In this episode we're talking about portholes, windows, and other window-like openings on the battleship. To send Ryan a message on Facebook: / ryanszimanski To support this channel and the museum, go to: www.battleship...
Пікірлер: 328
@_DK_-2 жыл бұрын
In contrast to their evil twins, starboard holes…
@SkeeterPondRC2 жыл бұрын
Underrated comment.
@fire3042 жыл бұрын
Oh that's good... You must be a dad!
@billkallas17622 жыл бұрын
Of course, then you have the "old-timey" name for portholes, Larboard holes.
@aevangel12 жыл бұрын
*Starboard Hole:* "See, there was another port hole, an evil port hole; ...and I killed him."
@mahbriggs2 жыл бұрын
😁
@garrettschweitzer71382 жыл бұрын
You know Ryan had that submarine joke cooking in his mind for a while. Couldn't wait to drop it at the end.
@robertway57562 жыл бұрын
I've been asked a few times if there were any "windows" on my sub. Ummm....no.
@jackmehoff23632 жыл бұрын
He thought of the joke first, then figured out how to make a video for the joke to fit
@nitehawk862 жыл бұрын
I do wanna hear a "Thats as funny as a screen door on a battleship" reference
@tech4pros1 Жыл бұрын
some russian submarines do have windows.. they have a weather enclosed bridge deck inside the conning tower as a bridge for surface running. the space is outside the pressure hull and is flooded when the sub dives.
@hondacrxrus Жыл бұрын
@@robertway5756 not windows but what about screen doors 😂
@grouchyoldpatriot2 жыл бұрын
Those small round "windows" found in the watertight doors are known as "Dead lights". Or at least they were when I served in the Navy in the 80's / 90's. Their main purpose was for damage control teams to check for fire or flooding in the next compartment before opening a door.
@tommyblackwell37602 жыл бұрын
I'd imagine one of the biggest reasons portholes were blanked out during the War was to make it easier to maintain light discipline underway. No point in making things any easier for the enemy if you can help it.
@inq1012 жыл бұрын
Got a family story to back that up. According to my great grandpa who was in the RN the americans "lost widows privilege as they couldn't be trusted to turn the bloody light out."
@soopaman22 жыл бұрын
Ryan is one of the few people in America who is happy to go to work.. I am so jealous of your job.
@pizzaivlife2 жыл бұрын
Sailor, shut that porthole before a museum curator appears to climb through it!
@F-Man2 жыл бұрын
The porthole is approximately 1 curator in diameter, sir!
@codyhuber2 жыл бұрын
Submarine window jokes…I love it!
@gunnergoz2 жыл бұрын
Have you ever done a video of the gunnery optics on the ship - those in the 16" gun turrets, the big rangefinders aloft and in the turrets, and the 5" turrets and their controllers? I realize it might be difficult to video through some of those optics but it would be fascinating for those of us who have not had the opportunity to look. I was fortunate to go aboard a Missouri class in the Philippines in the '80's and later on the Alabama on Mobile Bay, so I saw what some of those optics look like when you peer through them.
@astro-tek2 жыл бұрын
Though it's not specifically on the turret optics, I watched an older video yesterday titled, "Inside the 16in gun house". He went over some of the range finding equipment and turret periscopes, which were very interesting!
@Blue_Maxxx2 жыл бұрын
How about the funnels. Some questions to start with. Do they do more than just vent smoke? What would happen if they take damage?
@RuralTowner2 жыл бұрын
If it's anything like vessels earlier in the Steam Age...damage to the funnels affected how the boiler's breathe. Too many holes could adversely affect (reducing) how hot the fires in the boilers would get thus reducing steam pressure. A rough & probably poor analogy would be blowing (akin to the updraft from the boiler fire) through a cracked straw. It's easy to blow through since air escapes in more places & what comes out the end lacks force. With an intact straw more comes out the other end...more force behind hit...ie the updraft of the fire is more forceful ie it's breathing better. How much it would affect the more advanced systems seen later on...not sure. Saw your Q & figured I'd drop my best guess from what was learned from various sources but certain to get corrected in places.
