PTKM-1R Top-attack Anti-tank mine

[@kimsoon6927]

Can I program it so that it hits choppers and loud cars between 23-07?

[@cyberfox981]

Good idea for "Hackaday"

[@ZsXie10]

😂

[@natoisnazi]

You can😂

[@paristo]

This anti-vehicle mine is meant to strike roofs of the armored vehicles. Where PVM (anti-helicopter mine) is meant to shoot at the helicopters from the below. Those are similar, but they detect the helicopter from over 3 km range (and motor gliders from over 600 meters, drones from 200-300 meters) and use same way acoustic sensor to find a direction, and then IR sensor to find altitude and range. When the target enters to 150 meters range, the mine will start tracking and launches at it. If the target doesn't enter that 150 meter range but fly past 1 km from it, the mine will resume stand-by mode. The PVM can identify the helicopter type by the sound, so it doesn't engage a friendly helicopter.

[@kadoj]

Oh, for fuck’s sake, pleeeeeeeease do. And be quick about it, if you don’t mind. ‘Preciate it. While you’re at it, why don’t you also equip it with a vapor Blood Alcohol Content sensor so it will also be effective against drivers who are DUI, as well as Russian soldiers?

[@pteppig]

The mine always knows where it is and where the target is (where the mine isn't). Then it launches itself toward where it isn't, but where the vehicle will be. The mine knows where it was and where it isn't, subtracting both, it knows where it is. The difference between where it is and it thinks it is, is called deviation.

[@oceanboilmao]

The mine knows where it is

[@CrazyBader]

Kek

[@lgbtqisahategroup9781]

It isssss what it issssss

[@prjndigo]

Yeah, we know, we invented in in the 1960's. Muricah!

[@robert.m6755]

@@prjndigo link or proof. Otherwise cut the bullshit

[@jeanettewest]

Simply knowing this weapon is active in an area would add a pucker factor to any tanker. Even if it misses the turret roof, it would certainly severely damage whatever part of the tank it does hit. And the psychological value would be tremendous; that crew getting back to base and the word spreading....much resources would be devoted to "clearing" any intended route. Wicked.

[@myview5840]

Flood the area with noise

[@prjndigo]

Yeah, for tanks made before 1983... largely these are adjustable for use against personnel carriers and light vehicles - they're absolutely pointless against tanks that have been resistant to them since the late 1980s globally. But hey, if the entity that bought them wants to commit war crimes they can go right ahead and Rosoboronutsport isn't responsible, riiiight?

[@SergeiSugaroverdoseShuykov]

@@prjndigo you don't have a clue, don't ya? M1A2 and leopard 2A6 with 35-40mm roof armor can handle something like 14mm AP round from the top, anything with bigger penetration - won't give a shit about this 'resistance'

[@dominicmaier8885]

Hmm as slow as it fly's it will be easy target for tank anti air protection devices

[@uegvdczuVF]

@@dominicmaier8885 What are those "tank anti air protection devices"? The .50 cal? If you are talking about APS those don't defend against top down attacks and certainly not at distances where the mine is still undetonated.

[@doc7440]

M93 Hornet , are you ?

[@positiveandoptimisticvive7557]

This is a next level weapon...

[@SecurityGuy42]

This is a poor Russian copy of the US M93 Hornet AT mine which has been in the inventory for 25 years already.

[@dicecorporation]

@@SecurityGuy42 When and if Russia "copies" something, it's usually because it brings trash to perfection. Last time I checked the yanks never used it in combat, probably because it's about as practical as the Javelin on an actual battlefield lol

[@SecurityGuy42]

@@dicecorporation I must have missed the fleets of Al Qaeda and Taliban tanks...... Oh that's right they didn't use any so then no need for employing Hornet AT mines then. The Javelin has been used in combat in Iraq and Afghanistan and it is performing great against vehicles and bunkers. The Russian are going to find out within the next year just how well they work against their tanks. Here's a hint they are already worried about them, they have been installing sandbag roofs over the tops of their turrets. It's funny to see their tanks driving around with angle iron supports covered in sandbags about 1-2 meters above the turret. Or are they doing that for shade?

