Quantum Fusion is Here!

[@DavidRFortney]

Any published papers yet? Has anybody repeated their experiment yet? That's what the problem was last time with the premature announcement

[@Bobsry16]

Randall Mills, Jacques Dufours, and Leif Holmlid have on average a general idea that can explain the phenomina without needing fusion. Not perfect but more accurately reflects results than fusion. More like super hydrogen chemistry, like the hydroton in the video but the end result isn't fusion but other stable compounds (some are helium/dueterium hydrides like). Other people in online lenr forums made the connection. Google the papers, have a blessed week, and may the knowledge be a blessing.

[@terranspaceacademy]

A huge number are linked in the description.

[@johnbash-on-ger]

@@terranspaceacademy Awesome, many thanks!

[@Bobsry16]

​@@terranspaceacademy All the best to you and your team!

[@terranspaceacademy]

Thank you so much

[@markhatch1267]

This is the most interesting development in fusion I have seen over the past 40 years of following it. As I near the age of 60, I am realizing that the key to the design of any device is imagining the correct geometry (size, shape, features, arrangement). When I look at the difference between a Model T connecting rod and a modern NASCAR V8 connecting rod, the power of this principle is clearly illustrated. Einstein said imagination was more important than intelligence (realistic visualization of things -- not fantasy). Looking forward to seeing how this technology works out.

[@terranspaceacademy]

Indeed. I am very curious to see how "creative" our latest AI creations will be.

[@randywise5241]

We grew up seeing many changes, both good and bad. What an adventure it has been.

[@RonTodd-gb1eo]

I am older than you and I have had people promising nuclear fusion is imminent as long as I can remember. I will believe it when it happens. There is a big step from a quick burst of energy to sustained economical energy production.

[@JohnVKaravitis]

Wow, like hey, thanks for sharing how EXCITED you are about this. Our world has been enriched. Like white flour.

[@hellboundweeb149]

Imagination and intelligence are very strongly coupled. I really don't understand why this is parroted by people so much.

[@rein2889]

Seems like electrodeposition to creat nanowire/nanomesh would be ideal to create the medium needed. As the mechanism becomes better understood the ideal nanoscale dimensions & material matrix should be relatively easy to manufacture.

[@terranspaceacademy]

We'll put AI on it :-)

[@mathewward6229]

I was thinking a crystalline lattice of MOF or Zeolites with a nano mesh embedded in it creating both a lattice of micro pores and extra stability for the mesh to off set hydrogen brittleness of the metal.

[@p1mrx]

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.

[@martinwilliams9866]

No they don't!

[@p1mrx]

Sorry, my mistake. I am from space and do not understand your customs.

[@terranspaceacademy]

Indeed. Time will tell.

[@stevemeisternomic]

That is actually false. Anyone can claim anything they like. Evidence is only needed for those concerned. To those not concerned their opinions are about as relevant as bumper stickers on cars.

[@quantumkineticscorporation]

Carl Sagan was the best!

[@chadjensenster]

This sounded like my material science class and made me think of the dislocations between crystal cell borders when he started talking about random nuclear reaction sites. I just didn't anticipate the oscillations as being a factor, but makes sense. Very cool video. Thanks for sharing.

[@terranspaceacademy]

You are most welcome.

[@stuartnetherclift7566]

Really interesting! You have a great knack for sniffing out the frontier science breakthroughs I have not heard about before. Good stuff - thank you!

[@terranspaceacademy]

You are most welcome. We never know which idea will pan out.

[@stuartnetherclift7566]

@@terranspaceacademy Yes indeed - the pace of change and the breadth of fields that are starting to hint at useful breakthroughs is quite startling - real 21st Century stuff. Let us hope to be around long enough to witness some in the field!

[@terranspaceacademy]

Wait until AI starts really being creative... Its "mind" will not be limited by evolution to our 4 dimensions (counting time) and quantum mechanics will make sense to them.

[@stuartnetherclift7566]

@@terranspaceacademy yes - there was another really interesting article recently on AI being used to communicate with animals, and the spin off that might have for communication with ETs if they are ever encountered. Universal translator anyone?

[@devalapar7878]

@@stuartnetherclift7566 I don't think we made any progress in fusion. We know how fusion works and if there was an easy way, we would have found it. I don't think we will ever get more energy out than we put in. The problem is size! Size alone! The thing they showed here can't be fusion. I have no idea how the deuterium could come close enough to other deuterium to tunnel. It probably happens once in a trillion which is not enough.

[@Piraneous]

I remain sceptical…

[@terranspaceacademy]

As we all should...

[@DiscipleOfHeavyMeta1]

So cold fusion is confirmed? Fantastic.

[@terranspaceacademy]

Now we must see if it can be commercially viable.

[@seabeepirate]

Exciting times we live in. Hope this one is real!

