its so refreshing to hear Polish names being pronounced properly by an English speaker, thank you! Great video
@wlodekgoldsztajn6625 ай бұрын
same, his pronounciation is really good
@Halo_Legend4 ай бұрын
An only time in history an English speaker cared enough to make a 5 minute research about pronunciation.
@agjakkuАй бұрын
I paused the video to make this exact comment, I'm glad other Poles also praised this. When I heard the first flawless "Bolesław" I had to do a double take and make sure he wasn't Polish; that's kind of silly since English has all these phonemes, but very rarely have I seen English speakers put an effort into pronouncing Polish words correctly.
@Pan_ZАй бұрын
His Greek, on the other hand...
@thomasking495 ай бұрын
I could listen to this man talk for hours. Also the talking head style with really clean graphics is really refreshing. My new favorite youtube channel.
@davidemiozzi85895 ай бұрын
there's something hypnotic about his tone, and the content is top notch
@johngrebenor23635 ай бұрын
Some of my friends call me crazy for loving to listen to "dry" history content, but I honestly love just hearing this semi-monotonous (by some standards) delivery of info by a professional. It's soothing yet deeply interesting and is sometimes what I want as opposed to some overly-theatrical narrator!
@mo0se35 ай бұрын
ever since the time traveler vid, this guy is a "drop everything and watch" for me
@geebdohboy52515 ай бұрын
@@johngrebenor2363yes, straight forward and easy to digest with out without looking at the screen
@Rando_Shyte5 ай бұрын
Pee and poo
@FootballManagerPl5 ай бұрын
I'm Polish, and I'm positively surprised by this video. It never really crossed my head that this event is mostly mentioned in Polish historiography. I remember learning about it in school and possible explanations provided there, were that Otto had great plans for Europe which would involve Poland, but his death put a stop to it. And tbh elementary/middle school is probably the last time when I heard or read about this event. This video trying to get into the minds of people over 1000 years ago is a really nice, quick lesson and reminder of it.
@littlethings75224 ай бұрын
Wykład, który wiele wyjaśnia - hołd lenny, niemiecki sen o imperium i Unia Europejska (warto wysłuchać całości) - Kanał: Pro vita bona | Magdalena Ziętek-Wielomska: Od I Rzeszy do UE. Jak Niemcy od 1000 lat rządzą Europą
@piotrmalewski81784 ай бұрын
Otton gave Bolesław the throne of Charlemagne...
@RobiTobi-u3u4 ай бұрын
@@littlethings7522aż mi się nie chce komentować . Powiem tylko że to nie miejsce na leczenie kompleksów .
@littlethings75224 ай бұрын
@@RobiTobi-u3u Jakich kompleksów? Zakładam, że wykładu nie wysłuchałeś i nie wiesz o czym mówisz.
@anna345x4 ай бұрын
Please use correct grammar. I am Pole not Polish
@Patryk_Nowina-Nowicki5 ай бұрын
No way my favorite history youtuber dropped a video about my favorite country relating to my favorite empire during my favorite era
@@Patryk_Nowina-Nowicki Mówi to gościu z jakimś orzełkiem na profilowym XD
@Patryk_Nowina-Nowicki5 ай бұрын
@@OotsutsukiShibai cope
@alexlover16195 ай бұрын
@@OotsutsukiShibai The Roman Empire > those poor doppelgängers
@brumm36535 ай бұрын
The way this event is taught in Polish schools is that it was a sort of symbolic coronation, that Otto considered Bolesław to be worthy of being a king, but not a real coronation. That officially happened 25 years later, shortly before Bolesław's death.
@piotrmalewski81784 ай бұрын
What's interesting it's hardly mentioned that Otto gave Bolesław the throne of Charlemagne...
@8Hshan3 ай бұрын
@@piotrmalewski8178 What. The. F... O.O To me that's far more shocking than that "coronation" gesture. Damn, that shows how serious Otto was about his plans for Bolesław in his new empire...
