Problems That Have Tricked Scientists For Years

[@-GeneticallyModified]

Genuinely think this has the best explanation of the double slit experiment I've ever heard.

[@padmoose]

Every so often the KZbin algorithm gives me something special and today is one of those days

[@eugenesis8188]

You cant imagine how happy i am to find a small channel talking about relatively deep ideas that doesnt appear to be ai generated slop being read by a guy who genuinely has no idea what hes talking about.

[@TarezOfficial]

Well this is a second channel. Their main channel has like 2 million subs.

[@GhostlySpectreYT]

Watch Anton Petrov

[@noahway13]

ai generated slop is read by an ai bot. I watched a video on making money producing ai generated videos, it really opened my eyes to stock footage, etc-- tho they are getting harder to tell apart. Some use ai to imitate David Attenborough's voice, and animal video content is easier to fake.(and animal video viewers are way less discerning than people who watch this type of content)

[@dheibeljr]

I agree. It's refreshing.

[@micanikko]

@@TarezOfficialwas gonna say the exact same thing

[@edpiv2233]

Such a small % of people that would watch this great video. I am so happy to read these comments. What a great production. For us. Plz keep at this.

[@Sidius303]

Thanks!

[@briankachelman]

you're one of my favorite channels. Thank you for the research and tie you put in to do these for us!

[@samuelgarrod8327]

It's written by AI.

[@cxshexe]

As someone who lives in this universe I can confirm physics is weird

[@RileyBanksWho]

proof or cap

[@hyperturbotechnomike]

I live in parallel universe, where verything is a tetrahedron. Every atom, planet, shape.

[@himynameistonyable]

you live on the earth which is flat you need to do some actual research yourself sheep, it’s not that difficult

[@katiekawaii]

Same.

[@katiekawaii]

​@@hyperturbotechnomikeI don't know why but this comment just gets me. 😂 It's great.

[@terryhayward7905]

As Douglas Adams said, if we ever get to understand the universe, it will immediately disappear and be replaced with something even more improbable.

[@TheJoshuamooney]

The Nine Billion Names of God…

[@brianoshea1178]

Just like any girlfriend I've ever had also

[@jd32k]

Don’t mind the flashes, it’s just ships going into hyperspace to travel the universe

[@danmurad8080]

Traffic lights

[@robjohnston1433]

Please PLEASE let that be TRUE!!!

[@RobertHowarth-z6c]

Actually it's just your average alien 👽 🙄child pointing his new LASER pointer into the sky from his planet and reaching the earth. 😂😅 I'm still waiting for a explanation of the WoW signal.

[@ryanreedgibson]

You're awesome! Great topics on this compilations playlist!

[@pandoraeeris7860]

In Penrose's CCC theory, it is possible for an advanced civilization to send information from the end of one universe to the begining of the next. If this is true, then the light that created this universe would have contained information from an uncountable number of previous universes. This could be responsible for the fine tuning.

[@mikemurphy5898]

Hmm, interesting. I still think finetuning is a result of survivorship bias. We can only exist in a universe where the values are just right, and thereby that's the universe we exist in and while that probability is next to zero, if there is a multiverse of 10^500 "universes", it's also almost a certainty...well, I mean, we're here, so it is a certainty. Lol Or if you prefer, God.

[@Victor-ks3sp]

I don’t really understand how probability comes into the picture. Why is it improbable for a constant to be small? Was it even possible for things to turn out differently, isn’t the universe deterministic on those scales🤨

[@skintech8620]

Duh!!

[@jd32k]

in all seriousness. this is mind blowing stuff. I love it

[@Quakez0r]

I disagree that we are lucky to find ourselves in a universe that allows for us to exist. That's not luck, that's just reality. It would be lucky or perhaps even impossible if we found ourselves in a universe that doesn't allow for life as we know it to exist.

[@DumboSanchez]

But why should the universe even exist at all?

[@porkchopTopHat]

@@DumboSanchezwhy shouldn’t it? Prove that ‘nothing’ exists

[@jonwacken4312]

And if you win the lottery that becomes reality too, but it also means you were lucky.

[@OvrXNN]

Wow that just sounds like you said a non sequitur bit of dumb shxt. How unfortunate

[@Quakez0r]

@@DumboSanchez Why it should is irrelevant. The fact is that it does.

