Prize Lecture: Esther Duflo, Prize in Economic Sciences 2019

After a short introduction, the lecture begins at 1:45.
Field experiments and the practice of policy.
The Prize Lectures in Economic Sciences were held on Sunday 8 December 2019, at the Aula Magna, Stockholm University.

[@rahulsingh-eo5js]

Hello nobel prize can you provide subtitles for video because it's bit hard to understand french accent

[@sekekeretsu4172]

Keep watching you will get accustomed with it as you go.

[@NobelPrize]

You can see her presentation slides here, which might be a help: www.nobelprize.org/prizes/economic-sciences/2019/duflo/lecture/ - Thanks for watching!

[@dr.debajyotibose2928]

No it isn't .listen properly

[@sanchari.c]

@@dr.debajyotibose2928 An extremely unnecessarily comment which does nothing but show how obnoxious some people can be. He's trying to understand, which is all the matters. Of all the things to say, you just had to say the worst thing, isn't it?

[@dr.debajyotibose2928]

@@sanchari.c Making mountains out of molehills I see

[@valentinaa0.054]

This channel deserves more subscribers and viewers. These Nobel laureates are change makers and trend-setters, their voices need to be heard in every corner of the world.

[@marcelmuller7197]

Hello Nobel Prize executives and all interested, professor Esther Duflo is a very good lecturer on her subject of expertise in poverty research. She also has common sense on the importance of all insights in poverty must most certainly address the children and youth of today via appropriate curricula and relevant knowledge imparted in the classroom as a functioning education. She is very smart on the impact of all the results as well as the findings of scholarly work.

[@aaronwimberleymbamsf5776]

It is so amazing to see women at the top of their #STEAM fields. I have committed to furthering my understanding of development economics and policy skills refinement, inspired by Duflo & Banerjee. Among my favourite Nobel winning economists to date. Her Passion, Acuity, Lucidity comes through very thoroughly by the intonation of her voice. The work that she has done one United Nations Sustainability Development Goal #2 cannot be rivalled.

[@nandanm3826]

Respected ma'am, Good day. It's an honour for us also. Thank you for sharing.🙏

[@haseenamonga7609]

Congrats prof Esther.... I wish this could be implemented in South africa

[@harfehesabi9712]

Congratulations Professor

[@marketingbusiness718]

Excellent, thank you

[@bokkenneth]

Wonderful work

[@SimplyAndy]

Wonderful.

[@globaldigitaldirectsubsidi4493]

"The economic anarchy of capitalism is the root of the problem." Albert Einstein

[@bankofwerner4206]

Albert Einstein never said that.

[@redatamanine1040]

Then it's up to us to transform it to order

[@bishalcomedyandentertainme3091]

Yes, It possible

[@asimplelyriclife]

She's from MIT 😮

[@shanthi3105]

Go to captions and select English. Subtitles will come

[@maggiewhic97]

They aren't correct, there's a lot of issues as it is auto generated

[@NobelPrize]

Unfortunately, a transcription of the lecture isn't available. If you'd like to download the lecture slides, they're available here: www.nobelprize.org/uploads/2019/10/duflo-lecture-slides.pdf - Thanks for watching!

[@tehflooper]

A person who hasn't any money but is able to build his house and produce his food using natural resources and good environmental methods, is considered poor? A person who has a lot of money and is able to purchase the most basic needs and beyond, but has to work at least 40 hours for someone, is considered less poor? A person who inherent all his properties and money, and lives purchasing deluxe stuff, is considered rich? There are a lot of escenarios and I can't find an objective way to say that someone is poorer or richer than other, unless you use one single dimension, which is monetary income (or something related with money), but that leaves behind things that people also value, such as culture, religion, community network, values and so on. So, in conclusion, the concept of poverty should not be imposed as something that every group of people must eradicate using the same formula.

[@expantube]

Probably a real index for "rich or poor" would be pollution : the first person does not pollute, and is "poor". A guy who travels by plane, has a swimming-pool, follows the fashion and goes skiing every winter with his big car pollutes in a huge way, and is "rich". The richer you are, the more you pollute. That's why the richest people are the most dangerous for earth and climate, even if they are educated and sort their waste, this is peanuts compared to their way of living.

[@premgahlout5488]

she is our boudi.........

[@thangaraj5145]

mam, you getting Nobel prize for economic very happy , just you will say the ideas destroy people poverty in the world.. many members to get Nobel prize in economics but lot of people in poverty in the world in still now..so no use for your economic research idea for poor people growth. Wast of Nobel prize in economics