Radar, Smoke & Ragnar Guns - Svea First Impressions

[@denzmerin2568]

Ragnar is inherently underpowered. It lacks the necessary attributes to make meaningful impact on match result. No burst damage to speak of, split turrets, and yet still retains a fragile platform. I would take 1 Conqueror..Thunderer or 1 DM or even 1 of just about any CA over 2 Ragnars on my team any day of the week. Now... If WG gave it the specialized repair party of the Nestrashimy ( and 1 more base charge)... And maybe a few more thousand HP if could make up for where it is seriously lacking with longevity.

[@djquacker1018]

I may be braindead right now, but is this the usual sarcastic copypasta about the Ragnar or is this custom made?

[@alphax4785]

The copy pasta AFAICT.

[@theflames6558]

This was funny asf during Yuros vid

[@elliottbriggs3385]

@@djquacker1018it’s the usual one, always makes me laugh

[@aproudbaguette3605]

The meme is fun but did someone actually said all of that ?

[@Boatswain_Tam]

I love playing the Belfast 43, & this ship has a very similar play style with its short smoke and radar. Seriously contemplating getting it

[@taluthus610]

I was the gearing in the second match. I see it indeed DID make it to the video haha. Was a very fun match, torped the heck out of that flank. Gotta say, it was impressive in the finish watching PQ tanking all the damage at the end before goin down. GGs

[@Almedius76]

Finally a new steel ship I really want!

[@bLock_c1pher_Gaming]

Hey! thats me in the 1st game in Dead Montana, SORRY!!!, on PQ's team. I really like this Ship to bad I only have 6500 steel just a bit longer to go. thank you PQ, take care.

[@n2t460]

Save your steel for something better maybe like FDR. Definitely not Mecklenburg it can't even beat a Bismarck

[@Cactusjugglertm]

PQs description of every single rudder shift in the game: "a little bit sluggish"😊

[@Caleb-zu1pk]

😂

[@MrTrool323]

Svea is what should be called a box of gimmicks A Smaland that ate one too many semla's

[@RickardNilsson83]

They should have named it Fika in true swedish spirit

[@maciejlis9928]

'You could maybe slot IFHE' you say that when having 17 fires haha 16:30 Great content! Keep making the good stuff

[@takimara154]

I forgot this ship existence coming to WoWs while I just bought Austin......... which I still find it really hard to play it

[@Brezzanater]

Play around the reload booster and hide for the rest - honestly though one of my favourite ships - very rewarding experience, just have position yourself well, and use the reload booster for the best moments ( great fire starter after you see a bb damage con )

[@paullagarde7388]

>>plane based ASW >>cries in edgar's "ship based ASW that has one fewer depth charge per round than minotaur"

[@littlepea1325]

I love light cruisers. I was wondering which steel ship will be next. I know now 😉

[@BenjaminChapman-r7r]

Like you said I think it will be very powerful in a div with something like gearing. You mentioned it probably being great in a div with Svea Gearing and another cruiser. I think that 3rd should be wooster.

[@alexkesselaar2706]

hi mr PQ, thanks for the video. Since you are talking a lot about the rudder shift, is it worth swapping consealment for rudder?

[@cathouse791]

Those Blind shots on me in the Hayate in the first game missed me by inches on the map border....

[@thekillermanjaro]

Should've focused on the game instead of being a paid actor

[@thesaltybrit9321]

@@thekillermanjaroand the best version of you dribbled outta your Mum.

[@Apollyon-er4ut]

I think they're Oster torps at 13.5k. Halland are 15k range.

[@metalogic1580]

range doesn't define torps, speed detection and damage does.

[@Apollyon-er4ut]

@@metalogic1580 Oh, you mean like the Oster torps which have the exact same damage, range and speed? 🤨🤨

[@Joshua-fi4ji]

​@@metalogic1580which is why Chapayevs 4km torps are so effective. You're gimping yourself if you don't build your Chappy around its torps.

[@metalogic1580]

@@Joshua-fi4ji you either have a sever lack of reading comprehension or you assumed a lot of things in what I said because that's not what I'm saying, at all. Try again, dingus

[@metalogic1580]

@@Joshua-fi4ji Where the fuck does that come from? Your ass? Because you jumped like, 20 steps in your logic to get there. This is not what meant, at all

[@Abuulo1]

Love the videos! Definitely made me a better player. Although I am curious how you have the enemy ship angle info? In the bottom left

[@elliottbriggs3385]

Its a mod, which one specifically I don’t remember

[@bikeguy3034]

Navigator mod

[@AllAhabNoMoby]

I so wanted this ship to have more gun dpm, I'd easily sacrifice the torps for it. It looks like a decent ship, but a bit of a jack of all trades. And I am up for my next steel ship when the coupon comes, already had 3 shortlisted and now this...