[@youtubeuser1492]

Scientists should try to figure out why astrum doesn't have 100 million subs yet

[@voornaam3191]

No, they already have. My explanation is, an average IQ of only 100 is not enough. Many of us really think very very very slow and not much. It's a sad fact. We are not interested, we have no idea about the universe. We don't need it, get real.

[@czechmate8287]

More knowledge and passion than bots :/

[@mikemurphy5898]

Because his titles aren't: "1 star vs. 1 BILLION STARS" -- OR -- "I survived 3 days at the singularity of a supermassive blackhole"

[@mikehipps1015]

Word.

[@jimmywillims5929]

That many people dont not believe in space lol 😂

[@xxmorrisonaxs]

It's just aliens taking our pic lol

[@FinnishArmy]

Fell asleep to this and hot fuck my dreams were insane and intense. Woke up sweating not knowing if I existed.

[@mikemiller659]

i think i'm embarraced

[@Ezcape0]

Had that recent was living in a simulation where I can't explain but it was going up pushing infinities on me

[@zacarecobain2864]

You don't🎉

[@Ezcape0]

@@zacarecobain2864 true the idea of you is a primal hunt so you want it to be viewed as big as that is the hunt/item you feel you bringing to the table As it's attached to you It is your hunt

[@shawns0762]

General Relativity predicts dilation wherever there is an astronomical quantity of mass, not singularities. Dark matter is dilated mass. Mass that is dilated is smeared through spacetime relative to an outside observer. It's the phenomenon our high school teachers were talking about when they said "mass becomes infinite at the speed of light". A graph illustrates its squared nature, dilation increases at an exponential rate the closer you get to the speed of light. Time dilation is just one aspect of dilation, it's not just time that gets dilated. Dilation will occur wherever there is an astronomical quantity of mass because high mass means high momentum. This includes the centers of very high mass stars and the overwhelming majority of galaxy centers. The mass at the center of our own galaxy is dilated. This means that there is no valid XYZ coordinate we can attribute to it, you can't point your finger at something that is smeared through spacetime. In other words that mass is all around us. Dilation does not occur in galaxies with low mass centers because they do not have enough mass to achieve relativistic velocities. It has been confirmed in 6 very low mass galaxies including NGC 1052-DF2 and DF4 to have no dark matter. In other words they have normal rotation rates. All binary stars have normal rotation rates for the same reason.

[@codelicious6590]

Dude, if you actually Know what dark matter IS- you need to tell the scientists.

[@oatlord]

Was this thumbnail used for a different video? I swear I've seen it before.

[@mikichiix]

Same, it looks extremely familiar.

[@thoughtsandgamesandstuff]

You're not the only one. Same here. Definitely was used on some other video.

[@thisguy7616]

I've seen it too

[@whatthefleeb]

Yeah, I have for sure seen this used by one of the many seemingly AI-generated channels that YT has been recommending me lately for some reason. Most of those are garbage, so I'm glad I found this guy who seems legit!

[@nowintheprocess]

It's extremely similar to the thumbnail for the video "Light Is Weird" on the Astrum channel

[@MoOrion]

What if Quantum Entangled particles are the same particle... a particle that exists in a higher dimension and the particles we see are projections onto our reality. If one is interacted with then you are interacting with the higher dimensional particle and thus the other projection changes too...

[@flexico64]

"You are free to believe whichever you find most comforting!" That's not good enough; I want to know the TRUTH.

[@markclancy5714]

such great work as always

[@michaelturner7641]

I absolutely love your content. Thank you.

[@jimmirow]

Definitely seen the thumbnail before. Astrum pushes the limits. Great content

[@whtiequillBj]

@25:15, I feel that "very quickly" should be put with a very large asterisk! It took nearly 379,000 years for the first hydrogen to appear in the universe. On a galactic scale yes. it was a blip on a human scale it was many life times.

[@keskeyy]

We’re watching aliens fight the galactic equivalent of nuclear war in deep space

[@SomeoneCommenting]

Biggest mystery in the universe is why anything EXISTS. It doesn't matter if it 's rings, or particles, fields, forces, dimensions, whatever, it doesn't matter if things transform, expand, decay, cancel each anti- opposite that exists for it, etc., the origin of everything that came after was already there. From what did it come to be? Why was it already there to begin with? If _time_ as we know it only counts from the Big Bang on as the universe expanded, then what was there "before" that moment, if you cannot even use time anymore as a reference?