[@peceed]

It is not :/ There is no something like "gradual fusion" possible. Forget about environment, it is all about nuclei positions. Fusion is quick and sudden. They need a way to give ions the energy sufficient to break Coulomb barrier and that description has to work in every "reference frame". In the stars hydrogen plasma can be many times denser than lead, and still temperature is needed for fusion. There are fusion devices that work with trapped hydrogen nuclei, but they require plasma heating, use tritium and generally work as high energy neutron generators.

[@terranspaceacademy]

The transition is quick and sudden. The approach, when shielded, can be slow. As long as the distance is reduced enough to increase the occurrence of quantum tunneling to an economically viable level.

[@johnbash-on-ger]

@@terranspaceacademy Wouldn't it be better to call it lattice confinement slow quantum oscillating pinch (nuclear) fusion or something like that?

[@allanrichardson1468]

After reading about ultrasonic (and just plain sonic) heating and luminescence from bubble collapse in fluids, which erodes ship propellers and makes light flashes in water carrying ultrasound, I speculated that perhaps some of F&P’s results may have come from focusing of vibrations triggering fusion, but since they were not concerned about the exact geometry needed for focusing such vibrations, positioning electrodes within a vessel of just the right shape, generating the exact frequency of vibration needed, etc, they did not put those parameters (which they had accidentally met) into their paper, so that experimenters making their own “copies” of the apparatus failed to copy those exact conditions. In other words, maybe we need vibrations as well as electrolysis to trigger fusion. However, it has also been noted that their stirring of the water bath to equalize temperatures may have been faulty, resulting in heat spikes in a small area being misread as much LARGER heat spikes over the whole bath, thus “confirming” fusion.

[@terranspaceacademy]

I've always loved sonofusion but none of the designs have worked yet.

[@jennysquibb7440]

The Ikaros project device reminds me a lot of the A. Rossi device that went nowhere. There are a lot of ways to mess up heat measurement calculations. The “validation” of Rossi’s device even had trained scientists making mistakes and then those “validations” being trumpeted far and wide.

[@clytle374]

A friend of mine had a statement. We've all heard they saying don't hold your breath. He always said "I'll be the blue guy over in the corner" Would be awesome news, if it's true.

[@terranspaceacademy]

We feel the same way.

[@walterlyzohub8112]

I remember the excitement from those times. The fact that some labs did get similar results were promising but I agree they needed to get confirmation before announcing this.

[@terranspaceacademy]

They were stuck, the university was going to announce without them from what I've been told. Very sad for them.

[@sirjeffreyclaude]

I am always so inspired by these lessons. No matter what my mood is or how I'm feeling at the beginning I'm always uplifted at the end. Thank you.

[@terranspaceacademy]

You are most welcome.

[@octavianova1300]

the first thing that comes to mind upon hearing that it seems to be related to crack size, is that some kind of destructive interference is being facilitated between the virtual photons mediating the Coulomb interaction in the region

[@terranspaceacademy]

Interesting

[@anthonywilliams7052]

OK, not a physicist here but is the cracks similar to a quantum well effect? Possibly a resonant cavity?

[@terranspaceacademy]

I think so...

[@festeradams3972]

It's "Here", when its "on the shelf"...

[@terranspaceacademy]

Or in my house... Or spaceship.

[@WolfeSaber]

One detail missing in the explaination of the lattice confinement reactor, the platinum expanes and contractes to cause the fusion.

[@terranspaceacademy]

Interesting! Thank you!

[@gregorylambrihgt2757]

Cold fusion works! Power companies killed it!

[@terranspaceacademy]

Dang power companies... :-)

[@winfordnettles3292]

I found the discussion of the resonance of the particles that cause the reaction to occur under certain circumstances to be very interesting. It is very possible that a process for stable, reliable, contained fusion reaction is possible and actually achievable within the decade. It bears looking into.

[@terranspaceacademy]

We think so too...

[@AdamosDad]

3D print or compact powder material with graphite then burn off the graphite, this would possibly give you the structure you need.

[@terranspaceacademy]

Interesting! Thank you!

[@NexusSeries6]

Are there any peer reviews of this method done or being planned?

[@terranspaceacademy]

They have made their methods available for duplication.

[@johnellison7146]

If a scientist/inventor says, "and something happens", and the result is so-and-so, you have to take that explaination with a large grain of salt...NO? ln other words, if a scientist/inventor can't explain his discovery or new technique such that it can be reproduced by others, then it's merely "magic" the scientist is describing..

[@terranspaceacademy]

But it is reproduced by others. There is not doubt that fusion can occur. The question is can it be commercially viable.

[@johnbash-on-ger]

@@terranspaceacademy That is the big question now. Hopefully they can find cheaper materials to work with/in.

[@jtjames79]

Oh so you know how quantum gravity works? Can't prove gravity without knowing how it works right?

[@narcosalpha9472]

It is reproduced by others within the LENR community, not by researchers outside of it. There could be a systematic bias.

[@terranspaceacademy]

Good point

[@tortysoft]

OK, how come we hear it here first ? Too good to be true. Let me be wrong please !

[@terranspaceacademy]

Just like the aerospike that flew first in Japan there seems to be an information desert there.

