Ramana Maharishi samadhi state

PLEASE VISIT WWW.OMILLUMINATION.COM

[@cvanil1840]

sri ramakrishna also had similar states..he used to go into complete absorption ...he also reeled in ecstasy and felt great pain when some people touched him..the world has been blessed by the advent of these great saints....thanks to all who explain these rare phenomena

[@josefromspace]

David doing an incredible job as always.

[@andriano22]

We thank you so much David and you Team

[@saraswathiab5995]

Thank you David for such interesting stories about Bhagavan Ramanah Maharshi.Although a South Indian I donot know so much about him.Appreciate your love to tell people about what you know about a great manifestation on this planet.some where there's a holy connection.Though born elsewhere you live in HIS memories. You are an evolved being having received blessings from several such known & unknown saints of my great Nation.it's very true that God sends a team before the advent of such great manifestation.you're lucky to be one such.I was at Ramanashramam between 10th 13th of Dec. & did have the opportunity to see you but did not want to embarrass you by touching your feet.I do it mentally now. Regards, OM.

[@tapmijyo]

Even I thought the shaking of his neck was due to old age and he needed the stick for support because of arthritis. Now My perspective changed. He did accept the vasanas of his devotees and took on suffering himself. He said "The power that created you has created the world. If it can take care of you, it can take care of the world too. Throw all your worries to the higher power. It will take them all. If you are in train, why do you need to carry the luggage. You and the luggage are being carried by the train. "

[@SaithMasu12]

@@TheWorldTeacher I always had troubles with the perceiption of "incarnations" and why they happen. An incarnation admits of an ego identity that somehow goes from one life to the next, which is impossible, because the ego is an idea, it is not real. The second difficulty is if self-realisation is something to be aquired, its not worth striving for, as its also not permanent. If the goal of life is self realisation, then one has to admit a couple of things: In the infinite time before this very moment, the infinite lifes you had before this moment, you never could aquire self-realisation which is in itself, impossible, as infinity includes every possiblity, every scenario, everything from the deepest illuions to the greatest awakenings. The idea itself that one needs time to realize yourself is in itself flawed. There is nothing to aquire, nothing to realize. There is soly being and whatever appears from moment to moment is the sole reality.

[@TheWorldTeacher]

