PROSECUTOR *GETS OWNED* HILLSBORO, NH POLICE GET CHECKED W/BONUS FOOTAGE *JUDGE MAKES ORDER*

[@umeng2002]

Any prosecutor who thinks a law can override the 1st Amendment should be fired and disbarred.

[@giosuegenovese313]

14th amendment violation too. Come on. Someone press PCC PRIVATE CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS of Title 18ss 242, Deprivation of Rights under COLOR of law on these home GROWN anti constitutional rights Terrorists 😊

[@wmb5240]

Very spiffy Press NH!! Well done bro..

[@nocommentz8178]

The judge tried to override his rights by denying him to publish future BWC videos. She is a traitor too.

[@DuaneK-us2pv]

@@umeng2002 Here's the revised stipulation: _Stipulation:_ As an American citizen, claim designated beneficiary, in the state of Arizona and sister states in harmony, I, Duane Kirkland, assert that the Fourth Amendment protects me from unreasonable searches and seizures, including the demand for identification without probable cause or a warrant. I stipulate that: 1. The Fourth Amendment guarantees the right to privacy and security against unreasonable searches and seizures. 2. The demand for identification without a crime being committed or probable cause violates this right. 3. Law enforcement officers and government agents are sworn to uphold the Constitution, including the Fourth Amendment. 4. Failure to recognize and respect this right constitutes a violation of the Constitution and my rights as an American citizen. _Important Distinction:_ I do not claim to be a "sovereign citizen," as this term has been misinterpreted and misrepresented by some authorities. Instead, I assert my status as an American citizen, claim designated beneficiary, with all the rights and protections afforded under the Constitution and laws of the United States. _Statement Clause:_ For clarification, the term "sovereign citizen" has been incorrectly associated with anti-government extremism. I reject this label and assert that my claim as an American citizen, claim designated beneficiary, is grounded in a legitimate and lawful assertion of my constitutional rights, distinct from any extremist ideology. _Legal Case Laws:_ 1. _Terry v. Ohio (1968)_: The Supreme Court established that police may briefly detain a person for questioning if they have reasonable suspicion, but this does not extend to demanding identification. 2. _Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial District Court of Nevada (2004)_: The Court ruled that police can ask for identification during a Terry stop, but the individual can refuse to answer if they are not informed of their rights. 3. _Brown v. Texas (1979)_: The Supreme Court held that a person's refusal to provide identification during a stop does not constitute probable cause for arrest. 4. _Kolender v. Lawson (1983)_: The Court ruled that a California statute requiring individuals to provide identification during a stop was unconstitutional, as it violated the Fourth Amendment. Please note that this revised stipulation aims to clarify and distinguish your claim as an American citizen, claim designated beneficiary, from the misinterpreted label of "sovereign citizen."

[@DuaneK-us2pv]

@@umeng2002 Here's a legal office determination for the stipulation of legal terms and charges: *Legal Office Determination* *Case:* Breach of Fiduciary Duty and Abuse of Delegated Power *Stipulations:* 1. *Breach of Fiduciary Duty:* The respondent has violated their fiduciary duty by ignoring their oath of office and failing to uphold constitutional rights. 2. *Abuse of Delegated Power:* The respondent has abused their delegated power by acting ultra vires and exceeding their legal authority. *Charges:* 1. *Malfeasance in Office:* The respondent is guilty of malfeasance in office for willfully and knowingly violating their oath of office and constitutional rights. 2. *Perjury:* The respondent is guilty of perjury for violating their oath of office and providing false information under oath. *Legal Terms:* 1. *Ultra Vires:* The respondent has acted beyond their legal authority and violated constitutional rights. 2. *Misconduct in Office:* The respondent has engaged in misconduct in office by abusing their delegated power and violating their fiduciary duty. *Recommendations:* 1. *Removal from Office:* The respondent should be removed from office for breach of fiduciary duty and abuse of delegated power. 2. *Legal Sanctions:* The respondent should face legal sanctions for malfeasance in office and perjury. *Signed:* [Your Name] *Date:* [Current Date] Please note that this is a sample determination and should be reviewed and modified according to specific circumstances and jurisdictions.

[@SilkyJonson]

This is the most heroic thing I’ve seen a person do in a long time. Maybe one day everyone will realize that the fight for freedom is happening in corrupt courtrooms across the USA, not some far away country.

[@justingelinas6881]

Man you have balls. Calling that officer out about his house was hilarious! Thanks for showing thats its possible to stand up to the big man

[@RobBunney-pu2rc]

Indeed! Calling out the loser about his house had me lol.

[@mrmotofy]

Many of them do it all the time. In TX it's actually a statutory crime to name police. A dept filed that charge on James Freeman because other commenters listed the officers on his videos LOL

[@goodcitizen1611]

“It is hard to imagine a more stupid or more dangerous way of making decisions than by putting those decisions in the hands of people who pay no price for being wrong.” Thomas Sowell

[@kennethpucser774]

Yes I agree

[@douglashoward9616]

He is soooooo right.

[@RobertJones-er4hi]

They just don't care about right or wrong the law or the truth.......

[@Roboticdoughbull3k]

We just need to see Terry v Ohio overturned, & the statute of qualified immunity as well then we'll have fewer videos but much even more interesting. Great work they did here regardless winning is winning.

[@CUGS2009]

Welcome to North Korea.

[@tcarp8499]

Many years ago my college professor said there's nothing more dangerous than an idiot with authority. Still true unfortunately!

[@UnkleRuckusNoRelation]

Just look at Joe Biden he has weaponized every form of law enforcement he can.

