I forgot to include **slipping** in the list of ways to control your descent rate! Obviously one of the best methods, for both for gliders and powered aircraft. Just ask the Gimli glider!
@AndyRRR07913 жыл бұрын
Slipping it in is one of the best techniques!
@grahambambrook3133 жыл бұрын
Some years ago I flew the last winch launch of the day with a young student pilot. He knew he was going to get a launch failure so we briefed doing a truncated circuit and a 'spot' landing close to the hangar, for practice and convenience. I had never flown with this guy before but knew something of his reputation and at around 500' I duly pulled the bung. Now bearing in mind our airfield is rather on the large side, I was still surprised when the student excercised a nice recovery but then ignored everything we had discussed and opted to land straight ahead. His method was to put the ASK13 into a beautifully executed, full air brake, side slip whereby we lost a lot of height very quickly, thus reducing the options for a circuit. At no time was I worried other than by his ignoring our briefing (which we discussed later) and our proximity to the Skylaunch winch when we stopped rolling. This was the 'party trick' that he was reputed to enjoy!! Anyway, to cut a long story short this guy, at the grand old age of about 22yrs became, and is still our Deputy CFI. Whenever I see a glider side-slipping the approach I am pretty sure, to this day, that I know who is in the back seat!! :-)
@Rundumsfliegen3 жыл бұрын
Honestly the "Gimli glider" was a VERY GOOD Landing considering the circumstances. Well done by the crew. Random information on the side: I cant really fly gliders that often but the few times i got to to it, i loved it. Exept the flights were all pretty short due to no available thermals. And one time while landing the guy who owned the plane did a side slip that felt like we're going to "tip over" Interesting time that was.
@drahnier633 жыл бұрын
as a former glider student pilot i always ask myself why all motor powered pilots DO NOT HAVE TO DO THE GLIDER TRAINING AS PART OF THE TRAINING to become certified?! Sullys example on the Hudson River was the last and final proof this should be considered.
@Johan-ex5yj3 жыл бұрын
@@grahambambrook313 I enjoyed that story, Thanks Graham. :-)
@johncuthill97113 жыл бұрын
Learn to fly in the USAF and gained a private, Commerical, and a multi engine ratings. I was very proud of my abilities and felt like I was an extremely compedent pilot. I left the USAF in Dec 1968 and within a year started college. There was a glider club at this college so I decided to join. Best decision I ever made. I quickly learned that I actually knew very little about flying, and I mean real flying an aircraft. In a glider you only have 1 safe chance to take off and same for landing. This in it self puts your attention during these 2 phase's of flight into the proper mode. A couple years later while flying a prop aircraft as a right seat passenger, the plane lost power. The pilot in command panic'd and in no way would be able to safely land this aircraft. I took command and safely landed the plane. I do believe that my training in flying gliders aloud me to have the ability to safely handle this event. Suggestion to all power pilots, learn to fly gliders also, it will make you a much safer pilot at all times :) Thank you.
@PureGlide3 жыл бұрын
Hi John, thanks for sharing your story! Great to hear the gliding probably helped. I'm sure all types of experience flying other aircraft can help at times, but gliding surely helps a lot.
@10percenttrue3 жыл бұрын
John, any relation to Fred Cuthill?
@PilotPlater3 жыл бұрын
Thanks for sharing John. I'm very grateful for my glider experience too, teaches some great fundamentals
@MrZachalewel3 жыл бұрын
An officer in the USAF who can’t spell allowed? Seems suspicious…
@LuxPerp3 жыл бұрын
@@MrZachalewel what do you mean? Dude seems like a compedent spellar.
@lexuselk3 жыл бұрын
the propeller in the plane performs the task of cooling the pilot - when the propeller stops, the pilot starts to sweat;)
@PureGlide3 жыл бұрын
Exactly :)
@nzelm03 жыл бұрын
Hahaha
@abalfede7 ай бұрын
But if you're a glider pilot 😂
@AirJoe3 ай бұрын
Love this joke 😂
@maxflight7773 жыл бұрын
“Talking on the radio shouldn’t be your priority “…. As usual, with your observations…. 100% spot on !
@PureGlide3 жыл бұрын
Thanks Max! Funny some don't think so...
@ethanbarsky57893 жыл бұрын
@@PureGlide I really liked your criticism for this student pilot. He messed up the engine out checklist. He didn’t do the first S which is Best glide speed right away. He instead jumped all the way to the 4th S Speak which is what you do to tell whoever you’re talking to your technical last words before landing. mayday mayday (callsign) engine out, one soul on board, landing in a field (cut communication and focus for landing). The 5S if you don’t know for pilots who use motor aircraft is. Slope-Best glide speed right away 68knts in ce 172s Spot- where are you going to land Start- attempt to restart the engine Speak- 7700 transponder and tell whatever frequency you’re on your situation. Shutdown- prepare for all electrical and engine to be shutoff during landing procedure
@ethanbarsky57893 жыл бұрын
But he did a great job under a very unfamiliar and dangerous event, at that point it doesn’t matter if you ducked the checklist. If he landed then he did good
@genetyk3 жыл бұрын
Aviate, Navigate, Communicate. Always in this order.
@upyurz5272 Жыл бұрын
That's how I was taught it in flight school and still have that drilled into my head 30 yrs later!@@genetyk
@StayHighStayFast3 жыл бұрын
On the dangers of turning while low on airspeed- “Continue straight ahead to the hospital, or turn to the graveyard”. Great Video.
@PureGlide3 жыл бұрын
Ha well said
@ericoschmitt3 жыл бұрын
Facts. There were two hang glider pilots here who screwed up landing, low airspeed going down wind too low. One of them turned around, dropped sideways and died. The other just aimed at the trees downwind and flared. Didn’t even get hurt and still flies happily.
@outwiththem3 жыл бұрын
Depends on altitude and abilities. What about if houses in front and engine quits at 800 agl high?
@StayHighStayFast3 жыл бұрын
@@outwiththem Naturally if there is obviously a better option it should be taken. But if it’s in doubt, stalling it on always beats spinning out of a turn into terrain. Slower vertical velocity for decreased impact force
@maxflight7773 жыл бұрын
Where did the butter get used ? I’m confused can anyone help please ?
@peepa473 жыл бұрын
In Czechia in a single engine aircraft, we are trained to always look for a place to land, and never fly over a large forrest, body of water or a city. Only if you fly high enough to glide over it in case of engine failure.
@PureGlide3 жыл бұрын
Sounds sensible!