@uwu_smeg2 ай бұрын
maybe giving a carte blanche of sorts to Boleslaw like: "hey, I'd be cool with you being king, we can be buddies and shit"
@josega63382 ай бұрын
@@uwu_smeg Bougrelao, from 'Ubu, roi', Alfred Jarry, is a funny character. btw: 'Bougre' is not 'bugger' in the gay line, but 'guy', in Spanish: 'tiparraco'
@josega63382 ай бұрын
@@brumm3653 Awfully Sorry, Western Roman Empire dissapeared when Alaric conquered Rome. All Power in Roman institutions went to the hands of Alaric and his offspring. As Italy ceased having an state until Garibaldi and his freemason 'risorgimento', which had no continuity with spqr, a descendent of Alaric has the power to revert all decisions by Rome, he could annulate the designation of Jesus as King of the jews (I.N.R.I.) Pilato did, ambassador's decisions have same value as the head of state the ambassador represents, or eliminate, close, and leave without any content or power the Law and Religious position 'pontifex maximus'. These have been done. G, G, G
@milkymarco75 ай бұрын
POLAND MENTIONED!!!!
@Spugler25 ай бұрын
🇵🇱🇵🇱🇵🇱
@oiuqreofnqoiruegnqerg5 ай бұрын
polska mistrzem polski!!
@MietoK5 ай бұрын
torille?
@rdtfycugvibu16315 ай бұрын
POLISH MOUNTAIN
@CarterMuller5 ай бұрын
2137
@asocci1005 ай бұрын
It's amazing how much prestige and admiration the Roman Empire still held throughout history that even 600 years after the Western portion fell, European kings still tried to revive it or claim some hereditary link to its glorious past. The Franks, the Holy Roman Empire under Charlemagne, the Ottomans, the Russ, and the Poles.
@SaladDongs5 ай бұрын
And the Romanians! Hell, even the Roman Empire tried to reclaim the Roman empire
@pukpuk76425 ай бұрын
Because after the fall of Rome, the church preserved the legacy of antiquity and was an element of civilizing the barbarians who eventually became culturally Romans. In the Middle Ages, it was the church that civilized the barbarians. Then the USA was founded by Europeans who, taking inspiration from Rome, wanted to break the monopoly of the feudal lords. Then the Enlightenment era broke the monopoly of the church etc . Ultimately, the barbarians in the times of Rome preserved its legacy and eventually became culturally Romans and their entire civilization
@pukpuk76425 ай бұрын
Many do not understand the processes of the entire West and in reality the entire Western civilization is precisely a continuous of the civilization that was created in Greece, then due to cultural strength it was taken over by Rome after conquering Greece, then the barbarians did the same, who destroyed Rome, etc. because the church preserved this heritage and then the US uprising did it, which broke the feudal monopoly of absolute rulers in Europe etc .
@pukpuk76425 ай бұрын
Generally culturally such USA is not really a young country because it was created from the cultural heritage of Europe, which has been continuous since ancient Greece. Such USA was built by Europeans with obvious references to Rome
@odenoki95715 ай бұрын
@@pukpuk7642 Couldn't you argue that feudal monopolies still exist in Europe? I could be wrong, but it's my understanding that the descendants of feudal lords still hold huge swathes of land across Europe. These historic aristocratic families remain among the largest landowners on the continent. It's interesting that we still use the term 'landlords,' which has its roots in the feudal system. I recognize that this observation might apply more to some European countries than others, but the continuation of this land ownership pattern supports the argument that feudal monopolies persist in some form. While there have been significant changes in land distribution and economic structures, the enduring presence of these aristocratic landowners suggests that elements of the feudal legacy still influence modern Europe I suppose I'm being a bit pedantic though
@Dawid.O5 ай бұрын
Im Polish, I got my degree in history on Warsaw Uni and most historians here think that Otto;s plan was to make Bolesław his eastern ally in order to secure border and perhaps form some kind of long term cooperation. Idea of Roman Empire reborn, but with Slavs in it. Eastern lords in Germany, who wanted to expand to the east, did not aprove of this.