[@goldenstateofmind4153]

Absolutely my friend 👍

[@maximilianescobar3564]

Amen to that brother ......

[@velo3334]

Lots of truth in that statement.

[@jerriporter5500]

Good one!!!

[@JS-pe7uc]

Body worn cameras should be immediately available to the public unedited. Their purpose is to not only document interactions and evidence, they are also for documenting the actions and conduct of law enforcement employees for professional and public scrutiny.

[@isthattrue1083]

Well I can understand redacting addresses, phone numbers, and names of victims. You have idiots that will use that to attack people.

[@AmericanPatriot447]

I agree in principle but there are rare incidents where police are trying to locate a subject and the premature releasing of the footage puts the public in danger, so a delayed response is warranted. But yes I agree overall.

[@JS-pe7uc]

@@AmericanPatriot447 that rare instance doesn't justify police desire to delay or obstruct the acquisition of body cam footage. In many states the public also has powers of arrest and detention

[@volodyanarchist]

Google Glass got cancelled. Nobody actually wanted it.

[@dillondiemert4401]

They are available to the public.

[@wayneharwick5856]

He does not even have a attorney and he is kicking this prosecutors ass that is hilarious

[@Sylviajohnson88]

Most attorneys are actors ....for real. Acting on your behalf, supposedly. Yeahhhh

[@jeffhatmaker817]

I know...he's fearless. Trash talking the prosecutor before and after court like a gangsta...😅😅😅

[@ralphbrandsma7143]

Love you for what you do !!!!

[@rizz_the_dog]

This guy reminds me of myself. Except the screamed at the judge also. I embarrassed 4 prosecutors. By the time my case came to trial I have 3 prosecutors step down for misconduct and conflict of interest.

[@zebrazilch7249]

Yes he is a force to be reckoned with. I bet his life is littered by a trail those that have tried to get in his path when he knows they are wrong and and they push their luck trying to show they are right and superior.

[@871jamie]

They can’t stop the publishing of public information, the judge does not have the authority to silence the press.

[@thomaslascola9683]

Actually a judge I believe is the only one.. i.e. can make recording not in court or to allow it.. also what was granted was future obtained body eorn camera footage he cannot publish it going forward.

[@jeremy_trent]

They did, though...

[@sergeantmasson3669]

@@jeremy_trent LEGALLY, they can't.

[@davidt1621]

Yep. That same NH statute which the prosecutor referenced §105-D:2 also clearly outlines the fact that it's the law enforcement agency's responsibility to ask the victim of a crime whether they have consent from them to record their image, and if not, it states that they are required to blur out their image as soon as is practicable, which means as soon as they can get back to the police station to do so. It's not the responsibility of the people they disseminate the information to. If anything, the prosecutor is providing evidence that the police department broke the statute. Either he's truly incompetent, or he expected the Pro Se defendant and the Judge to be incompetent and tried to bamboozle them with a false interpretation through omitting the relevant parts of that statute in court. I can tell you this; if it was me in there, he'd be feeling every bit as incompetent as he sounds. And the Judge would be ticked off at him.

[@Etantrick]

​@@sergeantmasson3669 Take it to a higher court and see what they say.

[@sabrewolf4129]

Imagine the number of innocent people this Persecutor has sent to jail.

[@elohimsoldier3028]

Prosecutor are the most soulless people on the planet

[@Charles-oo8bq]

Absolutely ​@@elohimsoldier3028

[@rebareyes6595]

Hundreds of thousands

[@debbiegwinn564]

First thing I said

[@SirNic4180]

And your community allowed it. Tell the whole story Karen 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@michaelmason9822]

Police all over the country will tread on constitutional rights because they are not held accountable the majority of the time. Good job Marc.

[@chrisbudesa]

There is a national movement underway to end qualified immunity.

[@John-ow2mw]

LEGALIZE FREEDOM, END QUALIFIED IM.UNITY AND DISAVOW TERRY AND MIMMS STOPS.

[@sannytizer7772]

So why doesn't marc try and get the immunity law changed, he's an idiot if he thinks he'll win otherwise, they'll get him for something so many times that he'll end up in jail, as someones breakfast.

[@k.k.9571]

@@sannytizer7772yet he’s still free and publishing videos.

[@sannytizer7772]

@@k.k.9571 Assholes always get wiped.

[@Tortomus]

The prosecutor was visibly shook

[@gonesville6873]

Cop looked like he was going to cry

[@TheOleOtter]

Lol dude spent thousands of dollars to get busted up by a dude in a wrinkly ass suit.

[@1billiedale]

I thought he was stirred.

[@stephenmlangeni1243]

It's so nice to see a citizen standing up for their rights

[@TheSecondWitness]

Dude, quite honestly you are amazing. The level of what you are doing is off the charts. Thank you for putting these tyrants on notice, and educating the world.

[@noclue30]

100% agree

[@louskunt9798]

I agree!💯💯💯

[@toomanydonuts]

Damn impressive! Professional AF

[@videowatcher3843]

Anytime I get an alert for a dma audit that is automatically the first one I click on!

[@joeblow2069]

Keep at them Mark. America needs people like you. Shocking that this is happening in a state whose motto is live free or die. 🙄

[@Views965]

Live free or die…. But you better not put window tint on your car or else we will ticket you. You don’t have to wear your seatbelt though.

[@jays106]

@@Views965 or wear a helmet on a motorcycle. we stopped adhering to the live free or die along time ago

[@Views965]

@@jays106it’s not even a motto anymore it’s just something to put on a license plate.

[@tnasituning8173]

Very sad isn't it! If we have to change the State "Motto"... People Will be VERY UPSET!

