Franchise is an agreement between chatime Taiwan and chatime Malaysia , in the agreement there are requirement to franchisee to buy from franchiser. Regardless whatever reason you have … if you don’t buy from your agreed supplier , you are already on the wrong side . Unless u take them to court to challenge in saying they unreasonably inflate the price , but if you already signed a lopsided agreement.. you can’t win la….
@ZFounderClub7 ай бұрын
Yeap I totally understand, just sharing different perspectives.(Jin)
good video, really not much seeing the Chatime now in the market. Mostly were Tealive.
@ZFounderClub7 ай бұрын
I guess after the incident, Malaysia isn't really one of their go-to market anymore. Anyways, their group is already making good money somewhere else, might not even be a concern to them already. (Jin)
Just leaving a comment here to support Ivan & this channel. Agreed that Jin leads the discussion better than Ivan, but I think Ivan also did a good job as a partner host. Looking forward for more good contents.
@ZFounderClub4 ай бұрын
Appreciate the kind comment. We will be better and always strive for improvements!
@chun554011 ай бұрын
在f&b能成功到全马的寥寥无几 所以对我来说 他是很成功的人😊
@iMBAstrategicBIZadvisory7 ай бұрын
很棒的分享分析
@ZFounderClub7 ай бұрын
谢谢观看!
@phynecia2 ай бұрын
以前的chatime很好喝 其实它的变化我一直喝得出来 越变越香精 越变越化学味
@ZFounderClub2 ай бұрын
谢谢分享!
@genietoh229111 ай бұрын
前面1.3 分钟的声音坏了。喜欢这样的课题 ❤
@ZFounderClub11 ай бұрын
声音坏了?怎么说?谢谢你的喜欢哦,我们会加油的 ❤
@genietoh229111 ай бұрын
声音很小声。
@ZFounderClub11 ай бұрын
谢谢你!我会和录音室反馈反馈。
@waifeng250111 ай бұрын
@@ZFounderClub你test戴耳机 声音只在右耳
@ZFounderClub11 ай бұрын
@@waifeng2501 好的谢谢你,我会和录音室反馈这个问题。
@kianhonng27837 ай бұрын
The title of this video is about was he wrong, not about his success in business. Totally out of topic. Even during out of topic also speak as if like llao llao started the yougurt ice cream first in Malaysia, it was Tutti Fruiti not llao llao. And llao llao was brought in to Malaysia not by Br*an, the person was Tan Kai Young, the CEO of The Woodpeckers Group. As for Tealive vs Chatime, definitely Br*an in the wrong. A breach of contract is a breach of contract, period. Unless Chatime did something illegal, he definitely in the wrong. Just because you have a very good business reason (i.e. cost control else business can't survive/flourish), still doesn't gives you the legal right to do so else, contract means nothing anymore because in every wrong action we always can find a very good reason. Out of court settle could also be Br*an knows he most likely willl lose if go to Federal court because "Court won't help those in cheat" this sentence shows higher level court did not take his breach of contract action kindly, it will set a very bad precedent for the Franchises industry in Malaysia which then create havoc. And given the circumstances, he may had paid an exorbitant sum and/or extremely favorable condition to Chatime, high enough for Chatime to not proceed to Federal court. I don't dislike/like Br*an, just dislike half of the video out of topic and not so accurate info.
@ZFounderClub7 ай бұрын
(1) Title also included the fact that he recently raised a pool of 10 mil fund. So I dont't see why discussing some of his business decision and the recent success is out of topic. Tutti Fruiti might be first to came in but Llao llao was the first one to made it big. (2) Woodpeckers run Llao llao now but from what we know, it used to be under BLoo banner. (3) Not trying to justify his doing but was just sharing a different light on why he made the choices he had taken. Breaching a contract is always wrong, but unfair terms, while it doesn't nullify the breach legally speaking; but on a human level, you can at least see why he acted so. But again, not justifying the action. You can have your own opinion whether it's right or wrong or neutral in the end. (4) Doesn't make sense as if chatime know that they would ultimately win the case then it's always worth it to take them to court. Why take the settlement ( a piece of the whole gold mine ) when you can have the gold mine yourself? Just sharing some two cents. Feel free to agree to disagree. (Jin)
所以Bryan 一开始是被逼签下当初的 material purchase agreement? 没有错???LOLssssssss
@ZFounderClub3 ай бұрын
里面的条例外人都不懂。我们哪里知道是谁先违规?哈哈。
@sret78803 ай бұрын
@@ZFounderClub Court of appeal: court wont help those in cheat... nuf said
@ZFounderClub3 ай бұрын
@@sret7880 then opt not to go to federal court and settle for settlements? Both parties must have realised they both have fault. Else why would you not sue all the way if you're 100% of the win? It's logic.
@sret78803 ай бұрын
@@ZFounderClub bro.... chatime won the court of appeal.... tealive have to close their shop. its up to Tealive to appeal to fed court... OMG... apa logic ni
@ZFounderClub3 ай бұрын
@@sret7880 my point is why did they settle for settlements if they have 100% claim. It's just a simple question.
@kbandito8 ай бұрын
付了 20 mil 和解 iirc
@ZFounderClub8 ай бұрын
真的吗?woah
@kbandito8 ай бұрын
@@ZFounderClub So settlement is only RM9 mil, which is the greatest move ever. Their GP margin then went from 52-53% to 65%. Try applying that on a RM300mil business.
@ZFounderClub8 ай бұрын
@@kbandito if that's the truth, then it's a well calculated move. And great move indeed.
on this topic... Ray Croc is even worse... go watch "the founder" and it will have 2 conclusion to the story... is either Ray Croc is the protagonist or antagonist... judgement lies over the eye of the beholder