[@00-Dima]

Lol been around for a while

[@dicecorporation]

@E Van Just keep watching Captain Yankeestan or whatever his name is and please don't look up any reports on Javelin's performance in Iraq. It won't be good for your fragile little sanity

[@Markipedia]

I guess it should also be quite effective against active protection systems.

[@gregh9237]

efp are not affected by era

[@getsideways7257]

@@gregh9237 Everything is affected by ERA, just to a different degree. That said, APS has nothing to do with ERA.

[@gregh9237]

@@getsideways7257 sorry,I did not read the message carefully and I made a mistake, and yes it should also be effective against aps

[@gregh9237]

@@getsideways7257 however to say that esp are not affected by era is not a mistake, and only a little approximate, in fact they are very little influenced by the first generation era and are too short compared to the apfsds for the second generation era

[@getsideways7257]

@@gregh9237 They may be too short, but they are still affected - just like any projectile would be. But the sheer velocity is on their side, so there is a good chance of penetration.

[@ebek4806]

3:01 😲 Wow. That's all i have to say.

[@mr.normalguy69]

3:08 That is incredibly accurate.

[@rajdeepak5490]

I love the presenter man she is crisp n clear

[@prjndigo]

Looks a little like an older BTR tho.

[@Exige000]

She isn't a man, she is a woman - maybe you can't tell the difference.

[@SecurityGuy42]

So it took Russia 25 years to make a crude version of the US military's M93 Hornet Antitank Mine?

[@randomthot125]

Russia sell these weapons to America's enemies like a boss, stay mad.

[@SecurityGuy42]

@@randomthot125 And we sell weapons like Javelin and TOW Missiles to Russia's enemies.

[@randomthot125]

@@SecurityGuy42 Sensitive snowflake 🥶

[@becauseiwasinverted5222]

The fall of the USSR delayed a number of otherwise mature programs. The Soviets did have SFW/EFP technology in air/artillery weapons.

[@MichaelKing-tp6le]

Yes

[@natoisnazi]

A mine that can choose it's own target (only tanks or war machine. No innocent people). What a great design, Russia. 👍

[@ullrikegabler]

Now in the hands of ukraine hahahha Sold off to USA in exchange for better weapons.

[@aleks-rv9tg7bs8k]

@@ullrikegabler Don't lie, little liar, Ukraine has no such mines.. Fuck Ukraine 🐽🇺🇦💀

[@ullrikegabler]

@@aleks-rv9tg7bs8k it was left as a present by retreating and surrendering ruzzians

[@MichaelKing-tp6le]

America already has the m93 hornet this is old but new to Russia

[@aleks-rv9tg7bs8k]

@@ullrikegabler 380,000 exterminated Usrains and 800 of their American sex buddies, look at you with sadness and sorrow .. 🇺🇦💀🇺🇲💀😆

[@half-dead877]

Awesome. I'll take 6 of em.

[@chucksneed1264]

that's a very specific number

[@germanbricker]

How does the mine know there is a tank in 100 meter distance and not a truck, bulldozer or something like that? And what happens if someone forgets where the mine is or forgot to tell the trrops that they deployed the mines? can the mine distinguish between friend and foe?

[@udfty]

صوت الدبابة له تردد معين ورنين مختلف يمكن تمييزها عن باقي المركبات كذلك الاهتزاز الذي ينتج عن حركة الدبابة

[@skussy69]

Did you not watch the video or something?

[@pcpc7694]

is it possible to exchange it for Nutella?

[@MrOprawca1978]