[@absalomdraconis]

It's not the first time I've heard of it, but it's far too early to bet on it.

[@mr.ackermann807]

Was that 24mega electron volts a random number or what for the numbers I've seen on the isotope was over 4 not 24. Just an observation.

[@mr.ackermann807]

That visual equation of deuterium deuterium fusion seems off for it shows an extra proton or neutron that wasn't part of the equation and the result being helium 4, I thought t h e end results were either tritium or helium 3 the helium 3 being with neutronic radiation while the tritium being aneutronic radiation. During this video of the guy talking from the middle to end seems off on some information. At least from what I have learned.

[@terranspaceacademy]

They may have been talking about HH instead of DD.

[@mr.ackermann807]

@@terranspaceacademy as in hydrogen hydrogen fusion? I might have to watch the explanation again, but the math and energy still doesn't sound right. Last I checked even that fusion would release around 1mega electron volts per gram or so. If you could help with the math it would be appreciated.

[@terranspaceacademy]

The numbers are from their research and I'll reach out to them. Could be additive. HH to D. DH to T. TD to He+n etc.

[@mr.ackermann807]

@@terranspaceacademy so hydrogen or protium+protium=deuterium, deuterium+protium=tritium, deuterium+tritium=helium4+neutron? I believe I see where you're going, but question if you can do deuterium tritium to get energy, why not deuterium helium3 energy? Couldn't you make it artificial by deuterium+protium to make helium3 resulting in more energy and possibly safer as well? I'm aware it would be harder for greater couloumb barrier repulsion, but it would be safer than tritium. Speaking of couloumb barrier, could you help with the electron volts required to overcome that force with helium 3 deuterium and protium deuterium?

[@aljawisa]

This was a shocking episode. I'll actually give it a thumbs up.

[@terranspaceacademy]

Thank you! Great minds are working on great things... It's just a matter of time.

[@tristan7216]

Could you etch channels of different width on a microchip to reproduce this? Do you have to rely on accidental cracks?

[@terranspaceacademy]

That is an excellent question. You should be able to make channels of the exact depth and width. I'm just not sure you can do it in platinum or palladium... Perhaps laser etching?

[@YellowRambler]

“Cold fusion crosse’s the finish line decades before ITER” love to see that headlines, but I’m not holding my breath on that one. Let’s hope for the best and expect the worst.

[@terranspaceacademy]

Indeed. Fusion is not hard. Economically viable fusion is hard.

[@johnkelly7270]

That's very exciting, I hope it's for real

[@terranspaceacademy]

We do too.

[@quantumkineticscorporation]

It is very exciting indeed. Stimulating safe nuclear fusion can be 'triggered' at 1 watt/sec. kzbin.info/www/bejne/qqPCe6aOidifptU

[@dgpreston5593]

Years ago, I was fortunate enough to correspond with Storms about the NAE concept; a very convincing proposed mechanism. "Slow Fusion" might be a more precise appellation. My interest in PoW crypto-mining at the time motivated me to design and offer to produce a nano-patterened array to be formed by electron beam lithography, to survey a range of crack dimensions that might lead to realization of NAEs. Im glad to see further interest in this area. I hope they continue, and eventually prevail.

[@terranspaceacademy]

We do too my friend.

[@Greg-l3j]

I loved this episode,I hold great hope for cold and hot fusion both because it's only a matter of time and understanding

[@terranspaceacademy]

Thank you! We do too :-)

[@MagnumInnominandum]

It's a matter of do we have the time to understand. I expect not.

[@Greg-l3j]

@@MagnumInnominandum humanity burning its house down before we can get water to put out the fire

[@davidwilkie9551]

A look at this in the context of Frequency Combs, modulation integration, should be interesting.

[@terranspaceacademy]

You've lost me David :-)

[@jonny3003]

Hope too that this is real. But how comes that one of their reactors is running for 500 days already without any news about that?

[@terranspaceacademy]

They just went public two days ago.

[@jonny3003]

@@terranspaceacademy Thank you for the reply! I guess they kept it a bit secret because of the history of LENR you explained in the video.

[@thewitheredfigtree]

As mentioned earlier in the video, the first team suffered because they didn’t get independent verification of their results. The same thing seems to be happening again in this more recent case of Clear Planet. The difference could be in the commercialization of their reactor. Independent verification also means revealing the “secret sauce” of your idea, and it’s not needed if the idea can be commercialized into real world products. A similar thing is happening with Flibe Energy, who seek to make a safe, inexpensive, commercialized molten salt Thorium nuclear fission reactor.

[@terranspaceacademy]

Very true... If it works that trumps all arguments against it.

[@gregbailey45]

Interesting theory! It should be possible ti verify it pretty easily!

[@terranspaceacademy]

I would think so... the energy levels they are reporting could not be explained by chemical reactions.

[@martinwilliams9866]

Have the electrical current pulsate at the same frequency as the oscillating Protons. Maybe combine it with Muon catalyst fusion.

