Physics 101 - Chapter 2 - Motion in One Dimension

Hey, guys! I hope you’re doing well!
Here is Chapter 2 - Part 1 of Physics 101: Motion in One Dimension.
I hope you enjoy! Please leave a like and comment if you have any suggestions for what you would like me to go over.

[@rafsanrahman7810]

31:39 FUCKK! me on the night of the exam lmaoo

[@matthewohanian9167]

Thanks so much. You're making my life in physics so much easier!!!

[@physicssumo774]

That's what it's all for :)

[@frankdimeglio8216]

​@@physicssumo774 CLEARLY, gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are linked AND BALANCED opposites (ON BALANCE); as the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Consider TIME AND time dilation ON BALANCE. Consider WHAT IS E=MC2, as c squared CLEARLY (AND NECESSARILY) represents a dimension of SPACE ON BALANCE. INDEED, consider what is THE EYE ON BALANCE. WHAT IS E=MC2 is taken directly from F=ma, AS the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches the revolution; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE); AS TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE. The fourth dimension IS consistent with TIME AND time dilation ON BALANCE. ACCORDINGLY, ON BALANCE, a given PLANET (including WHAT IS THE EARTH) sweeps out equal area in equal TIME. c squared CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY represents a dimension of SPACE ON BALANCE, AS TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). Consider TIME AND time dilation ON BALANCE. By Frank Martin DiMeglio

[@toxic5780]

im from 2023 and im so thankful for ur work, the way u r teaching is very clear i guess u have the coolest teaching skills i have ever met in my whole life please do not stop teaching us u worth a lot of things, u have a future cause u r giving for others the chance to follow their dreams and making it easier. All in all thanks a lot for this man, appreciate it)

[@omairnajjar9941]

I don't get it in your first practice problem why did you add -1/2 in the equation???

[@paulchendamaiza2363]

Wow this is awesome you have simplified my work which was a problem. Be blessed

[@TheZoe555]

I think u need to prepare your lesson better before recording.

[@physicssumo774]

I don't disagree! All of these videos were recorded in a single day to help me prepare for a final exam. So, I too think that they are not exactly polished and could be revamped. I might even post revised versions of those first videos :)

[@sillyvester4890]

Hi, thank you so much for this video. I have a question. At 1:09:00, we basically have to take the particle's initial position as 0 right? Because if not, the displacement between 0-12 seconds, in other words the definite integral between 0-12 wouldn't give the position at 12s, just the displacement. Since "c" wouldn't be zero as a result, the position would be 144+c, am I wrong?

[@aterrarian5863]

I just realized what you wrote on the graph at 21:20, THIS GUY IS GOING TO SCHOOL THEN THE STORE FOR PENCILS, THEN THE SUPERMARKET AND BACK HOME IN 10 SECONDS, HOW

[@kawsar929]

I have stopped the video to write this comment. You are a absolutely a life saver. I have watched literally all the KZbin videos about this topic and yours truly made me understand the concept and not memorize it. THANK YOU!

[@laceyleblanc1798]

Why can my professor teach like this

[@zekiaydinli1393]

sir which chapters do i need to know from physics 1 to do physics 2?.. i use the book (physics for scientists and engineers with modern physics 8th).. do i need to know all 23 chapters form physics 1 respectively in order to do physics 2 or just a small bunch of it?

[@ainsyaffiqanordin392]

i need u more than my lecturer

[@rejoicezion8209]

Very good sir

[@ersinumutaslan7943]

Thank you so much. 👍

[@noongull8041]

Please upload the solution of exercise numericals.....its worthy Yours thankfully

[@realriyadh3204]

Are you indian?

[@physicssumo774]

Nope :))

[@shadiomranian3408]

@@physicssumo774 Def Iranian =D An Iranian, knows one

[@fundamentalphysicsashiquea2200]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/qZuzgmWpgcp7jZY

[@adityadj5225]

Sir, I am from India

[@anvooo]

thank you so much, i'm from vietnam. you teach very good, i understand it

[@physicssumo774]

Glad to hear that! New content coming up soon :))

[@koko_wurldwide76]

How about another video on thermodynamics am having an exam this week please 🥺🥺😞

[@rschultz9492]

You should practice. Not teach. Sorry.

[@aterrarian5863]

since I play ksp I already have a good understanding of physics It turns out

[@rafsanrahman7810]

bro you could have turned on ads

[@abdirahmanmoualem9683]

Really had to stop the video just to say thank you. Keep up the great work you do, wish you nothing but the best

[@belikebruh1224]

Whyd u stop uploading

[@mythoughts78]

Sir actually i have a question! That is If something is moving with X speed with relative to another(i.e ground), then , is another(i.e ground) has same X speed with relative to that something?

[@holuwadijex5999]

no, relative motions are mostly not the same

[@thubelihleimbongiyokuthula1689]

GYou just made my life easier

[@Fact_Eruption]

is it not meant to be t square

[@weebellplus8410]

you are awsome..you are the best .Thank you!!!!

[@aterrarian5863]

so delta velocity is the amount of velocity that can be added, basically?

[@poopy6552]

i need more of ur vids😭

[@Dakugamingtop1]

Can u talk in urduuuu

[@tolgamorkan8187]

thanks you are the bestt

[@physicssumo774]

I'm always happy to help out :D

[@aterrarian5863]

26:52 if that graph was true, you just destroyed your gearbox in your car

[@aterrarian5863]

because the momentum inside of the car when transferred into the gears, the tensile strength would not be able to take it

[@aterrarian5863]

then again it also depends on your velocity and traction of your tires

[@weebellplus8410]

thx so much

[@kudretkaradag2342]

can you share the pdf

[@HubliMarler]

helpful soo much

[@fundamentalphysicsashiquea2200]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/qZuzgmWpgcp7jZY

[@mohamedgebril9776]

you're so messy. I am so confused

[@SHAAN_SINGH_1909]

Sir op 🔥🔥

[@luisfengwu1551]

your explanation way better than my prof, thx you so much

[@ernestolerma8027]

excellent videoes for my students to study slowly explained. great!

[@physicssumo774]

Glad to hear it, Ernesto! You can let me know if there is anything else that you would want to see on the KZbin channel, and I'll do my best to include some such videos :)

[@meryemdamlagunay9387]

are u virgo ? nvfjfbjfbefbe but thats really helpfullll thankss

[@aterrarian5863]

so basically at 21:07, the angle of the line also defines the velocity?

[@serpilkaratas2381]

1:08:05 ı think you did wrong derivative calculation of velocity t =1 and t=4 but thanks for Your explanation helped me a lot

[@physicssumo774]

At what point in the calculation? I don't see the mistake

[@serpilkaratas2381]

Derivative of t^2-2t= (2t-2)×2 but maybe you forget 2 but this is not a problem

[@physicssumo774]

@@serpilkaratas2381 On the other hand, I think that d/dt (t^2 - 2t) = 2t - 2 Why did you multiply the result by 2?