Mashallah sir,,,, our society needs such great personalities,,,,,may Allah live you long🤲🤲🤲
@WaqarKhan-p2k10 ай бұрын
Sir I was so confused 🤔 in radioactivity but you clear my all confusions 😊😊
@umairahsan60863 жыл бұрын
Pata nai ap se itni jaldii kese samaj aa jati ha sir.... Allah bless u♥️
@argujjar8353 жыл бұрын
One of the best physics lecturer of pakistan...
@reemashameed51452 жыл бұрын
You are the epitome of knowledge....sir you don't know how much it help me...like sir how can I express it...May Allah bless you ..and grant You jannat ul firdous along with us.Ameeen
@StooriwalАй бұрын
Good teaching thanks sir
@sardarjawad24262 жыл бұрын
I really thanx to u sir ,,we remember u always for this ,u are best of the best👍
@nehmatfaraz4417 Жыл бұрын
Very very very nice. Sir gggggg your my best teacher in KZbin
@touseefahmadkhattak3 жыл бұрын
one small mistake in a lecture which as point no 5(from 25 to onward min), penetrating power is very strong as compared to alpha and beta
@conceptualstudy3172 жыл бұрын
Such a great method of understanding.Keep it up with a conceptual manner.
@medicoboy1652 жыл бұрын
Really this is the most beautiful lecture on radioactivity 😍😍😍
@Ubaid1324 ай бұрын
Mashallah Sir G the great❤❤❤
@HamzaKhan-po4bi2 жыл бұрын
Sir I really love to watch all your lecture. sir you are the best one in the youtube Sir you deserve 100k subscribers 😊 Allah give you a lot of happiness in your life
@HamzaKhan-po4bi Жыл бұрын
ÏŅŚȞÄĻĻÄȞ
@naeemkhanzada9259 Жыл бұрын
Watch out khan academy India🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳
@atifarsalan55803 ай бұрын
May Allah give you long life
@Shakirullah-hh3mt Жыл бұрын
May God Long your life
@dikshaauti375810 ай бұрын
Thank you so much sir❤
@asadkhanbori5971 Жыл бұрын
Great licture...❤🌷
@muhammadakram-nm3ft9 ай бұрын
Mashallah sir g❤
@patababa53028 ай бұрын
Why dont we say son nuclei instead of daughter nuclei That's a great question! The term "daughter nuclei" is a historical convention that dates back to the early days of nuclear physics. The term "daughter" was chosen to describe the resulting nuclei because it implied a sense of inheritance or succession, as if the parent nucleus was "giving birth" to a new generation of nuclei. The term "son" wasn't used because, at the time, the term "daughter" was more commonly used in scientific and mathematical contexts to describe derived or secondary quantities. For example, in algebra, a "daughter equation" was a secondary equation derived from a primary equation. Additionally, the term "daughter" has a more neutral connotation, whereas "son" might imply a sense of masculinity or gender, which wasn't intended in this context. So, while "son nuclei" might seem like a logical alternative, the convention has stuck with "daughter nuclei"!
@pharmacyknowledge12383 жыл бұрын
Best teaching
@Hamnaliaquat23 Жыл бұрын
Great Lectureee💯👍
@malikmusawer2653 жыл бұрын
NOW MY CONCEPTS ARE SHINING LIKE YOUR FACE.
@askproductiongb27833 жыл бұрын
Boht zbr10
@ConceptualLearningwithFun10 ай бұрын
If photons are chargeless then how do they emit both electric and magnetic fields as they are the reason for electromagnetic radiation?
@afnanbakht10 ай бұрын
Electric charges are not the only thing that can generate electric fields. Changing magnetic fields can also create electric fields. Also, changing electric fields create changing magnetic fields. So for light the procedure and method is that somewhere a charge oscillates creating a changing electric field. This changing electric field generates a changing magnetic field which in turn generates further changing electric fields. These changing fields propagate in space to form electromagnetic fields, the quantized form of which are photons.
@ConceptualLearningwithFun10 ай бұрын
ok thanks@@afnanbakht
@ConceptualLearningwithFun10 ай бұрын
And what about Gama rays as they also behave same?@@afnanbakht
@azharislam503 Жыл бұрын
Awesome lecture
@mirchakarazamrind-eo5xf Жыл бұрын
Sir what is difference between electrostatic force and electromagnetic force
@imranmohammad43062 жыл бұрын
sir as gamma rays have no mass but have maximum energy so how they follow einstein equation?
