[CoH3][DAK v UKF] Propagandacast

[@Propagandacast]

Some dak on brit action with a few surprises tossed in for todays episode! Support the Propagandacast by donating via paypal.me/ImperialDane Thank you for the support!

[@zbigniew2628]

I wish you casted game vs Alpenwell, coz it was similar, but he went for 2 bikes Bersa strat, with PZ III spam. To bad that it happend a days later and update broke it :P

[@buivietdungtran3065]

2 Pdr gun MVP :D

[@isaiahsmith6016]

I'm not expert but I think Enemy should've gone for pz.3s and trying to close out the game earlier whilst he still had superior map control. Waiting around for the Tiger just let Zuntew grind himself back into the game.

[@zbigniew2628]

PZ III can not zone out mathilda when there is so many AT. The only right call was to get a flak 36 / 88 and then some flanking tanks with artylery cover, with some atack on base.

[@georgfischer2328]

Funfact: DAK player has 80% of the map the whole game, still has his heavy tanks much later and his Tiger gets hardcountered by 1 Pak (!) and later on the second Tiger by 2 Medium Tanks... It really hurts to see, that UK player gets away with ignoring left side of the map the whole game. We definitly need some changes.

[@columfrank8111]

DAK player’s build order got countered and threw his tiger away. No MG, no AT, and no assault grenadiers against a heavy infantry Matilda build.

[@georgfischer2328]

I wonder how long an MG would habe survived against a matilda. Thats basically 2 shots. And honestly, the strategy from DAK didn t get countered, UK simply always plays that way and wins with it: Cars early, sells them, adds Aussies and Sections plus Pak. 100% strait forward without having the map and stilleasily winning...

[@Kamfrenchie]

@@georgfischer2328 i find the brits a bit too strong, but going for 3 jaegers is not a good move. Paks are less exenpensive and can actually damage matildas sometimes, plus iirc it's less bleed and upkeep.

[@georgfischer2328]

Yeah, the 3 Anti Tank infantrie was definitly not good. 1 is enough and a pak has to be added. You still get overrun by the matilda though, it ll crush the pak. The 17 pounder pak is still much too strong in terms of range and penetration.

[@columfrank8111]

It’s been awhile to see UKF.

[@Propagandacast]

It has

[@jdude2175]

Very nice predictive play from Zuntew. He bunched his stuff up a bit though despite knowing about the artillery cover ability, though Enemy’s activations of it were a bit trigger happy without coordinating them with big pushes. Leaving pjagers in front of the British tanks also bled a tonne of manpower given their high reinforcement cost. Would have liked to see something other than the tiger though, could have gotten double stugs and a 3rd unit just to give him some field presence and firepower for the same cost

[@met2002]

Enemy stuffed it up by going Tiger. I just got out of 3 games straight of my opponents gunning straight for tiger tanks as both USF and UKF. Iv won them all. Its literally a horrible strat in 1v1 unless its your 2nd or 3rd vehicle. All they are doing is letting the allied player recoup and come back. The dead give away of no tanks after 15 or so mins is a tall tale sign of your opponent is banking up for a tiger so its easy to prepare for just like how Zuntew did it.

[@jdude2175]

@@met2002 Yeah totally agree. Tiger rushes almost always give up more initiative than they're worth and the lapse in pressure gives your opponent plenty of time to prepare