@trailrunnah88862 жыл бұрын
Ryan did a video on the uptakes for MAY 4, 2021, it was to celebrate Star Wars day, and the video was answering the question "Would what destroyed the Death Star destroy Battleship New Jersey?" He shot the video standing inside the funnel, it was pretty interesting stuff. (the funnels are protected)
@richhagenchicago2 жыл бұрын
It is interesting in design on those ships as they were designed to avoid a shell going straight down and they have a piece of armor that is perforated with a bunch of holes in it that is very thick to catch and stop shells and bombs before they could make there way further down.
@stevecagle23172 жыл бұрын
I remember hearing that one thing contributing to the rapid sinking of USS Indianapolis was that the Captain McVey allowed them to be open that night due to the hellish heat so as to increase ventilation. As the ship listed the ports went under increasing the flooding.
@shawnbauman54632 жыл бұрын
That was completely normal for a ship of her type operating in the Pacific.
@davsim41162 жыл бұрын
That was one of the sham charges against McVey brought up By the US Navy to hide the fact that they left a ship unaccounted for. First torp blew her bow off the second torp cut her in half.
@flyer30002 жыл бұрын
Everything was McVay's fault (says Adm. King)
@AvengerII2 жыл бұрын
Open portholes were also supposed to be a reason the Titanic's sister ship, Britannic sank quickly. That ship operated in the Mediterranean which was much hotter than the North Atlantic if she had ever operated as a passenger line. Instead, she was used as hospital ship for roughly a year. The portholes were left open to release the heat buildup in the lower levels. Unfortunately, at the same time she hit an anchored mine, she was in the middle of a crew shift change in the boiler area so not all the water tight doors were secured, either, if I remember correctly. The mystery of the water tight doors is something they've tried to resolve over the years.
@robertn22 жыл бұрын
If my father was still alive, he be amazed with your knowledge of ships. My father used joke about enlisting in Navy with their recruiting logo "Join the Navy, see the World" through a port hole"
@raitchison2 жыл бұрын
FWIW I joined the Navy when this was the slogan and in 6 years I saw and visited 9 different countries across the Pacific.
@Plasmacore_V2 жыл бұрын
The Navy - "You know how to mop, right?"
@dbfbobt2 жыл бұрын
I suspect the improvements in electrical generation and ventilation had a great deal to do with the demise of hull portholes over time. The primary business of sailors for the past few thousand years is keeping people in and water out.
@MrManny345372 жыл бұрын
This is one of my favorites, because I see it a lot when I’m in Philly
@tedmiles21102 жыл бұрын
I used to live aboard the US CG Lightship #87-Ambrose at the South Street Seaport; her engine was changed from steam to Diesel in 1933. Her engine room bulkheads show evidence of enlarging the port holes up to 24-inches; we think it was because they could be used as escape hatches from the space. Most of the rest of the port lights were eight inches around the ship. TM retired but still interested.
@northerncaptain8552 жыл бұрын
Early in my career as an American Merchant Marine Officer I worked on several WW2 built T2 tankers that had oversized portholes for Bridge windows. Standard sized portholes were used in the accommodations.
@yes_head2 жыл бұрын
The editing on these videos is getting pretty good!
@rogerwilco22 жыл бұрын
Yes, the days of really wonky sound seem to be past us as well.
@philnaegely2 жыл бұрын
@@rogerwilco2 thanks to donations and such, which they've said since day 1 :)
@kainhall2 жыл бұрын
id love to see a series of videos on all the gauges...... like the fonts, design, and uses can be REALLY interesting . but the HOLY GRAIL.... would be to learn how you would "dial in" a shooting solution into the computers like... i want to know what knob does what..... and watch the gauges change
@tonytrotta93222 жыл бұрын
U.S. Navy ships like heavy cruiser USS Louisville CA 28 which my dad served on in WW2 their portholes welded shut in hulls for safety to make sure lights could not be seen. Also, smoking - the smoking lamp is lit! Take care! Also, USS Louisville CA 28 in WW2 in the Pacific had an Open Bridge with canvas top.