[@terranspaceacademy]

Muons would be great if we could create them efficiently.

[@GoetzimRegen]

I think the fate cold fusion has, is the same that fission had till 1938. But that didn't mean that the some military where not invested into the project nuclear energy and bomb long before 1938?

[@terranspaceacademy]

That's a good point. Most authorities in the 1930s thought that it was impossible to access the power locked into the nucleus.

[@mikeconnery4652]

While making what I call liquid graphene using carbon battery electrodes + and pencil lead (graphite) - . The liquid burned out a meter wire. This happened after I froze the solution to extract the liquid graphene then used this solution for the electrolysis. Just an idea, I don't know what really happened.😊

[@terranspaceacademy]

Sounds very cool though.

[@Siluetae]

Interesting, I had a similar idea. Were you able to measure the resistance across the wire?

[@hermandejong4309]

1000 centigrade is also nice for producing synthetic fuels

[@terranspaceacademy]

That would be a great way to transition.

[@IronsintheFire]

To create these cracks mabey a metal bar could be electroplated in alternating metals of the right thickness so that it could be cut across the layers and then etched with acid so you end up with smething that resembles damascus steel.

[@terranspaceacademy]

Interesting... I was thinking of high energy short wavelength laser etching... UV maybe.

[@esecallum]

Semiconductor making tech can be used

[@Rich13571113]

What about ENG8's reactor being independently verified to produce energy?

[@terranspaceacademy]

Can you give me a link?

[@Joe-xj2tb]

What do you think powered the first vimana's?

[@terranspaceacademy]

I am not convinced they were more than myth. Science fiction BC.

[@rgaleny]

Can sound shatter the material increasing cracks?

[@terranspaceacademy]

It can indeed.

[@johnkelly7270]

Serious question, is it necessary for this process to use heavy water? wouldn't this work also with "normal" hydrogen? for that matter would it not likewise work with almost any element given an appropriate crack width?

[@Bobsry16]

Yes and no. Normal hydrogen from water etc. is a better idea, but there are material/elemental requirements. Secondly it really isn't fusion at all.

[@johnkelly7270]

@@Bobsry16 could you expand on this. Why you say it isn't fusion

[@terranspaceacademy]

It does indeed work with both but you get more dangerious byproducts using just hydrogen.

[@camplethargic8]

3:53 "courtesy of Black Box Technology..." LOL as in 'magic happens'. 😊

[@terranspaceacademy]

No :-) Just proprietary... We hope.

[@davidmcsween]

Hmm quantum sqeezing in cracks reminds me of the recent super conductor research and their surface doping

[@terranspaceacademy]

Always worrisome when super rare events are necessary to replicate.

[@loxiasvlachos3026]

Yes, very interesting. Great content!

[@terranspaceacademy]

Thank you so much.

[@salzen6283]

Awesome video Captain! Thanks for the efforts🔥

[@terranspaceacademy]

You are most welcome and we appreciate you.

[@jimmypk1353]

"Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence." - CARL SAGAN

[@terranspaceacademy]

Indeed Jimmy! We will have to wait and see.

[@andreizelchenko934]

Is there any barrier of readiness of human kind to very very high power and limitless energies? As it can be used not in a good way nowdays.

[@terranspaceacademy]

We have not yet found a source of such power that our technology allows us to utilize...

[@DrJuan-ev8lu]

Nice step out from Fleischmann and Pons. And energy produced is enough to be useful. Just think of all the surfaces and mashed particle types that can be investigated to optimize! Maybe we can get some guidance from mystery materials recovered from alien crash sites.

[@terranspaceacademy]

I would love to see it! Transuranic element catalysts!

[@tkenben]

The skeptical engineer in me when it comes to energy often thinks about viability. People often think that infinite amounts of fuel automatically means free energy. What they often forget about is the cost it requires to actually make use of that fuel (the machines, the distribution, etc.).

[@terranspaceacademy]

Exactly... fusion is easy. High school kids have done it. Can you make it affordable and commercially viable?

[@juhajuntunen7866]

If 1GW powerplant cost 1 billion to build, you can expect 5% rate for money, several years to build it = no income but loss. And some guys in payroll when ready, and service, maintenance and repairs and PROFIT!

[@dmeemd7787]

I will also say as of late - and this isn’t necessarily new, but don’t wanna digress too much - where anything that doesn’t quite work out or goes against the grain in anyway with mainstream science, and then not saying “we need more evidence” or “I don’t agree with that, but let’s see what happens” … yes sang some really really inappropriate and approving things to people that are putting working into stuff.. and I’m not talking about the people that are scamming for money or whatever, we’ve had a lot of “pseudoscience” that ends up becoming actual science, and I know this topic, it’s caveats, and such is a massive massive thing to cover but it’s another thing I appreciate about what you do with these videos.. I hope people see that you’re essentially kind of pointing at this sort of thing and absolutely love what you do on this channel!!

[@terranspaceacademy]

Experiments beat theory and opinion every day.

