Q is not complete ordered field

[@shaniyamansuri8992]

Oh man thanks for this crystal clear explanation 🙏🤝very well explain mam

[@prachi_]

🙂

[@aayushgairola5983]

3ed sem wale ho ka

[@PawanKumar-yt4qr]

The way you teach is really appreciable 🙏🙏

[@prachi_]

🙂

[@babluprajapati9865]

Amazing. Thanks a lot Ma'am

[@prachi_]

🙂

[@rajarshipaul1901]

Crystal clear, superb ma'am!!

[@prachi_]

🙂

[@yogirabindranath2287]

Thank u mam .apko sat sat pranam .very clear and fair explanation mam.

[@prachi_]

🙂

[@MelPeters7]

Youre a really good teacher. Thank you.

[@prachi_]

🙂

[@bastab6969]

Very good explaination

[@prachi_]

🙂

[@viratkohlifan9207]

Ma'am case 1 me jo rational no assume Kia wo kaise kia

[@pratapbhanusingh498]

Thank you mam, aap jaldi se College Professor Ban Jaaye Meri Yahi Bhagwan se Kamna है 🙏🙏🙏🙏

[@prachi_]

🙂

[@tahsingul1007]

Great effort keep it up

[@prachi_]

🙂

[@tanukhatri1404]

Great explanation 👌👌

[@prachi_]

🙂

[@kartikeytiwari3793]

Nice explanation ma'am 😄

[@prachi_]

🙂

[@Devaratharaisaar1126]

Really, great ma'am

[@prachi_]

😊

[@abhinavjoshi3936]

Courtesy SC Malik "Principles of Real Analysis"

[@tahsingul1007]

I like this vedio

[@peaceful891]

Thank a lot mam ☺️

[@prachi_]

🙂

[@penpencilpoint]

Nice explanation mam

[@prachi_]

🙂

[@gsssingh9377]

why did you take this y=4+3k/3+2k ?

[@prachi_]

As we are talking about rational numbers ,so we took it in the form of p/ q

[@gsssingh9377]

@@prachi_ yes we take in the form p/q. So you taken 4+3k/3+2k only for proof

[@prachi_]

Yes.... but if you want to change this fraction you have to change the upper bound too, so that we can prove the required result

[@gsssingh9377]

@@prachi_ okk mam.......thanks

[@mohimajannatul1408]

@@prachi_ how can we do it.

[@Lucky-ny7vf]

Good explanation 🙂🙂

[@prachi_]

🙂

[@sagarnaik9452]

Well explanation mam

[@prachi_]

🙂

[@kidslover-kt7ss]

mast explaination

[@prachi_]

🙂

[@madhavchandragiri6493]

outstanding mam

[@prachi_]

🙂

[@the_indian_man]

17:00

[@qazafiyounis483]

Why u take -k then -2 in the case

[@prachi_]

Please repeat your question

[@qazafiyounis483]

@@prachi_ (4+3k/2+3k) -k Im talking about this -k and then -2 Subtracting 2 from rational number and also k from rational numbar

[@prachi_]

First, we are finding the relation between (4+3k/3+2k) and k (supremum ) in order to know that which number is greater ,and for this we are subtracting it because if a-b >0 this implies (a>b) and if a-b a)

[@qazafiyounis483]

@@prachi_ in dinesh book he done as you but in sc malik he done as k-y instead of y-k...... At last dinesh done as K²-2/(3+2k)²0 This irritate me

[@prachi_]

We have to discuss all 3 cases According to trichotomy law (a) k^2 >2 This implies ( k^2 -2) >0 (b) k^2

[@sudhanshusrivastava9567]

👌👌👌👌👌

[@prachi_]

🙂

[@riteshmandloi7998]

Thank You so much Di Di....🤗😇😇

[@prachi_]

🙂

[@--------Aesthetic-------]

Studying for back paper

[@prachi_]

👍

[@PawanKumar-yt4qr]

Mam aap online classes kyo nahi krti ho KZbin par.

[@prachi_]

Time issues

[@spazerzex5878]

great kecture.....!!!

[@prachi_]

🙂

[@abhaysudanfilmss]

You r great 👌

[@prachi_]

🙂

[@abhaysudanfilmss]

@@prachi_ mam... Real analysis ki aur videos dalo... Sequences ki video dalo.... Mai b youtuber hu... Meri videos b check krna

[@prachi_]

kzbin.info/aero/PLxDy7m_2BugWucH7qY4NjHXOb3mENzS3t

[@kirtisolanki3695]

👌👌👌Well explained

[@prachi_]

🙂