[@paulembleton1733]

The simplest answer seems that spacetime has no beginning. The problem with a beginning is before. There is nothing before, nothing by which to measure where that beginning is. And it doesn’t help much if there’s an external reference frame for spacetime, like a creator or higher reality, since that leads to an infinite number of external reference frames. Bloody difficult though visualising something having no beginning.

[@SolWayward-]

This is something that I always thought as well. The most impossible thing is the existence of the universe itself, matter, energy, spacetime and everything that makes up reality itself. So, if the most impossible thing exists, then is anything really impossible?

[@jnhrtmn]

I think these have an afterglow similar to GRBs. Afterglow is a contradiction to Relativity (waves arrive in order of wavelength with radio last), and if it were realized in the year 1900, Relativity would not be here today. The paradigm is set now and will not be questioned.

[@GSNRecords]

That delayed choice experiment is utterly wild. Quantum physics makes no sense from our deterministic experience of reality.

[@Myself086]

If I find solutions for any of these, where do I publish my findings?

[@NikolasScience]

such great work

[@jochenwagner2782]

Puzzle three light. It moves in the Aether. That explains not everything, but removes the knots in the brain windings to start thinking about the right things. NO wave can move without medium. By removing the medium you get weird stuff ....

[@arynnightshade7164]

I am just going to toss an idea out there and hope people talk about it. LFBOT is either a ship warping (similar to a sonic boom when you break the sound barrier, a "sonic boom" of light from breaking the speed of light) or...another intelligent being has created a device or explosion that has insane luminosity so the rest of the universe can see it (like a message - "were here"). Just an opinion, but I wish more people would talk about the more "outside the box" ideas for explaining existence.

[@CantoraMask]

It would help explain things better if the speed of light was referred to as the speed of causality instead. Explain what that means and then talk about photons travelling at different speeds. Talking about light travelling at different speeds of light can lose someone

[@jochenwagner2782]

The last one ... a pulsar is a star that gets more current as his Corona consumes. The Corona charges up like a capacitor on a circuit board in your computer. If you overcharge a capacitor it strikes through. You observe this flash ... and if you have a self repairing capacitor like a solar atmosphere you will get exactly the same time between the flashes if the incoming electrical current is constant and not distributed by bigger planets

[@SKEC212]

This staaa is probably either made of something that burns different or was exploded by an alien weapon. Staaaaaaaaaaz. LOL.

[@aok3642]

Thank you for setting the records straight again. Asrtogolgy gets a bad wrap because what most of us hear and see is 10 years old. My apologies if I complain too much.

[@allen_tor]

Actually a multiverse would require even more fine tuning than a single universe.

[@mrchaos239]

It has nothing to do with YOU looking at it! “Observe” in this context means “to measure” and the only way we can measure it is by physically affecting the thing being observed, ie firing a lazer at it etc. the beam of light will affect it meaning we have a hard time knowing what it looked like before the measurement device affected it.

[@digbysirchickentf2315]

Magnetic fields don't push the magnet pushes. It is an important distinction.

[@joshmccarty8800]

30:04 history channel taught me it has to be 👽

[@roymoysey9681]

"I see your eight states of matter and raise you....thirteen.(Mwuahahahaha!)"

[@McCoymiked]

After reading The Three Body Problem series, I can’t help but wonder if these explosions are caused by a civilization with god-like technology either wiping out intelligent life that they deem threatening, or performing the galactic equivalent of civil engineering.

[@Phosfit]

It takes longer to to travel through a wormhole for each additional atom being transported. The longer the wormhole is open, the larger the spacecraft.

[@WalmartBrandClothingItems]

Anyone else feel like there should’ve been another “again” at 1:11?

[@keatk_]

No

[@barrysmit5181]

Yes

[@dkmorris713]

Come again?

[@keatk_]

@@dkmorris713 no

[@AshishGautam-v5y]

Yes

[@KillianTwew]

What if one species got one of our messages while on a space mission, FTL communicated our coordinates back home (because our dumbasses gave em out) and now all the species across the univers out there with FTL communication sharing our coords. Their all taking pictures of us

[@LeonelLimon-nj7tu]

Those dang Alliens, they are trying to steal those Georgia Goddesses before us Mexicans do!