@CAPNMAC822 жыл бұрын
I recently learned that the Royal Navy would put external balconies on the stern of flagships as part of the Admiral's quarters. How they convinced an Admiral to quarter abaft the rudder post is beyond me.
@crgkevin65422 жыл бұрын
The Royal Navy seems like a very tradition -driven service, so it's probably because in the age of sail the officers were quartered aft, and they just ran with that.
@B52Stratofortress12 жыл бұрын
All officers had access to the stern balcony and it was on all ships of the class not just the flagship. Not sure of its purpose besides a place for the officers to go and hang out, might have been a prestige thing. All British battleships build after and including Hood no longer had it.
@SeanBZA2 жыл бұрын
In sailing ships the aft got the fresh sea breeze, so the officers would be there, to get fresh air, with no smell from the ship, and this continued a way into powered ships by tradition.
@CAPNMAC822 жыл бұрын
Mind, the catwalks were on ships near-contemporary to New Jersey, so nothing quaint nor aged. The catwalks were hung over the stern, lower than the main deck, and near to aircraft catapults. This is not the sort of neighborhood where one finds Admirals; their Staff, perhaps, but not the Flag himself.
@awjustus222 жыл бұрын
Obscure feature question: how is time kept on the ship while underway? Does it change as the ship passes through different time zones?
@tokul762 жыл бұрын
Logical answer is that you stick to one time zone cause your schedule depends on time. In good olde times your longitude is calculated based on your clock. You don't change The Clock just cause ship moves thousand miles to the west.
@MrGrunt012 жыл бұрын
You use 2 times, local and Zulu. Zulu is tied to Greenwich Mean Time and doesn't change, local changes as you transit either plus of minus Zulu. So local time could be +8 Zulu or -2 Zulu for example this makes it easier for daily operations while the Zulu time makes it easier to coordinate orders around the world. In WW2 they used very accurate chronometers to keep time, now its satellite based.
@ionstorm662 жыл бұрын
@@MrGrunt01 All navy ships still carry a pair of mechanical chronometers just like they did in WW2. Iowa's kept them in the navigation room in the conning tower. There is also an electrical clock in main engineering that is repeated around the ship.
@richhagenchicago2 жыл бұрын
Zulu time.
@Fa5Squad2 жыл бұрын
You would go by your native time zone
@NomadShadow12 жыл бұрын
Hmmm, when looking at photographs of older battleships I often wondered what all the little black dots were on the hull because they couldn’t *possibly* be portholes because why would you go to the trouble of having an armored ship just to go and compromise said armor by cutting little holes in it everywhere. 🤯
@raitchison2 жыл бұрын
6:43 When I lead tours (which I really only did when training new volunteers) I always pointed out the rounded bull nose on the portholes for the signal shack. That is there because during WWII when a lot of battle orders were relayed to other ships via signal flags the signalmen could retreat inside the (lightly) armored signal shack and run the lines for the signal flags through those holes to send messages for the admiral. The rounded bull nose was to ensure that the lines and flags would not get snagged when the signalmen were raising or lowering the signal flags.
@31dknight2 жыл бұрын
Great video from the battleship.
@Srinathji_Das Жыл бұрын
Awesome videos and beautiful museum! 👍
@markchip12 жыл бұрын
Aside from any structural compromise from having hull-side portholes, particularly in the accommodation or low-traffic sections of a ship, I would imagine the strongest reason for deleting them would be to avoid light sources at night potentially making the vessel easier to spot by the enemy. Especially as it is very difficult to see any such flaws from either the deck or superstructure. It is a LOT easier to notice an unshielded or uncovered porthole in the higher decks or where crew will be working or passing frequently.
@lucash.992 жыл бұрын
Could you do a video on the fuel-oil for the ships how it's made what it looked like etc
@alanh37132 жыл бұрын
"It would have been a much Quicker video if I worked on a Submarine." LOL Love it !!!
@garomcfbgdd32112 жыл бұрын
Ryan should do a April 1st special on submarine port holes 🤔
@axelrajr2 жыл бұрын
i imagine in wartime, portholes were seen as a real liability for setting Dog-Zebra, darken ship, one that was easily remedied. for the new ships, deleting them was probably seen as a quick and simply way to save time and money.
