I've been sitting here trying to read my textbook for 3 hours trying to understand this. You made this so clear in 12 minutes (+the Part 1) that I'm actually smiling, because, I guess I'm not dumb after all!
@PhysicsMadeEasy Жыл бұрын
haha Carson, no you are not. Being dumb is actually quite a rare feature: too many students think wrongfully that they are. Instead, it can be some teachers that are not that pedagogical, or do not have the resources to spend time understanding and discussing individually with students. All intelligence do not follow the same paths, but can arrive at the same destination.
@pingu83943 жыл бұрын
Thank you much for this video. You have some of the best physics explanations on the internet.
@PhysicsMadeEasy3 жыл бұрын
Hi Pingu, I am glad you enjoyed my work and that it is useful to you :-)
@seanryan60014 жыл бұрын
Thank you for posting these physics videos. I’ve been trying to learn some physics on my own. I just think it’s fascinating
@PhysicsMadeEasy4 жыл бұрын
You are welcome! and the best thing is that more you advance in your journey learning about physics and more it becomes intriguing and fascinating.
@gravimagswnforce91232 жыл бұрын
same here! physics is very fascinating, addicted and clarifying!
@ΚωνσταντίνοςΛαζαρίδης-ξ9ι2 ай бұрын
thanks
@roryshannon76294 жыл бұрын
Amazing and cool as you promised in the last video! Thanks!
@PhysicsMadeEasy4 жыл бұрын
Thank You Rory, I am glad you enjoyed it!
@toxikarp20634 жыл бұрын
Thank you for your efforts sir, I hope you always find happiness in what you do.
@dadagdadig53443 жыл бұрын
Thankyou very much Sir ..... You explains everything so nice , you are very calm and sweet .
@artranadani8051Ай бұрын
tbh i like how u make things this easy thank u
@PhysicsMadeEasyАй бұрын
That's the goal of the channel! Thank you for your feedback Dani!
@Mark-nu2kd3 жыл бұрын
really easy to understand the concept with the drawings, Thank you so much
@PhysicsMadeEasy3 жыл бұрын
Thank you! I remember spending quite some time on the drawing, so your comment is appreciated!
@courage9363 жыл бұрын
underrated channel
@SamiraMammadova-q3d Жыл бұрын
So good explanatiin. Thanks😇
@surendrakverma5552 жыл бұрын
Excellent lecture Sir. Thanks 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
@JOSPH111 ай бұрын
don't understand the last part. malus law is I=Io x cos squared theta but why use 100 as Io not 200 because 200 is the unploarised light
@PhysicsMadeEasy11 ай бұрын
Hello Joseph, When you pass unpolarized light through a polarizer, there is one rule that applies. the intensity is divided by 2. (see video Polarization Part 3 for the proof: kzbin.info/www/bejne/gnXTe4ltqdqDeLMsi=pmwhFS52hMkH0kqE) Malus Law applies on light that is already polarized. In the example at the end of the video, The intensity of the UP light was 200W/m^2, it passes through a polarizer and gets polarized, thus the polarized light coming out I = 100W/m^2. Then this polarized light passes through a second polarizer, and here Malus Law applies (the incident light of I = 100 W/m^2 is already polarized... )
@JOSPH111 ай бұрын
thank you very much for this clear explanation@@PhysicsMadeEasy
@notwasi45222 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much!
@zakirhussain-js9ku3 жыл бұрын
Thank you for Excellent video. I have not understood why amplitude has to be square to get intensity.
@PhysicsMadeEasy3 жыл бұрын
Think about the oscillation of a particle in a mechanical wave, like the simple harmonic motion of a spring. The total energy of the spring is proportional to the square of the maximum displacement: when x = xmax, TE = PEmax = (1/2)kx^2. Intensity is related to energy, and amplitude is maximum displacement...
@elku3775 Жыл бұрын
excellent.
@chenu72 Жыл бұрын
Thankyou sir 🙏 well explained 👏 👍 👌
@koushik5797 Жыл бұрын
Finally i understood what is law of malus 😅 By your's extraordinary explanation 😊 By the way i am from india and your video is helpful to me also that is amazing and unbelievable 😂
@PhysicsMadeEasy Жыл бұрын
Thank you for letting me know. I am very glad my work helps you improve your understanding :-)
@SarahPatel-c7g Жыл бұрын
AMAZING
@mustaphachinoun2580 Жыл бұрын
Thank you very much, there are light waves in the universe emitted by all objects from space, oceans and the interior of the earth. The question: How can these light waves be captured and then analyzed for % to confirm the fact that this emitted light is C we are looking for.
@PhysicsMadeEasy Жыл бұрын
Hello Mustapha, I am not sure I understand well your question. Whatever the light, it always travels at a speed of c. Are you trying to find a way to determine what fraction of a light coming from multiple objects, comes from what object ? For that, if you know the temperature of the objects and if these are all different, you should be able to figure out at what wavelength each object emits most of its light. So if you make a spectra of the total light, you'll see peaks, and will be to identify the contribution of each object. I recommend you watch my videos about Black Bodies in the suggested order 1 - kzbin.info/www/bejne/gqC1g3holqxmd7ssi=alXB8FrPioNMT-hb 2 - kzbin.info/www/bejne/q5jWp3R6n5aqqtUsi=Zt1-o-wn4FuQ4aMa If this didn't answer your question, fell free to reformulate it.
@jakubliszka91552 жыл бұрын
i love your videos, thanks
@PhysicsMadeEasy2 жыл бұрын
Hi Jakub, thank you for your feed back! I am glad you enjoy my work.
@mrslave412 ай бұрын
5:39 “I~kA^2 [intensity of a given wave 🌊 is proportional to the amplitude squared]” - why?
@PhysicsMadeEasyАй бұрын
Hi, In a nutshell: the amplitude of a wave is proportional to the maximum velocity of its oscillators (for example for a given oscillator, v(t) = A*omega (sin (omega * t)). And because the energy carried by the wave (via the movement of its oscillators) is proportional to that velocity squared, the energy is thus proportional to the square of the amplitude. (note that Intensity is proportional to energy). For an EM wave where the amplitude is related to the square of the field strength, while more abstract, the reasoning is similar . The relationship can be derived from Maxwell equations)