[@LeonelLimon-nj7tu]

My Peach Pies!

[@ruben3305]

It’s was Saitama fighting Lord Boros in outer space.

[@Appa-yi7yv]

Was searching for this comment

[@GMJ33]

skito posting but im like this has to be space travel and quick space travel , its like were looking at someone search history (never look at another mans portal gun history) LMFAO

[@up4discussion660]

NASA should try to reflect the LFBot back towards it in case it’s some cosmic search party from a galaxy too distant to study

[@omgahandlelol]

In a dark forest, that's the last thing you'd want to do

[@up4discussion660]

@@omgahandleloltrial and error

[@DeboraHolland-ei2yq]

​@@omgahandlelol I say go for it

[@NothingverseOfficial]

LF Bot explosions are up to 100 times brighter than supernovae, and their bursts quickly fade within a few days, unlike supernovae, which take weeks or months to dim.

[@voornaam3191]

Yes, time is weird, too. That is another video.

[@oxydoxxo]

That sounds pretty good I'll have one of those

[@InternationalDonDadda]

I immediately think of 3 Body Problem

[@GhostDrummer]

While I’m absolutely horrible at math, I understand that math is able to explain stuff that’s beyond my comprehension; but in simple terms, how exactly we are able to know about all of this? I’m not asking for someone to breakdown this entire video, but I’ve always wondered how we are able to decipher all of this information when observing the universe through telescopes.

[@hydra6076]

34:00 wait what I’m so confused where the idea that it was tuned by a super magical conscious being even comes from in this situation? Doesn’t that just bring up a billion more mysteries. What is this being made out of? How did the being come into existence? How does any of that shit work?

[@hydra6076]

Oh noooo.. I’m just realizing he keeps bringing up a magic deity as a equally reasonable theory to things we don’t 100% know :(

[@BOBLAF88]

Should try just one detector on one slit,the other slit would be detected by default🤔

[@ssaiyyrissssuzzuyyaa]

Oh that, nahhh don't worry about that it's just Broly wiping out star quadrants! He doesn't know where we're at...yet.

[@DJChesley]

I'm trying to wrap my head around this double slit in time experiment but the animation has me confused... The animation shows that it's a single laser pulse that is just alternately reflected in time. As in the indium tin oxide Was just switched on and off with the same single pulse consistently flowing not too pulses.

[@DJChesley]

After watching it a few more times I think that the animation is incorrect. It shows only a single pulse being fired... Love your channel anyway though! It's what I fall asleep to! ;)

[@jochenwagner2782]

Puzzle 5. Jumbo. See puzzle 1. Z-pinch star formation. Thunderbolts project or See the pattern channel will help to understand

[@kakhaval]

at time 13:55 would that movement of two stars be visible to eye and within few seconds. I am asking that because I witnessed such event in the sixties but I am not sure how could it be so visible knowing the limit of speeds and the distance between the two stars.

[@skintech8620]

I understand your question and have an answer for you: You Cray-Cray! 😁

[@camatrusaca]

11:39 there's a space war going on mate

[@andysully46]

I would say that our universe is in a never ending cycle of destruction and creation, and we just happen to be in the cycle that has the right conditions for life

[@Kenny-tc6rg]

The light of the stars we see are old photographs of a light long extinguished. How many million/billions of year's ago did these flashes occur?

[@jeromezelinske1763]

Energy weapons from intergalactic battles

[@erraticdesigns9038]

the blue glow and radiation align with a nuclear reaction, I would say a massive one, perhaps it is a neutron star that met its end somehow, while highly unlikely, there has got to be a way that a neutron star can be destroyed, in the process, I would imagine that the destructive force would give birth to a fresh batch of atoms, which in turn releases a massive amount of radiation across the entire spectrum, due to the large scale of the reaction.

[@tcf70tyrannosapiensbonsai]

Just living in a Universe that is onviously existing due to very unprobable coincidents isn't proof, that every possible alternative is taking place. I find it rather strange, that it's possible to make a living of such esoteric questions. The other thing, that haunts me is, why the double slit experiment are always illustrated with infographics or lasers or explanations how to count a single photon without absorbing it.