This is the Motiw-3M homing anti-tank element from the 9M55K1 missile from the Bm-30 Smierch launcher, developed in the late 1980s. Only slightly modified, because originally such an element was released in the air and fell on a small parachute, looking for a target to be destroyed, looking for thermal traces on the ground, but when it fell to the ground, it became useless and self-destructing. Here, it was modified so that it works only after it falls to the ground, only then it becomes activated, and for the search for targets, it scans seismic data and when it detects a typical trace of ground vibrations coming from a passing tracked vehicle, then it jumps several meters into the air and attacks the target, same as the original Motiw-3M element, forming a cumulative nucleus in the air. This is not an epoch-making invention, but a modification and modernization of what was invented over thirty years ago. To jest samonaprowadzający element przeciwpancerny Motiw-3M z pocisku 9M55K1 od wyrzutni Bm-30 Smiercz, opracowany pod koniec lat 80-tych. Tylko nieco zmodyfikowany, bo pierwotnie taki element był uwalniany w powietrzu i opadał na małym spadochronie, szukając celu do zniszczenia, szukając śladów termicznych na ziemi, ale jak opadł na ziemię, to już stawał się bezużyteczny i ulegał samodestrukcji. Tutaj zmodyfikowano go tak, że działa dopiero po opadnięciu na ziemię, dopiero się wtedy uaktywnia, zaś do wyszukiwania celów skanuje dane sejsmiczne i jak wykryje typowy ślad drgań gruntu, pochodzący od przejeżdżającego pojazdu gąsienicowego, wtedy wyskakuje na kilkanaście metrów w powietrze i atakuje cel, tak samo, jak pierwotny element Motiw-3M, formując w powietrzu jądro kumulacyjne. To nie jest żaden epokowy wynalazek, tylko modyfikacja i unowocześnienie tego, co wymyślono już ponad trzydzieści lat temu.

[@TitusFFM]

Kto to orginalie produkował?

[@Bialy_1]

@@TitusFFM Pewnie Imperium z gwiezdnych wojen. Cały ten system śmierdzi zaawansowaniem którym Rosjanie nie dysponują, za to wciskanie kitu mają opanowane do perfekcji...

[@TitusFFM]

@@Bialy_1 moment myślałem że chiny są Nr 1 w tych klockach

[@DanHym]

@@Bialy_1 you are right. It s a copy of the M93 Hornet

[@jeffreyprezalar220]

Not new the us came up with the m93 hornet mine back in the 80's, this one is bigger but has less explosive charge which I don't get.

[@ArmorKingEmir]

imagine partizans with this. are you kidding me

[@lCooLRusHl]

these mines are thrown off by cluster blocks of MLRS "tornado" or its newer modifications, up to 10 pcs in 1 block.

[@jackuzi8252]

Very interesting concept. Given the limited range and large size, these would be vulnerable to enemy foot patrols (or hand-launched UAVs) sent to look for them if they were suspected in the area. If there's a lot of vegetation to hide them in they'd be ok, but in a desert area (which I'm thinking of because of the paint color) finding concealment might be challenging.

[@yigolaski08]

Probably it will combined with anti personel mines when it deployed instead of solo deploy

[@prjndigo]

They give a very very hard return to drone mounted SAR. They're as visible as a bleeding hard-on hanging out a bus window... only effective at letting you know a scouting penetration is about to happen or as a terrorist weapon.

[@uegvdczuVF]

This is not something you place and leave, you would put them in front of your own position and *only* when expecting an enemy attack. So if you have enemy patrols 100m from your position them finding a mine is the least of your problems.

[@rajatdani619]

U r correct, this has happened in Russo-Ukraine war.

[@SpinoDude88]

I mean you could hide some of the mine in the sand or use it near buildings in the desert, or other things even if it's big doesn't mean it will get spotted, especially because it's a light tan color AND these are probably going to be used more in places with better places to hide it.

[@rolandlee6898]

So how do I get one? Do you deliver by mail or... how does it work? Do I get to program which targets it can engage and what the activation threshold is?

[@prjndigo]

DHL

[@heypistolero]

@@prjndigo Ryder is the preferred delivery van for these type of things. At least in 1995 they were

[@1337fraggzb00N]

It waits until someone is near to watch and then it makes a backflip. This mine is the drunken Millennial of anti-tank weapons.

[@Gammaduster]

What would be the autonomy of this mine ? I imagine the batteries will eventually run out ? For those interested, I did my research, the self destruct time can run up to 30 days on the american version, the M93

[@Name-ps9fx]

Self destruct times can be set for 1 to 10 days

[@ilovepotatos]

This added range reduces the amount of landmines you have to use.

