Places of Worship Act:Why was the law brought in & has it achieved its purpose?|Ep8 Laws of the Land

[@SanjayKumar-fb5xz]

I will vote for the party who promises to scrap this law

[@anupamjain3152]

Classic episode, where activism is seemingly trumping up the discussion. First off, there's no balance to the panel, with no space given to advocates who have been voicing against the law. Second, convenient ignoring of the politics before and after the law was introduced. Third, no mention of what's the demographic/religious distribution of disputed places. Quiet disappointing, aside from being flawed and incomplete. Yet another instance, where journalists want to be activists, but want you to believe they are journalists, when they are anything but!

[@abhijitmore8889]

100% agree with you bro

[@bkp95]

Exactly

[@naftentertainment]

भारत की सभी अदालतों में लोगों को उनकी कौम के हिसाब से क़सम खिलाई जानी चाहिए। मुसलमान को कुरान और अल्लाह की,ईसाई को बाईबल और जिसस की, सनातनियों को गीता की। यह बहुत ही ज़रूरी है।

[@spendharkar6731]

The Government of the day in 1991in its wisdom enacted Places of Worship Act. People are very eager to adopt the modern scientific inventions of the day as soon as they hit the market but when it has to do with that or any other antiquated Law it is being treated as if it is a word of God. If that is not Duplicity then what is? Why the 1991 law can not be amended or removed because it has lived its life.

[@vishalshah7604]

Can you pls make this kind video on Waqf Act?

[@Adish1205]

If this standard line - to ab kya badla loge ‘ goes around, all court cases can be dismissed following this argument

[@bkp95]

I dont know whether the lawyer concealed the fact deliberately that the court said that Sringargowri was worshipped there till 1993 and Mulayam Singh government banned it after 6 Dec and also the Gyanwapi has been defined as a place in Kashi vishwanath Act 1983 ,so the government know the reality of that place .So if there was worship till 1993 ,how can the act prevent the worship which prevents change of character from 1947 . As on 15 th august 1947 it was also a place of worship for hindus . Also the SC has told in the RJB case that the character of place don't get changed even the place is desecrated in Hinduism ,so once a place of worship of hindus won't change its character even if some invaders desecrate it and latter some foster children of Aurangzeb legalised this desecration. However the 'secular ' media which went 100 miles to falsely propagate that SC has made the POW act basic structure ,forgot to report other observations in the case . It came in light of Varanasi District court judgement . Why these people don't discuss what has happened in history . We should not forget history .Even Maharaja Ranjit Singh had brought the gate of Somnath after 800 years from Afghanistan in 1800s and it is now in The Golden Temple since Somnath was not revived till then and yes he had not read history in JNU from so-called historians .

[@nraj934]

May you kindly discuss about the Bihar Estate act popularly known as Khasmahal act,also applied on part of Jharkhand, which has real complexion on field enforcement. So generally saying the act on paper without enforcement.

[@Adish1205]

Didn’t understand. Please explain

[@melvinjoseph5809]

super

[@Siya_shrivastava]

WAQF BOARD SHOULD BE BANNED

[@coldstarter2560]

Poisonous snakes

[@HRC294]

Very poor panelist. Why is she laughing as if it is a trivial manner?

[@accountforcommenting]

This was one of the best law passed by Indian government

[@arunangshumazumdar9234]

So the "Places of Worship Act" was hope ? I will vote for that party who will kick this law out. One of the most disgusting brazen one sided tyrannical draconian hinduphobic Act. And this group is here normalizing this act of bringing this law. And didn't this Akruti Coubey represent Muslim side in Ayodhya Shree Ram Mandir issue ? Print is giving platform to this Backstabber to Hindus ? Enough reason for me not to take membership of this channel. Ayodhya serf Jhanki hain, Kashi, Mathura baki hain .

[@raghurampillarisetty7529]

Sai Deepak should have been in the panel

[@sb9060]

True

[@raghurampillarisetty7529]

@@sb9060 Biased panelist. The best argument she puts across is like "where is the end" "medieval age" etc etc.

[@spendharkar6731]

Why are we afraid of History and brush it under the carpet?

