Questioning Newton and Einstein

[@jdlawbooker3938]

Was watching it not realizing over 10 years ago. Claudia has gotten so much better at explaining than she was in this video.

[@DitDitDitDahDahDahDitDitDit]

It’s an odd choice by the editor of this video to keep interrupting her with close up pictures of people chewing.

[@joshua3171]

is taking everything out of the box, like placing the box in another dimension

[@IsaacRodman]

Here after the recent news articles about Massive Gravity in January 2020. The camera people and editors quite obviously had far too much fun cutting in audience as well based on the expressions captured!

[@PrivateSi]

Subspace: +ve charge cells (charge quanta, base charge +1) held together by an ethereal sea of free-flowing -ve charge Inertia: Energy lost by a free cell squeezing through the lattice is returned with a kick as the lattice decompresses/refreezes/balances behind Momentum: Free cells have inertia, free chunks form energy loops of cells in front moving to fill -ve space behind. Holes are just -ve charge flow Positron: +ve free cell (+1) pulls in -ve charge that rebounds with curved outflows. Drags cells, vibrates the Lattice Electron: -ve hole (-1) pulls in +ve cells that rebound outwards before stopping or looping back in. Drags -ve charge, vibrates the Lattice Neutrino: Over 50% (else back to empty lattice) out of phase Electron + Positron. Free cell and hole are close with tight shared charge loops so tiny mass Proton: 2 positrons (fuzzily) sandwiching/wrapping 1 electron. 3 sub parts and long charge loops so mass is large. Overall electric charge is +1 Neutron: Proton + Electron. Electron joins another proton in the nucleus, (pep)(e)(pep), decays outside via centrifugal force on the dangling electron Alpha Particle: 2N + 2P.. 10 e-, 8 p+.. -2 base charge .. (pep)(e)(pep)+(pep)(e)(pep), +2 valence charge. -ve core in a +ve shell (PPeePP) + Gravity ++++: Chunks + holes of lattice of various sizes that quickly turn to smaller chunks and holes, until electrons, positrons, neutrinos/back to regular lattice Atom: Lattice density increases to the nucleus centre. Outer electrons may be squashed flat on the nucleus surface or pulled away (completely) Weak Force: A nucleus weak point hit hard enough releases alpha particles, neutrons, protons, electrons, positrons, neutrinos and (gamma) light Nuclear Force: Gravity (-ve charge inflow/charge gradient) + electric attraction beat electric repulsion. Fuzzy balloons recursively pulled into spheres Electron Bond: Electron stretched between two +ve nuclei zones. There is also a 6 ins+6 outs charge flow model of electrons and positrons -ve Charge Flow: Continuous, gravity-centralised inflows, outflows curve with shallow exit angle. Lateral force in random directions cancels (else spin?) Gravity: Matter attracts -ve charge away from voids that repel more and expand. Higher -ve charge density compacts the lattice Time: -ve charge density slows -ve charge and light speed, therefore local time slows. Else cells are crossed in a constant time with more cells per area Velocity: Compresses the lattice (Length Contraction) so higher charge density so time dilation Black Hole: Drags lattice around (Frame Dragging). Neutrino crystal. Feeding may annihilate core boundary matter to empty lattice - a universe? Hawking Radiation: Annihilated matter frees trapped -ve charge that radiates in all directions, out of the black hole and into its core Tunnelling: The intrinsic radial energy of positron and electron charge flow directed in one direction for a brief time, possibly travelling at C2, or even C3 Particle Entanglement: Particles linked by charge flows.. Stopping a flow at any point in the network breaks entanglement Spin: particles (and cells and/or charge flows?) (may) spin (anti)clockwise perpendicular to the direction of travel (charge outflow bias? blocky lattice?) -- Light Blip: Compressed (excess?) -ve charge dipole pulls in cells. Concentrates -ve charge so may deplete voids and add to gravity. Dark Matter? Light Wave: Amplitude = number of blipping layers. Shorter wavelength = higher blip frequency = higher wave energy. Velocity = C Photo-Electric Effect: Light frequency over a threshold determined by atomic mass and valency dislodges an electron on impact Photon Entanglement: A vibrating line of cells like an ultra-fine (spinning?) AC current between entangled photons -- Big Bang: Lattice explosion flings charge out as matter / Black holes collide so rapid core growth / Black hole hit like a bell / Fast lattice expansion Steady State: Universe could grow slowly. A big hit may start simultaneous (patchy) matter formation across the whole universe, not from a point Boxed Universe: If voids can't expand when they lose -ve charge to matter gravity wells are steeper with more compressed lattice Conservation: Everything is conserved - but if a black hole core annihilates matter to empty lattice that absorbs the energy the information is lost PROS: Simpler, logical, bottom-up, recursive, realistic, 3D/4D, visualisable, self-contained, open/closed, (in)finite, (semi)conformal, cyclic , (un)balancing -- This isn't any form of science, not even pseudoscience. It is materialist make-believe in-mind modelling minus maths. A strictly 4D, neo-classical bottom-up approach compatible with a closed, contained and more importantly an open, but self-contained universe/multiverse using the fewest base particles and forces (2+1). There are many possible variations of this BINARY BASE CHARGE FIELD. This variant is a simpler universe to the Standard Model that corrects what seem to me to be obvious fundamental , problematic errors, namely Antimatter-matter and neutrino problem and lack of electro-lumino-gravitational !ETHER! (kind of... mine combines with +ve cells to form a more modern quantum relativistic lattice field).. This model has its merits and the maths can't be too difficult for a math wiz. It is a pretty accommodating, recursive, strictly visualisable premise (as it should be?).. The Lattice is everything, there is no nothing, no thing is perfectly still, balanced lattice. There is no empty space and probably not (much) truly empty lattice containing no thing(s). There is no before or after The Eternal Lattice, there is no outside and The Lattice knows everything because it is everything - but a (collective) conscious entity!