@@SaithMasu12, the above comment was written FIVE YEARS ago. The following is more accurate: 🐟 09. REINCARNATION (OR NOT): There is NOTHING about the individual person (that is, the ‘ego’, as defined in the following chapter) which transfers to another body after death, except, perhaps, habitual tendencies in the form of indelible mental impressions (“vāsanā”, in Sanskrit). For example, in my present incarnation, I have a strong affinity for the culture of Bhārata (India), a highly-advanced intellectual capacity, a very slim body, and an attraction to a frugivorous diet. That suggests there was an Indian spiritual master in the previous century which had some (or perhaps, even all) of these characteristics, but it was not “ME”, since what I am now is this ever-mutable Australian-born Aryan gentleman. These “subtle mind impressions” are known in psychology as the “collective unconscious”, in new-age spirituality as the “akashic records”, and in Islam as the “Preserved Tablet”. There is an abundance of evidence that humans are born with certain psycho-emotive links to previous persons, times and places. It is far beyond the purview of this document to list such evidence. As mentioned, in my case, I have an EXTREMELY strong association with all things Indian, despite not being of Indian origin, and the “collective unconscious” hypothesis seems to be the best explanation for this bond currently available, in my opinion (although the term “collective conscious” would, perhaps, be more accurate). For the popular view of reincarnation to be plausible, there would need to be an entity or an OBJECT called a “soul” (“jīva” or “ātman”, in Sanskrit), which somehow finds a copulating couple, then enters the woman’s uterus, to inhabit a zygote. Assuming the existence of an individual spiritual soul is profoundly illogical, because spirit is (by most definitions) the antithesis of finite matter. Therefore, how can an immaterial “soul” be confined to a single person’s body? It seems rather strange to believe that the universe was organized naturalistically in such a manner as to “recycle” an object called a “soul”, or even to recycle minds, particularly when one understands that a mind is naught but a series of flickering thoughts, feelings, and memories. Some believe that the “thing” which transfers to the next incarnation are the remnants of one's actions (“vāsanā” or “saṃskāra”, in Sanskrit) or at least one's psychological disposition (likes, dislikes, phobias, etcetera). This is far closer to the idea of the collective unconscious, and even if it is a perfectly accurate account of what occurs after death, it still cannot give substance to the notion of a SEPARATE individual which is travelling from one body to another and again to another (“saṃsāra”, in Sanskrit). According to the law of conservation of energy, first proposed and tested by Émilie du Châtelet, energy can neither be created nor destroyed; rather, it can only be transformed or transferred from one form to another. Both this law, and Dr. Leonard Susskind's minus-first law of physics, states that energy/information is indestructible. The analogy of one candle being lit by another candle is apt. Are the two flames the same flame or completely different flames? According to those laws, PART of the energy is transferred from one wick to another wick, a portion of the energy is released by the flame, and part of the energy remains with the original candle. When I die, my physical body, composed of the five gross material elements (“sthūla-śarīra”, in Sanskrit), will be reabsorbed into the biosphere, whilst the non-tangible aspect of my body, composed of the three subtle material elements (“sūkṣma śarīra”, in Sanskrit), will possibly merge with the collective unconscious, and the story of my life will come to an end FOREVER. See Chapter 05 regarding the eight elemental groups. This fact is difficult for many to accept, since they are thoroughly attached to their pseudo-egos, their intellects, their minds, their bodies, and their possessions. However, when one realizes that one is, fundamentally, not an ever-mutating psycho-physical organism, but, essentially, never-changing, all-pervasive Consciousness, all fears are alleviated. The only “thing” remaining of a person at the time of death is the only “thing” which has ever “existed” - Pure Unalloyed Awareness, or Eternal Conscious Peace (“sacchidānanda”, in Sanskrit). So, fear not - death is a normal, natural and necessary consequence of conception. Putting aside whether or not reincarnation is an accurate account of what happens in this world, it is ABSOLUTELY certain that we receive a completely new body approximately every seven years (via a gradual process, of course). Our first body was a microscopically-sized zygote and our present body is several kilograms heavier. From where has all that extra weight come? Obviously, from all the nutrients that we have absorbed via the umbilical cord in our mother's uterus, or via the food, air and water we've consumed since birth. Therefore, one who believes that he is nothing more than the body-mind organism is grossly ignorant of basic biological science. Genetically, approximately half of the cells in the body are not even of human origin, believe it or not! We can all easily understand that our infantile body is completely and utterly different to our present-day form, so logically, our true identity must be something quite APART from it. Nothing, including one’s genetic code, remains constant from conception to death. The sense of self does not even make its appearance in our psyche until two or three years after conception. Therefore, a person is more accurately defined as a process (a verb), rather than an object (a noun). For the sake of philosophical IMPARTIALITY, it is germane to acknowledge the perspectives of other eminent pundits. E.g. in “Bhagavad-gītā”, one of the very greatest spiritual authorities the world has ever known, Lord Śri Krishna, uses the analogy of how the individual person (“ego”, in Latin, or “jīvātman”, in Sanskrit) travels through the various stages of life (that is, from childhood, to pubescent adulthood, to geriatric), with His description of the process of reincarnation, as conceived by the ancient seers (“ṛṣi” [rishi], in Sanskrit) of India (“Bhārata”, in Sanskrit). However, as the Gershwin song says: "It ain't necessarily so". “...each person is destined to die once...” Anonymous (possibly Saint Paul of Tarsus), Letter to the Hebrews, 9:27. “The entity that is supposed to be reincarnated in another body, does not even itself exist, except as a concept! How can a mere concept be reborn?” ************** “When you are dead, you will be back in the primordial state of rest, which existed before you were born; that stillness before all experience. It is only the false sense of a limited, separate 'me', that deprives life of its meaning and gives death an ominous significance, which it really does not have.” ************** “The fear of death, is actually a product of the desire to perpetuate one's identity. Were you not dead before you were born? Those who know Reality, know the falsehood of life and death.” ************** “What is born, must in due course, die. The objective body, will thereafter be dissolved and irrevocably annihilated. What was once a sentient being, will be destroyed, never to be reborn. But consciousness is not objective - not a thing at all. Therefore, consciousness is neither born nor dies and certainly cannot be 'reborn'.” Ramesh Balsekar, Indian Spiritual Teacher.