[@mpvincent7]

Sounds awsome! Is it really true? If so, somebody better build it quick before energy cartels shut it down and erase all mention and all people involved!

[@terranspaceacademy]

Indeed. I saw that movie with Morgan Freeman and Keanu Reeves.

[@bmobert]

If the hypothesis of what and how this reaction works, then eventually we will use our knowledge of microchip manufacturing to make these cracks to the exact dimensions required to make this process very likely and very efficient. Furthermore, the exact conditons needed for each type of fusion will be discovered and implemented. Which is to say, if this is demonstrably true, then fusion on a chip will exist by 2035 and at least some, if not all of the energy collected will be done electrodynamically ratjer then thermally, greatly increasing the total efficiency of the system. In different words, if true, this will lead to kilowatts per cubic centimeter.

[@terranspaceacademy]

That is exactly what I was thinking! I was wondering about laser or electron etching also.

[@bmobert]

@terranspaceacademy Yes. And with the progress being made on electronic accelerators on a chip, at-home fabric may be a thing around the same time. Nanoscopic level fabs powered by micro scale fusion. Its a Star Trek future. We just gotta keep wwiii at bay for a couple more decades.

[@allanrichardson1468]

I was about to write the same comment. Maybe UV or electron beam lithography (as used to make microchips) could make those “cracks” regularly spaced and constant in size and shape. Perhaps “wells” of a controlled depth and with a circular opening rather than cracks.

[@bmobert]

@allanrichardson1468 Yes. It seems pretty obvious. Assuming the hypothesis is correct. Of course, there is one caviot: the cracks within the current iteration are 3d, as I understand it. That means much more.. Um... volume? (The cracks are nearly one dimensional. But maybe it's the surface area that's important? IDK. Let's just go with volume.) Much more volume for the reaction to happen. That might trump perfect conditions if those conditions are expensive compared to random conditions that are cheap. Regardless, it's exciting.

[@terranspaceacademy]

Or to prove that it isn't so we can all look elsewhere.

[@adamcollegeman2]

excellent

[@terranspaceacademy]

Many many thanks

[@nias2631]

Between TSA and Sabine's coverage of cold fusion I feel I gained a fair high level view of this phenomena. This was informative.

[@terranspaceacademy]

Very glad it was helpful.

[@gaius_enceladus]

A really interesting video! The theory certainly seems to be sound enough and has merit. Kudos to all those in the LENR field for their hard work in getting to this point. Theory is very important as a basis for good experimentation. What I really want to see now is for the alleged positive results to be *reproduced* in labs across the world. That is the "gold standard" - reproducability. If *that* can be achieved - that's when real and solid progress will have been shown to have been made!

[@terranspaceacademy]

Glad you enjoyed it! You are quite right... We need replication and a commercially viable product.

[@knswartz1]

It was actually the metal fusing with oxygen. The presence of Radon from Platinum and oxygen or Xenon from Palladium and oxygen in the venting gasses proves this fact. MOXY fusion. Unfortunately for the late Fleischmann he was unaware of these radiative isotopes. Pons is the one who moved back to France.

[@terranspaceacademy]

Oxidation reactions? Why would that occur rapidly?

[@rgaleny]

Coat activated carbon with palladium and platinum. This adds surface area.

[@terranspaceacademy]

That sounds good.

[@michaelbaxter8249]

Wow. Just, wow.

[@terranspaceacademy]

Thank you Michael!

[@terranspaceacademy]

That 60ft fall shakes all the dust off... :-)

[@sailingonasummerbreeze7892]

Very interesting. It will be interesting if Clean Planet can commercialize this reactor. Or - will it fall into the same category of Brilliant Light Power? A whole lot of hype but not a lot of progress....

[@terranspaceacademy]

They just announced their success. Let's hope it pans out.

[@sailingonasummerbreeze7892]

@@terranspaceacademy Agreed! Between them and your video on TAE - very exciting times in this space. Thanks for your good work in bringing this insight to us all!

[@terranspaceacademy]

You are most welcome!

[@meltdown7259]

Thumps up but you forget about the h2

[@terranspaceacademy]

Where did I forget the H2 my friend?

[@jamesfrankel7827]

All fusion and fission is quantum. So is radioactive decay, r process and s processes in supernovas and neutron-neutron kilo Nova's.

[@terranspaceacademy]

Ultimately, all of everything is quantum.

[@Benloehr]

Is this a 27min video on cold fusion????

[@terranspaceacademy]

How dare you! It's LENR or Lattice Fusion or some other name synonymous with cold fusion :-)

[@jacksonnc8877]

Truly a great turning point in human history cold fusion is up there with room temperature super conductor. In how it would change history for humanity I'm grateful to be apart of this amazing world in which we live!

[@terranspaceacademy]

It will truly bring us closer to a better world for everyone.

[@SteveRichfield]

If people think that natural oscillations drive this fusion process, then why not drive this oscillation by adding external RF power, akin to NMR? If these assumptions are true, then external drive would control this process, to be easily turned up or down. Has anyone done the homework to guesstimate the frequencies involved, and/or tried driving this process at those frequencies?

