Ramayana, Mahabharata & River Sarasvati by Nilesh Oak in Nashik (in Marathi) - Part 2 of 2

[@Moksha31]

निलेश सर तुम्ही इतिहास शोधून स्वतः इतिहास रचणार आहात. तुमच्या कामाला १००%यश येवो ही मी ईश्वरचरणी प्रार्थना करतो.आणि खूप शुभेच्छा 💐

[@arjunkulkarni4164]

Nileshji u have no idea how happy my aai is after seeing this, which I wanted to show her since year even acting like u in Ur English video to make her understand... Thanku from Marathi Manus...🙏

[@dineshm3470]

Jai Bharat Shreshtha Bharat Jai Shree Ram Jai Shree Krishna Radhe Radhe

[@shamuya1]

सर्व पुस्तके पण मराठीत येऊ देत, मराठीतून ऐकायला खूपच छान वाटते आहे

[@1002sanju]

निलेश सर पुराव्या नुसार सिद्ध केलेत खूप खूप धन्यवाद... त्रिवार प्रणाम.....

[@aneeketkeshavrane1786]

Sir very greatful to u. Humble regards. 🎉🎉🎉🎉

[@mayureshponkshe9325]

Dying to hear when it becomes part of school, academic history.!!!

[@arjunkulkarni4164]

Finally in Marathi 🙏

[@1961raghu]

I am a very recent addition to your large following. Your knowledge is unique and your attempt to establish reality regarding ancient Indian history is most appreciated. No reward or awArd is sufficient. Coming to end of dwapara yug and submerging of dwaraka about 7000 years Ago I recently saw a clipping regarding NASA finding a big crator formed by a meteorite in Gujarat which was dated back to 6900 years back. Is it a coincidence.

[@NileshOak]

Namaskar Let me know about the Gujrath crator of 6900 BP Thank you for the complimens.

[@NileshOak]

Nileshoak.com

[@wandu1961]

Great Great work, much needed now

[@rajeshsrivastava9418]

Nilesh Ji it was great to see you talking in Marathi. Though I don't understand the Marathi language but it would certainly have reached a much greater audience than English. I request you to do more talks in Marathi and Hindi so that it can reach more people.

[@NileshOak]

Thank you.

[@bhavanadeshmukh5600]

नमस्कार निलेशदादा तूम्ही ज्या सहजतेने विश्लेषण करता प्राचीन सभ्येतेतील घटनाकाळाचे ते ऐकणं पर्वणीच असते. त्यासाठी खूप खूप धन्यवाद आणि तूमचं खूप खूप कौतुकदेखील!! माझा एक प्रश्न आहे. तुमच्या अनेक संवादात वसिष्ठ-्अरूंधतीचा संदर्भ ऐकायला मिळतो. व्यासमहर्षींनी युद्धाच्या आदल्या दिवशी ज्या खगोलिय स्थितीबाबत विधान केले आहे ती स्थिती किती कालपर्यंत अस्तित्वात होती हे कळू शकेल का? शक्य असल्यास कृपया सांगा... विनंती आहे! 🙏🏻🙏🏻

[@NileshOak]

@@bhavanadeshmukh5600 do read my books and watch other videos.

[@darkknight4313]

​@@NileshOak hello sir where can I find the 1st part of this lecture?

[@pravinpatil9887]

Saraswati cha jawal rahanare saraswat tech pudhe saraswat brahman zale

[@keshawarpal444]

🙏🙏🙏🙏

[@ManOfSteel1]

Kindly link part 1 in description

[@indrajeetsutar5564]

If possible can you create publish your presentation as video?

[@ProtiumPower]