@follker2 жыл бұрын
I rushed here to point that out. Darkenship would have been real life saver at night pre radar pacific.
@callumdonington22272 жыл бұрын
Got the porthole delete option.
@vectorz26772 жыл бұрын
Makes sense, especially with the advent of aerial observations and the Japanese proficiency with night observation.
@quentintin12 жыл бұрын
still doesn't answer for the removal on ships already built because as pointed, the portholes would have beed equipped with battle ports to close them off in darken ship condition or when going into battle
@Thunder-543212 жыл бұрын
@@quentintin1 it would reduce the risk of some of the battle ports accidentally being missed and being left open, plus in general saving the extra effort of closing them
@deaddoggaminglol2 жыл бұрын
never in my life i thought i would watch a nearly 10 minute video about portholes
@asn4132 жыл бұрын
The Emperess Of Ireland's sinking was partially due to open portholes.
@lewisdoherty76212 жыл бұрын
The BRITANNIC'S sinking also was partially due to open portholes and the stoking crew jamming the watertight doors open for their convenience.
@SeanBZA2 жыл бұрын
Those viewports in the watertight doors would be laminated glass, multiple layers of glass and polycarbonate, probably with the top layers being made from tempered glass, all laminatecx to make a thick sheet, which was then ground down to the right diameter for the opening. Commonly was used for armored windows in banks and other armored applications, where you need a viewport that is resistant to fire, bullets and heavy impact, and which will, for at least a while, resist a raging fire on the other side. You cut it normally using wet grinding and abrasive media, so for the round ones they would have taken the sheet, and used a copper core drill, and either corundum powder or diamond powder, to slowly wear through the outer diameter and leave a smooth finish on the edge, so it does not crack. The sheets of glass are made from alternating layers of float glass and polycarbonate, cleaned and heated under pressure in a mould to get them to fuse together. Just like your car windscreen is.
@IIGrayfoxII2 жыл бұрын
2:26 It is said that port holes that were opened sped up the sinking of the HMHS Britannic. While nothing was shot through the port holes. The Britannic at the time was a hospital and she struck a sea-mine, The nurses opened the port holes to ventilate the rooms, despite being told not to. The Britannic was a sister ship to the Titanic, but she sunk in 30minutes or so, compared to Titanic 2hours. The opened port holes did not cause such a decrease in time alone, but the blast warping the hull of the ship preventing the water tight bulkhead doors from closing.
@lloydknighten50712 жыл бұрын
Ryan, I don't remember the book title that had this information. But I recall reading somewhere that the US navy blanked out all hull mounted portholes after Pearl Harbor. That source claimed the open portholes on CALIFORNIA, WEST VIRGINIA, NEVADA, and OKLAHOMA lead to their flooding after being torpedoed.
@oscarfloyd26782 жыл бұрын
My Theory as to why the port holes of the ship were covered up during war time, was to prevent excess light from giving away the ship position during the night.
@nzcyclone2 жыл бұрын
I guess the other issue of portholes and why not used is light....It could potentially be a source of light and could give away the ships position at nighttime. I dont know if that is a reason but it would make sense. Moreso is crew areas. Another great video Ryan. Thank you :) Keep safe and well everyone :)
@greeb6662 жыл бұрын
I think Royal Oak was probably one of the reasons a lot of portholes were blanked over.
@coincidentalrvadventures20812 жыл бұрын
I would really love to see you cover the antennas on the ship. Was there a dedicated MARS radio antenna? I ran the MARS station on the Carl Vinson. We had a dedicated MARS antenna on the ship. Very respectfully MM1(SW) USN Ret.
@dave85992 жыл бұрын
submarine window joke, nice touch!
@bryangrote87812 жыл бұрын
But wouldn’t port holes in submarine help it to crash dive faster?😉
@craigbathurst11852 жыл бұрын
The Seaview had windows in the bow of the sub and had covers for them. ; )
@cmdrgunslinger59552 жыл бұрын
Voyage to the Bottom of the Sea. They also had a flying sub. Which also had windows.