[@terranspaceacademy]

There are several companies working on that theory but I don't think they have focused on the nanocracks. They haven't cracked it yet! Ah well.

[@robertphillips2983]

Bottom line, is their Helium being produced or not? Because given that the inputs are oxygen and Hydrogen (Deuterium), their is only ONE WAY to get helium from that.

[@terranspaceacademy]

That's right Robert. And it's my understanding that they are.

[@allanrichardson1468]

If regular hydrogen is involved, there should be more helium-3 than helium-4, which would help to prove they are MAKING helium, not just getting traces diffusing in from the environment, which is made by radioactive elements emitting alpha particles (helium-4 nuclei).

[@ashleyobrien4937]

correct- Helium is the proof that is required

[@MarshalMHVHZRHL]

LOL LET ME KNOW WHEN YOU RUN INTO MY BOOTSTRAP GOLD LAYER

[@terranspaceacademy]

Will do

[@MarshalMHVHZRHL]

@@terranspaceacademy great thanks. Appearance may vary wildly depending on what angle and attitude you’re at when you hit it.

[@TheIgnoramus]

I’m just gonna throw it out there, Malcolm Bendall TSG generator. He’s using all these concepts and expounded on them.

[@terranspaceacademy]

I'll look it up

[@davidmcsween]

I dont want to pour cold water on this but... I'm not suggesting anything untoward is going on but there is an interesting conversation at the lenr forums about CP and disputes over money. Perhaps all is not as it seems?

[@terranspaceacademy]

It is always a concern...

[@andiralosh2173]

As much as I want this to be true, I was waiting to hear about any product detection at all and... nothing 🙃 They really should have talked more about the parallel of lattice confinement. Interesting concept, certainly, and the photon-electron decay cycle resonance (my summary) idea is new to me, but I want data!

[@terranspaceacademy]

They are producing a water heater first. We'll see how that goes. Hydrogen is not cheap to produce.

[@hellboundweeb149]

It's going to be another money laundering scam.

[@jennysquibb7440]

This area is filled with hopes and dreams to the extent that I will remain skeptical. People can be mistaken and people can fool themselves. People can also outright lie given what a big change it would be if it ever worked. I do not find the idea of gradually releasing photons from a coupled system of protons to get through the Coulomb barrier convincing. If that process is viable, I expect there are other similar processes that should be visible in chemistry and physics. If we saw similar processes elsewhere already , I think it would be more convincing. The closest I can think of is something akin to a cooling process, but it seems too dissimilar to me. I’m making this comment a year after this video was posted. Hopes and dreams will likely keep this topic alive for many more decades.

[@74HOLLE]

Blinded by the Light? Who is Dr. Randell Mills? What is the SunCell?

[@terranspaceacademy]

Sunglasses, Founder and principal stockholder of Brilliant Light Power, whose claims lack corroborating scientific evidence.

[@74HOLLE]

@@terranspaceacademy This is your opinion but not the truth of knowledge in science.

[@74HOLLE]

& "Quantum Fusion" is also a great. But it is not able to match the power output in any way given way wht´s possible with the "SunCell". Btw Dr Mills studied @Harvard & MIT. Merry X-Mas

[@74HOLLE]

The Yt-Channel of "Brilliant Light Power" is active since over ten years! Everything is shown. On the website you can see & download 1750 pages of Randell Mills "Grand Unified Therory of Classical Physics" So what´s wrong from your perspective?

[@terranspaceacademy]

10,000 pages without replication and peer-review do not "prove" anything. If it works so well he needs to show one that works so we can start building ion propulsion systems for our rockets. I would love to find out it is real.

[@Roger7137]

Muito bacana esse episódio! Faltou usar graphene.

[@terranspaceacademy]

Muito obrigado! Seria interessante considerar o grafeno. Fusão Quântica é o Futuro!

[@pilotnamealreadytaken6035]

Woop woop 🎉 the aliens are going to land next year, (2024) so get ready for that.

[@you-know-who.]

I wish

[@dmeemd7787]

When is aliens, it’ll be “aliens” - I’m gonna kind of just stick with Von Braun‘s narrative, lol

[@terranspaceacademy]

Why didn't they tell anyone else ? :-)

[@dmurray2978]

Just in time to prevent the election

[@toamaori]

Hope this is it.. without fusion things are pretty bleak for us as they are.

[@terranspaceacademy]

Indeed. It's been too long.

[@arieverhoeff9141]

it's only 10 years away

[@terranspaceacademy]

Hopefully not :-)

[@mathewward6229]

Has anyone tried this with MOF or Zeolites? Or perhaps a cathode covered in MOF or Zeolites? If micro pores are the answer then material scientists will makes them.

[@terranspaceacademy]

Not that I know of... Interesting thought.

[@jeffsewardfiredude4841]

Been a while but I'm still here

[@terranspaceacademy]

Good to see you.