@joshuapatrick682 Жыл бұрын
Colours is a great song!!!
@PureGlide Жыл бұрын
It really is! I should use it again
@yakalba3 жыл бұрын
I'm always looking for places to land power flying. Good to have options already picked out. No engine is 100% reliable and it can get busy fast when things go wrong.
@PureGlide3 жыл бұрын
Sounds very sensible! Cheers
@witblitsfilm3 жыл бұрын
Yup, definitely part of my training, constantly scanning for "get out" fields or areas to land.
@edwardhotchkiss90853 жыл бұрын
When in powered flight, always looking for places to land. It is in a cone of area defined by 45 degrees from the pilot position.
@SPQRTempus3 жыл бұрын
It's good airmanship to be evaluating your options constantly, my instructors drummed it into me.
@MrJohnyysmith3 жыл бұрын
Nearly failed my glider cross country test in a motor glider and was given some great advice not heard previously. 'If you have to land out, turn to head downwind as you will increase ground speed, ground covered, and therefore choices of landing place'
@PureGlide3 жыл бұрын
Yeah exactly right, we do the same in the gliders too.
@MrAerocomposites2 жыл бұрын
I am a rusty US private pilot. Have not flown in 25 years. I still remember the instruction during engine out instruction to "fly the plane" and minimize turns and land straight ahead if possible. Avoid stalls near the ground. Agreed about the radio. Stay off the radio. They can't help you.
@PureGlide2 жыл бұрын
Agreed, cheers!
@witblitsfilm3 жыл бұрын
Yup, the hierarchy I was taught depends on the failure altitude, but AVIATE always wins anyway. Also, we are looking for fields in powered a lot more than a glider pilot may think we do. Pretty much all the time, you are questioning yourself, "could I land now if the engine quit?" - It's not just a gliding thing. Low level engine failure (EFATO essentially) FLY - The plane (Vg best glide) Field - Identify Flaps - As required Mid level engine failure (1000-2000) FLY - The plane (Vg best glide) Identify Field Engine - Attempt to see if failure was for a stupid reason (mixture, tank ran dry, knocked magneto switch wtc.) and attempt to rectify If not, prepare to land and Flaps as required Higher level engine failure (2500+) FLY Identify field Engine & fuel checks to see if valid restart Only THEN, mayday radio, IF you have time Prepare to land, Flaps as required Another thing with powered, which gets a lot of glider pilots. This is not about saving the plane. When that engine quits, it's the insurance companies problem. This is about saving your life. If you have to put it through a hedge to dissipate energy in order to reduce impact forces, so be it. There is no pussyfooting around with "trying to save the plane or reduce damage". Hey, if you get a nice big field and the plane can be saved undamaged, great.... bonus. But it is not to feature in your thinking. Safety is everything.
@PureGlide3 жыл бұрын
Exactly right, and really it’s the same for gliding although we don’t think about it like that. By choosing the best landing location and giving yourself enough time you increase the chances of it going right and not ending in disaster
@witblitsfilm3 жыл бұрын
@@PureGlide Tim, somewhat funny story for you: I also glide (early solo still currently but getting to bronze soon hopefully): A few years back when I was doing powered EFATO's from 300ft failure off the end of the runway, I picked a decent clear field and my instructor was more than happy with the way I handled it. I had about 3 seconds to make the decision and another 15 before we hit the ground. I made a social media post about it (big mistake in hindsight LOL) with an aerial image of the field with the tag "would have survived... bonus". All my gliding buds (those with zero power experience) jumped on me like birds on worms and chastised me: "the furrows are the wrong way, you might have damaged the gear, that's a poor field choice, slopes wrong, surface is a bit rough, probably an expensive repair to gear, not good etc. etc.". Powered instructor had to come on and correct them: "when a light plane is going down, it's going down...that field was an excellent choice....this is life and death at 8:1 glide ratio and 900fpm down, not leisurely considering your options for 'optimum fields' at 45:1 in a DG1000" (He also instructs gliding so has a solid footing in both worlds). It did get a bit of a laugh. At least the tug pilots were on my side LOL. : )
@User00000000000000043 жыл бұрын
Seems to me the first thing you'd want to do in any of those situations you list is FLY the plane. I don't know why you'd leave that part out? One should always FLY the plane. FLY IT DAMN YOU!!!!
@paidgovernmentshill_69503 жыл бұрын
Totally agree re fiddling about with the transponder and yapping on the radio. Aviate, navigate, communicate in that order, as I'm sure others have pointed out. Sure, a pan or mayday saying you've lost the engine, but ATC can figure out the rest themselves if necessary. But you can't argue with the outcome. Good job.
@PureGlide3 жыл бұрын
Thanks for that, agreed!
@mwhite14743 жыл бұрын
All of my helicopter pilot training in the US Army involved the discipline of constantly scanning for a landing spot in the event of engine failure. This becomes less of a relistic concern when flying dual engine at cruise while not in takeoff or landing regimes.
@PureGlide3 жыл бұрын
Yeah makes sense, I also don't worry about landing options as much if I'm at altitude in the glider. At 5000 feet AGL for example I can glide at least 50km, so you have plenty of time and options. Of course I have to make sure I'm within glide of a land-able area at any altitude, it just gets easier and easier the higher you are! Thanks for the comment
@PilotPlater3 жыл бұрын
As a glider instructor and powered instructor myself, totally agree. Fly the plane, land safely, there's your priority. You are right though, the training for the written test especially focuses a lot on transponder codes and radio.
@PureGlide3 жыл бұрын
Hey thanks Andy, glad I'm not the only one to think that way!
@scottmontagu25543 жыл бұрын
Forced landing procedure in a Pawnee; 1. Throw a brick out the hatch 2. Follow brick. He did well on paddock selection, keeping the airspeed alive and getting it down in one piece 👌
@outwiththem3 жыл бұрын
Same as a Piper Colt. The Flying Brick..
@SenorCrazylegs8 ай бұрын
I mean, for a start, running out of fuel is just about the most stupid way to crash a light aircraft. Total lack of awareness and planning. If you were aware it was getting low, then you'd land it controlled literally anywhere, but to run out completely, without a leak, and unbeknownst to you...? Unforgiveable really.
@PureGlide3 жыл бұрын
Thanks!
@PureGlide3 жыл бұрын
Just testing the Super Thanks. Is it weird to super thank yourself?! Feel free to try it out too!
@gilvietor19183 жыл бұрын
Powered pilots are taught to always look for places to land, always. Great video as always.
