Quine-McCluskey Method for 5 variables

[@smileplease6151]

Thank You, sir. That was so helpful.

[@omeronuralpaslan]

Thank you sir! This video is very helpful.

[@spaart9844]

No entiendo nada de lo que dices xd pero mirando lo que haces y tratando de seguir un poco los pasos creo que ya entendi jaja graciaas👍

[@S_P_S]

This process is time consuming but better than K-Map.

[@TJLee-w7w]

why you don't do 2 and 3 "0001-"?

[@harshavardhan1980]

there was a mistake in the end while graphing is done we get only 3 outputs as answer not 5 outputs probably if i am wrong correct me!

[@khaileng3020]

The video is correct , it is 6 output

[@faisalsaddique3323]

at 9:12, you ignored m2 and m3, they had 1 bit change too, correct if wrong

[@khaileng3020]

He wrote it at 11.04

[@kamalishree246]

Couldn't understand how you shaded the prime implicants...

[@fajargilangramadhanp.6894]

ZERO ZERO ZERO ZERO ONE 👺

[@shivankitss8396]

Its like a 10x10 Rubik cude

[@XDdemonslayer]

Why are the numbers grouped on the left in a particular order, for instance [1,2,8] , [3,6,9,10,17,20] , etc.?

[@XDdemonslayer]

Wait I see now, it is grouping according to the # of 1's.

[@Amonfobious]

this method is such a tedious process haha

[@bonbonpony]

How about Quine-McCluskey for multiple outputs?

[@alexmercer8527]

lol he said dont ask me to do it again imagin him doing with multiplie outputs ahahha by the way he explains very good !

[@moatrgull5793]

Simplify the stated 5 Variable Boolean Expression using the Quine-McCluskey method. F(A,B,C,D,E)=∑▒〖(0,1,2,5,7,8,11,12,17,18,21,25,26,29,30,31)〗 kindly solve this Sr 4 me

[@arslanali5209]

I solve it for you.

[@moatrgull5793]

Plzzzz please 🥺