[@warrenpeas]

seems liek the next iteration is a switchblade type drone that sits unmanned on the ground waiting for a vehicle to pass by a sensor that could be miles from the switchblade. once the vehicle passes the sensor the switchblade is launched and find and destroys the target. 1 drone and multiple sensors could cover several square miles

[@tokomac7728]

Those explosion long ropes which explode 1m above ground clearing everything so by by any mines

[@mattilatvala4164]

Yes. 🤔 But if there is 100 km to go, that gets slow if these can be almost anywhere.🤔 Camouflaged. 😉

[@chucksneed1264]

yeah but you must follow the path of the blast exactly. these mines have a standoff range, they could avoid being cleared by a MICLIC

[@evanpilot]

@@chucksneed1264 Yeah, but the stand off range is only between 5-50 meters, and it must have an unobstructed view of the sky. Otherwise it'll hit what ever is over it.

[@agent-sz2qj]

video games developpers : right that down right that down!

[@mah6786]

And if you order now they'll even throw in a set of steak knives!

[@christhianurriola1620]

Woow😳😳no tenía idea de este tipo de mina antitanque

[@lifesso]

can you use this mine in special military operations too?

[@RainlineX]

right now

[@obey3086]

next level boomerang

[@aarrcchhoonntt]

Does it have anti-tamper? If a kid starts poking it will it blow up the kid?

[@jasonkeating9958]

Wow that is really slick I was thinking it would guide itself right on top of the tank I'm guessing that's an option or future option for target's further away

[@SecurityGuy42]

This is a crude copy of the US M93 Hornet AT Mine which has been in the inventory for 25 years already.

[@Trve_Kvlt]

@@SecurityGuy42 Imagine that, Russia not being able to come up with their own designs. Never saw that coming.

[@uegvdczuVF]

@@SecurityGuy42 This is the Motiv-3M homing anti-tank element from the 9M55K1 missile for the Bm-30 Smerch launcher, operational since 1987. So used for 33 years now. There is nothing crude about it. Learn about Russian equipment if you want to comment on it without looking stupid.

[@SecurityGuy42]

@@uegvdczuVF Maybe you should watch the video before commenting. She says this is a NEW landmine. NOT a homing anti-tank warhead from a missile. It also is not a Motiv-3M warhead. Do a search and compare the pictures of the Motiv-3M warhead to this mine, not the same thing. Next time watch the video before you comment and look like a idiot.

[@skussy69]

@@SecurityGuy42 lol you're the one who looks like an idiot

[@deadpoollee9497]

Couldn't you use speakers to activate it

[@definitelyfrank9341]

Then you're still dead (assuming you successfully activate it).

[@Blaster53]

This mine sents shivers down the spine to Ukrainian and NATO tank crew because Russia is de facto the most sophisticated and advanced armed force on the planet. While the USA was living in a dream of being invincible and indispensable, Russian very, very smart scientists and engineers were quietly developing full spectre of new ultra sophisticated weapons. This smart mine is activated between 50 and 60 meters away from the intended target which means that enemy tank crew has no clue that their end is very nigh. It seems to me that clearing minefield from such mines would be possible only with very large number of infantry moving through dense weed grass and shrub in line 160m shoulder to shoulder looking for the mines. You can imagine how long life span would be of these unfortunate troops? Better for Ukraine to recognise the reality and unconditionally capitulate and hand over all Nazi war criminals to face justice. Russia is truly great.

[@parttime9070]

That must be why Russia is losing every battle so far.?

[@Blaster53]

Sure, but I find it the most interesting and puzzling how on Earth losing side, as you said, occupied and is still expanding over 20% of occupied Ukrainian land? Maybe that is why mighty NATO is scared of direct conflict with Russia? Just asking.

[@brendonspeech4115]

@@Blaster53 look up hornet mine America already had this technology 40 years ago. losing half the territory you initially took while taking heavy casualties isnt winning. if your dumb enough to think russia can take on nato when it can barly fight Ukraine I'm afraid i can't put the little wheels back on your bicycle for you

[@socialghost4400]

Will this keep my neighbors annoying cats out of my yard?

[@akosmaradi5281]

No, but it will put them into your yard :D

[@becauseiwasinverted5222]

only effective against Leopards, not other felines. sorry

[@skussy69]

Nah, just get chickens/quail/random birds to keep outside in your yard then you're legally allowed to shoot whatever cat comes onto your property. A .22 break barrel air rifle is a good choice

[@barrefarre8133]

price?