[@AdredenGaming]

Well if it works I hope they can break the oil monopoly barrier

[@terranspaceacademy]

We do too

[@tinytim71301]

❤Kaizen + 💪fail fast learn fast = interstellar travel.👍

[@terranspaceacademy]

Fingers crossed!

[@edwardedward8139]

I remember that in the book that the two scientists produced on cold fusion the showed their procedure and the procedures of all the other labs that said they could not reproduce the results. None of the other labs followed the the exact procedures. If the published procedures in the book were legit, then as a non-scientist, I can at least see that nobody followed the correct recipe, and then when the did not get the results they concluded that such results were unobtainable. Now I understand that the different procedures as shown in the book could have been a subset of multiple attempts by each lab and that the different labs actually did follow the proper procedure but the book omitted that information. But if this is not the case, then there must be some reason as to why labs around the world would not follow the same procedures and then claim that they "could not" duplicate the results. I have no theories about this. Don't much care. It was just an observation and a thought when I read the book in the late 1980s.

[@terranspaceacademy]

That's interesting. Not following the procedures exactly proves nothing re verification.

[@mikegLXIVMM]

I want to see viable Fusion energy in my lifetime.

[@terranspaceacademy]

We do too Mike!

[@eshwarprasad524]

I'm no Physics expert, but the theory does look legit. You need manufactured microcracks + Deuterium for this to occur. Also, it is not a natural process because getting the weird hydrotron state is very difficult If this turns out to be legit we would see a new world

[@terranspaceacademy]

It will be amazing when we get something working well enough.

[@thomasciarlariello]

My MIT peer reviewed articles and by Invite only MIT presentation proves how Noguchi of early 1940s Hamhung Hungnam Hamgyong perfected muon catalyzed fusion rocket plane propulsion

[@terranspaceacademy]

Very cool. Where can I buy one? I would love a muon catalized fusion powered rocket plane...

[@thomasciarlariello]

I have a CIA archaeologists stuck in of North Korea and in of Changbai region searching for such a remains so CIA attaché to National Archives in of College Park will not let me negotiate with de facto Renaissance Fair North Korea to release such researchers. Such an engine was comprised of a Dewar of cryogenic liquefied deuterium fuel connte4c to a beryllium alloy reaction chamber nozzle coiled in around electromagnet coils to focus lens cosmic ray muons where by cryogenic fuel prevents exceeding Curie Point. A Xcor Lynx could be modified to have deuterated diborane fuel with a Helmholtz Coil since Xcor had patented a "Cryogen Valve" if only deuterium was not restricted to a military monopoly to remember how maintenance staff of a local airport freaked out on me for mentioning such fuels. Dr Mithcell Swartz of MIT phoned me to say I "should take Jerome Drexler to court for patents plagiarized so it is in of legal limbo status.

[@markrowland1366]

The reaction to the assault on Pons and Freshman was, to me,a repeat of the reaction called, Clovis first. The absurdity, implied, seemed a cold war Soviet propaganda attack.

[@terranspaceacademy]

It was quite cruel but scientists don't like you to go "media first" though that does not seem to be their fault.

[@petersvancarek]

This doesn't really work. Distances measured in nanometers aren't enough. For fusion to occur you need to get to sub-proton sized distances, 10 million times smaller distance than nanometer(

[@terranspaceacademy]

The lecturer is not with the Japanese company that has announced success so it could be subfemtometer.

[@petersvancarek]

@@terranspaceacademy Using the structure of metal to get them so close? Impossible without really extreme pressures(practically impossible on earth and anywhere in a few light year distance from earth... It may be possible only in really extreme gravity fields. The high temperature is what is needed to act in conjunction of pressure to make reaction possible still achievable conditions). The nature of elementary particles doesn't allow for that, the repulsive forces grow with 3rd power when closing the distance

[@terranspaceacademy]

I don't know enough materials science in this area.

[@dmeemd7787]

The videos you have made, especially as of late, are just sooooo d*** good…. There are so many of things that apply far beyond the scope of just the topic at hand and it’s elegancy is and/or is becoming second to none.. Thank you !😊

[@terranspaceacademy]

Thank you so much for saying so. It really means a lot to me.

[@johnbash-on-ger]

@@terranspaceacademy I second his opinion about your great videos! 😃Most people have considered the "cold" fusion experiments debunked for a long time. But it turns out, it does work! Seems to be some kind of lattice confinement pinch (nuclear) fusion! Lattice confinement fusion (LCF) en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lattice_confinement_fusion Pinch (plasma physics) - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pinch_(plasma_physics) The name cold fusion is a really bad name considering the electrical energy input is giving the nuclei a lot of energy, making this nuclear fusion approach actually a hot fusion approach. This all the way back to the original Pons and Fleischmann experiment(s). There never was cold fusion there! It's all "hot" in other words a lot of kinetic and thermal energy! Cold fusion en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cold_fusion How tight does the crystal structure squeezes the atoms? How close is the density to ultra-dense hydrogen? I can't thank you enough for the great video that finally clears up this mystery! 😃Turns out something was going on worth investigating further in the experiments of Pons and Fleischmann. The scientists who decided to investigate that unexplained phenomenon did this in a truly great example of how to do science right/correct and in the (enlightening and humbling) spirit of science. They're exemplary science heroes or, to use an internet slang term, true science Chads! 😃😃

[@terranspaceacademy]

We should always entertain the thought that we are overlooking a groundbreaking discovery because of emotional bias. Rest in peace Dr. Semmelweis

[@dmeemd7787]

@@terranspaceacademy Amazing quote right there

[@dmeemd7787]

@@terranspaceacademy right back at ya!!!