@ct87642 жыл бұрын
I built a flying sub model when I was a kid. It was at my parents' for years after I moved out but mysteriously vanished. I showed t picture of it to my grandson the other day he thought it was pretty cool.
@craigbathurst11852 жыл бұрын
@@ct8764 I believe that model is still available.
@ionstorm662 жыл бұрын
The Russians have a couple of subs with windows. They are flooded areas on the conning tower for surface watch. I think one or two early American subs have them too.
@StevieGPT2 жыл бұрын
Seaview was a fine ship. I served on her many nights as a young lad.
@Lando_P12 жыл бұрын
As a chef, I’m interested in how the kitchens are different from a normal commercial kitchen. That’d be a good video to make.
@BAZZA4532 жыл бұрын
what you call battle ports are called DEADLIGHTS in the UK MERCHANT NAVY which had to be put down in rough weather and they were hinged from the top.on passenger ships, it was quite common to have to replace port glasses when someone had forgotten to put their DEADLIGHTdown in bad weather
@ned9002 жыл бұрын
Great video. I'd like to see the sequence for firing the main guns. For example; an order is given, and then A. happens, and then B. happens, and so on
@phillipbouchard41972 жыл бұрын
You were filming in one of the area's I want to visit on an Iowa class ship , the 08 level Primary Conning Station. The view from there and on the bridge wings both fore and aft must be tremendous. In regards to not having portholes in the hull on warships it is far cheaper, easier, and faster to build without as well as more watertight.
@paddington16702 жыл бұрын
Theres a good tour video of behind the scenes areas on Iowa here on youtube somewhere
@fredrikhansen752 жыл бұрын
Awesome, cant wait! 💯🙏🏻♥️
@vrod6652 жыл бұрын
“If this had been a submarine video …”. We had some very ‘special’ glass on submarines. So special that you peak through the gold plated glass and see where zoomies zoomed around. But contrary to rumors, no screen doors.
@whirledpeaz57582 жыл бұрын
We had similar special leaded glass periscopes to see into the room where neutrons fly on Nimitz class.
@nunyabidness6742 жыл бұрын
@@whirledpeaz5758 geez, I hope they weren't flying... a reactor breach would be difficult to write off. I would be hoping they'd be smacking into something in short order, like fuel rods or shielding...
@richardmarble88982 жыл бұрын
Navy Ships need to run dark in combat situations. Having a place where light can escape might give away the position of the ship. Red lamps were in passageways near exits to weather decks to maintain night vision for those that need to go out on deck. I always wondered about the phosphorescent wake that the ship left behind at night.
@lewisdoherty76212 жыл бұрын
I wonder how well they show up in the infrared. There has to be a temperature difference between the water and ship, and if a nuclear reactor isn't used there are places where combustion gases must escape. A heat targeting missile would head down a ship's smokestack.
@tobyborgens38172 жыл бұрын
Content Idea : .... PIPE INSULATION there are tons of HAND sewn removable insulation covers on valves & piping. I always see in the background.... miles of insulated pipe on that ship.........Insulation on pipe in a steam operated ship is VERY important . Pipe Insulators are craftsman who get overlooked.
@gl3094952 жыл бұрын
As I remember, the glass part was called a "Portlight", the actual hole with the added closure fittings was the "porthole"
@comradevlad74592 жыл бұрын
I think the Navy's decision to limit through-hulls and portholes was more than likely a maintenance preference. Keeps things simple, and limits places external leaks could come from (not due to combat obviously). My family uses the same logic for through-hulls on our sailing yacht. Less things that could break and gives you peace of mind that you won't lose the vessel to accidental flooding due to a through-hull busting.
@craigsawicky16432 жыл бұрын
American ships began having better Ventilation, and Air Conditioning, removing the need for Port Holes, which were also problematic for Damage Control. Win, Win!
@jphellify2 жыл бұрын
In a “modern” 80-90’s task force would New Jersey work with a sub? -how would they communicate?
@michaelsommers23562 жыл бұрын
Even routine peacetime operations of submarines are TOP SECRET, so anybody who knows can't tell you.