@PureGlide3 жыл бұрын
Thanks Gil!
@Baddad363 жыл бұрын
I remember an interview with a Battle of Britain Memorial Flight pilot. He was asked how wonderful it was to fly the Spitfire. He answered it was indeed a massive privilege but not that much fun. Every flight had emergency landing sites every few minutes and he spent most of his time assuming the aircraft was about to break! The worst area was central London because there weren't any.
@PureGlide3 жыл бұрын
Yeah I can imagine would be short of good landing options! We have the same problem in gliders occasionally, but we try not to put ourselves in that position...
@stijnvandamme76 Жыл бұрын
the BoB flight always flies so damn low because everybody just adores seeing and hearing em.. but not much room for calamities at those altitudes. I remember them flying over the Bisley National shooting Range, we were shooting WW2 rifles at 600 yds when they came barreling over with the Lanc, 2 spits and 2 Hurricanes.. 8 Merlins.. the roar.. It was a day of days..
@brushitoff5033 жыл бұрын
Great review Tim, yes it was fuel starvation, Brian mentioned it in a reply to a comment on his video, it was either the plane was burning more fuel than expected or there may have been a leak. They put fuel in it & flew it back to the Airport the same day.
@PureGlide3 жыл бұрын
Cheers!
@LiorIPSC3 жыл бұрын
Fuel starvation or exhaustion?
@13megaprime3 жыл бұрын
Lior Bar-On essentially the same thing really, though if you want to split hairs, starvation is the engine loses it’s source of fuel, potentially still having some available. Think running a tank dry with another full of fuel because of improper fuel management. Exhaustion is totally running the airplane dry. So, in a sentence, the engine suffered from fuel starvation due to fuel exhaustion. 2 sides of the same coin, it all gives the same result of an engine that don’t work
@ColinWatters3 жыл бұрын
No low fuel warning on these? Why?
@harryspeakup84522 жыл бұрын
@@ColinWatters The low fuel warning is both tank gauges reading E, which apparently he ignored. Fuel checks every five minutes at least in the air
@skydive14242 жыл бұрын
Agree with your assessment; quick radio call and look for a field and set up for the approach and landing. Look for wind, slope, obstacles and pick one and stick to it. Make a radio call after landing. Try to get a cold one for filling out the paperwork
@jennywolswinkel85483 жыл бұрын
I wonder if Brian's radio communications were integral to his staying calm?
@PureGlide3 жыл бұрын
yeah might well have helped
@dwightbernheimer3313 жыл бұрын
If in fact this was caused by fuel starvation I have to think back decades ago when my instructor said... There is absolutely no excuse for running out of fuel, unless somebody cuts your fuel line while you're up there flying... Good stuff, thanks for posting
@PureGlide3 жыл бұрын
True although we all make mistakes especially when starting out! Read more about how it happened in the original video
@alianjohnson60353 жыл бұрын
yes agree that there is no reason to run out of fuel but lets consider the difference between fuel starvation (where there might be a blockage) vs fuel exhaustion (where you run out of fuel).
@testmcgee92303 жыл бұрын
Way to keep the nose down and airspeed up. Welcome to gliding, Brian!
@rex82553 жыл бұрын
Big screw up: running out of gas. I learned in the States, and was taught to ALWAYS have an emergency landing spot picked out. Basically, pick one ahead of you. It will be good until your a bit passed it, and then you find another. As far as the radio, I would likely have gotten set up for my landing and then called. Obviously he had time to do the radio work based on the success of the landing. And hey, the aircraftv was reusable, so it was a GREAT landing!
@PureGlide3 жыл бұрын
Yeah agreed, it was really the order of things- get the critical things done first, then make a radio call if you have time. Running out of time to fly can be critical
@R2Bl3nd3 жыл бұрын
@@PureGlide definitely seems like a case where the "aviate, navigate, communicate" mantra would've come in handy.
@eugeniustheodidactus88902 жыл бұрын
His *situational awareness* was spot on and his execution of the engine-out-landing was perfect.
@largo66443 жыл бұрын
I flew gliders many years ago, and I always think that fly gliders must be mandatory for general aviation's pilots. I'ts so obvious: you have to learn to crawl before you try to walk. An engine's shutoff is a nightmare for a no-glider pilot, but a dead stick landing is just another day at the office for a glider's one. I higly recomend begin your pilot's career in a glider, the purest fly machine: maybe you will end your career in fast jets, but you always will be a glider pilot.
@PureGlide3 жыл бұрын
It certainly helps flying anything else. Cheers!
@MisterIvyMike5 ай бұрын
As a glider and SEP pilot I can tell you, it may help but it is not a guarantee! In my Pilatus PC-11 I have a glide ratio of more than 30/1 at 50 kts. In the club skydive Cessna 182 I have a glide ratio of 7/1 at 70 kts. It is a whole different world!
@Jeff0343 жыл бұрын
A - airspeed B - best field C - checks - fuel taps, engine restart D - declare emergency E - prepare exits - crack doors, harness tight.
@PureGlide3 жыл бұрын
That's good!
@garywayland61683 жыл бұрын
I would Add after airspeed; trim…. Great checklist
@mikewings3 жыл бұрын
As a power and glider pilot I had pretty much the same thoughts as I watched this!!