[@tnasituning8173]

​​@@Views965countless times... Or how about the "modified Exhaust" BS... When majority of the Time they never even use a sound decibal meter 12-15" away at a 45° angle at 3000 rpms to see if the exhaust is over 95 decibels! Also the terms "Aftermarket exhaust" and "modified Exhaust" are 2 different things! NOT THE SAME! As an aftermarket exhaust is not a modified exhaust, it is ONLY Considered technically as an "Aftermarket exhaust" If you read the law it states that a "modified Exhaust" pertains to the stock OEM exhaust that has been "modified" from its original, unaltered ORIGINAL EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURING process! An "AFTERMARKET EXHAUST" that they sell right over at AutoZone is manufactured and approved for sale... It doesn't become illegal untill it has been "modified" itself, or outputs noise levels above 95 decibels... THAT IS FACTS! But cops either don't understand this and do the investigations not correctly because they just see a nice shiny stainless steel exhaust, so presume it to be illegal! WHEN THAT IN ITSELF DOES NOT IN ANY WAY SHAPE OR FORM BY ITSELF TO CONCLUDE SUCH A DETERMINATION!, or 2.) they know the law but think people will be stupid enough to just pay the fine, so they get their brownie points! People get Stainless steel Exhausts because they LAST SO MUCH LONGER TO THE WINTER ELEMENTS then the OEM stock untreated steel that rusts out every few years... Like my friend had a Ford escort and had to replace the exhaust every year or 2 because the OEM manufactured stock exhaust was so thin and bad quality that he had NO CHOICE but to go stainless steel and the exhaust is still fine till this day!

[@addison1856]

I had no idea you went to court, you got me helping you now! Thank you!

[@dakz2033]

Abolish qualified immunity for the greater good of the people! Notice how ashamed they are when you call them out! Shame on them for being like that.

[@Community-Action]

Also, abolish civil asset forfeiture, abolish internal investigations without public oversight, make it a crime to turn off body cameras, make it easy and cheap for citizens to obtain all records.

[@joeymerrell8585]

And absolute immunity for prosecutors and judges

[@dsprg]

Make it a law to honor their oath, and adhere to the clear punishments they'd all be more than guilty of at this point....see how the legislators really work for the people🫣

[@PedroAlvarez-rn2bq]

Lawmakers corruption+ title 18 section 1983+1985 conspiracy of Right ( government 4 the people? Prision industry+ prescription drugs industry+ homeless people+ made by house Representative 435/////congress 100/// + u got the traitor.

[@bobbyhempel1513]

​@@Community-Actionit should be free for us to obtain all records as we are already paying the employees that will be getting the records for us and we also paid for the paper, the computers and every other thing involved in creating and keeping those records.

[@Boblawblah229]

It’s nice to see a judge that just does their job the way it’s meant to be done.

[@Seawhaleorgonite]

quite rare indeed.

[@Boblawblah229]

@@Justice4all_001 of course, just saying more often than not they pretty much do whatever they feel like in cases like this.

[@volodymyrbuchak1852]

She knows she’s been recorded. Looks like a perspective to become a next social media star in negative tone is not in her plans. 😂

[@mathew8581]

@@Justice4all_001expected but not normal

[@Zazu1776]

Amen to that!

[@justice6436]

Thank you for Fighting Tyranny ❤

[@mrmister385]

Hey Marc, I'm a fellow Vet living in NH. Please put Hollis NH Town Hall on your list of audits. I just had an awful, disrespectful experience there. Especially from Donna Setaro in the Building/Code enforcement section. She wont let you speak, barks orders and wont let you 1 foot inside the office. I"d bet she calls the cops within 1 minute. Served for 24 years. Thanks for your Service man.

[@chucknorris277]

Mason chief is a tyrant also. Don't hire an older attorney if you get into shit. All older attorneys are corrupt to the bone and will take your money and fuk you over

[@Some_Guy6]

So, she's a massive Karen on a power trip? Let's do this!

[@ErikHeimdallr]

Thanks for your service, brother. I served US ARMY 1984-2004, 12B5PS.

[@ronaldlawrence3999]

Any judgment against future publishing of BWC materials, which are actually and technically public property should be appealed, we the taxpayers own the property we pay for!!!😡

[@jfmauto]

Thank you so much for educating these people.

[@jamesstone2849]

Interesting ho "ignorance of the law" is no excuse..... unless you are paid tax dollars to know and enforce it.

[@matthewh8573]

How does the court not have authority to make you take down footage but seems to have authority to ban you from publishing future footage. That doesn’t make sense.

[@brettlawton9513]

Exactly, that makes absolutely no sense whatsoever 😂😂😂😂😂😂

[@tonycardone990]

It's to make unnecessary jobs for more tax dollars to be wasted on.

[@johnlagreca6288]

"Don't do it again, or else.."

[@skillethead15]

They don't have the authority to censor public information like this. Judges just have stupid judicial immunity so they aren't afraid of making an unconstitutional judgement like this. If Press NH files an appeal on this judgement he would win. They can't tell you what you can and can't do with public information. That's the government completely over stepping their bounds.

[@johnlagreca6288]

@@skillethead15 It was interesting hearing the banter about the information being the "Property of the Police department".

[@mervyngreene6687]

I crack up whenever I hear a police officer say: "don't tell me what to do?"

[@JessyFinch]

We are their boss . They need to obey .