@moo4boy2 жыл бұрын
if that would happen, my guess is that there either would be orders given to both the sub and the New Jersey prior to sailing or that one of the escorts would coordinate with both the sub and the New Jersey.
@JM-nt5fm2 жыл бұрын
Multiple ways to communicate to submarines. Surface fleet use active sonar, so they can communicate via active sonar to the submarine. They can also communicate two ways via satellite buoy. VLF also works as communication to the submarine one way from surface fleet to submarine. That is very low baud rate. Submarine can communicate to the surface fleet via active sonar if subsurface position has been compromised. They also can communicate via satellite link at periscope depth as well as direct lite signals. The craftiest way to communicate is via LPI radio link from another buoy or auv. Lots of ways to remain in contact. One way coded communication to the sub is very easy. Two way is harder to keep discrete. But both are very doable with most opponents. Requires a very, very sophisticated opponent to hamper two way and single direction to the sub is really nearly impossible to hamper. All matters how sophisticated the opponent is. Remember submarines are denial, surface fleet is control, aircraft carriers and missile ships are about power projection. Denial is probably the easiest to achieve of all of those.
@ionstorm662 жыл бұрын
With a sonar if its under water, radio if its at or near the surface or old fashion light signals if its on the surface.
@darylmorning2 жыл бұрын
in 1945 the US Navy developed the underwater telephone, also known as UQC, AN/WQC-2, or Gertrude. It's similar to using "two-way" radio but with sound. Now, you can even send digital signals like dial up internet used to be. The ocean is a place where few advances are made.
@robotslug2 жыл бұрын
The submarine joke was 10/10. I did not expect it at all and it made me snort.
@allangibson24082 жыл бұрын
If it was a Russian submarine - they do actually have windows on all their submarines. Only a few American submarines have windows - the DSRV and NR-1 being examples.
@jochenreichl7962 жыл бұрын
My video idea: Fresh air in, bad air out. Tom Scott made that for the Texas, and I would like to see how the boiler rooms on the NJ would draw their huge air supply from. Espacially, where are the intakes?
@SheepInACart2 жыл бұрын
Blanking portholes isn't just about receiving damage, its equally about night watches and not wanting to disrupt sleep cycles of those who'd be heading to bed shortly after sunrise ect. Military has far more people running 24/7, and if your an engineer working in the hull between 10pm and 6am, you don't want to spend the last 2-3hrs of your shift with morning sun streaming in, and you REALLY don't want light entering bedroom spaces when your asleep during the day.
@chrisgay47862 жыл бұрын
A detailed review of all the light switches on the ship.
@ponchoremerize55082 жыл бұрын
The lack of Port-Holes is a survivability issue in that any open space can let in water. Also with the advent of modern engineering and ventilation you don't need to take the extra steps and cost to the vessel.
@alexandervasquez93242 жыл бұрын
Probably the reduced portholes and sealed the already existing ones so that the ship wouldn't sink so fast. A porthole would has a decent size so if the ship is already sinking and the portholes are open or broken water would rush in from the portholes or the would let air out reducing the air pressure allowing the water to more easily enter, it might not make the ship sink incredibly faster, but you know that when the time to evacuate a sinking ship comes every second counts.
@danmathers1412 жыл бұрын
Can you do re-enactments that show how the various stations worked with active duty sailors like the bridge and various steering stations?
@vbscript22 жыл бұрын
I would think that one of the main reasons for blanking out the port holes during the war was so that the ship could run dark at night if needed without actually having to turn off all of the lights in the rooms that had portholes. Especially since the Japanese ability to spot targets at night with radar was not so great.
@RuralTowner2 жыл бұрын
I know they have portholes. What about starboardholes?
@RodCornholio2 жыл бұрын
Bungholes and cornholes are cool too.
@jsherck2 жыл бұрын
I bought at an auction some years ago the porthole from the USS Banner (notable as the sister ship of the Pueblo.) Had been hanging above a bar for decades I guess. Big heavy brass one, probably a "medium." Seemed cool at the time but I'll tell you what, they're not very useful unless you have a bar to hang them above.
