(R) Miller V SoS for Exiting EU 2017

[@zhaoken5136]

God is so regretful that I didn't find this channel earlier; it almost includes all the important cases for public law! It helps me a lot!

[@johnfaisal700]

you're one the best teachers i've ever seen .amazing content: clear with with fantastic illustration .

[@caselawexplained7319]

Thanks John - appreciated.

[@makeitwithmaheen3]

Thank you for this. Helped a lot for my exam.

[@caselawexplained7319]

Thanks Maheen - glad it helped.

[@ahmadbunnia]

Your tie has convinced me of becoming a lawyer.

[@caselawexplained7319]

Anything to persuade. I have a public lecture tomorrow - you have convinced me to get the tie out for that also.

[@darylhong1957]

Great channel supplying useful content that's of help for law students. Thank you keep it up👍🔥

[@caselawexplained7319]

Thanks for the support Daryl.

[@russellkasmi8487]

Thank you very much for this. Helped a lot for my exam.

[@caselawexplained7319]

Thanks Russell

[@scotthowells8505]

Thanks this was great!! it really helped with my Public law paper on Case analysis of R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2017] UKSC 5. Any chance on one regarding procedural aspects of judicial review and judicial review remedies relating to declining an application to the licensing committee of the Council. Cheers

[@stamfordninja]

Good Video, helped a lot for some solid background to the case!

[@caselawexplained7319]

Thanks Stamford.

[@imaniprovenzanoadisi284]

Thank you so much!!!

[@caselawexplained7319]

Thanks Imani

[@brigittetucker1767]

Is there a Indigenous sovereign reserved chair in article 5?

[@caselawexplained7319]

That I don't know BT.

[@mulengakaenga4461]

This was very useful, thank you

[@caselawexplained7319]

You're welcome. Good luck!

[@vaishaligopalakirushnan9179]

Is this the case which is cited as R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the EU [2018] AC 61 [18]-[29](DC)?

[@caselawexplained7319]

It is the same case as [2018] AC 61 but not sure where you have got the extra '[18]-[29] (DC)' bit from.

[@karlfulton4854]

Do you have any remarks concerning the Robin Tilbrook case.?

[@caselawexplained7319]

Hi Karl. I am afraid that I don't have a comment on that particular case - as I understand it there will be an appeal against to the decision not to allow judicial review.

[@karlfulton4854]

@@caselawexplained7319 Thank you for your reply.

[@ayaan7370]

Am I allowed to email you please? I am a first year uni student and I need so much help please

[@caselawexplained7319]

Hi Ayaan. I am afraid that I am not in a position to offer 'so much help' - if you have a specific question you can always pop it on here if you wish. N

[@franknzewi603]

Thanks, you simplifies constitutional law, especially judicial review.

[@caselawexplained7319]

Thanks for the feedback Frank