I CANNOT THANK YOU ENOUGH FOR THIS ANALOGY! I have been struggling to understand the difference for weeks at work and this 6mins video made all the difference! :D
@kwodgawdyinsm8632 Жыл бұрын
Same bro
@ChiquitaSpeaksАй бұрын
Idk lol bros talking like he doesn’t even trust fully what hes saying
@Koh_Scoot Жыл бұрын
I've just started a new career within the solar industry, so I'm still getting used to the basic concepts. This video was great and I learned a lot, thank you!
@Luxlifeproperties3 жыл бұрын
Amazing explanatory skill this presenter demonstrates. Thank you, helped a lot.
@zaelu2 жыл бұрын
He explains absolutely nothing. He even makes blatant confusions. Power is Work not watt over time.
@PsychicOfficial4 жыл бұрын
5:35 Simple Summary of everything
@leonseramup80724 жыл бұрын
A very good explanation that is easily understood by anyone. Thanks.
@dalroth104 жыл бұрын
A very clear explanation - much appreciated 👍
@Sbudarh_P2 жыл бұрын
You are the best at simplifying this made it simpler
@mskraemerartclass Жыл бұрын
practical help: what is a difference between these two companies 1. Each block is equivalent to 50 kilowatt hours (kWh) of electricity and is available for $4.92 net cost per month. So when you subscribe to two blocks, you’re supporting 100 kWh of solar energy for only $9.84 per month or just 33 cents per day.versus Versus 2. The initial credit rate on your bill will be approximately $0.04 per kilowatt-hour (kWh) and will remain at that level for the first 36 months. Starting with the 37th month of continuous enrollment, the rate will increase 1.5% annually; A 1kw subscription to solar energy will cost less than $8.35 a month** Please help what is the difference between these two offers?
@ChiquitaSpeaks2 жыл бұрын
This is pretty simple. Whenever you find something labeled in its watts that’s how much power is being used by it per second…so first, you just convert it to Kw to determine it’s usage. Example: A 300w GPU. Make it Kw, so just move its decimal back by 3 or divide by /1000, whatever’s easier for you. So 300w is .3Kw. That’s .3Kw per second. Then see how many of that is being used in an hour. So that’s one second, that is there’s 3600 seconds in an hour. So multiply that .3Kw by 3600 seconds (1hour). That’s 1,080. So 1.08 KWh. Granted my pc will have more than just the GPU. A one Kw solar panel system could run the GPU for basically ~1hour. A six KW solar system could run it for about ~six hours.
@padraiggalvin28073 ай бұрын
thanks for telling us its per second.i dont think he said that
@Israela608Ай бұрын
@@padraiggalvin2807 🤣🤣🤣
@Israela608Ай бұрын
.3Kw * 3600 secs = 1080 Kw ⁓ 1MW. That's wrong If your GPU consumes .3Kw, it means .3Kw in 1hour. So one 300W solar panel working at full capacity can run it.
@ChiquitaSpeaksАй бұрын
@@Israela608 thanks bro i just made an assumption n decided to build off of that given he early on said power is energy per second…nice to know my system will be 3600 times more efficient than i thought 😅
@ChiquitaSpeaksАй бұрын
@@padraiggalvin2807 he literally said in the beginning power is rate of energy appliance uses per second
@nick27j4 жыл бұрын
Very well explained 👍
@sathyasview48923 жыл бұрын
Pretty cool examples I appreciate this method of teaching
@FirstGigawattDown4 жыл бұрын
Yes! People get confused. FYI, here's how we explain w v. wh, on the road to explaining our newly minted metric, the @ @hZ38 - Go Team Earth!
@atomicdmt87632 жыл бұрын
20w vs 100w: saying faster denotes more pressure: voltage increase. This is incorrect, or course. You might say its a wider/bigger (waterfall).
@jrloyal25945 жыл бұрын
Perfect explanation 🌞thanks!
@tomdane50074 жыл бұрын
You said we're pushing electricity into the bulb faster. Is that true? For example if the voltage was the same, but the amps were different. Is it more accurate to say that we're pushing a higher volume of electricity into the 100w bulb?
@SolarQuotes3 жыл бұрын
Fair point. It is not a perfect analogy. The voltage is analogous to how hard we are pushing the electrons, not volume. So slower electrons being pushed hard can be same amount of power As faster electrons being pushed less hard.