[@SaithMasu12]

@@TheWorldTeacher Thanks for the reply and yes i was aware that your statement was from 5 years ago, but i answered anyway;) "But consciousness is not objective - not a thing at all. Therefore, consciousness is neither born nor dies and certainly cannot be 'reborn'.” Thats exactly the point why "reincaranation" or "rebirth" is in itself illusory. Who is it that is reborn? The word re-born implies continuety, meaning being born more than once. That is impossible. "“The entity that is supposed to be reincarnated in another body, does not even itself exist, except as a concept! How can a mere concept be reborn?” Exactly what i meant

[@paramahansayogananda51]

Thanks David ji for sharing wonderful stories. Great saints have compassion for suffering relative souls so they take their burden on them. In book Autobiography of a Yogi, Paramahansa Yogananda have written about taking karmas of disciples by Swami Yukteshwarji. Jai Guru 🙏🏻 🙏🏻

[@TarotRider-t2m]

Taking others karma is a paradox in itself

[@paramahansayogananda51]

@@TarotRider-t2m It's like you are carrying a heavy load and someone who is strong take some load to make it easy. Those who ask for help they receive.

[@TarotRider-t2m]

@@paramahansayogananda51 Weird but they don't need to. Taking on others karma won't solve anything. They will not learn the lessons. And karma has nothing to do with sin. There is no judgement, there is no sin, therefore there is no karma as we think. Karma is just a cycle of entanglement that only we can free ourselves from. Mostly it's prebirth contract for the life we live. All the memories and karma can be dissolved with The one. Hooponopono technique is used for that. Therefore dissolving Karma is only in our hands.

[@mariatsakona5287]

Thank you David!🙏🙏🙏🌹🥀🌺❤🧡💛

[@advaitavedanta330]

DAVID...THANK YOU...TODA RABA YOU SHARING THE STORIES...IM ALSO GET MAGNETED WITH BAGAVAN..IM ALSO FEEL THE ATTRACTED MAGNETING FEELING I NEED TO VISIT HIS ASHRAM..I NEED TO GO ARUNACHALA..ALL SMALL STORIES WHAT YOU TALK FOR US..A PRESENT FOR MY SOUL...LOVE YA DAVID....

[@2sridhark]

Thanks you very much for these wonderful series of videos about Bhagawan.

[@enrico43869]

veri beautiful and intresting...

[@GodsMysteryZone_Zenbuddy]

Ramana Maharshi is dear god himself in human body form Christ like

[@IHACKER316]

Crazy , In Miracle of Love , Neem Karoli Baba is also have said to have taken on Karmas of people and gotten rashes

[@TarotRider-t2m]

Weird but they don't need to. Taking on others karma won't solve anything. They will not learn the lessons. And karma has nothing to do with sin. There is no judgement, there is no sin, therefore there is no karma as we think. Karma is just a cycle of entanglement that only we can free ourselves from. Mostly it's prebirth contract for the life we live. All the memories and karma can be dissolved with The one. Hooponopono technique is used for that. Therefore dissolving Karma is only in our hands.

[@Tvn143]

Bhagawan😭🙏

[@evadekool4246]

fascinating

[@shivkagrawal282]

🙏💛

[@avyay7903]

Thank you sir,🙏🏻 हरे कृष्ण

[@ScottBurden117]

Thanks for sharing.

[@gopichandravilla420]

Thanks for sharing this. I thought I read every thing there is about Bhagavan. I always wondered about the tremors and even though I kind of knew (my assumption) that Bhagavan took karma from (including his mother) others and probably is the reason for Bhagavan's health, I never knew Bhagavan kind of indicated that..

[@natarajanshanker5103]

From Tirupaavai (with a tentative attempted translation) that comes to mind when I watch this: அங்கண் மா ஞாலத்து அரசர் அபிமான பங்கமாய் வந்து நின் பள்ளிக்கட்டிற்கீழே சங்கமிருப்பார் போல் வந்து தலைப்பெய்தோம் கிண்கிணி வாய்ச் செய்த தாமரைப்பூபோலே செங்கண் சிறுச்சிறிதே எம்மேல் விழியாவோ திங்களும் ஆதித்தியனும் எழுந்தாற்போல் அங்கண் இரண்டுங்கொண்டு நோக்குதியேல் எங்கள்மேல் சாபம் இழிந்தேலோர் எம்பாவாய் Like faithful subjects gathered ‘round The emperor’s bed, as we surround, Like lotus petals gently bloom, Like morning sun and evening moon, Slowly open Your eyes divine And cast on us Your glance benign, All our sorrows stand erased In dazzling light of gentle Grace.