[@EugeneMenard]

That was pousland.He was an officer at NHSP.unforturnatly,for him,he's now a court officer and apparently in your previous video He didn't treat you respectfully.He was a awesome guy when he worked for the prison.Did his 8 and hit the gate kind of guy.i was there 20 years and the whole time i cant remember him EVER writing an inmate(or officer for that matter)up,for anything.was an easy going guy.looks like when he retired in 21' He became a court officer for Hillsborough County. Excellent job representing yourself in court,I've had to do that a few times myself,for felony's and when your charged w anything in NH, sometimes it's very hard to get a fair shake.you did a very professional job,I'm impressed. Keep up the good work,Respects- 🔪☠️🍻♻️😁

[@JohnBrandt-fk4zt]

@@mervyngreene6687 it sounds like you get pulled over alot. I drive taxi . In the city of Winnipeg and I drive about 16,000 km a year and 7 months of that in -35c weather and 2feet of snow on the street with ice. I got the most good points available to earn in Manitoba. So really I don’t have much dealing with cops . You get pulled over a lot then hey? And what do you cream your jeans when you deal with police 👮‍♀️! It sounds like you really enjoy it. Me I got different and better things then deal with cops cause they’re pricks. I don’t know why anyone would want to waste their time with cops instead of your kids and grandkids. But you’re pretty young and immature .. it sounds like

[@JohnBrandt-fk4zt]

@@mervyngreene6687 you like bending over or the the other way? Just Asking?

[@westcoast1axxx]

Brother, watching you in court vs the hack prosecutor was inspiring. Your preparation & knowledge of the law left that ambulance chaser looking like a novice. Well done & please know that so many of us support you. God bless….

[@louskunt9798]

Don’t forget to call the prosecutor and remind him how he got spanked. I sure have. 🤣😂🤣

[@louskunt9798]

@@SiberianHusky666 um, no. Only one of the prosecutor’s motions were granted, and rightly so. Even if he graduated at the very bottom of his law school class, he should’ve known better than to bring forth any motion that the law did not support. Reading the law is easy, but clearly he isn’t very smart. He 100% lost by losing ANY motion against someone who has zero formal legal training. Marc spanked him so hard and now every other attorney within that prosecutor’s circle are looking down upon him for his buffoonery. That’s how it works. I’m not even an attorney, but I was a LEO for 28 years and even I know better than to bring those silly motions forth that the loser prosecutor brought. Stop licking boots already and be a man, bro. No need to defend corrupt prosecutors. I speak from 3 decades of experience in government when I say that almost all prosecutors are the worst and dumbest attorneys that can’t hack it in the private sector. That’s why they work for the government for pennies on the dollar of what REAL attorneys normally earn. They’re uninformed, unintelligent and are true liabilities to the citizenry. Even us cops don’t want to deal with them. But I absolutely respect your opinion, regardless.✌️

[@matthewa.8546]

Oof. Not really. That said, the prosecutor acted in such bad faith by even trying to bring this motion, it didn’t take much to heart him.

[@michaeltrethaway]

How is that people that train, study, practice and enforce the law are so clueless about it? This is a nationwide problem. This is like a kitchen full of cooks who can't work the stove. Edit: How can the court order Marc not to publish Hillsboro PD BWC on any media in the future? I think this needs to be appealed.

[@crispy9175]

It's intentional

[@interestedparty00]

That was the WEAKEST prosecutor we’ve ever seen. The stupid prosecutor actually thought he could get body camera footage removed from the internet???? Good grief. If that was the best he could do, then this entire case is going to be a cakewalk.

[@interestedparty00]

I’m concerned that the judge thinks she can prevent BWC footage from being uploaded to the internet in the future.

[@viralsheddingzombie5324]

If the BWC footage is part of a pending criminal case, it can be excluded from the public...until the case is decided.

[@Sarge395]

Which is why we always need to be recording@@viralsheddingzombie5324

[@theaccentedguy1505]

Love it. You who's not a prosecutor knows way more than this actual prosecutor. Absolutely love it😂😂😂😂

[@garygray2078]

Love how you document the entire process.

[@laurielangford9423]

I am so impressed. Must feel good to go up against those tyrants in the manner you did. What a wonderful job on this and all your videos.

[@Dennis-pq3rc]

Awesome. This is how we all should handle these cases . This guy is awesome . Good luck people

[@dabadore.]

This is why I subbed to you. I'm tired of all the "we have to be nice" when being nice got us where we are now.

[@watershed44]

@dabadore BINGO! I see way too many auditors who are being civil to tyrants over and over again. LIA is a big one.

[@sslerlin]

Technically that body cam is public property, take it to a higher court. It is not police property

[@davidlenzi3551]

The assertion that the BWC footage is public is in fact backed up in that a FOIAct/FOILaw form must be filed in order to obtain any public document this is referred to as a Public Records Request.

[@PremiumUserUltra]

​@davidlenzi3551 indeed but the govt will never sue itself unless it's a political move

[@chrisbudesa]

Different states have different laws regarding FOIAand BWCs

[@davidlenzi3551]

@@PremiumUserUltra That Statement is the epitome of stupidity. No government is ever going to sue itself. Why? Because the applicant and the respondent cannot be the same entity.

[@terrysullivan9091]

You are truly a great American!! Please continue to educate we the people and exposing the corrupt government officials in this country!!!

[@ahveamstad2480]

So... it's illegal to publish public records?

[@Ceecee-xr9vz]

That's what the Bedford county, TN jail told me when I called to check on an inmate.