[@ManAdam712]

Congratulations on your awards in recent years Claudia. Now tell us what cern is doing?

[@pantheraleoromanus6241]

Firstly, what do you think Newton would have concluded if his observations of the falling Apple render the Apple to fall in a pond of water rather than the ground? Secondly, strangely how you can see the mirrored tile on the Lunar surface when I cannot observe no Artifacts left behind by NASA, the Russians, Chinese, Japanese, the Europeans etc., regardless how large my telescope is or the size of the objects?

[@lotharlamurtra7924]

How is it possible that everybody is eating during the lecture?

[@luchiandacian8815]

That is Newton apple?

[@gypsycruiser]

Dated now , a few gems

[@jamesrick3524]

If you want me to provide real evidence I would love to tell you

[@ankushrathore670]

I calculated speed of graviton

[@PaulHigginbothamSr]

Yes when you question Newton and Einstein you loose your footing and become lost to science as long as you do.

[@buca512boxer]

Given that premise, we should question you a heck of a lot more #claudiaderham , I for one, do.

[@JohanLouw68]

Gravity is matter absorbing infrared radiation in the 0.3mm to 4.3mm wavelenght range.Bombard matter with this frequency range at hig intensity and check for gravitational effects.

[@EzraAChen]

The math of newton and AE are primitive and now she is daring a monumental breakthrough. And you sense all the conservatism in the room and the full professors are not catching up with her. This can be a tenured presentation for an associate professor who has the most Intuitive Mind comparable to AE. So who is a better mathematician ? CWRU does not Keep the most Brilliant faculty. Who either is nontenued like they fire the Field’s awarded faculty. Or they left for a better institution.

[@kestrelmuse]

No you cannot produce something out of nothing..... What happened to logic? The ether is what everything is produced from. It is not understood by quasi-scientists of this particular planet. It is everywhere--- between all subatomic particles and perhaps in the particles. Mr. Tesla knew of it and probably understood it well.

[@muskyelondragon]

To what exactly do you refer?

[@JoeDeglman]

Seems every physics Phd in the country has promised a comprehensive theory on gravity before they retire. so far this is the most understandable model. About 1853, the Marquis de LaPlace developed a model for gravitation which was an improvement and extension of the previous work done by La Sage. In this model, gravitation is caused by the pressure of a ubiquitous gas composed of “infinitesimal particles”, each of which has an intrinsic velocity of millions of times the speed of light. This model for gravitation produces all the results of Relativity theory, while describing the actual cause of gravitation without resorting to any more than 3 Euclidean dimensions, nor requiring the mathematical fabrication of a “metric” Tesla was able to mess with this ether energy with high voltage shock and get electrons to materialize out of the ether. Some say he was creating neutrons and the beta decay of them gave him electrons. www.unusualresearch.com/doku.php/sqif

[@CosmicEpiphany]

Joe Deglman all mathematics is fabricated/constructed from scratch essentially.

[@spuddickson9197]

@@JoeDeglman matrix

[@JoeDeglman]

@@spuddickson9197 all matter is made from the ether medium. A neutron is a geometrically stable lattice structure of photons. There is a better observation out of quantum computing that an electron, as witness by Tesla forming out of the ether medium, is half of a photon and the ether medium immediately surrounds it. Now known as a quasi-particle or phonon surrounding the electron. Quantum computing can control this magnetic ball of ether with a laser to give it an electron 'spin' in all 6 axis of flow.

[@jamesrick3524]

Lol i want to show you why you are wrong

[@RD2564]

Who is the this lightweight who has the nerve to question two of the greatest scientists of all time, Newton and Einstein? Thanks for delivering one of the most boring videos of all time, I guess ...