[@adamduncan5371]

Theres somthing so familiar about quantum entanglement too

[@carefree002]

My head hurts…. (That’s a good sign of learning for me) I love these knowledge-headaches! 3 new things I learned from this video, I’m going to have to watch it 20more times

[@TangentX703]

The blue light could just be Cherenkov radiation with a gas cloud as the medium. I'm sure large scale electrical charges build up over time to cause an explosion compressing the clouds with its radioactive elements.

[@mlembrant]

38:50 i like how they added a human into this picture on top of the leaf.. so , like... we get it, it's us :)

[@cowboymaxwell]

goodnight everyone

[@GadZookz]

Is there any chance this could be a subsidyne gleure?

[@Joseph-z7s3b]

If you could somehow turn the entire universe upsidedown, you would be able to see that it says on the bottom "Made in China."

[@WallyMahar]

My God, would they kill everything in that galaxy?

[@LeonelLimon-nj7tu]

Super Symmetry was born when Atoms formed.

[@LeonelLimon-nj7tu]

Positions?

[@adamduncan5371]

Superposition

[@antoniobrajkovic1977]

Here's one theory Since dark matter is inverted, neutrons and protons are whizzing around electron nucleus so the logic implies that photons of the dark matter are some electrons in our universe. Since matter and antimatter are created after the big bang the probability of those being coupled on a quantum level is quite high.

[@WadeRussellRN]

All of this is just wronger than wrong. Back to the drawing board for you.

[@mikemm8549]

AAAAARRRGGHHH MY BRAIN!

[@GhostZeroGZ]

1:21:55 Your friend might just be a mooch then lol

[@sleepy4016]

Give me a case of beers and an oz of bud and I can crack all these problems on a weekend

[@Naidu-k8m]

We have endless enigmas about so many things on our planet that have never adhered to long enough for some serious results. And even more of the same out there. Ever wonder why !? Simple reason being religious disturbances ?

[@MimanshaTiwari]

Is the thumbnail reused? I've seen it before

[@boost1606]

There is a a video called light is weird that uses a similar thumbnail

[@davidwillis5016]

Thanks

[@fastmadcow]

29:00 I lean towards a creator in this way. Respectfully and I understand everyone else’s views. The thing that gets me to why I believe this way is that we are so much of an inconsistent chance that we should actually be completely impossible. The rest of observable universe is also telling us this. We are one of a kind and nothing else exist but this little blue marble. At least that is what is to be believed based on God’s word. I just ask you respect my view. As I love Astrum as much as anyone else, this content really is amazing and I love learning more about this universe we live in.

[@andrewprettyquick2070]

In tandem with many others I figured out the pioneer acceleration anomaly. That might be a few million people but hey.

[@Wholesomecontent789]

The universe is a battle royale we just in the farming phase

[@skintech8620]

I thought the Universe explained it to you already! It can do what ever the "Big Bang" It wants!

[@janekalbinsky]

I don't say it's aliens, but... Trisolarans, maybe? 😂

[@richschmitt100]

You have a very nice soothing voice. What nationality are you, just curious?

[@angus6678]

His name sounds very irish

[@bearb1asting]

Lmao. This guy. Pressure.

[@LowerCasement]

There's a lot we don't know out there still.

[@ratbullkan]

