Stefan Marinov motor / generator anti-Lenz test

[@Banzay20]

Paul Babcock and Jim Murray two engineers are playing with Lenz law in their machines.They are making over unity generators by canceling Lenz Law and using the peak voltage to their benefit. You should check it out, some of their material are free here on the tube. // thanks for the videos

[@echelonenergy8099]

Man, that is a really great build well done.! Something I've noticed about the marinov.b effect with both motor and generator is that it may only work with one magnet, because I've noticed that the Bloch wall between many magnets effectively sees the coil like some of a n or s pole face. But when only considering one magnet the center point has absolutely parallel field lines. Just a thought anyways keep up the good work👌

[@plenum88]

Not sure. I suppose in the motor case this is hard to test since you would have to make a single magnet with the B field circulating in the core, which is probably not available commercially. I had to use eight wedge magnets to make mine.

[@echelonenergy8099]

+plenum88 Yeah I've seen a very tiny mator in the don't know if you know of that video you've probably seen it to. What I noticed right away is when I had stacked neo magnetics, and then tested the center point for drag and it seemed to be interference where the poles join. I guess to have the real answer might need a huge neo magnet 🙁 expensive.

[@entdeckungssucherderfinder2482]

Super ⚡🌠 Die ganze Welt sucht nach alternativen Energien im privaten Bereich.

[@plenum88]

Ich mag deine Denkweise!

[@davidprock904]

Please test this anti-Lenz's Law with a Faraday Disk (1831)

[@RiverWyvrn]

Hooray for the scientific method!

[@bobt8735]

Mr. Marett ... Thank you for your exacting tests, and for the Faraday Paradox ones. I'm working on a new version of the Tesla/Faraday Disk generator. Could you run a test, with your Faraday setup, to see if there's any Lenz Law reverse reaction in the disk? I'm thinking there isn't any, because of the "magic" of the circle, opposite sides cancelling. There could however be a Lorentz Law opposing reaction. .. Bob ... Note: Isn't the Right Hand Rule used with these considerations?

[@KaliFissure]

Why is output alternating? Where is the boundary layer being crossed? There is only that single boundary in middle which rotates but coils are circular AROUND it so where is alternation coming from?

[@KaliFissure]

The coil is a simple singular coil in tube shape which the magnets rotate within AXIALLY. Is that right?

[@plenum88]

Hi Caleigh - nice to hear from you after such a long time! Yes, this generator is a little hard to understand since it work on the magnetic A force rules, which are really just a version of the Lorentz force. Anyway, yes the magnets have their B field in the axial direction, but the magnets on one side have North facing down, and on the other side, North facing up, to mimic an open B field loop. This rotates inside of a cluster of hemispherical coils. In the motor version, see: kzbin.info/www/bejne/Y2SYXpuajLqNq80 applying DC to the split path coil sets up forces that repel on one side of the rotor B field loop, and attract the other side. However, after the magnet rotates 180 degrees, since the magnetic direction in the loop is now facing in the opposite direction with respect to the current, the forces are reversed, which would make the rotor brake. In order to get full rotation as a motor then, the current needs to be turned off most of the time, and pulsed ON only when the rotor is in the correct orientation to experience the same attraction/repulsion of the rotor. So now returning to the generator version, the same rules apply - except that now the magnetic rotor is inducing stator currents, and the reversing orientation of the rotor B field every 180 degrees induces a reversing current in the hemispherical loops, thus the output is an AC waveform with peaks at the points of maximum thrust. A good ref paper is the article of Phipps on the subject - pdfs.semanticscholar.org/88a9/37981ae9f9663c591f9aca5db108faf122f0.pdf . Hope that helps!

[@squaredaway9315]

Forgive me for the stupid question I’m brand new to this. Is that thing out putting energy without taking any in?

[@michelgrenier1568]

The power is not on the flow, it is between different waves. See Telharmonium wheel, you will get it.

[@igorstaszak133]

can you show this coil? how you make this coil? do you have diagram of this motor?

[@colinquinney331]

Novel design. Congratulations.

[@Caesarus2011]

I know it is an 9 years old video but, siberian coliu was supposed to power itself … a little bit of difference I would say.

[@marazzas]

Could you try to rotate and the coil and the magnet together

[@plenum88]

Can't really do that with this design. This version of the Marinov motor doesn't work on the unipolar dynamo principle so you likely wouldn't see any voltage if it was changed that way.

[@EnergySeeker]

how can it be anti lenz if it slow down the motor and it increase the prime mover power ?

[@plenum88]

If you watch to the end, my conclusion is that there is no anti-Lenz effect. It is in the title because I am testing Marinov's claim that this generator has anti-lenz properties.

[@EnergySeeker]

@@plenum88 you are right i didnt watch to the end , am testing also a coil made by alex on you tube but am not getting what we need am getting 120 volts high frequency but when i put a load the input power its true it go down for the prime mover but the 120 volts drop to 0 volts also like a short , the load is 60 watt lamp and the 2 coils are 1000 turn on a U shape , watch my video you will see

[@primodernious]

as long as the magnets are moving in a seperate frame of reference to the coils, the induced current will produce a stationary magnetic field than that is not even distribuated in the coil and this induced field, don't want to move , and a force is needed to overcome the position of this stationary induced field to relocate where the field establish the circuit. a copper wire act like a gas and only some of the particles inside the inductor react to the magnet at the time, so its like a mangetic circuit is created and then recreated over and over as the location where the gas particles interact the stronges is where the circuit is formed. the induced field is not homogenious. if the induced field was moving with the magnets it would not produce drag. when a current is applied to a winding lets say a battery, the distribuation of the electromangetic field is more even and therby behave differently. lenz law suppose to only create an opposite field, and not a resistive force, which the theory does not explain, and is therby a separate phenomena. when a magnet is stationary to the coil and an magnetic bridge is formed between the stationary magnet and the stationary coil and is acutating the magnetic fluctuation, then there is not drag since the induced field is in the exact same frame of referance as the magnet. all convetional type generators are exactly the same, iron core or air core does not make a difference. if you do things the same way as everyone else, the you will get the same results as everyone else regardless of you, want to put your name on it or not.

[@gristlevonraben]

Very cool

[@plenum88]

thanks!

[@plenum88]

Best to wear gloves when handling the truth :)

[@plenum88]

Hey, its all about the truth around here...!

[@jaytee1288]

You can't handle the truth!!!!!

[@Surferant666]

not without rubber gloves you can't ^^