Quotient rule (KristaKingMath)

[@zakmatew]

This woman deserves an award for best explaining difficult concepts. Thank you and keep up the good work!

[@kristakingmath]

Thank you so much, Emil! :)

[@TSBooger]

You amaze me. As you post videos, its what I'm just learning in class. My professor is from Hungary and has a short tongue (lisp) and his teaching style is not the best. Thank you for posting! =)

[@PureInsanity]

Although I finished my calculus I subscribed to your channel so far I love it :) keep up the good work

[@cl0wn1cula]

Thanks helped a lot, didn't think i'd see another one of your amazing vids.

[@kristakingmath]

You're welcome! Glad I could help. :)

[@kristakingmath]

Thanks so much for subscribing! :)

[@vegetagoku7943]

You are welcome Krista. Can you make a video explaining binomial probability?

[@Postcalculus]

You don't need to memorise the quotient rule if you rewrite the denominator as a negative exponent, and then it is simply the product rule! :)

[@zajdragon6173]

Awesome!!! And again it makes so much more sense now that I watch your videos. You explain very very well. I thank you so much, I need this for my calc 1 class. Thanks a Ton!!!

[@kristakingmath]

I'm so glad it helped!!

[@0503696580]

wooowwww!!! what a brilliant explaining! thanks a lot a lot and a lot ^_^ , and keep going

[@hg2.]

Excellent! I'll come here when I need a refresher on Quotient Rule.

[@kristakingmath]

Glad you liked it! :)

[@kristakingmath]

That makes me so happy! :D You're welcome!

[@zainislam554]

i didn't understand the last part in which you found the common denominator. can we please explain it?

[@c.james1]

Learning with you is a treat, you are a great teacher and are very pretty too :)

[@Will-bb4zy]

nice as always!!! thanks :)

[@vegetagoku7943]

Thank you Krista. this video was excellent.

[@kristakingmath]

Thank you so much Vegeta!

[@SandunilJayasinghe]

wow,you are such a good teacher!l Love your teaching!

[@kristakingmath]

aww!! thank you so much!! :D

[@genesilopez6045]

your the dream girl of mathematicians !!!!!

[@zickrap5965]

I love this! You helped me so much!! :D I’m in love with your eyes!! 💙 d:

[@shubhamkannaujiya5940]

thanks

[@riacardi7011]

Do you have a video on Sinusoid graphs?

[@JAFFER3657]

cool i didn't understand it in my college lecture you teach me easily thanks alott

[@jamalnaser1933]

Could you use the product rule to come up with same answer?

[@user-nx1lj3ig7w]

at 7:22. isnt (x) x (cx^-2)= cx^-1???? you put cx/x^2 im really confused

[@kristakingmath]

your and my values are actually the same! :) if you start with cx/x^2 and you cancel an x from the numerator and denominator, you'd get c/x, which you could rewrite as cx^(-1). :)

[@user-nx1lj3ig7w]

ohhh i see, thank you and i hope you don't mind my other 100 questions in the future, just kidding :D

[@herbcruz4697]

Just out of curiosity, before taking the derivative, would it have been easier to first multiply both top and bottom of the original function by x?

[@kristakingmath]

+Herbert Cruz Yes, that would've been a great way to make the problem easier right from the start. Good thinking!

[@kristakingmath]

No, sorry about that.

[@biscaynebuckets]

Thank you so much!! Awesome smile btw:)

[@shubhamkannaujiya5940]

you helped me very much

[@kristakingmath]

Glad I could help!

[@ngalexngalex]

May i ask sth? when to use the quotient rule? just like using the L'H rule to solve the limit question eg. Lim f(x)/g(x) =0/0 why cant we use the quotient rule? that just mess up my mind =[

[@herbcruz4697]

ngs kenneth L'Hospital's Rule is only used for finding limits, when getting an indeterminate form of either 0/0 or ±inf/±inf. L'Hospital's Rule, however, does not say that the limit of the function is equal to the limit of the derivative of that function. Rather, it says that the limit is equal to the limit of the ratio of the derivatives of the top function to the bottom function, after establishing the fact that the limit turns out to be one of the indeterminate forms, as described above.

[@abedaburomman367]

Just a friendly comment, I think you left out taking the product rule of CX^_1 Please correct me if I am wrong 😬

[@kristakingmath]

You don't need the product rule for the derivative of Cx_1, because C is a constant. So it's like taking the derivative of 3x. The derivative would just be 3, so in the same way, the derivative of Cx_1 would be C.

[@abedaburomman367]

Krista King thanks, I didn't assume that C would be the constant thank you for replying back Your videos are extremely helpful. Thanks again

[@kristakingmath]

You're welcome, glad I can help! :)

[@junals03]

can you make a quotient rule with trigonometric derivatives

[@kristakingmath]

this might help! Chain rule for derivatives, with quotient rule :)

[@billtruttschel]

This is not a rational function because the denominator is not a polynomial.

[@ThePinoyMamba]

:)

[@kristakingmath]

:D

[@vizestroowash]

You remind of laurel from Arrow, only more beautiful.

[@armanazimi2587]

OMG you are so sweet.

[@M1k4e]

so hot

[@MichaelMantion]

:)