@dennisthone5662 жыл бұрын
I would like to learn more about Seacrest, the openings in the hull below the waterline, numbers, uses, and locations.
@dave85992 жыл бұрын
I second that, what of the openings in the hull, and hull markings?
@MrStrangegoo2 жыл бұрын
Blanking out the port holes was most likely to control light. No port hole, no accidental show of light is possible.
@joshuavinicombe57742 жыл бұрын
Please could you do a video on galley equipment? What sort of gear did they have? Was there any special equipment that we wouldn't see in a conventional land kitchen?
@DavidWilliams-hv7so2 жыл бұрын
Found a cool book about the USS Tennessee makes enjoy your KZbin channel.
@wendywhite45372 жыл бұрын
Thank you for the upload. I have always wondered about the portholes. Why they were on some but not on others.
@Odin0292 жыл бұрын
I really enjoy all the videos, but my favorite ones are when Ryan answers a question that I didn't even realize I wanted to know the answer to. Edit: And there has to be some way to get him to watch the movie Battleship, just for the ridiculousness alone.
@reese26942 жыл бұрын
Sounds like a good livestream fundraiser if he could get the rights. Surely no studio still claims it?
@Jedidaddyo2 жыл бұрын
Most likely the lack of portholes or covering them up was more about light discipline. I could also see removing them as they could be landmarking the ships stricture if they are being targeted.
@MacMcCardle2 жыл бұрын
Might be a bit odd but is there anything quirky with the steering gear on an Iowa? The two ships I've worked on hard fairly standard for their time equipment but I guess it is kind of interesting in its own right - One had a set of rods that ran the entire 54m length of the deck from the fwd wheelhouse steering gear. Emergency steering was via a few hefty men and a set of tiller like irons that keyed into the top of the rudder posts. I can't imagine that would have been fun work on a 980gwt twin screw. It was allegedly goofy to maneuver under steam, let along via independent and manual steering. The other was far more modern. Still chain driven steering but the steering gear engines were remote to the wheelhouse, located on the mezzanine of the main engine room. There was a main and auxiliary steering gear engine. In the event of failure of the control from the bridge or from the main gear engine you'd use the auxiliary via manual steam valves. A large wheel with very minimal visibility through the aft ventilator was the specified fully manual failover. Engage the dogs and wind like mad.. again, doubt it would have been a merry time crouched on the mezzanine in the heat of the engine room spinning a wheel, facing aft with only yelled directions and a heaving sea for company.
@SkylersRants2 жыл бұрын
Nice zinger at the end! LOL
@skydiverclassc20312 жыл бұрын
It would be a short video for most submarines, but not the Seaview from Voyage to the Bottom of the Sea. :) They could see all kinds of giant squids and such.
@fishpotpete2 жыл бұрын
How about a video on the welders and types of welds, cutting torches, etc., and the people who did it.
@dave85992 жыл бұрын
Video Suggestion...Hull Penetrations. Waste discharge, bilge intake or discharge, cooling water, fire fighting inlets, etc.... And also include what those hieroglyphic hull markings mean? keep up excellent work!
@jaquigreenlees2 жыл бұрын
On pleasure boats that are ocean going or crossing you can have "battle ports" for the portholes, though they are called dead lights instead. They serve the same purpose of blocking the hole in the hull / superstructure when at sea.
@captainswoop87222 жыл бұрын
The glass part is the ‘scuttle’ the metal cover is a ‘dead light’ Well it was in British terminology when I was in.
@ypaulbrown2 жыл бұрын
always wonderful Ryan...best wishes.....
@patcb8292 жыл бұрын
Tip of the hat for the submarine window joke.
@freddieclark2 жыл бұрын
Never heard them called 'battle ports' before. We always called them deadlights.
