even the grade 6 student will understand this, very nice to have on this network
@davidchang58625 ай бұрын
It is really a waste of time and money paying for school fees. Just KZbin and there you have it. Better quality explanations complete with sophisticated animations and a deep, sexy voice. Bravo !
@IsaiYuno2 ай бұрын
I think its a bot. But true
@AhmedSamy-ll5si2 күн бұрын
I love this voice over so much
@Fizah6v3 ай бұрын
the most useful and most understanding video for meh on this topic ❤
@philipwilkie32397 ай бұрын
Kirchhoff was one of the under-rated figures in science history. It was these first systematic rules defining how electricity flowed in basic circuits that changed electricity from a curiosity into the ubiquitous tool that it is today. For certain there are other figures - Maxwell the most notable - that made essential and magnificent strides, but these basic ideas of Kirchhoff laid the foundation.
@buffplums28 күн бұрын
This is an excellent tutorial many thanks.
@aasaithambi87587 ай бұрын
Please provide more videos as beginners like will learn more from that. You are wonderfully great teacher of electrical theory. AwAiting for more videos please
@Profmad7 ай бұрын
Thank you, I will
@crystalmacau4 ай бұрын
You video is fun to work with thank you for your clear explanations💞💞💞
@chrisposiquit23133 ай бұрын
very clear explanation. thanks for your very helpful videos.
@maruthalakshmit9a65829 күн бұрын
That was very clear, thanks a ton😊
@kabandajamir98447 ай бұрын
The world's best teacher thanks sir
@youssefadam51863 ай бұрын
Nice animation. Great content. Bravo 👍
@Savage-lx5yj7 ай бұрын
Clear and concise! Excellent 👍
@kgomez51046 ай бұрын
He making nose se at all this why he on KZbin explaining the current across can't be the same dumbass that's what the resistator is for
@kgomez51046 ай бұрын
To fucking regulate the flow of energy so one side can't be giving 12 volts of you want to regulated unless you have a transistor you just probably never worked on circuit
@ivegotpetercriss5 ай бұрын
when he says DONE at 8:01 i felt that
@AdeoyeBukola-b6k3 ай бұрын
True
@aryanchhillar53205 күн бұрын
24:00 you changed the battery sign ..
@Krawdad-k8n2 ай бұрын
I don't understand why is the equation 5- equation 4 multiplied by two? and why is it multiplied by 29 and (3I+10I)? Minute 22:11
@Bereket-ow1ky6 ай бұрын
Great explanation + great animation = greatest video,it is better than all videos in Kirchhoff law Thank you 👍👏
@Profmad6 ай бұрын
Wow, thanks!
@mkepler58614 ай бұрын
you obviously weren't watching very carefully, he made two mistakes!!!
@kebugcheck7 ай бұрын
you're so helpful...thanks!!
@UcoK00072 ай бұрын
Thanks a lot, Sir Shanilka
@Düttürüdüt17 күн бұрын
beautiful video
@subatomicparticle6535Ай бұрын
At 6:43 if there is "0" volts at point D then how can current flow with no EMF to create/cause it after that point. Doesn't the wiring after point D also contain some resistance that would require some voltage to be consumed all the way back to the battery. Kirchoff's law being the sum of all the voltage drops will equal the source voltage.
@andyz11573 күн бұрын
Need to show calculation part of voltage and current 😊
@UNIVERSESOUND2502 күн бұрын
i got problem so when there is rise do we put negative sign or it is positive sign
@SelindaThomas2 ай бұрын
well explained. Thanks🙏
@Ben5-uf5tg7 ай бұрын
in the last example you changed the direction of the voltage source with 0.5 volts which messes up calculations. otherwise great content
@jeewakanuwantha75617 ай бұрын
Same problem to me
@MarkBinalasi6 ай бұрын
You are right 👍
@filyz942 ай бұрын
at 22:10 number 2 come from where? "2" x eq 5 - 4.
@manjeerapalagummi4964 ай бұрын
Please upload thevenin and norton's theorems
@UcoK00072 ай бұрын
Sir, why at the example no. 02, the source at right side, before the + on the top then at the second you made it to be - on the top? Could you explain it to me Regards
@SajeduzZaman-kh1rm7 ай бұрын
22:09 can you explain why you used 2×(5)-(4) equation. Why not (5)-(4).
@RadiantMeteor-y4n4 ай бұрын
That is to solve the algebra. It is not a physics question, it's a math problem
@PrincessaRatty2 ай бұрын
It's like the elimination method in simultaneous equations. He twice both equation for them to be the same number to cancel it , I think 😊
@nacirasebsi18697 ай бұрын
Thank you so much teacher!!🙏🙏 Sorry teacher at: 4:40 of this video I1=0.3A I2=0.6A Excellent lesson👍👏👏💯🇩🇿🇩🇿
@I_love_electricity7 ай бұрын
5:29 Something isn't right. Sould the fraction be 3 over 40?
@whoopsie21227 ай бұрын
In that area he did not use ohms law. It just means that the value of Rt1 is equal to 40/3
@crystalmacau4 ай бұрын
Its right when you do the algebra :) Because 1/Rt=3/40. So you have to rearrange to find Rt. Thus Rt= 40/3
@I_love_electricity4 ай бұрын
@@crystalmacau There was something I missed and thank you.
@tritomvanherk5187 ай бұрын
Very well explained thanks.
@MehilaTahaYacineАй бұрын
23:46 you changed the positive side of the 0.5 battery.