[@Raj-dg5zw]

To avoid Hindu identity mobilization. Liberal politics likes all kind of identity politics except for Hindu identity. Kashi Vishwanath is a Jyotirlinga, 1 among the 12 most important Shiva shrines. There is ton of evidence in history to prove that the temple was fell by Aurangzeb. But if the historical evidence goes jn the favour of Hindus, the so called protectors of rights, identity, etc etc will look the other way.

[@sb9060]

When impeccable scientific logics n arguments are put forward, these lawyers immediately resort to philosophical and intellectual dishonesty behind the stereotype question like "where to stop"!

[@tushargoyal554]

The jargon "where to stop?" will not be applied to the Ambedkarites who say some communities have been oppressing them since last 1 billion years.

[@Raj-dg5zw]

The Print brought, advocate for against argument in Ayodhya temple case. To explain us the 1991 Act and the new petitions in the courts. Few questions here Does the religious character of a Hindu temple change after the demolition? What justifies 15 August 1946 cutoff date? Why is it expected from hindus to compromise and not ask for fallen temple, but not from Muslim party to come ahead and restore the most important shrines of Hindus as a sign of Fraternity, secularism, right to worship. All of them being basic structure, fundamental rights, human rights. Political correctness keeps changing with shifting Overton window. So lets be Realists and answer some touch questions asked by Hindu Right too

[@rajeshsinghbais6311]

Pathetic justification & illogical show

[@keepitup2027]

Apoorva mandhani very skillfully concealed ad. Chaubey's work history in Supreme Court .Ad Chaubey pleaded for Muslim party in Ram Temple case in Supreme Court.

[@spendharkar6731]

Are these Anchors aware of the grey areas in the 1991 Law to say that it is in Black and White. Juvenile standard of Journalism under the pretences of knowledge.

[@desistarktm7270]

Congress: forms alliance with Indian Union Muslim League (IUML) the successor of Muslim League which partitioned India. Also congress: makes president of IUML as Minister of foreign affairs and releases postal stamps to honour them. Also also congress: Takes communalism and secularism classes to BJP.

[@debiagungte9466]

IumL party in Kerela has no relation with Pakistan muslim league party what's app University graduate😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

[@keepitup2027]

Ad. चौबे was fighting for Muslim party on the Ram mandir issue . Why only one side perspective is allowed on the print ? Why not J sai Deepak called?

[@yorisingrango9837]

The Places of WORSHIP ACT is the most blatant example of discrimination/Hinduphobia faced by Hindus in India, It also shows the bigotted Abhramic still prevalent in the Ruling/Elite class.

[@sb9060]

Which party has this advocate pleaded for in the hon'ble SC?

[@akshaygupta6625]

This was really informative. Thanks :)

[@sujaygupta6139]

Think about the Sindihis in Pakistan ! And two sindhis here are trying hard to be secular & BS

[@tushargoyal554]

Who are Sindhis here?

[@parvadhami980]

@@tushargoyal554 Apoorva

[@tushargoyal554]

@@parvadhami980 Oh yeah, just noticed the last name. These people are traitors who collude with anti-Hindu forces for petty personal gains.

[@Adish1205]

Sometimes their journalism is school essay type- whitewashed, conformist, not catering to nuances and trying to be politically correct.

[@bappadityadas2170]

When logic ends then "Where to stop" like intellectual mental gymnastics starts floating.

[@vishalkumar-nt9wd]

Aakriti speaked like Aweshi

[@cyrilphilip4641]

Excellent explanation of the PWA 1991.

[@youthink5552]

If Aurangzeb, tipu sultan, Mohammed ghaznavi, ghauri were to come back to life they would love to argue “ why do you want to reconstruct temples we destroyed let bygones be bygones” I am sorry but I will not agree with them

[@keerthyyalapalli7757]

Let bygones be bygones!!!!! Why do you want these dead and rubbled to be alive again till discussed.

[@nagarajuneeriganti8101]

Very insightful discussion...

[@prakashtiwari8003]

Lmao, this lady Akriti Choubey was representing Muslim side in RamJanm bhoomi case. 🤣🤣 What a black spot on the face of every Hindus? We clearly have failed as a civilization.

[@parvadhami980]

In law, it's more about profession than about emotions. That's why even Kasaab got a chance to fight a case

[@prakashtiwari8003]

Lmao, these secularist demonise Brahmins day and night because lower caste people were oppressed for 1000 years to support reservation but when same logic apply against Muslims then they show their true colour. 🤣🤣