@spookymethod5 ай бұрын
Always a pleasure to see you upload. You bring a very authentic perspective to the history side of KZbin. :^)
@Artur_M.5 ай бұрын
Looks like I just found another great channel to subscribe to. An excellent video! I'm really looking forward to the other two in this project. Fun fact: in 986 Mieszko I gave the young Emperor Otto III a surprising gift: a live camel (probably a Baktrian one). It's funny how among the precious few facts we know about this period, there are such fascinating, random details. Although, we can potentially conclude something useful from them, for example, about the trade contacts.
@kamelia6335 ай бұрын
This is not a random details at all. At that time, people believed that the Christian emperor commanded not only people, but all living creatures, so animals were given to the emperor. Unusual and rare animals that aren't found in Europe were especially valued as good gifts. Over time, rich cities began to imitate this custom and because of this, zoos as we know them today appeared. The fact that Mieszko gave Otto a camel speaks of either good relations between the Piasts and Ottonians, or a desire for good relations.
@SMiki555 ай бұрын
So there's this one Polish historical writer, Teodor Parnicki (you can look him up - he has an article on the English Wikipedia). In 1944 he wrote a novel titled "Srebrne orły" ("Silver Eagles") that focused on Emperor Otto III and Pope Sylvester II. It's an underrated gem from the writing craft perspective (Parnicki was a master of dialogue) but there's one quite shocking plot detail that stands out: at Gniezno, Otto makes Bolesław the Patricius Romanorum. Bolesław is meant to be the Empire's arm in the east and potentially an emperor himself in case something happens to Otto. What's mind-boggling is that when you research the actual sources, Parnicki's bold hypothesis appears… kinda credible? Bolesław's son Mieszko II was taught speaking and writing Latin, Greek, and German, he was engaged to and later married Otto's niece Richeza - could he be groomed not to become a king, but an emperor? Of course, that's just a hypothesis, one that's less credible because it is formulated within a novel, not a historical work - even if said novel was based upon the author's enormous research in libraries of Teheran and Jerusalem.
@premodernist_history5 ай бұрын
Sounds cool. I wish I could read Polish. I'd probably enjoy his books.
@alexbernat5255 ай бұрын
That's so fascinating. In the most out there interpretation, it makes you wonder if there was a kind of plot to restore a unified Roman empire between these rulers. If things went perfectly for Otto, you could've had a Holy Roman emperor married to a Byzantine empress in partnership with Poland. It sounds like the type of stuff an ambitious young emperor would dream up. I'd love to peer into a timeline where Otto didn't die so young, maybe nothing would've come of it, but then maybe, just maybe... Crazy the things that sudden death can tear apart indiscriminately 🥲
@slawomirkulinski4 ай бұрын
It makes sense. Piasts were ruling their state in a very German and Roman Empire way.
@bonus888884 ай бұрын
@@slawomirkulinskiWhat do you mean, that is interesting
@karolol1274 ай бұрын
@@premodernist_history I think if you get an digital verion of it, you can translate it with some top quality AI translators like deepl and if not understand each single word perfectly then you'll get the context in details at least.
@gunsoup95305 ай бұрын
I love this channel, I love the way you explain things it’s like we’re having a conversation but you’re doing all the talking for me in the best way
@tyzj68012 ай бұрын
谢谢!
@premodernist_history2 ай бұрын
感谢!
@confutatismaledictis75995 ай бұрын
Please make more videos, man. I love the chill vibe + solid scholarship. It’s a great combo.
@magimon918345 ай бұрын
Central European history in general is stuck behind a linguistic barrier to an extent that fascinates me. We don't have this history with most of French or Italian history. I love the HRE but so much of it isn't available in English
@funkle26455 ай бұрын
Citing your sources mid video like that is such a breath of fresh air
@WolfPackDiggyDog245 ай бұрын
I really appreciate that you go out of your way to describe how a historian thinks and what kind of approaches, considerations, and even frustrations an academic might deal with. It humanizes what I think a lot of people see as a sort of intellectual black box that pushes them away, an "oh that's not for me, I wasn't born with the knack" approach you see with all sorts of things from arts to math and science, when in reality a thirst for understand what really happened and how things are the way they are is as human as you can get. I love history and tell my friends and family the _what_ of it all the time, but I'm not nearly as competent at explaining _how_ history is, which to me is all about the historian's approach I always look forward to your videos to the point where I'll save them for special occasions when I can really pay attention. Keep up the great work!