@lorenknox762 ай бұрын
Thank you!
@Aggy-c4q6 ай бұрын
how come the voltage at point C D is 6.7v? if you sum up the voltage drop for the circuit i.e 2.2v +9.8v+6.7v it will be more than the supply voltage which is 12v.
@muftahibrahimsahoub34977 ай бұрын
Thanks so Much pro mad its very good information and good intimation withe video
@geraldwellem26962 ай бұрын
U are making my life easy.. Do you have those notes or slides?
@KananBehera-q5k7 ай бұрын
Thank you so much sir ❤
@zaktrinkle14253 ай бұрын
Why did you multiple equation 5 by 2?
@surgingcircuits69557 ай бұрын
At 4'13", why wasn't Rt = ((R1*R2)/(R1+R2)) enough? Thx.
@surgingcircuits69557 ай бұрын
Nevermind, thx. Another video filled the info holes.
@gorang_vashist3 ай бұрын
for example, if same question came in MCQ type exam , and my current values are negative then how should I choose correct answer ?
@siddharth5448Ай бұрын
It simply means that the assumed direction is wrong & not the value. If your calculation is correct just go with the +ve option
@robertlinder64147 ай бұрын
Flashback to high school electronics shop
@PrinceMatladi-w4h5 ай бұрын
Salute 🤝
@jondoe34567 ай бұрын
How did you get 40/3 for your answer?
@crystalmacau4 ай бұрын
Because (1/Rt)=(3/40) So you have to rearrange to find Rt (solve for Rt using algebra). Thus Rt= 40/3
@davidf90626 ай бұрын
21:40 WTF ! You changed the sign of 7i2 ! But how ? Very confusing.
@lubbers715 ай бұрын
was also confused but the sign should be +7I2 (in the first equation)
@Wil_Bloodworth7 ай бұрын
I wish I "got it" but this was really confusing. I will have to watch it again and see if it makes sense the second time. I think it was all of the reused label names that is confusing.
@drmindbender86167 ай бұрын
Current draw
@whoopsie21227 ай бұрын
@Wil_Bloodworth Don't just watch it. Solve the problem to understand it better because it's really confusing when you just watch it.
@crystalmacau4 ай бұрын
I pause a lot, and use several study aids this being one of them. The more and more you hear the words slowly slowly it will click. I also draw EVERYTHING
@stanfordkoga-zs9nh4 ай бұрын
Thank u
@DrakeLarson-js9px7 ай бұрын
This is Great!
@BurRun-kt3tf7 ай бұрын
Thanks អរគុណ❤
@GiC77 ай бұрын
Thanks
@Bob-dx9ve3 ай бұрын
DONE!
@juancarlossaavedra67577 ай бұрын
@1:29 there is a big mistake ! electrons have a negative charge so the current should flow in the other direction ! !.
@Bedfford7 ай бұрын
yes, but in the video the current is in the CONVENTIONAL form, not the REAL. For almost all cases, the conventional flow work just fine.
@VinceVILLEGAS-w1r3 ай бұрын
asa ang sign sa resistance?
@farhans26507 ай бұрын
Make a video on MOSFET
@thandintsizwa56392 ай бұрын
Please make a video on MOSFET
@oliversalvador86947 ай бұрын
Current flow from negative to positive
@SelindaThomas2 ай бұрын
Current is the flow of elections, but current and electron flow in opposite direction. Current flows from positive to negative and electron flows from negative to positive.
@wimharter6 ай бұрын
Current travel is negative to positive
@siddharth5448Ай бұрын
No, Current flows from positive to negative
@معكتاب2 ай бұрын
9:09
@SatExam-gl9eq3 ай бұрын
calculate the law
@IrtazaShahid-v4f2 күн бұрын
in Q4 voltage is 2.9 and your approach seems a little wrong in that case.
@mkepler58614 ай бұрын
it is quite obvious you know this material very well, but at 15 minutes the Loop 2 is not a circular current path. it is only from top down. another problem is at the 21 minute problem, on the left side of the circuit, you used conventional current flow positive to negative. but on the right side you use electron flow from negative to positive. sorry MAD, but you can't have current flowing in both directions, no bueno, I'd like to see you talk your way out of this one. you may have made this cake, but the only way you can eat it is to admit your mistakes or if you can answer my questions why you are right I will give you a sub and thumbs up. mike but I don't this that's gonna happen!!!
@JakeGamiao2 ай бұрын
Yeah. We have the same observation bro. @ 21:40 He said loop BCDB but presented 29 = V3 - V2 and ultimately ended V3 + V2 = 29 as as the 3rd equation... HOW DID HE DO THE MATH in this part...it shud be noted that + or - signs denote the direction of current... HOW COME mike seemed to have neglected that theory????😂😂😂 Your presentation does not seem to be helping mike!!!! on the contrary YOU ARE CONFUSING visitors of ur video.
@subatomicparticle6535Ай бұрын
@@JakeGamiao Good on ya Jake I just posted the same and wanted to see if someone else also picked this up. How does 29 = 3 I3 - 7 I2 all of a sudden miraculously with no explanation now become 29 = 3 I3 + 7 I2. They both cannot be correct. Equation 3 looks correct based on solving that loop which I called CBDC starting just after the battery + using the direction of current flow and not his arrow direction opposite to current flow and how he solved the first loop ABDA. My question is what practical application would you put 2 independent power sources in a circuit like that. In electronic equipment AA, AAA, C, D batteries are installed + to - to multiply the voltage output. I never seen anything + to + or - to -!