[@idaslpdhr]

NO you can publish it's Public record

[@ahveamstad2480]

That's kinda my point. The prosecutor said in court, out loud, to the judge, that the body cam footage he posted on KZbin is "property of the police department "

[@WorldwideDarts]

I'm guessing that's more of a copyright thing? Which is odd because it's PUBLIC record. I don't understand why a citizen wouldn't be able to publish officer bodycam videos. They're all over KZbin. This needs to be taken to a higher court. @@ahveamstad2480

[@kevinhoye2920]

​@idaslpdhr well not according to the court because she JUDGED he CANNOT PUBLISH FUTURE BODYCAM FOOTAGE

[@andykrueger7564]

Even if you get the case dismissed nothing will happen to the criminals that tried to throw you in a cage unlawfully

[@kingwoodguyatgmail]

Do Prosecutors have qualified immunity? If the charges were found to be unlawful then you can file petition to ask for qualified immunity to be revoked, on the basis that your civil rights were violated, right? Go after the arresting officer personally. Prosecutors should be personally liable also!

[@mohammedhosein5210]

In the eyes of the public, they look like scumbags that don't deserve any respect .

[@matty11311]

​@@kingwoodguyatgmailprosecutors and judges almost have absolute immunity

[@wessutton4560]

@@matty11311that’s a misconception. Once they act in violation of the law they lose their immunity.

[@VIP-603]

I have to admit that I have not been watching your videos for awhile…. Luckily I found this one! This follow up in the court put you back on my radar. Great job and much respect. I’m back in your lane

[@mongo6043]

Judge granted #3 because of the wording. You cannot upload any HPD "OWNED" material in future. What you uploaded before was public record and Discovery for your own defense, making it, as we all learn by following you, your property!! Thanks for recording and sharing this with us! You're regular Audits are great but it's nice to see the courtroom sparing and behind the scenes follow ups as well! Great Work Patriot and your friends who had your 6 whilst doing it! p.s. Thanks to all the people around the country that called in and redressed any concerns/grievances to all Gov. officials involved in this matter.

[@vex4444]

Ah that makes sense, thanks for clarifying. This was quite unclear.

[@allendefoli8630]

Great job, proud of you man. Keep the good work

[@ElmshornBoy]

It is good to see a judge listened and then decided. Freedom of press is most important. I am a German and can tell you freedom of press as constitutional law kept Germany from 1949 a democracy.

[@anobjectivereview]

The whole idea of the Bill of Rights was to support a citizen's right to their respective freedoms, even though and especially when it's in direct conflict with what the government wants. This is truly a kangaroo court!!!

[@dennismood7476]

Not really. The judge ruled AGAINST the prosecutor and FOR NHN. How can you say it's a "kangaroo court" ? Maybe you were not paying attention to the end of the video where NNH now said the judge ruled in his favor or you don't have the attention span to get through it all.

[@JimWhelan365]

@@dennismood7476No, the prosecutor won. Did you read the judge’s ruling? Press NH Now just said he won. Hopefully he will appeal.

[@Balmighty1981]

Glad to see you won in court you did really well in front of the judge !

[@buttonsf3293]

What did he win? "Order the Defendant not to publish any Hillsboro Police Department owned BWC video on any electronic media forum in the future." appears to be a loss

[@Sylviajohnson88]

Great job. You are THE Man! Thankful for a decent judge also. But you did great.

[@neilhaslam]

I am impressed with the more popular you have become, you still kept to your original demeanor...dont back down. But i also can tell you have taken each situation and learned from it. Keep doing what you do and stand up for all of our constitutional rights

[@TERMINAL-BALLISTICS]

Absolutely outstanding job representing your own case! 🔥 Much respect sir!

[@JimWhelan365]

@TERMINAL-BALLISTICS: You understand that the prosecutor won, right?

[@UnknownHumanOnline]

​@@JimWhelan365No he doesn't and don't care either. This is their hero .

[@blznft9513]

​@JimWhelan365 Hey Jim, I see just made that account 15 hours ago. How's the donuts buddy?

[@JimWhelan365]

@@blznft9513lol - I’m not a cop. In fact, I support Press NH Now and other auditors and encourage others to do so. I actually read the ruling and wanted to correct the record. The judge handed down a ruling that was as pro-government as she could make it. I hope Press NH Now hires a good lawyer, appeals this ruling and wins. The ruling sets bad precedent for auditors.

[@valiantgold442]

Can you put the full onm. So we can zoom in

[@TheNicki2020]

Wow! You are beyond awesome! Thank you, for all you do! ❤

[@truthjusticeintegrity]

No one is safe from a judicial system that is not anchored to Truth, Justice and Integrity. Thank you Press NH for your service to our community and country.

[@truthjusticeintegrity]

I think Paper Ballots is the bigger issue.@@treschou6695

[@andydidcott]

Press NH Now, you are the boss, putting these corrupt clowns in there place is good to see, keep the vids coming please.

[@kenshepherd7168]

This is just beautiful, thank you for all your work, better than most lawyers. It was brutal on that that guy will never recover, what a joke ar a lawyer.

[@crispy9175]

It's insane that this is even before a judge at all.

[@raccuia1]

All this over someone recording with a camera in public. If he had walked into the pubic place with a gun where there is open carry they probably would have even opened the door for him. But a camera. Oh my gosh, he's got a camera. Quick run, call the police. SMH!!!

[@crispy9175]

@@raccuia1 it's sooooo revealing too. That the camera is what scares them... a device that captures events as they actually happen. So much easier to falsify a report than rebut video evidence in court.

[@Some_Guy6]

@@raccuia1 You forgot about their security cams going 24/7.

[@falseprophet1024]

If the court lacks the authority to remove a video, how could they possibly have the authority to preemptively remove videos?