@theenglishman5 ай бұрын
Mike Duncan really wasn’t kidding when he said that Poland always factors in somehow in times like these.
@EvoDeVeau3 ай бұрын
Can you elaborate? As a Pole I'm curious where can I read/listen more of what you've said
@deepbluejeer3 ай бұрын
@@EvoDeVeau Check out Mike Duncan's Revolutions podcast. While Poland isn't one of the main countries discussed, he touches on the way Poland affected the French, 1848, and Russian revolutions
@dinodonut57763 ай бұрын
@@deepbluejeerIt also comes up in the American, and Haitian revolutions as well
@Hadar19914 ай бұрын
18:00 As a Pole, who is not a historian, I always interpreted this image of Sclavina, Germania, Galia and Roma approaching Otto III, that Otto III idea was to make from HRE union autonomous kingdoms (more less divided among the ethnic lines), that each of those kingdoms could have own customs, traditions, language etc. with the emperor being above those divisions and focused on what unites all those kingdoms, that is Christianity. That would match Otto III religiosity, but also would be extremely progressive. And I think that Polish historiography somewhat agrees with my interpretation, because usually history textbooks alongside Congress of Gniezno discuss the idea of "Universal Empire" where Emperor was meant to be emperor of all Christian states. Basically an European Union focused on Christianity/Catholicism and with Emperor at the top.
@michalswag5 ай бұрын
its kinda funny how this event is always mentioned in polish education but its always in passing. so a lot of people know that "in the year one thousand a german king came to gniezno" but not much besides that. i guess its just an easy date to remember so it always sticks with you. pozdrowienia z lublina! edit: also shoutouts on the pronunciation, no one wouldve been mad if you messed up but i appreciate the extra care.
@metanoian9655 ай бұрын
The Frankfurt Schul don't like that story
@michalswag5 ай бұрын
huh?
@metanoian9655 ай бұрын
@@michalswag uhu !
@karolol1274 ай бұрын
Why? Can you explain it a bit? To be honest, Otto's idea was revolutionary at the time, he seems to be a very open-minded person. Being an emperor, he didn't want to be a kind of dictator, instead he tried to base politics at the highest level more on liberal principles.
@ipodman19104 ай бұрын
He probably read Plutarchs Alexander story…
@adstz79795 ай бұрын
This is one of the really important medieval events in Polish foreign policy. Our history teacher explained to us the outlines of the political environment at the time in connection with the "Gniezno summit". She pointed out that due to the imperfect nature of the sources, interpretation is difficult, but everything indicates that Otto III had the idea of expanding the empire eastward basing the whole thing on a common denominator, something everyone shared - the Christian faith. She added that what he wanted to do, in a sense, is perhaps being realized today, after more than 1,000 years in the form of the European Union. It is true that no longer on the basis of faith per se...but on the basis of civilizational foundations imbued with Christianity? Sure, it kinda sticks. Unfortunately, the chances for something great vanished into thin air after Otto's death, and Poland was doomed, it seems, to endure German shenanigans for centuries with a spectacular finale in the form of the release of the "Drang nach Osten" album with such well-known hits as "Little oopsie (1939-1945)"
@DavidGBlair5 ай бұрын
The EU is imbued with Christian principles? I would say the opposite is more true.
@misterborak7513 ай бұрын
Haha. Great and unexpected last sentence.