@98765zach2 жыл бұрын
Seinfeld voice: *”portholes? Whaaaat no love for the starboard?”* *comedy ensues*
@Mark-lv1ub2 жыл бұрын
Ryan, I request your summary of the U.S.S. Bon Homme Richard fire. There must be reports out by now. It seems that the Russian cruiser Moskva suffered the same type of damage...that is a fire that burned thru the entire length of the ship. Look at the few videos of the ship damage and observe the portholes spaced at regular intervals, have black smoke stains coming from them. This suggests a fire along the entire length, probable starting under the bridge. It is likely that the fire set off the forward gun magazine, or the midships missile magazine, (not the huge P-1000 Vulkan missiles). The resultant explosion ruptured the hull and led to flooding. Perhaps even, most of the crew was dead at this time, and could not save the ship. Thanks MCI, DS2, 1980-1986, USS Reeves CG-24, USS Carl Vinson, CVN-70.
@cooliobeans70342 жыл бұрын
This video is informative and adorable
@kotori87gaming892 жыл бұрын
You talked about the Port Holes, yes, but what about the Starboard Holes?
@combatrock30692 жыл бұрын
Ha ha like the submarine riff there. COMEDY!
@TheJttv2 жыл бұрын
Port holes add manufacturing complexity and I am willing to bet weight with the added frame. So removing them for rapid production would make sense.
@akizeta2 жыл бұрын
Now you're thinking with port-holes!
@TheFerd16052 жыл бұрын
i have been wondering how the steering is liked from all the steering compartments to the hydro rams for the rudder .
@Ltblitzful2 жыл бұрын
it'd be neat to see the ventilation system of the ship
@richhagenchicago2 жыл бұрын
It might be a bit too nuanced for its own video, or such, but those huge rotary electric switches for routing signals and power all over the ship. The inside guts of those would be rather interesting to see. They are different from what I have seen in old industrial buildings and I am guessing were purposely built for the Navy and probably went through an evolution to end up where they were in 1941.
@billwit78782 жыл бұрын
Do a video about how the Iowas were used as oil tankers to replenish destroyers fuel tanks
@strydyrhellzrydyr13452 жыл бұрын
Oh idk... I like the window idea... Honestly would like more facts about the ships windows... But... Also. I'd like you to talk about walls.. and roofs. Or ceilings... How thick are the walls at certain places. Or the engine room. And info about that
@agy2342 жыл бұрын
Now that you’ve covered lights, doors, floor coverings and now portholes can you cover the ships ceilings?!
@johnscott60832 жыл бұрын
Now you're thinking with Port Holes!
@Quasarnova12 жыл бұрын
Interesting to note that the Richelieu had portholes across its whole length despite having an internal belt. But it looks like that is because the Richelieu's bulkhead is external above the belt, making the portholes much more practical in her case.
@BB.612 жыл бұрын
Iowa class also have "portlights". The only difference between them and portholes is portlights have fixed glass and cannot be opened. I may be wrong but I think the round windows at the wardroom behind turret two are fixed glass.
@m1t2a12 жыл бұрын
It's too bad the designers at De Havilland didn't know about the round windows thing before the Comet flew.
@Cragified2 жыл бұрын
Port Holes lost their importance as forced draft and oil firing came to be a thing. Lots of air was screaming through the boiler compartment and no-one was having to shovel coal so temperatures weren't so high. Along with forced ventilation (Plus air conditioning if equipped) . Which is why all the below deck ventilation draft funnels disappeared. Port holes were a flooding risk during heavy seas (much like casemates) and required the crew to be ready to close them if the ship was suddenly attacked by say a submarine during condition X-ray. And along with that they could never be opened during the war as even if the glass was still closed and secure light would stream through them at night which again invited attack by submarine (If one was in the right place). Lastly installing portholes took a decent amount of time and labor by the welders to cut them out and weld in or to rivet in. And eliminating them was just win-win-win. Less cost, less time, less things to worry about especially as below deck ventilation on newer ships wasn't such an issue.
@SSN5152 жыл бұрын
Massive air conditioning closed up the ships, too.
@projectinlinesix Жыл бұрын
I lol'd pretty good at the submarine comment!
@zyzzy19442 жыл бұрын
You asked for an obscure feature on a ship to make a video about... How about explaining the strainers on fire mains. I can't remember its name, but there's one at the very beginning of your November 10th, 2020 video named "Fighting Fires on a Battleship". It's the thing that's between the red valve and the hose. Enjoy your videos, thanks. Jack