[@josephlieberman3027]

Researching an unrelated topic, battery chemistry, lead me to mention of some devices which have long service stand by batteries which are constructed so as a glass ampule contains electrolyte and when needed it is broken and only then begins the degradation of energy source, ensuring ready batteries even after long storage duration, I would hope that russian designers employ countermeasures which discourage attempts to tamper with, analyse or reverse engineering,

[@AlexKarasev]

2:30 I'm mildly annoyed that the entire thing was clearly spray-painted fully assembled (microphone grilles included). That's pretty shoddy. On the other hand, it's clever that the mine chooses to only attack vehicles that cost as much as itself or more :)

[@mattycakes1161]

Ah so it's like the Hornet mine. Cool pieces of technology.

[@denispol79]

А вы почтой посылаете или у вас есть курьеры?

[@halfonso_0871]

It is interesting, but ¿How many can you manufacture per day? The strength of the mines is the ability to cover large areas quickly, cheaply and efficiently. Yhis one looks efficient, quick enough, but so expensive. I personaly preffer traditional mines.

[@liliethcameron7110]

This mine reminds me of the Swedish company' Bofors Bonus top attack artillery cluster round.

[@jean-lucpicard3012]

Just in time for Christmas

[@wanjevi]

No work able the light infantry ahead of the tanks will locate it

[@Archer89201]

The mine field will also have anti personnel mines and most probably will have machine gun pill boxes covering it and have artillery zeroed in to pin the infantry down. Mines are not placed in vacuum, they will be part of a larger defense line or be used to funnel the enemy to a kill zone or be placed behind the frontline along the route of advance via planes or MLRS launched

[@3istderburgerunbequemnenne154]

@@Archer89201 Das ist korrekt👍

[@wanjevi]

@@Archer89201 no way...mines are place in area denial areas....why plant mine and put infantry to guard them? And the goal or purpose of this system is to allow light trucks, buses and people to pass as they could be feeing refugees but to hit heavier viecles which are tanks ...

[@Archer89201]

@@wanjevi mines can be used both defensively and offensively. It can be used as a delaying barrier, part of a defense line or used offensively to catch retreating enemy forces. This particular one is made to attack the weaker top armor to kill MBTs which would otherwise only loose treads to normal mines or get negated by anti mine flails etc.

[@AndreasConfirmed]

Soviets had anti-personal mines of the same principle already in Afghanistan. They identify the targets from a distance and do not react to animals. When a right human target is identified they jump in the air and explode spreading hundreds of projectiles.

[@QxAlex69]

Half-Life 2 Hopper mines "Watch out for the Hoppers. They're everywhere!" ― Rebel

[@le_gaouri]

why saying "kgs" instead of "kilograms" i will never know

[@jaydwy8069]

How does this know if it's a friendly or not?

[@sergeychert964]

You see, there are microphones and acoustic system on the mine. When the mine pops up, tricky questions in Russian are asked loudly (so that it can be heard in the tank).

[@girohuang5196]

Also a threat of choppers?

[@lucian9274]

Sounds like a CBU-105 cluster munition but make it a landmine

[@uegvdczuVF]

Because it is an anti-tank element from the Soviet 9M55K1 cluster missile in a form of a landmine.

[@lucian9274]

@@uegvdczuVF WELL SHIT seems like I was almost correct LOL

[@eve_squared]

But is it able to get through active defense systems that are being placed on many armored vehicles as of recent? In terms of what an ADS system can do this is a very slow moving target and probably won't be very effective against any more modern armored vehicles.

[@zano187]

not really, ADS primarily counters shaped charged warheads designed to explode at point blank range by ruining the warhead, 3:12 I am assuming the method is the same as the GBU 100 bomblets where it uses an explosion to shape and propel a slug to pierce the target. With the main differences being ground based and a single one is launched at the target. Reactive armor would help a bit at least.

[@becauseiwasinverted5222]

It does not have the horizontal velocity to trigger APS.

[@alexandrvasilev2865]

I guess there won't be only one mine per enemy tank.