@slawomirkulinski4 ай бұрын
Here is one interpretation. Otto III was looking for ways to rebuild the Empire. However empire requires an Emperor who is obeyed. The problem was that many tribes in the north, including Norse, Germanic, Baltic and Slavic tribes were not so bend on authoritarian rule in the late Roman Empire fashion. In these cultures leaders were very often selected to do specific job - lead the tribe, or a stronghold, without a right for succession for their offspring. Their power was bestowed by the people. In Slavic tribes the gathering which was selecting a leader was called "wiec", it was an conducted to elect the leader, perform justice duties and other matters of the community. Now Piast dynasty was an oddity in this northern eastern European region. They were very authoritarian. The way Piasts created the their domain was a constant conquest of independent Slavic towns and strongholds. Fallen strongholds were usually razed to the ground. If captured people were resisting they were slain on the spot. If they not resist, there were two things that would happen. If they agree for resettlement to other stronghold under Piast rule they will keep their life and only loose all their possessions and status. If they don't agree, they will be sold into slavery (Hence the English word slave = Slavic). With this, Piasts would build a new stronghold nearby the old one and settle there their supporters. This process was to uproot Slavic people from their towns and settlements. Piasts were creating very effective state in terms of adopting and developing technology and military prowess. This state was ruled in a very authoritarian way which didn't suit most of Slavs. Piasts introduced Christianity to Slavs because it was a vehicle for authoritarian rule. In Christianity disobeying the monarch was a mortal sin as the ruler was anointed by the God, not by the people. It was effectively a blasphemy. As I've said this didn't suit the Slavic mindset and Piasts were facing uprisings. Good example of Slavs in the region which didn't like the idea of authoritarian were Velets. Why we don't know much about them? It's because they've decided to side with the German Roman Empire and keep partial independence. In the end they were divided and assimilated. They've resided in the region north of Berlin (on a very interesting and undiscovered lands - see Battle of Tollensesee). Back to Otto III. He has seen in Bolesław the ruler that can govern the state the way Roman Emperors did by creating the system where his will is passed down without question. What happen afterwards. Main Piast dynasty died out by the end of XIV century. The lower branches in Silesia turned away from Poland and pivoted towards Bohemia and German Roman Empire proving my point. Poland had to put someone on the throne so the nobles (which were Polish Slavs) crowned Hungarian Princess (as King, not the Queen) and married her to Lithuanian Duke. So we can see a return to Slavic idea to have powers elected. Since then every Jagiellon Duke had to gather support of the Polish nobles to be crowned the King of Poland. Each "election campaign" like that was yielding new rights and privileges for Polish nobles creating the foundation of Polish Noble Democracy - private ownership, right to court justice, elections of kings, parliament.
@ipodman19104 ай бұрын
Please investigate that Slavs has nothing to do with English ‘slaves’.
@littlethings75224 ай бұрын
Wykład, który wiele wyjaśnia - hołd lenny, niemiecki sen o imperium i Unia Europejska (warto wysłuchać całości) - Kanał: Pro vita bona | Magdalena Ziętek-Wielomska: Od I Rzeszy do UE. Jak Niemcy od 1000 lat rządzą Europą
@ludwikahawryszuk66375 ай бұрын
Cześć! It was really nice to hear about my country's history today. Dziękuję ślicznie!
@thenextguy325 ай бұрын
They say youtube videos are for either tutorials, entertainment, or comfort. Well, this guys my comfort historian
@citricdemon5 ай бұрын
i remember hearing this story when I was a child. it always smacked of fantastic legend to me - in fact, it was always told alongside other legends, like Boleslaw under the mountain, the dragon of krakow, and the queen who threw herself into the river rather than marry a german.
@metanoian9655 ай бұрын
Allegory. Polish Freedom and Independence. Like them Hussar fairies on horseback. It's about Poland the Stronk !
@Amleto.5 ай бұрын
None of those bullshit history KZbin channels that create great animations and put a robotic voice in the background reading the Wikipedia page of an event will ever be as informative as a true historian who simply presses play and starts talking about history.
@danielacordero33765 ай бұрын
PREACH
@lategigi-bx45 ай бұрын
Bullshit KZbin is the real cancer. Especially in such matters
@SarimFaruque5 ай бұрын
by "animation" it's ai generated art
@seebasschipman2935 ай бұрын
He definitely doesn’t “just press play and talk history” there’s a lot more to these productions
@alextravers41275 ай бұрын
Llololloooopollllo p o 2:50 bucks London on 3:09 😊llool😅olo😅😅l😅 to lol and oh lloo😅oo😊 Lloyd on lllolol😅 ol'ppoop Lloyds oooopoolpl 😅
@punipunistuff5 ай бұрын
I need 4 times more the amount of videos, thank you.😁
@evinton5 ай бұрын
im a history student that's on the verge of dropping out. your videos remind me why i love history and why i went ahead with it in the first place. thank you.