[@bryanw5983]

A Protective order is about proscribing present & future conduct. So she is effectively issuing an order to not violate NH RSA 105-D, with Judicial consequences if you do. For the video already on KZbin, just a guess, and completely spitballing it, but I bet it is because of the form the Prosecutor chose to push this issue. He asked for a protective order, which are handled by District courts all the time. He is now asking for "relief" in a protective order which I have never seen before - proscribing past conduct. Still, be careful - what the Judge did was lay out a roadmap for the prosecutor to go to the correct court with a proper motion to get the relief he seeks. Normally, I'd say that this particular ship has sailed so he would probably forget about it, but while I know it's fun to publicly denigrate & humiliate bad public servants, it also motivates them to be as vindictive and petty as possible. If the other person in the video is alleged to be a "domestic violence victim" or "witness" the prosecutor's move in Superior Court would be a slam dunk. All they have to do is claim it whether it's true or not at this stage.

[@David-p9o6g]

It's sickening how low these public officials will stoop to

[@davesanders9203]

WOW! You did an amazing job in court! Keep up the great work!

[@luppe77]

Absolutely perfectly executed ! Thank You Sir

[@perropulgoso3351]

The corruption is just mind boggling.

[@crashman5555]

And remember....only one not getting paid to be there, is him. He has to spend money to be right.

[@sammatsusaka823]

Much RESPECT to you and those who go after these TYRANTS.

[@davidlakes5087]

That judge had no basis for ordering you to never publish video in the future. She should have denied all 4 prayers. She’s not the honest actor that you think she is.

[@houseofwonders1]

If the first bodycam video is legal then the next videos will also be legal

[@kevincaldwell7431]

You’re a LEGEND in your own time…….YOU ROCK THEIR CASBAH! Bravo!

[@eleonj87]

I love this channel. You sir are a straight boss. You represented yourself well in court. You were fearless and focussed. You looked like a well polished attorney. Great work!

[@JimWhelan365]

But unfortunately he didn’t win.

[@azuth11]

Its obvious to anyone that legal documents use unnecessarily unclear language to justify the salaries of lawyers.

[@mustaffa1611]

check out some of these questions from this court script I got: Is this ticket consistent with the Texas constitution? Yes or no. [There is most likely going to be an objection, calls for a legal conclusion, the witness is incompetent to testify! I ask for all the legal opinions to be stricken, including the ticket.] [If they fight and object to the previous question without declaring the cop incompetent] Did you file an invalid ticket? Yes or no. Would you knowingly file a ticket that was not consistent with the Texas constitution? Yes or no. Is this ticket consistent with the Texas constitution? Yes or no. Is there a victim? Yes or no. Have I been accused of violating someone’s rights? Yes or no. If yes, can you identify the right I allegedly violated? [To clarify, was it some one’s right to life, liberty or property?] There will also be an inconsistency with the ticket where no victim is noted. Did I violate the judge’s rights? Yes or no. Did I violate the police officer’s rights? Yes or no. Did I violate any of your rights? Yes or no. This civil action does not involve the alleged violation of a legal right? Yes or no. How does someone acquire standing in a civil case? Then please explain how the alleged plaintiff has standing to complain against me. Is your purpose here today to protect rights? Yes or no. Didn’t you already state the ticket is consistent with the Texas constitution? Yes or no. Please take judicial notice of article one section two of the Texas constitution. “All political power is Inherent in the people, Government is instituted for their equal protection…” How is this ticket consistent with the Texas constitution when article one section two states the Government is instituted for their protection and you’ve said I am not accused of violating any one’s rights? Would your [the judge’s] actions and orders be valid if you [he] did not have jurisdiction over me? Yes or no. [This question proves the RELEVANCE of the following questions. That is why I ask it. I may have to come back to it.] Does Mr. Judge have jurisdiction over me? Yes or no. [If objection] Did you bring this ticket to this court? Yes or no. Do you understand the nature and cause of the charges and proceedings you instigated against me? Yes or no. Then tell me, does Mr. Judge have jurisdiction over me? Yes or no. Is that an arbitrary opinion? Yes or no. So it’s based on facts currently within your knowledge? Yes or no. Who provided those facts to you? Are they on this ticket? Yes or no. So if I asked for the facts proving where, when, why and how you acquired your alleged jurisdiction over my life you could provide it? Yes or no. Do you know and understand what jurisdiction is factually? Yes or no. Factually what is jurisdiction? [Legal opinions, basically anything beyond CONTROL over people and property, is NON-RESPONSIVE, I OBJECT and MOVE TO STRIKE.] Is jurisdiction control over me? Yes or no. Do you exercise control over me? Yes or no. Factually, how was your jurisdiction, or control over me, acquired? [I never accept the spewing forth of political gibberish here.] Objection, Non-responsive, move to strike. Does your control over me depend on my freely given consent? Yes or no. If I don’t consent to your control over my life and property you’ll back off and leave me alone? Yes or no. My consent to your control over my life is not required? Yes or no. Would it be accurate to state you acquired your control over my life violently? Yes or no. [This has to conflict with the previous question] So your control over me is based on your coercion? Doesn’t control imply ownership? Yes or no. Didn’t you state I had basic human rights? Yes or no. Can you please explain to me how I have basic human rights that you respect while you take control over my life and property without my consent? Is the judge a party to these proceedings? Yes or no. Relevance was established earlier when told I’m entitled to a fair meaningful hearing, conflicts of interest. I’m not a lawyer, I don’t understand. Are you [state attorney] a party to these proceedings? Yes or no. Is he a witness in these proceedings? Yes or no. Are you [state attorney] a witness in these proceedings? Yes or no. Is the judge permitted to offer testimony against a party? Yes or no. Are you [state attorney] permitted to offer testimony against a party? Yes or no. What prohibits you both from testifying? May both of you disregard that? Yes or no. Would it be a fair hearing if either of you did? Yes or no. Who does the judge represent in all of this? Who do you [the judge] represent here? They may say: “I’m the judge.” Remember, explanations about the job or title are NON-RESPONSIVE i.e., I make decisions, rulings etc. That is NON-RESPONSIVE, move to strike, I know what your title is, I need to know who you represent here. On whose behalf are you appearing today? The judge either represents the “state” or he’s there on his own behalf. If he represents the “state” or the “people of the state,” then he represents the plaintiff. If there on his own behalf, then he may not claim the “constitution” as so-called “authority.” If the “state” then there is a conflict of interest. I’ve already been told I can’t get a fair hearing if there is a conflict of interest. If you don’t represent anyone and are appearing on your own behalf, then you are here on your own authority? Yes or no. How can you be here pursuant to the “constitution” and at the same time be here on your own authority? If you are here pursuant to the “constitution” then how could you not represent the “state,” the plaintiff? What is the nature of your [the cop’s] relationship to the judge? [Any type of relationship would imply a conflict of interest] If there is no relationship then why is the judge holding me to answer your complaint? Please tell me why that is not a conflict of interest. Is it still your opinion you [or the judge] have jurisdiction over me? Is your opinion you have “jurisdiction” arbitrary? So it’s based on facts currently within your knowledge?

