na pirmahan noon pa yan during FRRD pa.
@danilomanuntag17062 ай бұрын
Fixed land bases para Brahmos missiles, dapat undisclosed locations para hindi easy target, dapat marami kasi target maraming barko. Bumili ng maraming HIMARS, ang US magdeploy pa ng mga Typhon missile launchers, tomahawk missiles at hypersonic missiles.
@user-uc9qt1mc5i2 ай бұрын
Missile silos are very visible to satellites, you can't hide them from prying eyes.
@TheMowst2 ай бұрын
Don't forget to like and subscribe for more updates
@user-uc9qt1mc5i2 ай бұрын
@@TheMowst Yeah bro, I always do that.
@Paul2804672 ай бұрын
Can u advice someone in the government na sana naman ay meron din brahmos na naka tutok din sa north south and east ng bansa. Baka kasi mangyari ulit katulad sa Bataan noong ww2 na ang mga kanyon sa corregidor ay sa isang parte lamang naka tutok. Kaya na pasok ng mga hapon ang Pilipinas. Isang pagaaral na iyon dati at kaya dapat matitunan na ng mga Pilipino ang dating pagkakamali noon.
@user-uc9qt1mc5i2 ай бұрын
I think your mistaken, those huge cannons or mortars used by the Americans on Corregidor Island during WW2 can traverse in any which way/direction, (360 degrees) and those guns weren't fixed on one position, pointed at a single direction.
@johntwohy83372 ай бұрын
A former Adviser to the US State Department said this: "Without C4ISR, Philippines’ BrahMos Missiles are “Symbolic, Lacking Operational Use.” "
@JeanAriesM2 ай бұрын
If so, I'm sure they already work with it. US forces been helping the Philippines defence currently.
@johntwohy83372 ай бұрын
@@JeanAriesM Yes. Helping with loans to purchase American systems.
@jaroldquilab55732 ай бұрын
They will it against Miltary Bases in Artificial Islands. as those are setting ducks. even without C4ISR.
@JeanAriesM2 ай бұрын
@@johntwohy8337 not bad...than to be the side of China and purchase their junk unit/item, just like currently we have issues of train units that made in China 😁
@johntwohy83372 ай бұрын
@@JeanAriesM A military strategist never underestimate his opponent. 🙂At least we know you are not a military strategist.😆
@motoringpinoy2282 ай бұрын
Laughable!
@isleephungry2 ай бұрын
Useless 😢😂
@benmiranda15362 ай бұрын
If china being friendly to ours filipino we have no problem but they choose the hard way.
@Paul2804672 ай бұрын
Because it is the communist part group of Xi Jinping and not the old China what we used to know before.