@afghanwazir50442 жыл бұрын
Awesome as usual 👏👏👏
@pharmacyknowledge12383 жыл бұрын
Best wishes
@afnanbakht3 жыл бұрын
Jazakallah 😊
@IftikharMeenawal Жыл бұрын
why electrostsic repulsive force overcome the strong nuclear force when atomic number increases from 82 ?
@mahikhan-fk2hb Жыл бұрын
Great sir
@mirchakarazamrind-eo5xf Жыл бұрын
🔥🔥🔥🔥
@Servant-of-Allah111111 ай бұрын
Sir tasu kho pa writting ke da likl de che penetrating power of gamma is low
@AmirKhan-zp8fc2 жыл бұрын
How can a neutron split into proton and electron ???
@izazuddin.65312 жыл бұрын
Great sir 👍👍
@gurria2004 Жыл бұрын
mashaAllah
@imtiazalam57373 жыл бұрын
Sir today lecture? Waiting for lecture from two days.
@malikabdullahawan7864 Жыл бұрын
Sir CRO ki bhi video bana dein
@grumpywarm43172 жыл бұрын
thankyou so much sir
@afnanbakht2 жыл бұрын
Welcome dear 🤗
@zarkasharif82663 жыл бұрын
great work sirrr
@yasiralee48192 жыл бұрын
Asalam o sirr i want to ask a question i have search alot about thiss but doesnt got a better answer i hope u will solve my problem an answer me .Why do slow moving electrons repel and fast moving electrons attract each other when travelling in the same direction? Concept and maths behind it?
@afnanbakht2 жыл бұрын
Walaikum salam dear...The answer to ur question lies in Special theory of relativity...Remember parallel beams of electrons will always repel..bcs the electrons in both beams have magnetic field ass well as electric field, but the repulsive electric field between electron beams dominate over magnetic field at speeds less then C(speed of light) hence there will be repulsive force between them..but as the electron beams gets more and more speed there magnetic behavior increases but electric field remains the same bcs electric field is due to the property of charge, and charge of electrons doesn't change with the increase in speed bcs its invareint with speed but its mass do change..and from Special theory of relativity, the faster u move the massive u get... and if there speed reaches or exceeds the speed of light "C", only then the attractive magnetic field of the parallel electron beams will get strong enough to dominate over repulsive nature of electric field between two parallel e beams..but electrons can't move with "C" bcs special theory of relativity forbids any particle with nonzero rest mass to move with C..bcs if an electron do move with speed of light..its mass become infinite..which requires an infinite amount of energy..which is not possible..hence moving electron beams will always repel...hope that gives u some clue..to understand it in detail u have to have a firm grip on relativity..
@afnanbakht2 жыл бұрын
The math behind can't be done here in comment....
@yasiralee48192 жыл бұрын
@@afnanbakht thankyou so muchhh sirr🙏❤
@afnanbakht2 жыл бұрын
Welcome dear..
@mirchakarazamrind-eo5xf Жыл бұрын
✨✨✨🌍🌍🌍
@dilawarkhan21463 жыл бұрын
Sir g please make a video on Compton's effect
@farhanaanjum12208 ай бұрын
Assalam o alaikum Sir...I need nuclear shell shell model lecture or notes
@mfarooqueofficial77893 жыл бұрын
Please sir upload the frame of reference and it's types
@afnanbakht3 жыл бұрын
Coming week for special theory of Relativity inshallah
@laillunnahar81573 жыл бұрын
@@afnanbakht and then Chapter 16 & 17 according to smart syllabus. I'm right SIR?
@syedaarshiyahasnain39853 жыл бұрын
Masha allah . Sir numericals is a request of last 5 chaps .
@afnanbakht3 жыл бұрын
Inshallah soon..
@ayazjunaid27373 жыл бұрын
@@afnanbakht according to smart syllabus exercise short question and numerical of class 12 physics upload kai sir dera masla da tol students ta plz sir
@imtiazalam57373 жыл бұрын
@@ayazjunaid2737 u mean Sir should mention those short questions numericals, & examples which are in smart syllabus?