It's mind bending if I anthropomorphize the quantum and think of it as a unit which can store information and behave with due regard to same information, and furthermore suppose that before it can utilize its information it has to acquire it first for example through probing or communicating. And the probing process interferes with the probing processes of quanta units of different identity. Entanglement fuses two quanta with different spacetime coordinates, as it were, to one multilocal or multitemporal object which splits apart again when it exchanges information with some non-entangled quantum. (All the while entanglement is not always total but instead more than two quanta can be alltogether partially entangled while all their entanglement adds up to 1 full instance of entanglement.) That's a lot of made up assumptions stemming from common sense which make it look so weird. Yet I'm struggling to picture it without those analogies. I find the probing/stretching-out-its-feelers analogy in particular very intriguing to work with. So he mentions that the quantum may take in consideration all its possible paths and then choose the one that's fastest, or offers the least resistance, i.e. maximizing or minimizing some consequences of whatever kind. I find that thought really, really intruiging. At first, of course, I thought, it's our/physicist's common knowledge that, while the quantum is drawn towards said optimal path, it deviates from it according to the probability function, and if the function has multiple identical values, it chooses one of them at random. But then consider this. What if it's not random. If - like the experiments suggest - when (before its alleged collapse or choice) it goes through all the possible choices with all their consequences, goes trough every single calculation, maybe it doesn't just take into consideration the path from emitter to detector, but in fact ALL its possible word lines from the beginning of its existence to infinity, as it were, if THEN it maybe does really choose the overall, for example, fastest path, which is exactly one... then it might appear as if it randomly chooses to deviate from its optimal path, but in fact it does only now, so as the deviation in some way results in a huge path optimization in the far future or past. Because it knows. Furthermore, because the quantum is connected to the whole visible universe in this way, since on large scales the universe is pretty much homogenous, it's this fact that translates into the smooth probability function, the bell curves, and most notably the perfectly random directions of radioactive emissions etc. A possible prediction would be, if we measure the probability distributions with sufficient precision and resolution, (which might be technically inpossible yet), they should project on for example the mass distribution of our universe or the microwave background. It would be a completely deterministic clockwork (again). I'm quite confident that this is not true, but nevertheless a thrilling scenario. Edit: Oh and it would solve quantum gravity because, while a massive particle is wobbling around with its impulse quantum fluctuations, when it's "stretching out its feelers" into all directions, in direction of curved spacetime cavities there are more possible pathways to explore than in other, flat directions, so it's biased in its "fluctuation choices" towards the cavity but, yeah, probably bullshit.

[@jochenwagner2782]

Puzzle one. The bright flashes. As these just exist in empty space between two galaxies and in spiral arms and happening really fast it might just be a phenomenon known from a plasma lab. A z-pinch is a plasma instability in a birkeland current. If there's enough matter around it gives birth of stsrs as seen in star birth regions where stars form along the visible filaments in these plasma clouds. If there's not sufficient matter to compress enough matter to a point, you just get the bright flash of the shortciruiting currents. If it is a birkelland current interconnecting galaxies the first short-circuit may not have enough current to neutralize the charge in one flash as the ion density is not supporting the required current. Then you may get repeating similar flashes ... like in a usual lightning strike. Puzzle two. There's no dark matter required. Just do not ignore that maxwells equations function in space. Everywhere this "experts" of physics in the "Queen of science" they measure magnetic fields. What is the only thing that can cause them? An electric current. These "experts" are using kindergarten speech like "solar wind". A solar wind is composed of moving charged particles. The definition of an electric current is: Moving charged particles .... You see there's a coincidence? If these "experts" finally understand plasmaphysics and electrohydrodynamics they will fund out, there are no black holes. They are plasmoids. These have such strong magnetic field, they can bend the orbits of BIG moving charged particles like a star just by it's magnetic field. The plasmodid spits out two beams of particles perpendicular to it's plane .... in the lab as in the core of our galaxy. As there's no cosmological constant required we do not need to talk more about. Even the big bang might never happened as redshift ir occurring in the lab by different plasma phenomenon. Measuring a distance might fail completely because of these ignored redshifts. This explains the impossible big giant stars. We get a wrong distance measure and calculate a fully wrong size of the star. The ever-growing findings of galaxies that are literally too old to exist are one of the hundreds of successful predictions of the electric universe community. As they do not work with hypothetical non existing unscientific stuff like dark matter or dark energy, but using real in the lab reproducable physics their predictions for each new mission of NASA, ESA & Co become better and better, while the "experts" always state their suprizes by the new findings. We did know Pluto has mountains before the pictures where shot. We did know and WARN Nasa, that deep impact will create a flash such bright that the picture will be just white. I in person warned the ESA that their fridge shaped lander will bounce of the comet where they tried to land. We did all know JWST will produce hundreds of findings that do not fit in the model an we even specified which findings .... These "experts" of nothing still ignore the Electic universe model and keep continuing to remodel their not working models while we becoming better and better in our predictions. It remembers me to times of Galileo Gailei 😂 These "experts" made their big bang to a religion and ignore everything and everyone which falsifies their holy model.

