Prince Carl Philip of Sweden visit with Operation Smile

[@nadezdahulo3699]

🕊️💖

[@evagolldwing2623]

♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️

[@OpSmileSWE]

❤❤❤

[@matiassaarikoski5155]

Hi 😊

[@gabriellagirardi4741]

🍀💕🪻

[@美雪陳-o4w]

Prince of Sweden, what happened to this little beauty??

[@美代子出水]

カール王子の第4子がプリンセス👸だと、二重に嬉しいですね❤

[@TambovWolf1989]

こんにちは。 4件ほどのメディア報道を見ましたが、赤ちゃんの性別については一言も言及されていませんでした。 あなたの知性は素晴らしいです:)。 健康で幸せになってください！

[@TambovWolf1989]

I must say. The free system... of healthcare, education, etc. is a disgusting system. I know from the USSR. Doctors who work for free are very proud, intractable, prone to bribes. Patients who receive care for free and students who receive education for free do not appreciate it, they treat these expensive things like toilet paper. "In itself". It is better not to have a free system, but a paid system. However, paid healthcare should be adjusted for cost. So that the price is not inflated. Just monitor the price carefully. But a price is needed, an official price. Because a bottle of iodine and a bandage do not cost $ 100, they cost 60 cents. But when you pay pennies for iodine, you still pay and have respect for your money. And when you get iodine for free, you think that it is a piece of cake. But it is not so. A system of loans for education and medicine also makes sense. Easy, cheap, simple loans. You broke your neck and have no money? No problem! They'll unscrew your neck now and put a new neck on. And you'll pay later, in a year. And the price. It shouldn't be insanely expensive.

[@jonaskessler326]

Doctors in Sweden do NOT “work for free”. My cousin is a surgeon in Sweden and they make very good salaries and have a high standard of living. And nothing is “free”, not healthcare or the education. It’s paid for by taxes and Swedes are more than happy to pay them. I’m sorry you had a bad experience in the Soviet Union but that was a very different system than Sweden has. Mainly, there is much more freedom and of course Democracy in Sweden than there ever was in the Soviet Union, when you were not allowed to own anything or make many of your own decisions. Sweden and the Nordic countries have had the highest standard of living of any countries for decades.

[@TambovWolf1989]

Thank you, Mr. Jonas. It is very nice to receive an answer from you, especially against the background of tons of stupid "hearts" and emoticons. I wrote about the free system, since the description under the video says that this clinic provides free help. That is why I wrote my position. The Soviet Union embodied the idylls of Europe of the 19th century, in particular the idylls of Great Britain, France and Germany, the idylls of the philosophers of these countries. Including in the direction of free medicine. Believe me, everything was implemented very accurately. Fortunately, the kings and queens of Scandinavia were smart enough not to do as the smartest people of the adjacent language taught.

[@TambovWolf1989]

@@2121gul Jag är från Ryssland. Jag sliter av dig huvudet om jag måste och inte har en vård i världen, skönhet.

[@TambovWolf1989]

@@jonaskessler326 Regarding the quality of life, sir. This is a very interesting question. I often think about the quality of life. In such regions of the world as Latin America, Southeast Asia and Africa, the quality of life is obviously lower than in Scandinavia. Why? You would say that there is no democracy in these regions. But in this case you would be wrong, sir. There is a lot of democracy in Africa and Latin America, as evidenced by the very free relationships within these societies. That is, a high level of democracy in general, everything serves to degrade, but not to increase the quality of life. I believe that the concept of "quality of life" is not associated with democracy, but with Christianity, which is a derivative of the ancient Jewish Law. "Do not kill", "Do not steal" ... When these simple rules are followed, the quality of life in society is high. If these principles are voiced out loud, but not followed, then the quality of life is low. And as a consequence, in order to follow these principles of quality of life, society must be uniform. That is, have ethnic integrity. Only in this case the quality of life will be at the level when most people do approximately the same thing. And one does not "put a spoke in the wheel" of another. Of course, you will say, fascism in Germany also sought ethnic monolithism, but it was not good there. That is the point, I will answer you in this case, that fascism, which was a democratic system, killed. Both inside and outside its state. The commandment of Christianity was violated. The quality of life fell.