[@paristo]

It gets through, as those ADS are only capable to react horizontal threats. IIRC it is about 15-30 degree from horizontal plane they can react, why something coming from +/-15 degree above of you is just in blind spot.

[@Vlad-Gromov]

Эта мина копия американской мины конца 80х годов?

[@vadim-2068]

Cool weapons 👍

[@jeffjefferson2676]

This is drone warfare with artificial intelligence. This is one step closer to the Terminator movies. Greetings, Jeff

[@Dr.KarlowTheOctoling]

This isn’t “drone” warfare. It’s an electronically timed and targeted mine. No artificial intelligence involved…

[@jeffjefferson2676]

@@Dr.KarlowTheOctoling Who said drones need AI to be a drone? Wait, I did say it was AI. It knows when to strike a target, but that is just a set parameter. It is not thinking on its own. But is AI thinking on its own? It is all set parameters. Even the AI generated art, is a program that runs. So when is it AI according to you? Every AI made, is set parameters, it does not have a mind of its own, its just a program. Maybe DNA is a program too, and the environment makes it behave in a certain way. Greetings, Jeff

[@ricksgaming7298]

hope these are helping you guys

[@mammi7699]

Basically a booby trap Javelin... Ingenious!

[@Fold-103]

the us already had this its called the m93 hornet.

[@Sun-Tzu-]

Never went into production.

[@lepmuhangpa]

Only prototypes.

[@matthewjacobs141]

So is it placed by hand or can it be airdropped or both?

[@OfficeMusic]

Hand for now.

[@michaelfleischer9795]

Gibt es davon ein Datasheet?

[@Hit-First-And-Hit-Hard]

Bring more to the front!

[@johnzajac9849]

Their hospital, top-attack mines are good, too.

[@toddtaylor6110]

To quote George Carlin..."Give 50k and paint them green"

[@eduardoivanbieberachortega5617]

Queremos este mismo canal en español tbm

[@josephlieberman3027]

By the way if you want to see an old comedy movie, "sale of the century" with Chevy Chase, its about a freelance wholesale of surplus military armament who stumbles upon a chance to inherit an as of yet to be finalized arms deal with a south American country dictator. Comedy is another countermeasure which should be employed prior to engaging in war. At least its worth a try.

[@omnianti0]

1 to 10 day autodestruction its a bit short for trench war as ukrain do

[@kimmch464]

Good job 🇩🇿🇵🇸

[@Pikulev_Evgeniy]

Сколько стоит?

[@dannyarcher6163]

Very beautiful.

[@timbrwolf1121]

I've seen the same targeting system for the warhead in a US developed system. I mean come on future weapons did a feature on it years ago. The warhead just wobbles until the laser hits the target and then it fires. Ironically the nato version has multiple warheads.

[@timbrwolf1121]

@Ci Absalon Thank you. Thats the one.

[@Bialy_1]

@@timbrwolf1121 Nope... "The M93 Hornet mine is an American anti-tank mine, it is a wide-area mine, capable of attacking targets up to 100 meters away from its position. A development contract was awarded to Honeywell Defense Systems and Textron Inc. in August 1987. In April 1990, Textron was given the contract to complete development of the system. " They are coping this mine... and 100m distance = 4 times the area you can cover with every mine.

[@legion6277]

Yes, tuned for the T-72 great idea 😉

[@rajatdani619]

Meanwhile America we have developed A 6feet spider mine.. which will be inducted in 2040's.

[@TheKaMeLRo]

American had XM93 hornet mine long time ago, not sure how common it is nowaday.

[@SecurityGuy42]

@@TheKaMeLRo The M93 Hornet has been in the inventory for 25 years already. They are replacing older AT mines stocks.

[@E85_STI]

Microphones look like the boomerang on the MRAP

[@Beneficiis]

Honestly... doesn't seem very effective. Mines are meant to be used in large numbers and have least moving parts possible. Something like this will just get damaged by shell fragments from artillery and likely not function properly.

[@StanislavS-k4j]

Летающий валенок. Перспективно

[@jaskong5093]

The Russian always have "SURPRISE" for the Enemies... ! 😊💪👍

[@marcofebrian6911]

Jadi tentara rusia yu bro, gua pengen daftar... kalo mudah.

