Quine McCluskey (QM) Method

[@DogeCharger]

Probably not relevant anymore, but I'm pretty sure some people have doubts around the 9:00 mark about why (1,9) and (3,11) aren't paired together - after all this would technically form -0-1, which would make sense right? However, this isn't a possible pairing because the second pairing you are trying to merge has a value lower than the last value in the first pairing So, if you notice throughout all of the pairings, the right hand value is consistently at least larger than the left hand value for example, (1,3), 3 is greater than 1, (3,7), 7 is greater than 3, (9,13), 13 is greater than 9 This same concept is carried over to pairs with two dashes or differing bits: (1,3,9,11): 1 < 3 < 9 < 11 (2,3,10,11): 2 < 3 < 10 < 11 (3,7,11,15): 3 < 7 < 11 < 15 A pairing of (1,9,3,11) would break this rule: 1 < 9 !< 3 < 11

[@Vodallus]

Finally someone without a strong indian accent

[@AniviaS]

Nice to see you using a Pilot Metropolitan ;)

[@pslr0804]

Thanks for help me to clear my exam 😀😀

[@UmairKhan-ir5yo]

thank you soo much! your teaching style is great :)

[@johnt1342]

This was very helpful! Thank you!

[@yaboi_sakurai]

Amazing explanation, thank you!

[@joshuahew]

at 15:44, does anyone know why he draws the line from 2 to 3 instead of 2 to 11?

[@nanda_8]

Same doubt... Could you please tell me why?

[@mevlutkelle4083]

same doubt , the video is good for someone new , but not good for someone who studies for a test

[@MuhammadLatif-tf2xp]

Thank You so much..... Your teaching style is great.............

[@petersonjr8015]

What about (1,9) + (3,11) at 9:47 ?

[@GoneRaiding]

yeah i saw that too, (1,9,3,11) are -0-1

[@DogeCharger]

@@GoneRaiding Probably not relevant anymore, but I'm pretty sure it is because the second pairing you are trying to merge has a value lower than the last value in the first pairing So, if you notice throughout all of the pairings, the right hand value is consistently at least larger than the left hand value for example, (1,3), 3 is greater than 1, (3,7), 7 is greater than 3, (9,13), 13 is greater than 9 This same concept is carried over to pairs with two dashes or differing bits: (1,3,9,11): 1 < 3 < 9 < 11 (2,3,10,11): 2 < 3 < 10 < 11 (3,7,11,15): 3 < 7 < 11 < 15 A pairing of (1,9,3,11) would break this rule: 1 < 9 !< 3 < 11

[@rohicr3381]

Thank you so much..! your explanation is nice

[@MeetPatel-lm6wx]

at 10:12 why u not take (1,9),(3,11) pair

[@berserk8914]

still wondering man, have you figured this out? also (2, 10, 3, 11)

[@e_manue1]

@@berserk8914 Those have already been written so no need to repeat the same combinations

[@berserk8914]

@@e_manue1 No they haven't been man (1, 9, 3, 11) (2, 10, 3, 11) (9, 11, 7, 15) for example. This exercise goes further.

[@e_manue1]

@@berserk8914 stop the video at 9:30 and you can see he just finished writing two of those sets of numbers in a different order. As for the (9, 11, 7, 15), that isn't a possible combination since 3 symbols change.

[@purrconnections75]

Why didnt you use 1,9 and 2,10- for the 2nd table

[@bernadethcasio8832]

Thank you so much brother 😘😘

[@naveenkumawat4039]

Thanks, your video was helpful!

[@megatron3591]

pretty good ngl

[@nehal076]

Why 9 is not compared with 7

[@atharpathan8527]

Thankewww. Sooo muchh broo.... 😘😘😘

[@Spookameer]

thank

[@Futo210_MCJE]

thank u

[@kavitagrover9024]

why did u added 1,1o and 15

[@SkillWill22]

Hi, what are these "don't cares" you talk about?

[@myfrnd3457]

thanks, bro!!

[@robertharmon4385]

bruh not gonna lie you low key sound like Mr. Rogers

[@AmViR1]

THIS IS VERY CONFUSING !