[@tsuaririndoku]

Can’t believe Felix’s Minecraft Dog is now a Warship

[@evolutionari]

Looks interesting, though I'll still get a Bourgogne next. I really wanted an Austin so I got it first and I'm having a blast with it but yeah. Thanks for the review!

[@Skerra-kk6sm]

Bourgogne should always be first steel ship imo. I say this as someone who has Z-42/Bourgogne/Stalingrade/Plymouth/Scilia/Incomparable/and I feel like I'm missing one more.

[@evolutionari]

@@Skerra-kk6sm Honestly I enjoy cruiser gameplay more, and even though it took me 2-3 business days to decide, I went with Austin.

[@Skerra-kk6sm]

@@evolutionari Austin. That's the one I was forgetting. It's fine but I find it very situational. It would be nice to see another Des Moines style cruiser as a steel ship. Maybe something with 32mm bow armour would be nice.

[@clmwrx]

With coupon that I still have, I can get this. I might just for the hell of it. Was thinking about getting stalingrad originally. Ragnar is the only steel dd I have so far

[@danlheureux4551]

I want to aswell but im paranoid that big daddy WG is gonna Nerf the hell out of it soon

[@clmwrx]

​@danlheureux4551 why? It doesn't really seem op. I bought it earlier. Haven't played it yet tho

[@danlheureux4551]

@@clmwrx You Know how daddy WG is about Balancing ships

[@matthiasdarrington3271]

@@clmwrx it does seem super OP. It has everything : good detect, speed, great guns and balistics, smoke, radar, a good heal, a small silouhette... It's OP as fuck

[@bikeguy3034]

​@matthiasdarrington3271 But that sluggish rudder shift thou!... 😂

[@-sly-Critique]

I encountered this ship in battle two weeks ago, and it shredded my team. It was very, very broken and OP to the max.

[@TurboBMRProjectLove]

one thing to note is no torp hits on that 2nd game even with fast torps

[@hobo3813]

do we think IFHE is worth taking as it does seem to set a lot of fires at base already at least for what ive seen after having just bought her

[@hoosierrampage1877]

The Plymouth has British acceleration, better turning radius, 3x longer radar duration, hydro, a heal, better repair %’s, 10,000 more health, does only 30,000 less ap damage with only half its guns, and has better AP shells, yet the Svea is clearly better because it has HE, a short duration speed boost, 2 more smoke screens, and better torps?? I think you should play Plymouth more.

[@Skerra-kk6sm]

Ragnar guns is a big selling point tbf and that Daring smoke is nothing to sneeze at but it does sound like this is just another attempt at a Plymouth

[@matthiasdarrington3271]

Plymouth has garbage balistics so you can't do anything with the guns. Svea has some of the best in game...

[@Skerra-kk6sm]

@@matthiasdarrington3271 it's very much like any light cruiser. It's all about positioning. Plymouth chunks ships when you play it right

[@LaunchpadGP]

You forgot vastly superior firing angles. And the health difference evaporates fast when you consider that Plymouth is much harder to overpen due to its size, to the point that blind fires often lead to citadels. I am quite fond of baiting overpens in my Austin/Jinan and Svea is the only T10 cruiser that’s even thinner.

[@Skerra-kk6sm]

@@LaunchpadGP oh yeah!. You basically can't fire the Plymouth outside of smoke or you're screwed.

[@bpdlr]

"Things like Des Moines are just absolutely going to annihilate you" I was just in a Ranked match in a DM and did, in fact, absolutely annihilate a Svea. Came to check your review to see if that is normal.

[@EraOfJack]

Small light cruiser getting plane based ASW is nice.

[@KronStaro]

Fast moving HE spam ships are very hard to learn, because you have to constantly be on the move, dodge shells, and keep your aim on the target, definitely not for everyone.

[@oldschoolgaming4763]

Svea + Sherman Div for the win!

[@marcushert2759]

Monty with the Reinforced Emergency Response unique upgrade next!