[@Atrides0777]

It also justifies the 200k spent becoming a lawyer.

[@pagliaccisghost269]

Now what the people need, is a rich First Amendment auditor, that goes after qualified immunity instead of cash settlements. We need some auditors that will NEVER settle...💪💪💪❤️🖖✌️

[@jonathonmcglew4992]

Good for you bro! I live in NH and alot of public areas are becoming more restricted.

[@JeffCrow-l3t]

You're an absolute BEAST Brutha. I love your audits and assertiveness dealing with our corrupt public officials. Thank you so much

[@tamtam9179]

Great job I really enjoyed the show and thank you for standing in the gap for our constitutional rights if they violate one person's constitutional Rights they violate everyone's constitutional rights.❤

[@chuckjones3516]

It’s funny they want the public to obey the law but not obey it themselves wow.

[@salis-salis]

it's (unfortunately) become a feature not a bug... but with dedicated people like Press NH maybe we can start turning this thing the right way: the We The People's way!

[@shadowbeast2276]

That's because their Sovereign citizens/ they're above the law. They're not paid to enforce laws. They're paid to generate revenue for the city and enforce feelings/ comfort/ policies that, either don't really exist, or only apply to the workers

[@AVRWorks]

Criminals never pay any mind to the law. The cops, and the judges are all buddies in beating the hell out of their neighbors, the public. We are sick of it but they are still playing their sneaky games. They, in the system, who are acting against us, know exactly what they are doing and they KNOW they are doing wrong. I have never seen karma escape any of us.

[@1951rlc]

It's sad that prosecutors are willing to take these type of cases to court in an effort to circumvent the first amendment right of FREE PRESS. What a blatant assault on our rights, and an egregious waste of tax payer funding!

[@hobodarkness7696]

Thank you for your service also thank you for taking this all the way to court some auditors dont go all the way to court and i appreciate that you do

[@jimmyrecinos0621]

You can tell NH is tired of this bs, gets old super quick

[@kittyhawk7060]

Are you talking about Press NH? or the state and its goons?

[@alanlykins4181]

The order says you can't publish, but it doesn't say anything about your friends. One of the outer doors to the courthouse was locked--this is a fire hazard and should be reported to the fire marshal immediately.

[@ZsasiZen1]

Its not the auditor’s behavior that causes the calls and emails, it’s the behavior of the cops and civil servants that people are responding to.

[@drummersnare6276]

People always say not to represent yourself in court, but if you actually know the law then I think it’s fine

[@UnknownHumanOnline]

Yeah. Prosecution won though

[@ChoppedSteak]

No, it isn’t fine lmao

[@nder]

Lawyers, generally speaking, know the law, and never, ever represent themselves, even in their areas of expertise.

[@coolcreamykiwi]

Pro se'- NO way, there are hundreds perhaps thousands of little trap doors in the law, without a degree you will never know them all and get severely brutalized. Is it possible to prevail, of course, but in general its a very bad idea unless you are a self absorbed egomaniac.

[@mikhaelis]

It's not. I represented myself pro se in bankruptcy court and stood in Opposition (objection) to a creditor's attorney's malicious request to remove the stay of proceedings regarding a foreclosure until the bankruptcy case was settled. Even though I pointed out all procedural errors her motion had which by law would render that entire motion null and void he ignored it. He also ignored the substantive elements where her motion was in violation of bankruptcy laws. Instead of denying her motions he scheduled an evidentiary hearing for six weeks later. Turns out she withdrew her motions , but still by law they should have been dismissed with prejudice outright. But as a pronse the courts think of you as a peasant and they don't care.

[@wrestlingfan2024]

They’ll find every excuse to be corrupt and to prosecute for constitutional activities.

[@user-mo8gw9om1z]

Thank you brother, amazing job. I've been screwed over by these people and they put my child in jeopardy. So grateful to see people and the Constitution be put first

[@salis-salis]

Love your work, keep it up! I'm not in or from your country but I thank you & everyone who stands against tyrannical government behavior in all of the (supposedly) free world.

