MOST realistic Generative ai I have seen - CG Dream Flux

[@photoshopcafe]

Use it for free here bit.ly/3BBcvO8

[@FotomakerAcademy]

This is so cool! It feels like the quality of images generated in this product will spark more innovative & creative ideas of how to evolve them than other AI I've tried (which are more time and trial & error consuming).

[@photoshopcafe]

I like how it can help you with the prompt

[@BreannaMae]

As far as I'm concerned this infinitely better than platforms like Midjourney and Leo AI! With all of the controls and filters, this opens the door to more creativity versus having zero control over what is generated. We can actually create a final result that is ours, which is way more desirable!

[@photoshopcafe]

I agree, its quite impressive, Flux and lora make a huge difference.

[@adventure9606]

To each his own, I photographed a horse for a customer and used AI to replace the background instead of spending a week driving all the way across the country and back to Lexington KY to get the background and then collected a check. Works for me.

[@photoshopcafe]

There are many ways to use AI to help you. I rarely create an entire image in ai and thats it. I often combine with my own photos or use it in practical ways. It replaces stock photography for me.

[@stephenrobinson9923]

The headshots of the women are beyond amazing. In fact the whole app is amazing. Thanks for giving us a taste of what it can do for ordinary folks like me.

[@photoshopcafe]

Yeah, its getting very realistic

[@royceahr]

Very interesting product...fun to play with. I am thinking this would be an illustrator's dream to use.

[@photoshopcafe]

Useful for creating elements to use in Photoshop composites too

[@delpinsky]

Wooah! 😍 FLUX makes a huge difference here. Human beings are hyper realistic, using x2 scale feature. 100 credits per day for the free plan, better than nothing. Thanks!

[@bigbigsquid]

Awesome! Thanks Colin 😃

[@photoshopcafe]

Glad you liked it!

[@RalphMcAllister]

Way to go.. Love the 2D to 3D

[@photoshopcafe]

One of my fav features

[@djr3386]

I would love if you showed us how to create environments/backgrounds for characters/products. Loved your rusted radio image. Thanks for sharing 🙏

[@photoshopcafe]

Good suggestion

[@artypop2102]

Why can't we use Character, Structure, Style, Image and 3D model reference all together or at least just two of them together? Will that option be possible in the future?

[@thewebstylist]

Def checking this out! 🎉

[@photoshopcafe]

cool

[@davidoliver2161]

how can I make my generated image export to my desktop or email? Is that part of the paid subscription? Thank you

[@suzannecarter445]

There's absolutely no comparison between the photorealistic characters I produced with CGDream and the ones I did with Midjourney. The difference is like cartoons compared with real 35mm film. If only I could get guaranteed consistent characters in CGDream, I'd be one loyal customer.

[@AZJack]

Can you use your own image and apply some of the filters?

[@photoshopcafe]

Yes, load it in as reference and turn the strength up?

[@AZJack]

@@photoshopcafe Thank you!

[@franciscusvandermaat]

What about the copyright of images generated in this manner? And how does the copyrights of images used in the generation vector into that?

[@IvanCGDream]

Copyright ownership rests with the CGDream user. To use visuals for commercial purposes, a Basic, Pro, or Premium plan is required. As for the second question, no, copyrights are not needed for reference images. However, users are responsible for ensuring they comply with copyright laws. For example, if someone generates a passport using another person’s documents and is caught, the software isn’t liable as it simply processes the user’s input.

[@Otchengazoom]

The only thing is sad that Flux does not support image-to-image option ...

[@Jude2408]

Help please - since the latest update I cannot transfer my files from LR into PS for the final retouching which is my usual workflow. Just get a message that the connection is broken.

[@photoshopcafe]

You probably just need to set it to photoshop in your Lightroom preferences, as external editor

[@Jude2408]

@@photoshopcafe thank you - I think I should be able to do that. It’s the first time it’s happened after years of using these two. I was blaming all the ai stuff PS is adding.

[@photoshopcafe]

@@Jude2408 all good, hope it works for you.

[@photo2000]

whats the resolution of the downloaded image??

[@photoshopcafe]

2688 x 1536, 2048 x 1168, 1344 x 768 are some of the ones I downloaded

[@photo2000]

@@photoshopcafe 👍 so good enough for social media

[@wisu3529]

I can see how easy it would be to smash through 400 credits trying to create a single image with all the adjustments and readjustments, adding filters, etc. I'm still a newbie on this and trying to learn without bankrupting my account within a few days! 😂😂

[@tongelsing8570]

i'm not so interested in all those fantastic images but more in how ai can enhance the use of photoshop and LRC

[@photoshopcafe]

Fair enough, more to come.

[@mistycloud7257]

I like Flux, but their generated, for example female models all look the same in the face. This is a big deal for me and makes it less realistic.

[@BubbleGendut]

"Bye the way this video is sponsored!" a comment thrown in at the very end of the video, is deceitful. You should have stated this at the beginning. Underhanded IMO More like this and I will Unsubscribe.

[@photoshopcafe]

I tagged it when I uploaded it and youtube shows a badge at the top left the very beginning, not trying to hide anything. Why would that benefit me? Does the badge not appear on your browser?

[@BubbleGendut]

@@photoshopcafe KZbin in Ms Edge. There is no Badge or any notice that this is sponsored paid promotion.

[@photoshopcafe]

@@BubbleGendutthanks for letting me know. My apologies

[@pixeljammer]

Absolutely agree. It felt very dishonest.

[@pixeljammer]

@@photoshopcafeit does show, but we’re not always looking carefully at little icons-they’re everywhere these days, and are just more visual clutter to be ignored. Put your disclaimer up front, and nobody will feel duped. I don’t think you were trying to be deceitful, it just came off that way. Especially after claiming that the results were better than other generative ai. That may be your opinion, but I’ve seen and made Midjourney renders that are objectively more realistic than your examples.

[@ibperry7656]

Not interested in Ai at all’

[@danielm5386]

Thank you for that very helpful comment

[@roblarson9065]

“I’ll never go digital” said many photographers. Just decide how it might augment your artistry.

[@stiffori]

sucks to suck

[@AdJeanL]

​@@roblarson9065comparing the two is apples and oranges.

[@Ian_Walsh]

What is the point of this kind of thing ?

[@TrevorDennis100]

Ian, can you not accept that an application like Photoshop is used by a vast range of professional creators? There are more than 33 million people with legit versions now, and I suspect there are still lots of people stealing it. One Professional I know does art work for the movie industry, and uses Ai to create backgrounds and minor image elements. It's fast and it's effective, and that adds up to happy clients who are paying for way less hours than they used to.

[@AdJeanL]

Surprised you support this

[@photoshopcafe]

Why? I should be stuck in 2023 forever? That won't age well. See my other video on my thoughts on ai.

[@AdJeanL]

@@photoshopcafe you obviously don’t see the bigger picture.

[@photoshopcafe]

@@AdJeanL I do, but this isn't the place to discuss it.

[@wernerwoska8825]

Not my cup of tea

[@photoshopcafe]

I prefer coffee ;)