@PureGlide3 жыл бұрын
Glad you think so! Cheers
@stevemiranda24183 жыл бұрын
Well said
@aviatenz3 жыл бұрын
It's an interesting one to analyse as from my perspective there was a lot wrong with this procedurally. But ultimately, he was a student pilot in a very high stress situation and he delivered an absolutely perfect outcome. I've never had an engine failure, so I'm not going to presume to haughtily talk about "what I would do", instead I will talk about what we are taught to do here in New Zealand. Firstly, you are one the money talking about the glider mentality of always having a field (or area of fields in mind). In theory that applies to the power world as well. It should also factor into your flight planning in terms of should I fly over this terrain at this height, or should I plan my route elsewhere to increase my safety margins. Having said that, in practice, your typical GA aircraft is moving over the ground a lot faster than a glider and so always knowing where you would go is harder; and of course the risk of an engine failure is just that - a risk, and not a certainty as it is in a glider. So it's very easy to get complacent. What we call a Forced Landing Without Power (FLWOP) is a very dynamic procedure. But in essence it is: select a field, plan your approach, commence flying the approach, conduct trouble checks, make a mayday call, brief your passenger, secure the aircraft, land. Obviously that is all as time allows with the aviation adage of Aviate, Navigate, Communicate applying. Just watching the video, it didn't look to me like he really selected a field and planned his approach. It's hard to tell from the cameras perspective, but it feels like there was some last minute make-what-is-in-front-of-me-work. I also didn't see any trouble checks (not that it would have helped him in this instance). Broadly, those checks are typically carb heat, switch tanks (if applicable), try different mixture and throttle settings, and try both L/R mags individually. He also got a bit carried away on the radio - "Mayday mayday mayday, , 3 north of , engine failure, landing in a paddock" was all that was required. Then ignore the radio. Transponder to 7700 and ELT activated if you have time. If he had a more planned approach, as you noted I would have like to have seen him fly a descending circuit with a stable final approach to an aiming point 1/3 of the way into the field (and this is really where your planning should start and you work backward from there). Once landing was assured, the use the flaps to move the aiming point closer to the near end of the field. I would have also liked to have seen him turn off the fuel, set the mixture to full lean, close the throttle, and turn off the master on short final. This is partly a protection against fire in the event of a hard impact with the ground or a structure, but it also prevents the engine from deciding to give you enough power to ruin your approach, but not enough to actually fly on. Cracking the door or canopy on final approach is generally also taught to avoid becoming trapped in the event that the airframe becomes deformed. As a side note, and a very big positive that definitely impacted the outcome: he didn't get focussed on getting to an airfield which is a common mentality for engine failure in America where you are frequently in glide range of a massive runway. Ultimately, the above is armchair quarterbacking. As pilots I think that is always a valuable exercise. But this is not intended by any means to be a haughty critique. Ultimately he was a student pilot and he delivered a perfect outcome. If I am ever faced with that situation, I can only hope that I manage the same.
@Dudeisthere3 жыл бұрын
When the engine fails at just 1000 ft. AGL i would never attempt to check anything, there just isnt enough time to do it (unless the engine started quitting just after i made a configuration change, in that case undo that change). The same goes for the whole "fly a circuit" idea, great in theory, but once again at that altitude you wont have a nice and stable circuit even if the field was right underneath you. The C172 drops like a rock, especially with flaps out. Of course there are things that could be improved, but overall i think he did well. Most importantly he kept the nose down and the aircraft flying, managed to find a suitable landing spot and landed as he was supposed to. Thats all you can ask for in a situation like that.
@2niner773 жыл бұрын
Side slipping is another way to increase the rate of descent.
@PureGlide3 жыл бұрын
Yeah absolutely, I foolishly missed it in my video. Cheers!
@2niner773 жыл бұрын
@@PureGlide Don't worry, you always get down, one way or another. Just the meeting of plane and ground may not be so pleasant.
@stevegallagher6873 жыл бұрын
Just took a glider ride on Harris Hill in NY at National Soaring Museum. Hadn't been gliding in about 35 years. Loved it.
@PureGlide3 жыл бұрын
Awesome!
@jimfryett7022 жыл бұрын
Early in my gliding career, I took power training with forced landing approach. This training and practice was an excellent boost to my knowledge and confidence as I began cross country soaring and the inevitable off field landings. The benefit of power with a good instructor allowed repetitive attempts with critique.
@PureGlide2 жыл бұрын
That’s great. We do the same sort of training with motor gliders, to practice choosing fields to land in
@barbermot3 жыл бұрын
Great video. Slip is a good way to control descent. And yes, talk & transponder are taught as the final items in the engine failure checklist.
@PureGlide3 жыл бұрын
Ah crap I forgot to mention slipping! Whoops, yes that is a great option as the Gimli Glider found out...
@edwardhotchkiss90853 жыл бұрын
With an airplane equipped with an ELT I’d turn on the switch to activate IT. THE SATELLITE CONSTELLATION SHOULD PICK IT UP FAST.
@SuperSpeedMonkey3 жыл бұрын
Did some pilot training many years ago in a few small Cessnas. From what I remember, they glide very well actually.
@PureGlide3 жыл бұрын
Everything glides to some extent!
@kasperadamson46543 жыл бұрын
Nicely done. Beautiful editing and well selected music in the end. Surprised you do not have 140K subscribers.
@PureGlide3 жыл бұрын
Wow, thank you! Yeah we'll get there one day, cheers!
@motorTranz3 жыл бұрын
Superb airmanship that one! Thank you.
@PureGlide3 жыл бұрын
Thanks for watching! Cheers
@nexpro69853 жыл бұрын
Superb airmanship involves constant monitoring of one's fuel situation.
@grant81243 жыл бұрын
Great video. Rarely does music work, but that did the trick in the end. Most times the video maker is more interested in the music it seems than the love of flying and raw sound.
@PureGlide3 жыл бұрын
Thanks! It’s a great song that one, glad you liked it. Cheers
@lewisgower19543 жыл бұрын
I can't wait to finish this video!
@PureGlide3 жыл бұрын
That's the spirit!
@welshpete123 жыл бұрын
I was told if you could fly a glider properly and a Tiger Moth , you could fly anything . So as we could fly gliders properly , but not Tiger Moths we were half good pilots. 😉
@PureGlide3 жыл бұрын
I like that :)
@dougtarbet61933 жыл бұрын
By slipping are you referring to crossing your controls. There’s a famous case of an Air Canada Airline pilot having to do this in a Boeing 767. The Gimli Glider. Thanks to the Captain’s glider flying experience he was able to rapidly bleed off altitude and energy in order to safely land at a decommission RCAF airbase at Gimli, Manitoba, Canada.
@PureGlide3 жыл бұрын
Yeah exactly right! That’s the one
@dwilliamson85393 жыл бұрын
A friend of mine, who was also a sometime glider pilot, had an engine failure on take off, when two-up in a single-engine plane. He did a fairly high banked 90 degree turn straight into a ploughed field, as his gliding knowledge kept bail-out fields in his mind at all times and they had no injuries, with minimalised damage to the airframe. The passenger was the mechanic who had just serviced the engine and they were on a test flight. When they came to a halt, choice words were exchanged.
@PureGlide3 жыл бұрын
Haha I bet! Thanks for sharing
@martynh54103 жыл бұрын
Hah! Just serviced and forgot to put the oil back in the engine?
@paidgovernmentshill_69503 жыл бұрын
And THAT'S why you always take the mech up on the first flight after the job. Focuses their mind..
@DerbJd3 жыл бұрын
How did he run out of fuel in the first place?
@PureGlide3 жыл бұрын
Good question!
