Ranking best-worst: Bone, Tusq, Plastic. The bone is fuller and,as you said, has more depth. It's more musical. The Tusq is loud but is thinner and, although it's superior to the plastic, it had worse highs than either the plastic or the bone when playing in the upper register (22:45--23:28). Thanks for the Vid--I just ordered a bone saddle to replace the tusq saddle on my new Godin acoustic, hoping to tame the nasty/harsh highs. Based on your vid, I think I made the right move.
@BigWhiteNuzАй бұрын
Dang man you have pretty bad taste. The Tusq blew the bone outta the water.
@markbaker845411 ай бұрын
Nice vid. Exactly what I was looking for. My spruce/mahogany guitar has a bone nut and saddle and my daughter's new spruce/mahogany guitar has Tusq. The difference between the two guitars sounds a lot like the difference of the two materials in your vid. I'm a strummer and prefer the bone since I don't care for the Tusq sparkle. My daughter is a finger picker and I think the Tusq produces a little more volume and string separation. It seems about right for this style without having the pick attack bringing out the high-end sparkle. Thanks for the vid.
@jrredfordmusic25 күн бұрын
Hey thanks for making this. Actually super helpful.
@andrewneenan566 Жыл бұрын
Just what I found going from bone to Tusq. The bone was mellower and the Tusq more lively. A very helpful video.
@MillerCustomGuitars Жыл бұрын
Thanks man! Really glad you enjoyed it!
@AdamColson10 ай бұрын
Great comparison. Makes me rethink the more expensive TUSQ option. I liked the warm sound of the bone demo.
@MillerCustomGuitars10 ай бұрын
That was my favorite too, and what ended up staying on the guitar
@brianaaland526311 ай бұрын
Nice test. I have bone on a dozen guitars and tusq xl on probably 6 more. They do sound different, but in the looks categorie bone when polished looks nicer In the end, there is a difference in sound, but depending on strings pick and technique there is no correct choice for any guitar, just situations.
@sfdasdfasfasfdasfd Жыл бұрын
amazing work you've done! thanks a lot for all these parts!
@MillerCustomGuitars Жыл бұрын
Thanks!
@vinfetty9513 ай бұрын
Lots of great information, very nice!
@harvendarbains38648 ай бұрын
Well done!
@MillerCustomGuitars8 ай бұрын
Thanks bud!
@theotherside0017 ай бұрын
Thanks for a great demo, i prefered the bone overall. They all sound good and each has its place for playing style and the guitar. Strings, picks etc are other factors etc..... thanks again for a great demo!
@MillerCustomGuitars7 ай бұрын
No, thank you for watching! Providing educational content like this, and having people learn something make it all worth it!
@alexjauxier Жыл бұрын
Great video!
@MillerCustomGuitars Жыл бұрын
Thanks Alex! And thank you Stringjoy!
@MrrM0108 ай бұрын
Nice video, thanks ❤
@MillerCustomGuitars8 ай бұрын
Thanks for watchin!
@vijelieable4 ай бұрын
I find listening to these samples that bone either brings more high freq in front or loses some lows and tusq keeps the freqs better overall. I have bone nut and saddles in a Yahama FG and almost no lows at all.. I will try tusq next
@blueser1002 ай бұрын
I get close to the same tone with a Blue Chip pick even with plastic saddle and nut.
@XskaterdudeXАй бұрын
Thanks for this complete and useful info!! Could you tell me the name of the song of min 24:05 ??
@MillerCustomGuitarsАй бұрын
Naw man! I’m just jamming chords!
@DougHinVA6 ай бұрын
I do not see any comments at all about cost and how to do the work ... go look and find out if you want to spend the money needed and the skill level needed....
@MillerCustomGuitars6 ай бұрын
There is definitely a cost associated with doing it yourself, the previous videos address this topic. Check those out!
@RobertoCichetti3 ай бұрын
its really the saddle that counts not the Nut, the sound difference is from the saddle not the nut 100% sure
@matheusmarin9337Ай бұрын
Plastic is the only no option. I cant decide between tusq and bones. It just different. Bone with warm and body. Tusq with clarity. I'm using tusq in my martin dc16gte. Maybe I'll try bone. But i think i'll miss some clarity
@wjdavey35 ай бұрын
A String Wrap behind the Nut will Help Eliminate the Ringing and Overtones that are too Harsh!!!! Other than that: Bone Sounded Best!!!! 🎵🎶👍🎶🎵🙏😎
@farah-q8c3p Жыл бұрын
bone 😍
@MillerCustomGuitars Жыл бұрын
Thanks for watching!
@patrickevelyn80282 ай бұрын
I ve heard brass parts are best
@MillerCustomGuitars2 ай бұрын
This is exactly why I make this channel. There are so many people on the internet telling you that "this" is better than "that". I wanted to create a place to help players to find out for themselves. For myself, I wouldn't want a brass nut or saddle on an acoustic guitar. It would be the wrong kind of sound, and they are much too difficult to service as the guitar changes and shifts over the years. Much better suited to an electric guitar.
The plastic sounded bad The bone had too much attack when you strummed so the sustain afterwards was not in balance with the attack. The Tusq sounded the best : it had a nice , balanced sound : not too much attack , a nice sustain after hitting the strings .
@CapnHilts11 ай бұрын
Can someone please do this test scientifically with a proper equalizer sound display thing?
@MillerCustomGuitars11 ай бұрын
I did the comparisons as good as I could. My very first youtube video was two years ago and it was looking at the same subject. It was recorded with an iphone camera and even then you could hear a difference. In my opinion, the biggest take away is to understand that there is a difference. Obviously YOUR guitar is going to sound different, so an EQ is not going to be as helpful as you think it would be.
@CapnHilts11 ай бұрын
@@MillerCustomGuitars but we have no way of objectively knowing any difference, this is all subjective. But if you did the same guitar, same strings, just swapping out the saddle materials, showing the EQ for various strings and chords, that would be objective Nd visible. for instance theres a video where the compare dreadnought and concert sizes using same guitat model/line and an EQ. You could objectively see that concert size loses on the low end of the EQ
@MillerCustomGuitars11 ай бұрын
@@CapnHilts You are right, but in my opinion, all guitar tone is subjective. You want to trust your eyes, but I think it's more useful to trust your ears. And honestly, in videos I have watched, I have found the subjective insight from player more helpful than the clips themselves. This is why I included my summary at the end. Sometimes it's difficult to tell the difference over a KZbin video, especially if you're watching on a phone. I can tell you what I experienced: The plastic sounded fine. The Tusq had more full response overall, but especially in the upper mids and trebble. The Bone had an even response over the entire spectrum, and also didn't compress as much when I played at loud volumes. Anyway, thank you for watching the video!
@CapnHilts11 ай бұрын
@@MillerCustomGuitars I respect that. For reference, these guys did a hybrid science / subjective analysis. But anyway I appreciate the effort that went into your video, sincerely. kzbin.info/www/bejne/nX2bmH-fgZt6m6ssi=y7X9g3vZ15Fo90U-
@BigWhiteNuzАй бұрын
@@CapnHiltsgoofy 😂
@simplyrome Жыл бұрын
I prefer tusq
@MillerCustomGuitars Жыл бұрын
Thanks for watching!
@RobertoCichetti3 ай бұрын
Bone and tusq sounder much fuller than the plastic
@DougHinVA6 ай бұрын
Skip all the emotional inflections and just deliver a message...