Pierre Boulez - Incises {2001 version} (Audio + Score)

[@BetonBrutContemporary]

BEST BOULEZ PIANO PIECE

[@RyanPower]

AGREE

[@machida5114]

AGREE

[@brianvasquez1349]

AGREE

[@connorcmusician]

AGREE

[@JonLeungpiano]

AGREE

[@MicoAquinoComposer]

Wonderful playing! I love this recording of Boulez's Incises! Thank you for uploading!

[@JoaquimMendeziMartinez]

Masterpiece!

[@OmarFernandesAly]

Bravo!

[@machida5114]

quite good...

[@machida5114]

so good...

[@yeetthebeet]

great textures

[@MrInterestingthings]

Boulez truly kept exploring till the end . I can't even recognize Boulez in this music ! I'm amazed at how different this is from the early postWW2 works . Maybe because he allows the player more freedom it doesn't sound like Boulez all the time .I think I have missed to much of the music after structuesand Notation in the 5th minute I recognized much from Anthemes and Anthemes II in feel There is anxiety but more brightness ,more color a completely different type of humor here but it feels like a gadfly ,looser,freerer ,less dogmatic ,less rigid I prefer the earlier Boules ob the early 1950's and sounds too much like other composers -its profile is lighter, weaker? than that of the 2nd sonata . I have to see a works list and catch up !

[@masem3156]

Late Boulez is particularly consistent and amazing

[@growskull]

i wish i could see how the performer looked during the super fast partsn amazing

[@RyanPower]

I believe this is the same performance: kzbin.info/www/bejne/nH2ToH-OfK6MkNUsi=Ov8xSNKkmCImYegY

[@Quim1441]

🗣️🔥

[@宮本孝正]

やはり自作自演を聴いてみないと評価できないなぁ😮‍💨

[@hernanpiro]

3:06

[@muslit]

The pitches matter in as much as they follow serial procedures. They aren't chosen for their color or freshness.

[@Whatismusic123]

We don't recognize pitches, computers do. Sh*t like this is why modern composers and listeners are incompetent.

[@muslit]

@@Whatismusic123 You don't recognize pitches. I do.

[@Whatismusic123]

@@muslit actually yeah, I'm wrong, there exists Perfect Pitch and Relative Pitch, which I did not account for. However, those are entirely conscious operations, and I should have clarified my statement for it regarded unconscious perception of music.

[@muslit]

@@Whatismusic123 Thanks. Anyway, harmony went to the wayside when composers avoided tonal harmony at all costs. It became boring, every pitch being equal. No one says listening to Incises "what great harmony". It's purely functional. The rest is gesture, rhythm and pacing.

[@muslit]

@@Whatismusic123 Here's some interesting harmony (I think) kzbin.info/www/bejne/mIKcoJ9_etiDg80&ab_channel=ContemporaryClassical

[@huailiulin]

0:31 well it isn’t classical music

[@bylokonnor]

What makes you say that?

[@muslit]

The harmony is never varied, therefore it is dull.

[@monsieurbrochant7528]

what harmony?

[@robertnicolay8327]

The melody is in the resonances, listen from the inside out.

[@muslit]

I hear harmony in the resonances. Dull harmony. @@robertnicolay8327

[@Caleb-yn9ko]

The harmony is absolutely varied. Sure it’s based on a tone row, but the row unfolds differently each time so the intervals are never the same. That’s just serialism in a nutshell lol.

[@Caleb-yn9ko]

I’m not gonna pretend I’ve analyzed this piece closely but I can hear variation though listening for it.

[@Whatismusic123]

This is not music.

[@themobiusfunction]

This person is a troll, just ignore them

[@KarlProust]

You are not human.

[@KaikhosruShapurjiMedtner]

This is not a comment.

[@BrianJosephMorgan]

Bravo!