@sodster683 жыл бұрын
Good analysis and great that you support the guy with a proper shirt! I smashed the like button in the analysis and was about to hit it again when the you zoomed up from that ridge. Man this is one of those channels that needs a "Likes-a-lot"-button. Thanks!!!
@PureGlide3 жыл бұрын
Thanks Patrik! please don't hit the like button twice it goes back to nothing ;) lol
@sodster683 жыл бұрын
@@PureGlide Exactly! I caught that in the nick of time but we need the Super-like-button. :-D I'll harass lubetube for one.
@peterensinger17703 жыл бұрын
As a microlight pilot we are trained to always be on the lookout for a place to land this come from the old days of flying with the temperamental 2 stroke engines. we were always told 'Aviate navigate comunicate'.
@PureGlide3 жыл бұрын
Yeah a good summary I'd say!
@glennwatson3 жыл бұрын
Powered flight, we are told especially on navs to be constantly scanning for landing spots as well. My instructor will just keep randomly asking me at regular intervals where we would do a landing right now with the orientation, wind and all that stuff. Both fixed and rotary that I fly. Rotary is easier in some ways to do an emergency landing since you can go to negative airspeed, zero airspeed to make the spot you want, but you do need to be at 60 knots (in a R44) by the time you flare the aircraft about tree top height. In other ways harder since it happens faster.
@PureGlide3 жыл бұрын
Hey thanks for sharing Glenn, very interesting
@boahneelassmal3 жыл бұрын
Regarding the radio: I couldn't quite understand what he was saying, because unfortunately you were talking over him. But he did call itc and the first thing he did was identing. This is fairly smart. When VFR you aren't always talking to atc and atc doesn't know where you are. So from what I could read he said informed tower of having an engine failure over a residential area with very few landing option. What he's doing is basically saying "Hey ATC I'm in trouble, this is where I am, should you not hear from me in a couple of minutes send help to this location." Apart from that I don't think most of it was really necessary, same with the squawk. He already declared and emergency, gave his location andthat's it. Anything beyond that just takes resources away from finding a field. But apart from that, great landing and great reaction.
@PureGlide3 жыл бұрын
Thanks yeah agreed. You can check out the full video without me talking over it, link in the description.
@fredbloggs48293 жыл бұрын
Glad you mentioned side slip as an option. As a glider tug pilot, you pull the power when the glider releases and basically set up for a landing way too high, and then side slip the plane to wash off all that extra height. Great fun landing those tug planes. The glider pilot is paying per minute of your air time, so getting it on the ground as soon as you can is the priority. I like to think of them as tractors in the sky. I'd hate to think what the glide ratio would be.
@PureGlide3 жыл бұрын
We charge for the tow height at our club, which is good for the tow pilot, they don’t have the pressure and will do things like go around if needed more freely. And bringing the Pawnee down too fast isn’t good for it, I can’t remember the reason?
@outwiththem3 жыл бұрын
Retired CFI. He ran out of fuel. But was lucky to have a great flat field to glide to. Good landing, but too many basic mistakes by running out of fuel and talking too much.
@mumblesbadly77083 жыл бұрын
Would like to know why he ran out of fuel. For example, what did he do during the pre-flight planning and checklist regarding his fuel levels.
@outwiththem3 жыл бұрын
@mike spike For me it is easy to forget to put my pants on before i go outside.
@PureGlide3 жыл бұрын
Yeah agreed, cheers
@garywayland61683 жыл бұрын
My training in the 70’s were all dead stick landings in C-150. Now they are training these 747 circuits using power all the way. Augggh!
@PureGlide3 жыл бұрын
What could go wrong?!
@garywayland61683 жыл бұрын
Hello! I was doing a BFR in a C-172. We were doing circuits so long I said to the CFI on downwind; You are aware we will not make it back to the field if we lose an engine? I probably would not have seen this without flying gliders. Glider flying definitely makes you a better pilot.
@feathermerchant2 жыл бұрын
Did my primary flight training in an AA1A Yankee, The flaps, if you can call them that, have almost no appreciable effect. Slips, on the other hand, worked great. The thing I really liked about slips you could drop like a rock and then IMMEDIATELY regain normal flight/descent rate by straightening out (unlike waiting for the electrically driven flaps to retract).
@robhobsweden3 жыл бұрын
In fact, the spot in 3D space you are going to hit stands compeltely still in your vision. This means, for the spot you are going to hit the ground when in a glideslope (without the flare) is not moving forward, backwards, left or right in what you see. Lengthwise, that means, if things on the ground move towards you, you are going to overshoot those spots, and things on the ground are moving away from you, you are not going to reach those spots. However, you have to include the flare if you are going to have the feel for the touchdown point, and that is purely by feeling, which is beyond the spot you are aiming for. This is why you often hit what you look at - you're focusing so much on that spot you want it to stand still, and your body reacts to it.
@PureGlide3 жыл бұрын
Yeah good points! Cheers
@shadowsrwolf2 жыл бұрын
Cessna fuel gages are trash. They are only required to read correct when full per the book. But on that i stick the tanks and never use my fuel gages and plan for a hour in the tanks at all times
@samaipata47563 жыл бұрын
As a former flight instructor I confirm everything you criticized and all your recommended procedures are very true and of great value also to engine powered aircrafts. During my 45 years of flying I had to deal with 5 emergency landings including a ditching. AVIATE, NAVIGATE, COMMUNICATE is the proper sequence. However it is wise if possible to report your position at altitude, particular flying in sparsely settled area on the present frequency as well as on 121,5. Now in this scenario I ask myself as why he didn’t notice much earlier that he was getting low on fuel? If low on fuel and with no airfield in reach it is always best to still land under power in a selected field or most suitable spot that you can check first before landing. Great educational video!👍👏👏👏
@PureGlide3 жыл бұрын
Hi thanks very much Samai! Yes that is a great question why he didn’t notice the fuel gauges :) thanks for commenting
@witblitsfilm3 жыл бұрын
@@PureGlide Fuel gauges in light aircraft are next to useless - they should be marked INOP straight from the manufacturer LOL. They only generally work on the ground when stationary and parked on a perfectly level surface and even then, I wouldn't trust them. The best fuel gauge is the visual inspection before your flight to confirm levels (and therefore time at known burn rate) in each tank and then to fly by time and burn rate accordingly, with generous minimum reserves built into your flight.
@Peasmouldia3 жыл бұрын
I was taught the "footsteps" method. In a single engine aircraft when flying below controlled airspace, continually look a couple of miles ahead picking where you might go within 45 degrees either PorS if things get quiet. More practical in a Cub or the like. Most accidents in the event of a engine failure are stalls due to having to turn too tightly to reach your selected field. Ta.