@citricdemon5 ай бұрын
I used to work hvac with a guy who had a history degree.
@EndOfSmallSanctuary975 ай бұрын
My sympathies for when you try to enter the job market, however
@knightoflain5 ай бұрын
Absolute props for your pronounciacion of polish names
@elliekate.a3 ай бұрын
It pleases me so much that you’re making these videos!
@renerpho5 ай бұрын
You mentioning Theophanu reminded me about CGP Grey's "Someone Dead Ruined My Life… Again.", which is a nice video about how to get lost in primary sources. If you haven't seen it yet, I highly recommend it.
@henkow075 ай бұрын
As someone who lives in Gniezno it was surreal to see a picture of that museum in a KZbin video.
@hailtodachimp29503 ай бұрын
Great content, this is fast becoming my favourite channel.
@sebastiandimase68303 ай бұрын
i wish you posted more i love this channel so much your approach to history is so engaging to me. you look at these subjects from a great angle and ur super well read and researched on the subjects you talk about its just fuckin sweet 10/10 channel 4 sure
@saltA-saurus5 ай бұрын
Wow, to hear this is a collaboration with History With Hilbert and Mr. Laser History! A grant is amazing to hear as well.
@allentlee15 ай бұрын
So cool. Ignites my interest in history all over again. Premodernist is a stud!
@bloodywanker7815 ай бұрын
I've seen an interesting hypothesis on the event of crowning Bolesław with the imperial diadem. According to it, Otto wanted to re-create the system of tetrarchy with himself as the Augustus and Bolesław as the Caesar.
@crownic3 ай бұрын
Great video thanks for a new upload ❤
@MrAlexo015 ай бұрын
It's weird that I have researched a topic in Uni only to see a YT video about it, it feels really surreal.
@tamasburik99715 ай бұрын
Anything more you can tell us of your research?
@MrAlexo015 ай бұрын
@@tamasburik9971 it's nothing important, I just researched the Ottonians and the christianisation of eastern and northern Europe for a presentation I had to hold for a beginner's course. I was really interested in the Ottonians specifically, so I read a book about them. Otto III. and Boleslaw I. of Poland, the idea of renovatio imperii romanorum and their friendship were mentioned there.
@Ahcp30055 ай бұрын
Thanks for the awesome video as always!
@wuggi86035 ай бұрын
Thanks for the video!
@Vual295 ай бұрын
Terrific video. Thank you so much for making this!
@senoraxolotl45975 ай бұрын
Yes, more Premodernist! Your medieval time travel video was simply impeccable, as is all your other work.
@AreYouCerealious3 ай бұрын
Dude i need you to post another video asap i fall asleep to your content (positive) and need more ❤️❤️❤️
@Matthew_0805 ай бұрын
A very interesing video! Thank you for showing us this topic :D
@bw29035 ай бұрын
Been waiting for the new Premodernist video to drop. Appreciate your work!
@CatSounds-u9f5 ай бұрын
Boleslaw crowned himself king again because he was dying and needed to legitimise the passing of the crown to his child. This is because Otto crowned Boleslaw King, not his child, so to prevent a succession struggle he had to do it. It's explained by the fact that he crowned himself king in 1025, died within a few weeks and the crown passed to his son.
@Visitor______________________v5 ай бұрын
I've been subscribed and watched every video since the time travel one. My go-to channel for the morning with a cup of coffee
@pawelperzynski44364 ай бұрын
I love that part of Polish and Central Europe history. Do more videos!
@YouB3anz3 ай бұрын
you’re speaking style is unmatched my man
@Damian-ll4um4 ай бұрын
Such a fascinating topic!
@Engehaugen824 ай бұрын
Great work. loved your authenticism.