[@videolabguy]

Just thirty more years and another 100 billion dollars please.

[@terranspaceacademy]

Or not. Just invest in some more coal and it'll all be good.

[@victoraurel77]

if some ppl will not make a lot of money out of it and if it makes energy too cheap you will never see it put at use for the common good

[@terranspaceacademy]

We hope you are wrong...

[@gormnykreim8650]

Pons & Fleischman's premature press conference would have been completely excusable had they been dying of neutron radiation poisoning, which they would have been, if the energy production had been as large as they had claimed.

[@terranspaceacademy]

Hah! True but they weren't in the room during the meltdown.

[@ultramarinus2478]

I do love the optimistic naivitae behind this vid. Car industry (including electrical car and hybrids), power industry (Gas, Oil, cole and almost everything in those areas), would have to lay down and somehow forgot not only the trillions in gains, but also the POWER it grants them over others. Somehow, i belive they will probably snuff promissing upstart idea out - either by money, or by "accident", than lay down the kings on their chessboards. Only way i can immagine some new idea come trough, would be in China (with backing from the right people for sufficiently long time), first, and the rest of the world, just to race the tech race.

[@terranspaceacademy]

The Japanese need to be oil free more than the Chinese do...

[@unclewerner]

The statement that cold fusion does happen only rarely in nature might be wrong. We do not know much about the internal composition of our own planet for instance. Deep bore experiments have shown an unexpected high concentration of hydrogen deep inside our continental crusts. Combine that with unexpected layers of carbon and telluric currents and you might end up with a different model how heavier elements could form. Indeed we might end up with a total new understanding of the cosmos. See: "Earth factories: Creation of the elements from nuclear transmutation in Earth’s lower mantle" // Fukuhara, Yoshino, Fujima

[@terranspaceacademy]

I saw some of that. Hydrogen pockets like LNG...

[@unclewerner]

@@terranspaceacademy Formation of LNG is no mystery. Hydrogen and carbon are among the most common elements in the universe. Of course they form molecules. The current bore depths of natural gas become more and more problematic for the biogenesis formation theory. A proposed deep biosphere (see Gold) could save that theory, but I doubt it could explain the natural gas on many other heavenly bodies. The real killer question is how after such a long time hydrogen can still bubble up from great depths. The Japanese researchers hint at core transmutations as the culprit of heavier elements being created and that is also the source for the internal heat of our planet. The interesting part for the Japanese researches here is that if that theory turns out to be right it could lead to much improved prediction of seismic activity.

[@esecallum]

30 years

[@terranspaceacademy]

That will not always be true my friend.

[@WaxonwaxoffDanielson]

So im the only one that sees that aetheric atmospheric free energy (the tesla coil) is being paraded as nuclear.

[@terranspaceacademy]

You are indeed. And when you are the only one seeing something double check your glasses. :-)

[@stevenyee8967]

Great video on cold fusion professor! I believe in cold fusion. Why blast a building to smithereens when you can just kick the legs from underneath it and let gravity do the rest. This is high energy plasma versus cold fusion. I hope Clean Planet Incorporated will be commercially successful to save this one and only planet we call home. Keep us informed about their progress. 🤣

[@terranspaceacademy]

Something is producing all that heat :-)

[@deserthorsedude]

Good explanation of the cold fusion phenomena and how it is different from hot fusion. The distinction there is essential for both the physics understanding and for future development of cold fusion. Too bad this whole class of fusion processes got a bad reputation and is still regarded with "cult science" status. Hopefully, we can get past those misunderstandings and move forward with this exciting potential energy source.

[@terranspaceacademy]

I hope so... LENR has so much potential.

[@clydecox2108]

If it’s real this is probably it.

[@terranspaceacademy]

This is the most practical small scale fusion idea I've seen. Fingers crossed.

[@antoniobragancamartins3165]

About general breakthroughs, we only should heart top people like Neil Tyson, Elon Musk, some physicists, instead KZbinrs! The fission or fusion never, never, never won't be used for space thrust, because for it mass injection is indispensable! About fusion on Earth, there are much papers but no one can reproduce. I'm 64 and I had heard that since I was 15 ! The promise is always 10 years in the future! Ten years forever!

[@terranspaceacademy]

Not forever my friend. Someday it will happen and everyone will see that it was inevitable.