@PureGlide3 жыл бұрын
Sounds very sensible! Cheers
@Peasmouldia3 жыл бұрын
@@PureGlide Dan Grynder on hi Probable cause channel has some wise words on this imho. Dan's a bit of a divisive figure, a big advocate of lowering the nose in this event rather than being directly concerned with AOA. Thanks again, really enjoy and appreciate your channel.
@guinnog23 жыл бұрын
A very competent and confident emergency landing.
@PureGlide3 жыл бұрын
Yeah agreed, it went very well
@theoldman88773 жыл бұрын
When flying powered I always have a good landing location selected no exceptions. Way ? I am a mechanic I fully expect the engine to fall at any time. Man has never made any thing that will never fail. But I also have a glider rating.
@PureGlide3 жыл бұрын
Exactly right!
@thelorf67132 жыл бұрын
That's a great tune by Torii Wolf. Thanks for the introduction to her music.
@PureGlide2 жыл бұрын
It’s a good song eh! So lucky I was able to use it
@phaedradg3 жыл бұрын
In case of engine trouble on a single engine plane, we had to use a very short checklist to troubleshoot and attempt restart of the engine. During my training, we practiced that checklist over and over again, until I could do it within 10 to 15 seconds (checking mixture, heater, tank selector, magnetos). In case of failed restart, secure engine if time available. Then lookout for landing terrain, make mayday call whenever possible, constantly keep an eye on airspeed, do landing pattern, unlatch doors right before touchdown. Practiced that routine many times.
@PureGlide3 жыл бұрын
Good to hear, cheers
@nuclearrabbit13 жыл бұрын
Running out of fuel was the only thing this kid did wrong. Well done, sir.
@PureGlide3 жыл бұрын
Yeah exactly!
@sirclarencedarrow3 жыл бұрын
As a microlight pilot, I always keep an eye out for landing possibilities, especially after having had an engine out at about 400 - 450 ft AGL.
@PureGlide3 жыл бұрын
Yeah at that height you wouldn't have many options at all!
@stevemiranda24183 жыл бұрын
Thanks again for the videos, keep them coming I brought merchandise to support your channel
@PureGlide3 жыл бұрын
Much appreciated Steve, and hope you love it!
@halfrhovsquared3 жыл бұрын
I fly a gyrocopter. Whenever I am flying, I am constantly thinking, “Where would I put down if my engine failed?’. In fact, I plot my routes across terrain such that I always have a few decent options for a forced landing within “gliding” distance (I put the word in quotes because ‘glide” isn’t strictly the appropriate term to use but it’s the one most people understand). I agree with you that it is a state of mind that all pilots should adopt regardless of whether or not they have an engine. Taking off is optional. Landing is mandatory. People get upset when aircraft land on their houses. You say that talking on the radio probably shouldn’t be his highest priority. In some ways, I would agree, but it is sensible to make a mayday call whilst you still have the altitude to get through. Making that call might make the difference between being rescued quickly, or found perished hours, or even days later. As long as he has the aircraft under control and has already pitched for best-glide, getting that mayday call out should be his next step (in my opinion). He can scan for his best field whilst he is talking. His eyes will continue to work whilst his mouth is engaged.
@PureGlide3 жыл бұрын
Hey thanks for sharing! And yeah great to hear you guys do the same thing in the gyros.
@Fractalite3 жыл бұрын
Around 30 seconds from the time that the engine fully stopped to touchdown and maybe only first 10 seconds to get himself in position for the left base. Certainly nothing up his sleeve there for changing paddock selection or confusion - very lucky to have good fields around . Great job Brian . I'll stick to aircraft with a great glide ratio !
@PureGlide3 жыл бұрын
Yeah it’s real quick isn’t it! Like having the glider air brakes out 3/4 on a glider I would guess
@Rickenbacker693 жыл бұрын
He did a great job getting it down! The only thing I could really criticize is all that radio chatter - one short message to whoever he's talking to, so they know where he is and that he's in trouble, then focus on landing. But he did remain calm, kept flying the plane and brought it down in one piece, so all in all an awesome job!
@PureGlide3 жыл бұрын
Yeah agreed! Cheers
@mathieuclement80113 жыл бұрын
I learned ABC: Airspeed (for best glide), Best place to land, Checklist. At 1000' there's really no time to even pull up the checklist (shut off fuel to prevent a fire, open doors in case they deform or jam on impact, etc.), so it's best to have it memorized and focus mainly on landing.
@PureGlide3 жыл бұрын
Sounds perfect, cheers!
@jimmbboАй бұрын
Low altitude engine failure 1) Establish and trim for proper glide speed 2) Locate field, plan pattern entry 3) Conduct memorized emergency procedures - throttle, fuel, magnetos, carb heat 4) Communicate, time permitting 5) Enter pattern with enough room/altitude 6) Add flaps, side slip if necessary FAA Gold Seal CFI since '77
@mattlawrence71305 ай бұрын
It was a Cessna, so I know the procedure. First, trim to best glide. Then look for a place to put down. Once you have that made, put in 10 degrees of flaps and trim again to stay at best glide, once that is stable put in 20 degrees and trim. Repeat with 30 degrees. Going to 40 degrees may or may not be an option. Once you get very close to the ground, plan to keep the nosewheel off and hold the nose up since the field may be soft. If it looks like you will be a bit short on final, take some of the flaps out. If you are landing on a paved surface don't worry about keeping the nosewheel off.
@diesdasananas6911 ай бұрын
I always have to laugh at your intros. It's like you're surprised the camera is rolling
@PureGlide11 ай бұрын
yeah it's always quite the shock lol
@MisterIvyMike5 ай бұрын
As a glider and SEP pilot I'm every single time amazed when I pull the engine in our Cessna 182 on final to idle how steep I have to put the nose down to hold 70 knots airspeed. For my glider brain it looks everytime like flying straight into the ground! 😆 I hope I will do a good job if it happens to me sometime... But yeah, he did mostly a good job bringing down the plane savely!
@willburrito97103 жыл бұрын
The 1st time I watched the original video a while ago I thought he talked too much. But putting into perspective his skills vs. hours as PIC it was clear he needed to talk to someone to keep from totally losing it. His head movements showed me he was looking for a suitable place to land. He was grasping at straws with the transponder. Lucky he had someone to talk to. I give him an A and some good luck. He’ll make a great pilot.
