If your hypothesis that 佢想要一個器官比佢老母用 is true, then there must be a 第3者作案. Since the killer didn't leave HK after the murder, someone else must have used the missing 行李喼 to carry the organ (with lots of dry ice?) back to 大6 for the transplantation. Most likely, this 第3者 is a close relative of the mother, possibly named 阿凱 (or similar?) who lives in 大6. Like you said, 純粹猜測.
Thank you for debunking the 48 hour myth. Don't know why TVB used to talk about the 48 hour rule
@Moremoney888 Жыл бұрын
如果我做陪審團,就咁聽,真係會非常掙扎好耐,判唔判佢有罪
@amychan526910 ай бұрын
Thank you very much of sharing your story. I cried along the way. May God blessed you
@mandylee3186 Жыл бұрын
我覺得應該是追還錢惹殺生之禍,兇手作故事說有第三者買器官是作,試徒錯唔引導警方向,他一定是兇手。
@truchoo Жыл бұрын
邊個會要一個老人家器官吖?明顯作假古仔
@hkhistoryw5062 Жыл бұрын
@@truchoo Beggars can't be choosers. When you have no connection to power nor $$ to buy a young 器官 , you'll take whatever is available to you, no matter how old. It's a crime of opportunity.
I cannot tell if this killing is premediated or not, but I don't have doubt that the Police got the right person. The evidence showing him carrying bags out of the building multiple times in the middle of that same night and returning without them was damning.
The man is convicted for murder, but what is the motive ? If organs trade is involved, a butcher cannot have done this alone !
@RhenoRose Жыл бұрын
Organ delivery needs hi-tech,not stupid thought to do so.
@RhenoRose Жыл бұрын
Dead photos sticker to the wall of prison cell all the time could help this shit to remember or remodify his fuvking story telling close to the real deal.