Where is the European president for handling international politics, for managing conflict in Europe in the name of the whole EU? May be it's Orban! EU must act now!
@bobtate68123 сағат бұрын
Oreshnik wasn't tested yet against modern air defense systems, just some 80's anti rocket systems that Ukraine has. Response: Sir, NATO tested all air defense systems they have in Ukraine. They work fine against subsonic cruise missiles and drones. Russia successfully intercepts up 90% of all NATO programmed and launched from Ukraine missiles . NATO problem is Russia gliding hypersonic missiles that glide bellow 100km sealing. Due to ionic plasma envelopment they are invisible to all NATO radars. According to Pentagon “We can see missile launch; we cannot see their travel path”. You cannot hit something you cannot see. Oreshnik video clearly shows multiple warheads more than 20 (rumor is up to 36) enveloped in plasma glow. Same goes to Kinzal/Dagger, Zircon, Avangard (ICBM launched) missile. All of them on active duty although limited quantities . At NATO practice they use dummy Dark Eagle future US hypersonic missiles yet to be developed and produced. Oreshnik is waiting for them on European theater.
@bobtate681215 сағат бұрын
What was Russian Oreshnik missile loaded with? It hit Uzmash Ukraine gigantic grid of underground factories. Putin said that group of such missiles is equal to small tactical nuclear device. What is the power of smallest tactical nuclear device? One kiloton of tnt. 1000 tons tnt. Russian Eskander hypersonic missile has load of 0.5 ton of tnt. No one knows not even MI6, CIA or Mosad.
@livingproof47888 сағат бұрын
It was loaded with a dummy warhead (probably some metal compound or even a rock) they have said couple of times already. The destructive properties are caused by high velocity. Compare it to asteroid of small size hitting the earth, the small diameter causes huge impact just because of the speed that it lands on the ground. As Russia claims it is capable to install nuclear warheads on it instead of dummy. But the question is what would be the purpose? Installing nuclear warheads probably could make it weapon of mass destruction but that is not the point of this type of ballistic rockets. They have separate rockets to carry out nuclear strikes. Thus this one would be probably used for different purposes, to not over escalate and have possible advantage in hypersonic missile technology. It was basically sent to scare shit out regular people, because military is pretty aware of this kind of technologies since 1970s. Oreshnik wasn't tested yet against modern air defense systems, just some 80's anti rocket systems that Ukraine has. It is also not clear on how accurate is it and if Russia can really load nuclear warheads on it. Also it's unknown how many of those systems it has. But since as they claim they have already projected and manufactured the first unit, the next ones could be much cheaper because they don't have to pay research costs, but it is unclear for the ppl if the system is already fully developed or even if it would function properly especially against new anti - missile technologies. IT WAS SIMPLY NOT TESTED AGAINST 2020s MODERN WARFARE SYSTEMS. So even Russia could face a potential fail in next strike if they decide to do so. There are numerous things that could go wrong. They have sent one to Ukraine, that's true but Ukraine doesn't have top-notch air defense, more like few decades old stuff and not that is not even intended to intercept hypersonic threats. It was spectacular for regular guy yes, but trust me for military this is nothing new.
@bobtate68123 сағат бұрын
@@livingproof4788 Oreshnik wasn't tested yet against modern air defense systems, just some 80's anti rocket systems that Ukraine has. Sir, NATO tested all air defense systems they have in Ukraine. They work fine against subsonic cruise missiles and drones. Russia successfully intercepts up 90% of all NATO programmed and launched from Ukraine missiles . NATO problem is Russia gliding hypersonic missiles that glide bellow 100km sealing. Due to ionic plasma envelopment they are invisible to all NATO radars. According to Pentagon “We can see missile launch; we cannot see their travel path”. You cannot hit something you cannot see. Oreshnik video clearly shows multiple warheads more than 20 (rumor is up to 36) enveloped in plasma glow. Same goes to Kinzal/Dagger, Zircon, Avangard (ICBM launched) missile. All of them on active duty although limited quantities . At NATO practice they use dummy Dark Eagle future US hypersonic missiles yet to be developed and produced. Oreshnik is waiting for them on European theater.