[@matstick199]

I recently bought stalin, and dont play often enough to get more steel, i regret not saving for this ship

[@Smalcozad]

Yo my man. Create ticket for wg support, ask for reverting your account to last save point. They are done every few days. You can do it once a year, you will lose few days Progress but get your step back. I had same situation last year, got incomp and NEXT day lauria came. Wg reverted my account to a state before 3 or 4 days before purchase

[@matstick199]

@@Smalcozad by recently i mean this year lol, i have no idea which month it even was, it's ok though i barely play the game anymore :( thanks for trying to help man!

[@captain.foxtrot]

I really dont know about svea… If i want the ragnar experience i take ragnar, and if i wanna farm in smokes i take smolensk or mino. Anyways the tools against dds are nice so maybe this is equally as good as brisbane in divisions

[@mrcrafter2060]

Worchester is No.2 in terms of Fire per minute from all T10 ships. 1. Colbert | 3. Jinan

[@randomguypi-uf2jc]

Ah yes Bigland

[@robertshaver4432]

A Pan Euro Cruiser? I already have one! Ragnar lol As a Pan Euro Main, I have to have it.

[@TheSanco26]

May someone explain the "changing" green ring around the eblem of the ship he is attacking?

[@mathiasrryba]

Full green ring = ship going at its Full speed.

[@BuriedAlien-TRN242]

Got it 2 days ago 😎👍

[@felixt.4443]

its the perfect op ship for I dont need teammates ship for random battles :S

[@kyleuptergrove4040]

Dammit, I just spent my steel lol Now to farm it up

[@Sagittario68]

Exactly what this game needed: another ship that never existed with smoke screen, rapid recharge, and with a radar that comes back on in a minute. They should just say it straight out that they want to stop people from playing DDs and so at least we can put our minds at rest. I'm really starting to get fed up with this way of implementing the game by WG.

[@philipreber3314]

I do play DDs quite often, dk why ur fed up because there arent many radars per game, they are not that hard to avoid if on your flank, just a bit of awareness and ur good

[@Sagittario68]

@@philipreber3314 I wish it was just the radars. In every game you find radar, submarines and CVs. And the DD game becomes a nightmare. It used to be that you could play with surprise attacks or by going around ships and penetrating deep into the opponent's deployment. Now it is almost impossible, because the opponent's aircraft carrier or submarine will spot you before you can perform the desired maneuver. Then the much-vaunted WG matchmaking should be revised because it is not that uncommon to be in a team with (for example) 4 cruisers on each side and while one side has no radar the other boasts 4 out of 4. Anyway, back to the ship in the video, I wish you not to find yourself against it. I have already had the dubious privilege of facing it 2 times and I can assure you that it is not at all pleasant.

[@outsidein3206]

The Best of former Soviet Bias!? *Edit - Any Hidden Armor platting?

[@tmGrunty]

Did we really call a 8.55s rudder shift time on a Cruiser "sluggish"? What are you comparing it too? That's literally amongst the best in class at T10 and the same is true for the turning circle.

[@metalogic1580]

PQ logic: If it doesn't turn like Sims, it's sluggish lol

[@kooky_blip5168]

🎉 mr Not PQ i am been waiting for this 👏😁

[@stevebrandman2493]

Dammit I just spent my steel last week!

[@elmateo77]

This ship is exactly what the game needed, dds don't have a hard enough time already...

[@dovaskostasgr]

21:44 don't worry the last 2 days have so much faster games the balance in that game for teams is very ridiculous

[@paulcosteines5556]

Austin, Stalingrad, Svea? which do you purchase?

[@Joshua-fi4ji]

Austin is more a meme than a serious ship. You either want it or you don't. Stalingrad is strong, but not like it used to be. Tanky, strong guns, big citadel and burns easily. Svea is probably the most interesting and challenging to play. It's possibly also the most competitive, but be prepared for potential nerds, since it's new.

[@newmanpc4253]

iS THIS A FANTASY ship or did it exist in reallity, i cant find it in the swedish ship book.

[@RickardNilsson83]

Fantasy

[@TheRickRouss]

Damn i want this ship

[@dalenielsen8651]

I bought Stalingrad, and 2 days later this little gem is released. Suddenly, I have big regrets and a too-small stash of steel.

[@shimmers61]

Don't be sad. Stalingrad is far better. Austin in a division is also far better than this.