[@jorath9644]

sometimes i wonder about the "information" cant travel faster then light part lets say you have a endless train that's running with light speed along tracks, would have the tracks on cogs that then rotate with light speed. while in the endless train you have a conveyor belt rotating with light speed, delivering a letter towards the front of the train... how would you not be able to have information travel faster then light? (i know its weird but you get what i'm saying)

[@KarolOfGutovo]

You wouldn't be able to have physical objects move at lightspeed at all since any mass would result in infinite energy/need infinite energy to accelerate to lightspeed. And once we start getting int relativistic speeds like this Newton's equations stop being accurate, and stuff like 0.9c+0.9c≠1.8c are a result of spacetime dialation iirc. There is a... mi uyephysics I think? Video that explains how that specific phenomenon works. Also, FTL information would break causality (something could be caused by an event that has yet to happen)

[@Robert_McGarry_Poems]

1:00:30 Light has no experience of time. So what we see as photonic transmission is literally the probability that something that does experience time will interact with it before its predetermined destination. You said it's like pinching the ends of strings to create standing nodes. Because beginning and ending are the same thing relative to the photon, but what does that mean for the wavy part? If time disappears for the photon, that means distance also means nothing as it would need to reach infinite distance if it felt no time. But we see it pass through both time and cross distance. What does this mean? We see the emission of refelcted information striking our input sensors. That means we don't see photons travel. We see what information they have reflected off of, as stimulated signals. Light fills its space because of probability. This means we only see what we are looking at, when we look at it... intriguing. We are looking into pure probability. How does that become? There must be some form of causality that cascades through entanglements. But also that doesn't guarantee locality in all directions, only at the moment of cascading. Which seems to imply some form of quantum Darwinism or retro causation for massless particles. Maybe light doesn't move. Mass moves. Being bounced around and animated through multiple photonic stimulations. We perceive this as light moving through time instead. Causation is, therefore, the speed at which mass interacts due to this larger interaction in the photonic probability cloud. How then could this be mapped back to the concept of spacetime.

[@FirestormX9]

Light has to move, the photons literally travel. Otherwise there should be photons everywhere all the time. But there would be 'dark photon' spaces as well in timespace. The photonic speed is not the maximum speed. It is not the probability which determines its causality. Even if there were absolutely no observers, the photons would still be travelling indifferently.

[@voornaam3191]

Yes. Or no. Pick one, and sleep on. Or start answering all your questions. Pleaae do it yourself, please do not ask all those todler questions in a public place? Or is everybody here thinking teet for tit, now?

[@alexskillz45]

You pretty much got it correct. Our reality is as real as a dream is. All is light and light serves its observer. All light comes from one source, itself. The light itself has been bouncing around for a long time creating a cluster which became conscious of itself and eventually divided itself into conscious beings which were able to MAN-ipulate the light as a mass. "Man" (not male) and reality are a symbiote. We were born together. There is much more light, the world is bright white with it. We only see a portion of it as a frequency or a sequence, Fibonacci, The truth starts with the eye. ALl eyes are round, as well as camera lenses. Fibonacci, from "Y" perspective , is a vortex, or one can even call it a pillar. Like looking into a tunnel, Fibonacci naturally gives us sense of depth perspective as well as time. Fibonacci, from "Z" perspective, is a relatively straight line, like the world around us that individuals can see. It curves rapidly on a graph like the Horizon does to the eye and ends and the repeats itself like the days and night and all of time. The rainbow is proof of this.

[@jerrysolonsmith8471]

Great.... Space lightning...... Something else to be paranoid about

[@andysully46]

What if energy density decreases over time, causing the intense conditions directly after the Big Bang where nothing can form and causing the collapse of the universe back into a singularity at the “end of time”, then trampolines, causing a cycle of universe creation and destruction

[@LeonelLimon-nj7tu]

Static Energy when the Universe was just a infinitesimal cloud of dust.

[@Djdjrkejcjfjf]

Sorry that was my bold head reflected by the led light ....

[@paranormalbirdman]

only the first 20 minutes is about this new phenomenon!

[@zoranskibalatski]

In a universe with an unlimited number of possibilities,THIS has to be ONE of the possibilities. And it is?

[@ElternLetsgo]

Personal Timestamp: 19:43

[@antwan.]

it's relatively general, that general relativity is relative, generally...

[@Meinstein]

I may be missing something.. but why couldn't light be made up of particles that travel like waves of particles?