Containers with systemd - Lennart Poettering

[@ncbmullan]

Lennart its odd how often you make the comment that everything you do is "the right way"... there are a lot of smart people working in container technologies. Don't confuse this comment with criticism of what you're doing with nspawn etc. Its always good to see new ideas.

[@dacresni]

Lennart Poettering I believe, in FreeBSD /usr/etc has all the userspace program configurations and /etc contains system wide configurations that you can't boot without, like for network and sysctl.conf

[@justinnoor4915]

Hello and thanks for this video. No pun intended, I am sincerely curious as to why Poettering compares btrfs with lvm at 11:03. Isn’t lvm an alternative to conventional disk partitioning, while btrfs is a filesystem method?

[@eddieoconnor4466]

Since I'm new to Linux (in a way....) I don't see the problem with systemd?....I mean....as long as its not including bloat-ware...or spyware.....what's the problem?...I've installed Fedora 29 on my old Lenovo ThinkCentre PC...and it seems to work just fine.....I dunno...is there something about systemd I'm missing?...can anyone elaborate?..

[@villangmail]

why does he keep looking at the projection? roffle

[@gabrielblack1]

Free Linux in free init.

[@aboringfart413]

Ork castration is cool. And of course a real Unix guy still uses the original Bourne shell instead of bash, bla blabla.

[@johnpublic5205]

About time, but innovative and elegant solutions aren't the UNIX way.. it's a good thing GNU's not UNIX.

[@jovaha]

Lennart perfectly portrays systemd criticism. That's not the Unix way. etc was always full of stuff.

[@snsm6730]

".... but innovative and elegant solutions aren't the UNIX way" Must be a Microsoft user 8) Systemd is the Microsoft way and is to be avoided at all costs. Init is to boot your system....and it IS elegant as it is...its simple and does its one job. Systemd is NONE of these things.

[@markbauermeister5449]

If you think systemd is "the Microsoft way" you're, quite frankly, a moron. It's closer to UNIX than sysvinit had ever been. Actually, you confirm my suspicions (that you're indeed a bloody moron) further down, when you claim init (which of the 100+ incompatible incarnations are we talking about, btw? Debian init? Slack init? Gentoo init?) is elegant. PS: systemd PID1 only does one thing, either. systemd as a whole is a collection of system management tools. systemd PID1 is its init system.