[@jetlee2644]

This ship will be best against DDs in Ranks It should be played as DD

[@beyond560]

steel ship so it wont be nerffed, I might invest

[@Alex-hy9cw]

light cruiser guns* , they don't have unique dispersion, same dispersion as other light cruisers

[@saintzero9044]

"waiting for the i was wrong" section for this ship

[@BergenDev]

🤣

[@ElvroomGames]

Hey PQ, would love to see Helena.

[@Gopher31]

Good thing it doest get Ragnar dispersion.

[@sardaukerlegion]

For the look, it's compared to Ragnar. For weapons and gimmicks, i compare it to Brisbane. Brisbane has more guns, more torps, radar and hydro - and is for coal. Svea is for steel. And does not look worth it.

[@lugerCRO]

i want floding ribbon for citadel overpen

[@disarm9170]

WOW today, 3 sinks, 150k damage and a LOSS LOL

[@FrostBeam009]

The ship looks super boring.. Looking forward to La Pampa tho!

[@Rob.DB.]

7 rounds of 6 inch per every 5second salvo at T-10 ???...Hell no!

[@VDSLight]

food for ElBinBong

[@matthiasdarrington3271]

I doubt it, If angled this thing will eat BingBong everyday.

[@ChrisNabholz]

I JUST spent my steel :(.

[@thatinternetguyj5222]

Hmmm... this or Ragnar....

[@smaug9617]

Svea has short smokes and torps and Ragnar doesn’t have Citadel(which is huge plus if you meet Wisconsin). So I would say Ragnar.

[@volknetai.3690]

This ships has smoke to disengage, More consumables, Faster reload of all consumables, Airborne depth charge, Being cruiser ( people will not usually force you to cap as much as DD ), Has flak clouds, Torpedo While Ragnar is like better concealment and no citadel hitbox as the only upsides

[@FrostBeam009]

2 very different ships tho... One is a destroyer. one is a light cruiser.

[@j_taylor]

I love Ragnar, but have to say it has a serious weakness: you'll want a dedicated commander. And I really do mean "dedicated" because the tech tree is also DDs. Because Svea is a cruiser, you can reuse a DD commander like Swirski without losing him on your favorite tech ship.

[@Belzeh]

@@j_taylor Ragnar uses the exact same captain skills as Gdansk, no need for a dedicated captain.

[@rajmanickam7239]

Apparently balance is a crime in 2024 WG office.

[@rollyunicorn]

It's better than Smolensk.

[@somersthesunless1874]

Wargaming is sacrificing new players to satisfy old ones. This is just as stupid and OP as all the other radar/smoke ships. Hard enough for an experienced player to play DD around and new players will get wrecked by it. This is bad for the game and will cause the player base to continue to shrink.

[@Goldleader469]

This thing is insanely overtuned and should not have been released in it's current state.

[@Rob.DB.]

Really?? I think its crap!

[@Goldleader469]

@@Rob.DB. the 30% speed boost makes it insanely good at speed juking. The smoke allows for you to melt DDs, or burn battleships. The torps have higher dom than halland albeit one launcher per side. You have radar as well. What part of it is crap?

[@louchemobile]

Please stop laughing.

[@f15H8ul8]

its sickening to watch these russian guns land almost every round on target while i struggle to land any at all at any kind of range with my german guns. i thought german guns were known to be very accurate IRL.

[@pr0skis]

this thing divved with essex and radar mino = fkn cancer

[@CrazyGamer1098.]

my friend has mods and put a svea in a test battle. i went in with a slava and i got detonated by one torpedo 💀

[@sandshrew8148]

day 9 of asking for roon review

[@FrostBeam009]

Its a shit worse Hindenburg and Hindenburg isnt that good these days.

[@sandshrew8148]

@@FrostBeam009 awe

[@j_taylor]

Roon is good at kiting away. I play it like a Tier 9 Nurnberg. I don't think it's inherently bad, but you often face higher tier BBs and they can give a serious vibe check.

[@sandshrew8148]

@@j_taylor ogis

[@zagareth4604]

This ship did not seem to have much battle impact in the way you played it. Farming is definitely something, but it doesn't win games. The damage output is too low to deter and kill other ships and the cap contesting ability is "questionable". It might work in isle hugging style game play, where you are protected, even when uncovered by radar or hydro. Not really impressed by this ship, but I might think otherwise when I get a real good enemy in this ship...

[@matthiasdarrington3271]

It has better DPM than half the cruisers !

[@zagareth4604]

@@matthiasdarrington3271 and not better DPM than the other half...