[@rajeshwardoraisubramania7138]

Aptly translated.Thank you.

[@natarajanshanker5103]

@@rajeshwardoraisubramania7138 thank you sir!

[@martinshannon7632]

Thanks david

[@santoshheerakar243]

Om namo bagvate sri ramnaya

[@yogikundaliniananda8757]

Amazing information

[@muraliikrishna6705]

ఓం రమణ మహర్షి యే నమ:

[@ngatihine6072]

thats like when someone touched Jesus hem of garment and he felt power leave him

[@tomekjaglinski2123]

Tibetan Tonglen is something similar:with the breatch in,one is taking the dark misery,pain,and sickness the other beigns,with breatch out -the white and bright air,free of pain is offer to the others...

[@Prakashbphappy]

Observed while watching video of JK (J.Krishnamurti) his hands used to tremble.

[@stefos6431]

Hi sir........Actually this WAS parkinson's that J. Krishnamurti's body developed. It was not Shakti/Self.........If you see his earlier videos, pre 1980's, you'll see no shaking in his hands. Thank you kindly

[@zain4019]

Stefos Having said that, it’s important to note that Papaji believed J. Krishnamurti was one of the few truly enlightened jnanis he’d ever met, and after the only occasion Nisargadatta Maharaj saw J. K, walking in the streets of Bombay from afar, he would often tell his devotees to go to listen to J. K’s talks, because this single glimpse of him has impressed Nisargadatta so much. So he was quite a being.

[@bhupendrabharti9515]

MAHARSHI LOVE

[@ArunKumar-zj7cw]

Thank you David

[@hitheshyogi3630]

Ramana Maharshi is great incarnation of India.In Hinduism no partiality to any one or anything.That is its greatness...Universal Arrow,Kerala,India.

[@oldnewbieraver]

Hithesh Yogi there is no Hinduism or anything. Only the Self. Everything else is ignorance and false pride.

[@Sagar-qt6sg]

@@oldnewbieraver yes but you know this because of Hinduism and our ancestors. While you are in the relative word. Give relative credit to the ones who discovered it.

[@eldridbakk8623]

It makes me sad to hear this, I want to be realized or assume my natural state, but I am sick and have a lot of pain throughout the day. I don't want anyone to have to take all my pain that I have. It feels like I am a living burden for others who are open. But I have an inner cry to end this drama, I was hoping for help.

[@CrazyLinguiniLegs]

I recommend googling “pdf Upasni Maharaj Talks”. There are 5 or 6 different free pdf files.

[@esneliamunoz4475]

🕉🕉🕉🙏

[@balakrishnapillai3063]

Bhagavan 🙏🙏🙏

[@tr7b410]

When the barrier between the unconscious and superconscious mind becomes transparent, the force of that GOD frequency in some circles, can be measured at 963htz-while most people's frequency is at 7.83htz.

[@N-MITTALKRISHNA]

good talk sir i heard a new thing about bhagwan

[@mariajoseoviedoruiz6264]

Porfavor traducción al español 🙏😳

[@TheKevoyo]

Hare Krishna

[@arunmarwaha7149]

❤️❤️

[@MamtaSharma-dc2bv]

🙏

[@yyohimbe1]

I know several people that has the same facial Tick, nothing spiritual about it. And does not discount that his sublime state! This condition is widely documented in scientific journals, not related to spirituslity

[@enrico43869]

WATH SUBLIME LOVE...

[@tomekjaglinski2123]

BREATH...

[@d.l.7399]

Think, he meant (!) it so(!) that he took(!) the karma(!) of others, hmm, understand...?

[@centralauthority7616]

You are speaking in English but spewing out utter foolishness..what is this nonsensical explanation...what happens to the millions of those who are not lethargic like you blabbering gibberish...If you are alive take Bible and read...There is only one God...do not call any one bhagawan/god

[@zain4019]

Jesus said the same as David and Maharishi- turn within and give attention only to the I Am. That is all, no more, no less.

[@TarotRider-t2m]

God is not outside somewhere, it's within

[@sree18697]

@@zain4019 i dont think jesus said that.