@PureGlide3 жыл бұрын
Yeah I agree, he certainly was looking around outside a lot which is great to see. So yes it was a great outcome and he did a great job handling the situation really. And there's always things we can improve and do better too. But overall they were minor things.
@witblitsfilm3 жыл бұрын
Totally agree, aside from the radio and transponder stuff, he did a superb job under pressure. Hats off.
@juhakettunen79713 жыл бұрын
If a power pilot runs out of fuel, he has 30 seconds to find a landable field somewhere within 3 miles. If a glider pilot runs out of weather, he has 30 minutes to find a landable field somewhere within 30 miles.
@12vibaba3 жыл бұрын
depends on his altitude.
@witblitsfilm3 жыл бұрын
Totally depends on altitude. I've had "engine failures" (instructor instigated) at 3500 feet and then you've got your field picked out and run your engine and fuel checks in a minute, done your pretend mayday and you still have 2500 feet left and you're like "come on already, let's get down to the landing field, I'm bored. Then the EFATO's at 200 feet off and past the runway where you have 15 seconds or less to sort yourself out. Altitude is time, money in the bank to think. And it can be many minutes.
@airgliderz3 жыл бұрын
Wrong, very wrong dangerous thinking, depends on power pilots and glider pilots altitude above the ground.
@chrisruf75903 жыл бұрын
I flew a ridge, lost the lift and was on the ground within 45 to 90 seconds
@21mozzie3 жыл бұрын
When gliding on thermals, they start to weaken at the end of the day. Pilots can find themselves scratching around at very low altitude trying to find somewhere to land. Very dangerous.
@sailingfromswitzerland Жыл бұрын
@9:06 There's another option, which is to do a forward slip (I think that's what it's called). This is helpful when on final and still too high. It involves adding right rudder and left aileron at the same time. This exposes the left side of the aircraft to the airstream and will result in loss of altitude WITHOUT gain in airspeed. This is of course preferred over descending straight down because too much airspeed will result in a very long float over the runway (or field, in this case). I earned my PPL (Private Pilot's License) for Single-Engine Land aircraft in the US and my instructor and I practices the forward slip during my training. I became proficient in it and was very comfortable using it. I'd rather be high on final, than too low, just in case I lose my engine, and doing a forward slip is a safe way to get on the right "glideslope" when you know you've got the runway made.
@alepiati3 жыл бұрын
Those gauges in the beginning of video are fuel gauges. The engine failure was due to lack of fuel. That was a great land, specially under severe stress
@PureGlide3 жыл бұрын
Yeah not good!
@voidedname Жыл бұрын
In single engine aircrafts you're always supposed to have an emergency landing spot picked out at any point in the flight. Cause Ince the engine quites, you're just a glider.
@PureGlide Жыл бұрын
... with a bad glide ratio compared to a glider!
@kirkmason70793 жыл бұрын
Important information. Running out of fuel is pilot error. The FAA don’t look at this as a minor infraction. FAR: fuel requirements for VFR 91.151, IFR 91.167
@PureGlide3 жыл бұрын
Yeah maybe there was a reason behind it, not sure.
@phaedradg3 жыл бұрын
Not sure if he ran out of fuel, a short glimpse of the gauges didn't convince me they were indicating "empty". But yeah, it's the pilot's responsibility. Had an incident years ago, with a young passenger in the plane, where my fuel gauges suddenly both indicated empty. I had checked them 5 minutes before, and they were still at 1/4 then. Tower put me in a holding pattern for inbound IFR traffic, so had to declare fuel emergency. It was the longest stretch home of my whole flying career, but I made it without a problem. Was a gauge problem.
@kirkmason70793 жыл бұрын
@@phaedradg The difference in your situation is the engine was not sputtering, as in deprivation of fuel. The pilot’s improper fuel planning, resulted in a total loss of engine power due to fuel exhaustion
@roadboat92163 жыл бұрын
Ok, you just made my comment for me. Slipping is something we did a good bit in training in both Power and gliders. Yes, great job Brian! And if you can, I think that emergency squak is important as they have your exact location quickly so know where you went down. Maybe you are injured or just stuck in the wilderness.
@PureGlide3 жыл бұрын
Yeah if you have time, worth doing! Keep in mind they'll still see you on the tracking systems no matter what squawk code you have
@witblitsfilm3 жыл бұрын
You are likely being monitored anyway with general conspicuity - you can see he has 1200 in his transponder at the beginning, which is "general conspicuity" for VFR flights in the USA (and Australia) - It's 7000 in the UK. He's therefore already "on their radar", quite literally. There'd be a track of him going down and losing altitude fast and that would trigger some alarms on the SSR radar system pretty fast, especially below preset altitudes. No particular need to select 7700... They'd have his position regardless. In this case, it's an unecessary "nice to do".
@roadboat92163 жыл бұрын
@@witblitsfilm Good info, thanks.
@jonrambin15723 жыл бұрын
Thanks, Brian!
@PureGlide3 жыл бұрын
Yeah exactly!
@simongault58043 жыл бұрын
Another awesome video Tim; keep up the great work and well done Brian.
@PureGlide3 жыл бұрын
Thanks Simon, glad you liked it. I was slightly concerned power pilots would rip me to shreds :)
@ronaldglider3 жыл бұрын
Indeed big applause for Brian! *However* AFAIK power pilots also make sure that they have landing options in case of engine trouble. They do this as part of their flight planning ahead of the flight. A good friend of mine (I lease his Antares) flies the Bücker biplane, and he makes sure that landing options are within gliding range. He plans to visit us at our Münster gliding camp, which involves negotiating two Alpine passes at around 10'000 feet. He has limited options!
@PureGlide3 жыл бұрын
Luckily it's a long way down from 10,000 feet!
@Gusto01723 жыл бұрын
The rule I learnt in Australia when I did my PPL license was, in this order, 'aviate' navigate, communicate.
@PureGlide3 жыл бұрын
Yeah exactly, I’m pretty sure that’s a world wide thing!
@TonVerkleijT33 жыл бұрын
Well, my instructor hammered into me to aways look for a suitable place to land in case of an emergency. And try to avoid as much as you can areas where emergency landings are not possible. This saved the day for me when my gas cable broke, I was able to land on large stretch of new but not open motorway and could take off after repair some time later.
@PureGlide3 жыл бұрын
Sounds very sensible
@chrispowell83983 жыл бұрын
As a mustering pilot, yes always looking for a safe spot in the worst case. Only had one engine failure in about 3,000 hrs. The motor stopped when I was literally down amongst trees chasing a beast out and as I already had a plan I was able to execute a damage free landing. I was lucky enough to have a very good instructor when I did my ag rating who barked in my ear all the time about ‘engines stop anytime anywhere’. Nothing more disappointing than a bent aircraft.