@ayazjunaid27373 жыл бұрын
@@imtiazalam5737 exactly
@RehmatAli-qn3ej10 ай бұрын
❤❤❤
@haqibwazir77382 жыл бұрын
Jazakallah
@GulKhan-b4z9 ай бұрын
❤😊
@zilleyhuma72583 жыл бұрын
Fire...
@mirchakarazamrind-eo5xf Жыл бұрын
🎉
@nadeemhashmi-wr3bp Жыл бұрын
Thank you sir
@IkImrank0s Жыл бұрын
Sir pls.define nuclear force
@askproductiongb27833 жыл бұрын
Keep it up sir
@mirchakarazamrind-eo5xf Жыл бұрын
❤
@shahzadnaseer46812 жыл бұрын
Sir does nuclear force and binding force are same?
@sebastianmechaelis4952 жыл бұрын
I don't know,never heard of binding force but it's better you use nuclear force
@kumarharinder77992 жыл бұрын
Sir jab atom ka nucleas electron in the form of beta particle nikalta he to ye electron shell me kiu nahi jata aur beta emission ke bad jo atom hamare pass reh jata he us me ek proton increase to hojata he lekin us me ye ek electron kha se ata kiu ke atomic no to hum sirf proton ki bat to nahi karte electron ko bhi hum atomic no kehte he
@kumarharinder77992 жыл бұрын
Because atomic no number of proton or electron ko kehte he aur atom nutrel hota he to is me dono same hote he
@kumarharinder77992 жыл бұрын
Sir please is question ka answer mujhe de me sare chapter me is ki waja se confuse hu please sir🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
@mirchakarazamrind-eo5xf Жыл бұрын
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉
@mirchakarazamrind-eo5xf Жыл бұрын
😊
@abutalha4046 Жыл бұрын
thanks sir
@syedaftabalishah21713 жыл бұрын
Sir beta emission ki bilkul b samj nhi ai
@mirchakarazamrind-eo5xf Жыл бұрын
Sir plz ten class ki physics bhi perha dain plz plz plz plz plz 🙏🥺🥺🙏🙏 sir plz ten class ki physics perha dain plz
@mirchakarazamrind-eo5xf Жыл бұрын
Very request 😢 please help us
@samikhansamikhan29323 жыл бұрын
There is one mistake sir you wrote penetrating power of gamma rays is very low which is very high so.....
@afnanbakht3 жыл бұрын
Yes i know but i have said ..just likha ghalat hai..and at the end i have made it clear again..but i will put it in subtitle's too
@samikhansamikhan29323 жыл бұрын
@@afnanbakht okay yes i know sir i was just informing u i understood flowently there was no problem at all
@samikhansamikhan29323 жыл бұрын
@@afnanbakht sir when will you upload the last topic of this chapter
@saimafridi3593 жыл бұрын
Sir physics of solid chp upload kr dy plzz
@d_oddy Жыл бұрын
12:25 😂😂😂😂
@zarakhalid47212 жыл бұрын
Sir sunein?
@education2024-c2l Жыл бұрын
Carbon 14 have less electron 83 why they are unstable
@afnanbakht Жыл бұрын
When we say that atomic number greater than 82..then all the isotopes are radioactive...but for elements having atomic number less than 82 not all isotopes are radioactive...but some are...that is due to unbalanced ratio of neutron to protons...which can't be explained in comment...
@education2024-c2l Жыл бұрын
@@afnanbakht thank you
@ayazjunaid27373 жыл бұрын
Sir aoa sir ma la physics k dera masla v taso plz ma la khpl number rakai plz sir plz plz sir ma ta der zyada problem v
@ayazjunaid27373 жыл бұрын
Sir plz plz sir
@ayazjunaid27373 жыл бұрын
Sir g
@imtiazalam57373 жыл бұрын
@@ayazjunaid2737 Sir Facebook I'd link; facebook.com/afnan.bakht
@zarakhalid47212 жыл бұрын
sur zara ashta bolein itna fast bol rhy ha😩🥺
@afnanbakht2 жыл бұрын
If it's fast for u...then Play it in 0.75x speed or 0.5x speed ..these options are available in KZbin
@learnwithgd2 жыл бұрын
@@afnanbakht but men to x2.ki speed.se dekhta hoon