@krzysztof-michalak5 ай бұрын
You are the first person who has made history interesting for me
@marijntaal15315 ай бұрын
Please, please do more on the Holy Roman Empire. I really love it.
@bernardkealey64495 ай бұрын
Otto III’s manifesto “ fac Romam iterum magna”; looked great on a red cap Great to see a new vid from you
@LV426-Acheron5 ай бұрын
Im always so glad, and excited at every new upload!
@Audrey_11105 ай бұрын
Yay! A new upload from my favorite history KZbinr
@HtotheMK15 ай бұрын
An upload?! What a treat 🎉
@konstantinosbaras36294 ай бұрын
give us more Byzantine stuff!!! You are by far the most analytical and concise researcher on the youtube world! More Byzantine == more fun!
@2Cerealbox5 ай бұрын
It doesn't matter what you're talking about, its always something new to me and fascinating.
@mejzzwejz7135 ай бұрын
I want to hear everything about everything you've mentioned, I keep buying books that I never read because my focus is broken or something but listening to these videos is AMAZING and I wish they'd go on forever
@nightcall7085 ай бұрын
great video as always
@OceanicBacon5 ай бұрын
It’s a good day when Premodernist posts a video
@pawezarnotal13825 ай бұрын
The difference between Polish and western historiography is understanding of the context...or lack thereof. E.g, Bolesław coronated himself in 1025 to anchor and perpetuate the kingship for his son, Mieszko 2, who was coronated - irony - also in 1025
@4232emmie5 ай бұрын
I get excited everytime I see you uploaded. Keep up the great work!
@Reladan1875 ай бұрын
Oh yes a new video. Love your stuff! Your passionate and well articulated narrating is such a pleasure to listen to. I'm not much of a reader since I have adhd. School was always hard but history was always my favourite subject. Now with youtube I've learned so much about science, space, archeology, history etc. Because of interesting channels like this. It's nothing fancy. It's simply modest and interesting. So thank you and never stop!
@Reladan1875 ай бұрын
Education never stops. It's hard when you're a kid. I always thought I was just dumb. I'm not. I just learn very differently and this is the best way for me
@Adelinold5 ай бұрын
Wooohooo POLAND MENTIONED!!!
@random-numbers5 ай бұрын
Very interesting video, thank you
@blueblack35912 ай бұрын
We love your channel
@IchibanBaka5 ай бұрын
literally the only channel on youtube i clicked the notification bell for. Every video is a treat.
@katherineedman48575 ай бұрын
Thank you for posting again :)
@mrvincefox5 ай бұрын
Eagerly waited for a new episode. Thank you
@ryangatton40945 ай бұрын
Needed a premodernist video today 💯
@falatpw5 ай бұрын
Fantastic video!!!
@AironSmieciowy-di3qy5 ай бұрын
Great video!
@ColonelAsshat5 ай бұрын
just want to express my appreciation for the fact that you've collaborated with other youtube channels and mentioned them explicitly. you are my favorite history youtuber and it's really, REALLY hard to find other channels i like as much as yours, so it's great to get your recommendations! thank you!
@gangsta_meg5 ай бұрын
Greetings from Poland 🎉 love your videos
@KateG-s8c5 ай бұрын
Thank you that was so balanced and fascinating
@trying-to-learn5 ай бұрын
I get so excited whenever you upload
@rogergalindo73185 ай бұрын
this sort of videos is why youtube is worth it!
@magdalenaszulc89972 ай бұрын
Listening to this was so pleasant
@corro2025 ай бұрын
Great video.