[@jaskong5093]

@@marcofebrian6911 klo tjuan ente =DUIT,ente gabung aja jd askar dUAE/BAHRAIN/KUWAIT.../PMC asal Barat...tp jgn lupa utk bekali diri dgn ksaktian khas Nusantara y...😊😄

[@SecurityGuy42]

What surprise? This is a crude copy of the US M93 Hornet Antitank Mine which has been in the inventory for 25 years already.

[@SecurityGuy42]

@Maximus _ From what I am finding over 15,000 were produced and accepted into inventory by the US military. In a test conducted in 1998 (which was not the only test) 6 mines were employed against a passing T-72 at Yuma Proving Grounds, AZ. Three did not acquire the target and did not fire. Three did, fired the projectile, and all 3 hit the target. Of those hits 1 was considered catastrophic. This was below expectations which resulted in upgrades to the mines to get them to expectations. Either way they were accepted into inventory and real numbers in inventory will only be found out during the next report to congress on the landmine stockpile in depots. Also, the testing and deployment is still over 20 years before Russia finally made a crude cheap copy.

[@SecurityGuy42]

@Maximus _ If you are talking the OLD Dragon ATGM, yes. It really only came about because of the AT-3 Sagger being deployed by Egypt and captured by the Israelis and sent to the USA for evaluation.

[@mortenlund1418]

Think of this weapon and then put it on small tracks and let it be possible to remote control it!!

[@mortenlund1418]

I am sure it is out there somewhere - just logic.

[@lepmuhangpa]

Top attack anti-tank mine? Russian engineers are geniuses.

[@marsocmaniac6806]

Starcraft`s widow mine

[@f.6081]

Вы когда чью то идею берёте,хоть стопачку за здоровье автора 🌹 выпейте!о большем не прошу! Человеку приятно будет👏🏼

[@engineer0831]

Thanks for video 🔥🔥🔥

[@akramkhalil1170]

الترجمة غير متاحة 🤔🤔😳😳

[@3istderburgerunbequemnenne154]

إن منتدى ARMY-2021 العسكري الفني الدولي مليء بالمستجدات المثيرة للاهتمام التي كان من الممكن أن تمر دون أن يلاحظها أحد ، وفي هذا الفيديو تكشف شركة JSC Rosoboronexport النقاب عن لغم مضاد للدبابات PTKM-1R. هذه "الذخيرة الذكية" التي تحدد هدفها بدقة وفقًا للمعايير المحددة. لن يتم تنشيطها ضد مركبة ذات عجلات أو مركبة خفيفة حيث أن هدفها هو درع ثقيل من نوع الدبابة. يهدف PTKM-1R إلى الجزء الأقل حماية من ضحيته - السقف يعمل هذا تمامًا مثل بعض الصواريخ الموجهة المضادة للدبابات ، والتي تنفجر أيضًا مباشرة فوق الهدف ، وفي أسوأ الحالات بالنسبة للطاقم ، قم بتمزيق برج الدبابة بمدفع من قاعدة الدبابة. الرجال ممزقون أشلاء.

[@akramkhalil1170]

ولكن نحن بحاجة الترجمة من الموقع نفسه ....هل تظنون أن أمريكا هي من سيشتري سلاحكم غريب امركم

[@akramkhalil1170]

@@ahmetsahin5210 !!؟؟؟

[@drno3391]

Great, I would need one for my mother-in-law please.

[@Preyhawk81]

remembers me on the mines from starcraft. To bad that the mine doesnt run like a crab to the target :)

[@av8or4951]

Could I get this set to a more sensitive setting for shrew elimination operations? I bet this would tame those little basterds!

[@matthewjacobs141]

Tell me about it...I've lived with a shrew for 40+ years

[@alexzalk9860]

But does it work? I've never heard it have ever destroyed a tank

[@Chpago]

ah yes!!! niceee job!

[@pixelpatter01]

Built to old Soviet durability standards, stamped out of recycled truck frames and hand forged from the finest rebar available at the time of manufacture. I don't doubt the thing will work, but my goodness it looks very clunky. I visited a space museum in the old USSR and all their rocket engines and capsules looked like they were made with a welder and a grinder. The Soyuz-Apollo capsules on display provided a stark contrast between the US and Soviet equipment.