[@toddguillory692]

The sheep will spend its entire life fearing the coyote only to be eaten by the sheepherder.

[@cramkisson9709]

​@@toddguillory692Never heard that before . Profound

[@toddguillory692]

@@cramkisson9709 It's deep...

[@fisch69]

Love it! The prosecutor is so used to breaking the law in court that he doesn’t hesitate to try even when being recorded!! This is such obvious corruption, this criminal should be in prison! Great job! Keep up the great work!!!😂👍👍👍💯💣

[@dennismood7476]

Unfortunately, being incompetent is not illegal. It's stupid, but not illegal. It is only a lack of responsibility by the town government to hire in competent people to do the jobs.

[@chucknorris277]

Hillsboro county is corrupt. From your defence lawyers to prosecutors judges ect. It's a big club and you are not in it

[@Downhill2024]

This made my heart happy brotha really cool to see you take it all the way.

[@NYBorn519]

George is absolutely horrible and is wasting the time and money of The People and The Courts! We deserve better than this in the prosecutors we employ.

[@bedpansniper]

There's a reason old boy George is a public prosecutor and not earning the big bucks in private practice, and I think we can see what the reasons are!

[@PremiumUserUltra]

I remember when I had the confusion that these people were honorable since they call them honorable judge and prose

[@dennismood7476]

I agree. If George was not as incompetent as he is, he COULD be working for a private law firm. The reason low class standing lawyers work for the government, is because the government doesn't really care about your qualifications, just that you can waste the courts time with BS that won't hold up on face value.

[@lindac6416]

Prosecutor should be fired because she should’ve dropped us and never should’ve made it to court

[@JimWhelan365]

@NYBorn519: You understand the prosecutor won, right?

[@brianmcgovern9005]

So cool Press! Good for you and I loved the bonus footage at the end especially! Keep doing what you do brother!

[@garyromeod8790]

My brother extremely impressive. Proper decorum, the language, the research, the discovery, the statutes. The presentation you are on point and I'm telling you. I've never studied law but I do a lot of research similar to you. I really appreciate somebody like people like us. That go forward and challenge. In a very organized professional and studious.Well researched way god bless you

[@err67803]

LOVE the way you talk to these prics. Tihs is how they need to be addressed.....

[@lf3566]

Wow you guys are good! Way to go keeping these criminals in check! Wish we had a lot more auditors that was this educated on the law and had balls as big as bowling balls!

[@MH-me9eh]

Thank you guys.

[@walterkapica6540]

Way to go. I wish more auditors with follow through.

[@Arkusthegreat]

Retaliatory arrest, tampering with evidence, derelict of duty. Disgrace to the badge.

[@jf8138]

This is a required action by the citizens, in order to prevent further corruption of the system. We cannot allow prosecutors to even think they are slightly above the law. It is that simple, it is purely holding them accountable.

[@edwardmikusek2307]

Mark,how awesome was this man!They will never learn!Good luck in court on the 3rd.Kick ass brother.

[@donaldhart419]

nice win, except for #3... I'm not sure even the courts have the right to limit your first amendment rights to free speech using information that is available to the public. I'd probably push to have that one fixed if possible. But great work sticking it to these people! Keep it up.

[@robertsims9791]

Press NH Now, you're an absolute monster. I'm glad that you're doing this for the rest of us. These tyrants must be kept in check. I support Law Enforcement 100%, but they must be kept in line and honest. Thank you for what you do. You're the absolute best.

[@neilcharles2520]

I hope that judge has protection,because these tyrants will do anything to harm anyone that don't side with them..

[@rustuslandon5612]

That judge looked SO HURT that he had to find you not guilty... As if he was appalagizing to the prosecutor...

[@BrianBrowning-g8y]

Seems that auditors are making some ground against these hillbilly court subjects....good stuff !

[@BouillaBased]

It's like everyone from the cops to the prosecutor just counts on everyone who gets cited or arrested not to know their rights, or how to read a law, and expects to just steamroll all of them without having to do their homework. Way to prove them wrong.

[@frederickwilliams147]

It starts with the corrupt judges!👿💩💩💩💩💩

[@Rainey973]

Byron Donalds imitators.

[@egSmith-sp9gl]

It's called corruption !

[@JS-pe7uc]

They sell out their own countrymen for a paycheck.

[@teeheehee4494]

You just made an instant sub, thank you very much. Unfortunately, we need police officers in this world, NOT ignorant, lawbreaking a whole ones.

[@paulmonin5215]

ALL the good officers are out fighting crimes protecting civilians. These are the cop gang trouble makers.

[@TheBPlotSource]

This was super interesting and educational seeing the court proceedings. Fascinating. Thank you.

[@TheBattousaiMedia]

Well done, brother. That prosecutor knows better and he deserves all the heat he's getting from this. BTW that 50 cent shirt is 🔥🔥🔥 brings back memories.

[@stephenmcgreevy9650]

The fact that they do not want any recording proves corruption will be carried out

[@gjayone]

Bro you’re amazing. I’m just learning about maritime admiralty law, the judge and the black robe, the policy revenue collectors etc. shitting all over our rights and the unbelievable DEEP rooted corruption in our “justice” system. We need MORE people like you.

[@JoanneTuinstra]

Ty for all you do

[@headbanger0653]

GREAT FOLLOW UP. THANKS FOR THE UPDATE. CANT WAIT FOR MORE

[@PennelopeWhitmore]

Wow! You were allowed to film in court ? Wow! Shes a darn good judge.

[@albeerobert]

But you have been ordered to NOT to publish any other Body Cam Video in that future. You should appeal that to a higher court at 26:03.