D.7 Mixed strategies | Game Theory - Microeconomics

[@berkayserim1971]

you made a huge mistake. The expected payoff of choosing boxing for man is 2q+(1-q)0=2q, that of choosing shopping is q(0)+(1-q)1=1-q So, q=1/3 and r=2/3. Since if a man already chooses the boxing his payoff depends on the probability of woman's choice.

[@kejdisula1670]

Damn, learning things of the internet do be dangerous sometimes hahahahaha

[@aureliaM13]

you are absolutely right!!!!!

[@zenapsgas]

Didnt get the logic behind the expected payoffs

[@abhishekjain2431]

best video for understanding mixed strategy thanks

[@florencefetiveau2476]

The probability calculazations are not correct; Please, fix this. Thanks

[@Jcava5]

Is the expected payoff calculated by adding or subtracting the values?

[@berlinkind6108]

If I understood it correctly, expected payoff = result of dominant strategy.

[@retard3419]

idk maybe either i am just very stupid or what but this video didnt explain shit to me im still lost as f?

[@serinacat4781]

you saved my life 👍👍👍

[@deathcore322]

i can't understand if you need to multiply expected payoff by probability in man's shopping, then how comes 0 * r-1 equals to r*1 and not 0

[@babitamehta3898]

1*r-1 that's when he goes shopping because he doesn't prefer going to boxing match alone.

[@babitamehta3898]

why are we equalizing expected payoffs ?

[@zerohero109]

Thanks aloot

[@cristianofanvivo7904]

still confused