@gamuhnerdu47593 ай бұрын
I admire how humble you are about these history issues when you don't have direct access to the primary sources because you don't speak the language
@RexOlafusVidulusMagnus3 ай бұрын
Finally! Such an under-propagated moment in history! (Note: not propaganda in it's modern context, but in the original, which is simply spreading of knowledge) As a Polish history college student, I sincerely thank you for spreading awareness of the Gnieznian Congress in the Anglo-lingual world. Edit. I would like to propose two other interpretations prominent in Poland, aside from the crowning as King theory: 1) He was crowning Bolesław as Heir to the Empire - I'm personally sceptic towards this, because Bolesław Chrobry/Wielki was some 16 years Otto's senior, being born in 967 AD. 2) He planned to make Bolesław ruler of Sclavinia aka. Słowiańszczyzna (Slavic lands/world) as part of his federal Roman Empire, which would include aside from Sclavinia (Poland, Bohemia and the Rus) also Germania, Galia or Francia and Italia. As you said, we don't know what Otto's presumably grand plans were, as he hadn't had them written down, but based on the sources we have and the inclusion of these provinces in iconography, I would say I find this idea more probably, and even highly probable. That idea would also indicate a very high intellect of Otto III in my opinion. He wasn't just a feudal lord wanting prestige and tribute, but a political visionary, quite frankly, perhaps to an unparalleled level in his time.
@user-uh1wb4bt4e5 ай бұрын
Poland mentioned by my favorite man on youtube!! 🦅🇵🇱🥟 greetings from Poland, i absolutely love your work! I thought you would mention the gift from Otto III for Bolesław - the replica of the lance of St. Maurice. Receiving something like this from an emperor must have been incredible...
@BkennyP5 ай бұрын
The highest of quality 👌
@michaireneuszjakubowski52895 ай бұрын
I live in Kołobrzeg, seat of one of the four dioceses mentioned in this video. By a side entrance of the local Gothic basilica there is a monument to both Otto and Bolesław as well as the turbulent histories of the nations they represented.
@nicholasricardo84435 ай бұрын
I love the Ottonians, because they prove that for a time, there really was a western Roman empire centralized in Germany
@DonetskiLetsplayshik5 ай бұрын
I definitely view the pre-interregnum HRE and post-interregnum HRE as two different entities historically, especially after habsburgs started coronating themselves
@rafaelmakaveli47954 ай бұрын
hahahahhahahahaha
@berndlauert81794 ай бұрын
habsburg rome was still a roman empire centralised in germany
@nicholasricardo84434 ай бұрын
@@berndlauert8179 the ottonians and the emperors before the great interregnum had a much more centralized empire than the post interregnum hre
@berndlauert81794 ай бұрын
@@nicholasricardo8443 and who says that it was supposed to be centralised like under the ottonians forever? if it were not for metternich the empire would prevail to this day
@Synochra5 ай бұрын
omg new upload yass thank you Premodernist !!!
@brumm36535 ай бұрын
Your pronunciation of Polish names is surprisingly good!
@user-ys6ro4wi3f5 ай бұрын
ANOTHER BANGER DROPPED 🗣️🗣️🗣️🗣️
@Unclear45 ай бұрын
GOAT youtube channel
@MegaPierzak4 ай бұрын
Chłopaki pojedli i popili, Otto był w dobrym humorze i ja to widzę tak: Otto: "Bolek a chcesz se koronę przymierzyć?" Bolesław: "Nie no... Weź... Przestań... Co ludzie powiedzą..." Otto: "no co tam mają gadać... Jestem cesarzem i mogę se robić co chcę... No weź" Otto wkłada koronę Bolesławowi na głowę Otto: "no patrzcie jaki przystojniak! Widzisz jak ci do twarzy!" Gall Anonim:
@melcombrowne52085 ай бұрын
Should do a series on just how the HRE functioned over time, because if anyone can give a clear answer it’ll be you
@fillywilly6475 ай бұрын
fantastic video yet again
@fedam46485 ай бұрын
Being a historian has got to be so frustrating. In this case, the 2 most useful sources seem contradictory and have very clear biases. I can't imagine what it's like trying to create a reasonably objective story of what happened from a modern perspective with that kind of material. Thank you so much for sharing!
@SearTheo5 ай бұрын
i believe you’re smart because you’re talking in front of a cluttered library.. genuinely love these videos
@BorklundSE5 ай бұрын
Babe wake up, new Premodernist video dropped
@Woet5 ай бұрын
Yeees my fav YT channel uploads, thanks mr :)
@sppoonlord8975 ай бұрын
love ur vids and can’t wait for the next patreon vid !!