@mmnyako3 жыл бұрын
Thank You, just the perfect explanation I needed
@michaelmcclafferty3346 Жыл бұрын
A very helpful video, thanks.
@padraiggalvin28073 ай бұрын
Thank you very much for explaining this
@SefatChowdhuryIsTheKing4 жыл бұрын
Something I was looking for!
@michaelgonzalez72402 жыл бұрын
When you turn on a 100 watt bulb in your home it actually consumes 100 watts per seconds but your electric company charges by the hour so that would be 100 watts every hour. When you produce electricity from your PV system that 100 watts bulb would consume it every seconds, so a 100 watts bulb will drain a total of 100 X 3600 ( 3600 seconds in an hour) = 360kwatts in that hour from your batteries.
@yea_dude_225 жыл бұрын
i love you guys for this
@TheCliverguy3 жыл бұрын
Very informative, thank you 🇸🇦
@mmccarthy196312 жыл бұрын
Cheers mate, I think I'm finally getting it
@jimwalker30393 жыл бұрын
thanks, i think you should also add the conversion factor at the end....kW to kWh is 3600
@Ducklesworth3 жыл бұрын
So if i have a 1500 watt solar generator why is the batter only rated for 1069 wh instead of 1500. In my mind i could use 1500 watts for one hour. But by this rating itd be less.
@mrmatias26182 жыл бұрын
Very informative video. Greeting from Angola.
@andelwangubane2 жыл бұрын
thank you for the informative video
@ratusbagus4 жыл бұрын
So watt about volts? Where do they fit in?
@SolarQuotes4 жыл бұрын
Think of Volts as electrical pressure. Volts X current = power
@rajsars68823 жыл бұрын
Perfect explanation
@dannysuru2 жыл бұрын
still dont get it 100% -that solar graph was confusing - 6kW system measuring kW to add up to 24kWh per day??
@anthonyyusuf3844 Жыл бұрын
Good Example all the way
@harshitjain59449 ай бұрын
So how many kwh will 6kw solar system produce?
@SolarQuotes9 ай бұрын
In Australia - multiply kWp by 4 to get average daily energy. So 6 kW will produce 24kWh on an average day. Less in Hobart, more in Cairns.
@tudorelarustei75673 жыл бұрын
Best explanation heard
@SolarQuotes3 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much 🙂
@CaptMarkSVAlcina4 жыл бұрын
Sent here by comment on Sailing Uma
@nyarmhamad9244 жыл бұрын
Thank youuuuuuuu... Interesting..
@NarendraModi00704 жыл бұрын
Thanks 😃
@silvershadow7973 жыл бұрын
You can make a resonance destruction machine by talking a little more louder than now
@tulioalexbo53124 жыл бұрын
well done.
@raghubatteriesandsolarcons373 жыл бұрын
Hi
@PTuffduty4 жыл бұрын
got it.
@raghubatteriesandsolarcons373 жыл бұрын
I m a technical advisor
@grzegorzkwasniak90913 жыл бұрын
the sound is not good I am quite disappointed
@kenj9993 жыл бұрын
🔥🔥🔥
@anlozdemir84042 жыл бұрын
It's still confusing. Because I am dumb
@MiltonGale-p2x4 ай бұрын
Efren Highway
@susandenyme96913 жыл бұрын
That is so so inaccurate.
@SolarQuotes3 жыл бұрын
Hi Susan - what is?
@susandenyme96913 жыл бұрын
@@SolarQuotes Water flowing through a pipe is not even remotely close to flow electricity. Electricity is readily available at the source, the way to increase flow is to increase the load or draw.
@SolarQuotes3 жыл бұрын
@@susandenyme9691 I agree is it far from the perfect analogy. But for the purposes of helping solar and battery buyers visualize the difference between power and energy it is helpful - as many comments here seem to suggest. The intended audience is not engineers or scientists :-)
@susandenyme96913 жыл бұрын
@@SolarQuotes inaccurate analogies is not the best path. I have worked in instrumentation/Electrical engineering design for quite some time. So many people challenge what is being done simply because they never had it explained properly, do not understand or found something they Googled claiming it is more accurate. There is no need to be engineers or scientists to have it explained properly. None of us where either when attending school