@PureGlide3 жыл бұрын
Goo stuff!
@kirkmason70793 жыл бұрын
I learned flying in a Cessna 150. We practiced power failure emergency landing and it can be part of your check flight. As you said first find a place to land. Next, best airspeed to glide. On a Cessna 150 I believe is 70kts IAS with a decent on 500 fpm. On final flaps and brakes as needed.
@PureGlide3 жыл бұрын
Sounds good, cheers!
@tommorrisey39993 жыл бұрын
Immediately going to radio violates the pilot’s hierarchy of emergency actions: aviate, navigate, communicate.
@stormchaser97383 жыл бұрын
I think he actually did Aviate, Navigate, then communicate. In the original video you see the RPM’s drop and he immediately pitches for altitude (aviate), then he scans and picks out his landing field (navigate), and only then does he call tower (communicate).
@danamiller26733 жыл бұрын
Screwed up his preflight a bit to miss the fuel situation but he lived to learn a critical lesson.
@PureGlide3 жыл бұрын
Yeah we all make mistakes, the trick is to not let them get us!
@bruceme1013 жыл бұрын
As a glider pilot and powered pilot... I can tell you that powered pilots are also thinking about where to land out in case of emergencies on a regular basis in all phases of flight, but especially take-off and periodically in cruise. Now I find this habit is one of the first to go after your check-ride, but it's one of the most important. On take-off, I brief what will happen if I lose power on the runway, immediately after-takeoff, before 600' (my impossible turn height) and thereafter. In cruise, I use a cycle with most, but usually not all.. - Attitude (fly the plane) - Heading (stay on course) - Engine gauges - Exact location (dead reckoning, not just what the GPS says) - ETA/ETA (aka E6B stuff) - fuel remaining (with reserve) - Finally... Where are my emergency landings (airports, airfields, farm fields & roads) roughly in that order
@PureGlide3 жыл бұрын
Hey thanks for sharing Bruce, Cheers
@major_nadds52823 жыл бұрын
To make this more watchable, maybe consider a full run through, then go again with the interruptions every few seconds. These kinds of analysis vids are great but it's hard to keep continuity with only a few seconds at a time at the first run through.
@PureGlide3 жыл бұрын
Yeah I'd love to, unfortunately for copyright reasons I can't do that. But I link to the original video in the description so you can check it out fully.
@21mozzie3 жыл бұрын
Fantastic commentary. That's a follow.
@PureGlide3 жыл бұрын
Thanks mate!
@russellharris50723 жыл бұрын
One of the most common causes of flying accidents is denial,where the brain gets stuck in a "no,I can do this." mode when it's obvious to the observer that remedial action is needed....................................
@PureGlide3 жыл бұрын
Yeah so true
@upyurz5272 Жыл бұрын
I was taught from the beginning that you should always be on the lookout for a place to land when flying and that relying on your engine is a mistake. This was so drilled into me that I would even plan my cross country routes to be within emergency glide distance to airports if I was flying over hilly, forested terrain with little chance of paddocks. Then again ... my older brother was my instructor and despite that I think he wanted me to stay alive :)
@grahambambrook3133 жыл бұрын
Nice touch with the T shirt, Tim!! Perhaps this guy is a 'closet' glider pilot. :-)
@PureGlide3 жыл бұрын
I think so!
@adamheene56163 жыл бұрын
He is talking to the tower and looking for a place to land. Tbh it’s natural for pilots. And it definitely helps because it helps the tower know what happened if the worst case happens.
@PureGlide3 жыл бұрын
Yeah I can understand it being very natural for a newer pilot, as normally they'd have an instructor to talk to beside them! It's hard to transition to 'I'm really on my own and have to make my own decisions' Anyway he did, and the outcome was good!
@michaelksiezopolski3 жыл бұрын
Transponder code will help to locate the plane if ELT is not installed. It will focus on ATC screen with current location of the plane in trouble, so it is important, even at 1000' AGL. Conversations could be shorter, I agree here. Loosing power is still pretty common in todays aviation, so proper training of emergency procedures is a good thing to practice.
@PureGlide3 жыл бұрын
True although the transponder will be broadcasting no matter what the squawk code. I doubt it wouldn't work for emergency search and rescue if it's not on the right frequency. So assuming that's true, it might not be worth mucking around with. Cheers!
@michaelksiezopolski3 жыл бұрын
@@PureGlide The 7700, 7500 and 7600 codes are pointing to transmitting aircraft and are locking the screen when signal disapear up until is reset by the operator. Very good tool for SAR actions to point out last known location.
@PureGlide3 жыл бұрын
Yeah and good to do if you have time!
@philokeefe79603 жыл бұрын
The Cessna is not a glider. The pilot carried out a forced landing without power - every power pilots worst nightmare. With a fully stopped engine to maintain a safe airspeed (typicaly 55-60 knots) your rate of descent will be 500 -600 fpm so from 1000 feet you are going to be on the ground in about 60 seconds. This pilot mostly did the right things, yes there was some luck involved but it had a happy ending. We all know of course that the incident could have been avoided if he had dipped the effing fuel tanks before flying the final sector! Thanks for sharing, fly safe.
@PureGlide3 жыл бұрын
Hey exactly right, it does happen very quickly. Cheers!
@stevemiranda24183 жыл бұрын
A Cessna is a glider with no engine..All aircraft have a glide ratio
@justbob5883 жыл бұрын
Always thinking about where I'm going to land on an engine out. Was drilled into me during training. Also run PFLs regularly.
@PureGlide3 жыл бұрын
Good stuff! Cheers
@jofox1186 Жыл бұрын
I wonder if he talked on the radio partly to control his fear and remind himself of the proper response proceedures to the engine out. In his position I could see myself doing this too.
@PureGlide Жыл бұрын
Yeah maybe!
@tsmall073 жыл бұрын
I'm not a pilot yet but I think all pilots should have to have glider training. I've heard so many stories about how experience in gliders made for much better outcomes in engine out landings. Even one in a commercial airliner.
@PureGlide3 жыл бұрын
Agreed! It certainly won't hurt to have gliding experience
@tderoo713 жыл бұрын
Aviate, Navigate, Communicate is the order of priority when flying.
@rohanchung2185 Жыл бұрын
I totally agree that he should focus on where to land than talking on the radio.