[@basketcase1235]

call them clunky, but guess whose rockets still fly?

[@stijnvandamme76]

i'm sure it will work i doubt it's ability to discern targets properly Next wanker that drives by in his lada is gonna get fragged

[@robert.m6755]

@@stijnvandamme76 that’s why there’s a self destruct timer of in between 1-10 days

[@Tyrant_8053]

Indeed, and it is still those soviet rockets getting American asses up into space.

[@pixelpatter01]

@@Tyrant_8053 They provided round trip service. I'll give them credit where due. At least they made their own stuff and invented what they used. The Chinese on the other hand spent more time spying and buying politicians and companies to get the tech.

[@mostovaya_ru]

И всё это на продажу . Похвально . Мошна трещит , да ?

[@MikhailRU]

В Сирии применяли, сейчас вот на украине начали применять

[@saobanjaylamong]

🇷🇺🤟💪ຣັດເຊຍ​ສູ້​ສູ້​ສູ້​

[@vasionok]

I feel here the Robocop vibe.

[@marioschneider5129]

We will first send drones for terrain reconnaissance an then tanks. I`m not afraid of that.

[@andraslibal]

Who says kay gee for kilogram 😅

[@ronaldwhite1730]

thank - you .

[@maysammirzakhalili4862]

It's more 💖🙏🏻 enjoy able to considered it as a mine or weapon . 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👌🏻🤗😂. Well done.

[@TheGrindcorps]

I feel so bad for the poor Ukrainian souls that are being forced to drive into this at gun point in their wunderwaffen western tanks and mine clearing vehicles. Good luck clearing these.

[@ivanred4497]

Imagine how many European and American coffins this could make!

[@Bialy_1]

“The top attack system is envisioned to consist of the Common Anti-Vehicle Munition (CAVM) top attack munition, the top attack dispenser launcher module (DLM), the Remote Control Station (RCS), and an obstacle planning capability. The CAVM top attack munition shall have improved lethality over previous generations of top attack munitions (M93 Hornet and XM204). Once emplaced in a tactical obstacle, the system shall be capable of operating in a standby mode for up to six months with the ability to transition to a target engagement mode for 30 days.” And this is just a copy of that old M93 Hornet mine...

[@memomayo3312]

👏👏👏👍👍👍

[@MeanLaQueefa]

This mine would be jammed with a modern army

[@kienspeiher5142]

Да да "не имеющий аналогов в мире"=) Американцы от M93 "Hornet" отказались именно из за низкой эффективности попадания по цели.

[@JW-zs9bk]

Если у кого-то не вышло, это значит плохо? Надо самим пробовать под свои задачи.

[@user-dn9gi3mq7e]

О, сало нарисовалось. Вы свои боевые унитaзы Оплот уже модифицировали?) Или прячете их от ЛДНР, чтобы те их не скупили у ваших бравых вояк?)

[@kienspeiher5142]

@@user-dn9gi3mq7e как говорит наш любимый шеф - если человек идиот, то это надолго. Иди Мурзилку читай, как раз для твоего интеллекта.

[@Bialy_1]

@Maximus _ “The top attack system is envisioned to consist of the Common Anti-Vehicle Munition (CAVM) top attack munition, the top attack dispenser launcher module (DLM), the Remote Control Station (RCS), and an obstacle planning capability. The CAVM top attack munition shall have improved lethality over previous generations of top attack munitions (M93 Hornet and XM204). Once emplaced in a tactical obstacle, the system shall be capable of operating in a standby mode for up to six months with the ability to transition to a target engagement mode for 30 days.”

[@pezazul2917]

Send me two dozens

[@smelfant6105]

че лопочет не понятно . учите русский пригодится .

[@JW-zs9bk]

А по русски можно?

[@steve-wu7jp]

Considering this channel is to showcase weapons to foreign markets that doesn't make sense

[@JW-zs9bk]

@@steve-wu7jp по русски мне надо.

[@brodiapunch]

Ironic that this is now being used by Ukraine