Sir, I use to see the Western narrative videos of AIT and then look for the answers in Indic narrative videos. Still I find it hard to counter some of the arguments presented by AIT presenters. 1. The main argument they present now a days is based on genetics. They say Y chromosome R1a gene found in East Europe, southern Russia and India, has come from invasion as oldest sample was found in Ukraine, from 5000-3000 BC. But Abhijit Chavda has presented a research which says that the R1a gene originated in India around 15000BC. Then AIT people say no other Indian gene is found in Eurasians. So Out of India theory is false. They also say R1a is found more in Brahmins and higher castes based on David Reich's research data. How to counter this? 2. Your dates of Ramayana and Mahabharata are based on astronomical data. I agree with this but is there any Archeological evidence like ruins to back these dates (except Dwarka)? We have found Saraswati civilisation which at most dates back to 8000BC and some pottery cultures. Though humans have inhabited India for atleast 80000 years. Still no evidence of advanced old civilisation from 15000 years ago. 3. Why is it still in progress to decipher Indus script if it is part of Indian civilisation? Why they are so distinct from the vedic culture after 1000BC? There is a great discontinuity. No burnt brick structure has been found between 1000BC till Mahajanpada/Mauryans in 400BC, only mud houses. The people were considered tribes. There are no temples found, also very less major Hindu religious practice evidence has been found in Saraswati civilisation (though Shiv ling was found). One point said by Witzel was the fire pits found there were not used for Yajya as they were different from those mentioned in Vedas. They were probably used for cooking as some burnt animal remains have been found in them. One study found that the people used to eat meat heavily like pig, cattle, buffalo, goat, chicken based on lipids found there. The leftist argument is put that the people were secular. The Indus civilisation has more been associated with Dravidian civilisation based on: a. Script more like Tamil. b. Non-Vegetarian aspect. c. Jalaikattu represented on a seal. Recently, IIT KGP did study which suggests that due to climate change the people migrated east in Ganges plains. But how they forgot their earlier lifestyle, why is it so different? 4. They also present the argument that spoked wheels were not present in Saraswati civilisation. This can be false because I have seen some indirect evidences of spoked wheel. a. In British museum, there is a small toy brass spoked wheel made by early wax casting method, from 3000BC b. A terracotta toy wheel with spoke impressions has been found. c. The Indus script has spoked wheel symbol, famous one on Dholavira sign board. Still I am not aware of direct evidence of spoked wheel. The Sinauli Chariots have solid copper decorated wheels. It is possible that it was ritualistic chariot, not practical one. Earliest evidence of spoked is found in Kazakhstan from 2100BC. Answer to these arguments will for sure shatter Aryan Migration Theory.

[@adityanarayan3909]

So this is proving that aryans migrated from outside

[@ProtiumPower]

@@adityanarayan3909 As for genetics, it is possible that R1a gene came not with aryans but with later rulers like Kushans, Huns and possibly Turks. As for more gene in higher caste, it is possibly due to fact that higher caste people lived in urban centres where foreigners more came in contact, while lower caste lived in villages. Genetics is AIT's main strength but it is very flawed. Even if you agree with AIT, it is hard to explain why the aryans adopted Shiva as supreme god which was not their god according to westerners. Vedas can be looked in two ways 1. It is very old, according to Oak sir 30000 years probably. Therefore it doesn't mention Shiva, only basic devas of Swarga like Agni, Indra etc. are prayed. Shiva is in form of Rudra and not prominent. 2. Vedas were brought by Aryans which gods similar to greek gods like zeus or Indra. Then they blend with Indus valley culture and we have present day Hinduism. The western scholars also follow tree model of indo-european languages which is very misleading because it says languages can only diverge which is not true as two languages can also combine eg. Urdu from Persian and Hindi. But it is very hard to accept that the 'superior' aryans as they western scholars say,‌ adopted practices of Indus people like 1. Meditation- the famous statue of beard man meditating is very similar to Buddha's posture of meditation. It is most important part of yogi's and rishi's life. Even Shiva and Vishnu have same posture of chanting Om. Why aryans adopted this? 2. Yoga postures have been found in Indus valley. The yoga is a medium to connect with the Universe and nature. It is important for yogi. Vedas were written by rishi's and yogi's. How aryans adopted this? 3. Sindur in women statues has been found. Why aryans adopted this? The conclusion is Either today's Sanatan is more derived from Saraswati Civilisation rather than aryans 'if AIT is true'. Or AIT is false, which explains everything much easily. Also majority of today's Indian people DNA matches with Saraswati people.

[@adityanarayan3909]

@@ProtiumPower what about the DNA reports of the skeletons found in sanauli? Why ASI is not releasing the reports ?

[@ProtiumPower]

@@adityanarayan3909 It is very hard to extract DNA from bodies found in India because of very hot climate and rainy season which doesn't help preservation. Everyone agrees that.

[@adityanarayan3909]

@@ProtiumPower We have found the DNA of skeletons in rakhigarhi and harappan sites, so it's not difficult to extract DNA from the bodies found in India. And we have found that the DNA samples matches with Dravidian. So I think the DNA found in sanauli must be aryan one.

[@himanshuverma1260]

!!!!!!!!

[@nosubject6899]

Plz make it in English.

[@chiranjeev5]

Sir tumcha mail id havay

[@NileshOak]

@@chiranjeev5 [e-mail]. Do read below before emailing. -- Many folks approach me wanting to do research, ask questios/doubts and/or seek my guidance (the number has skyrocketed!) wanting to be my mentees, yet when it comes to following my advice, they score ZERO! अनेन योगेन यथोपदेशं -- Visit Nileshoak.com for how to invite me as a speaker, OR to book a 1:1 consulting session with me OR to contribute to my research efforts. -- 0. Don't be in a hurry to contact via phone conversation. Don't be in a hurry to ask questions via social media Or email (all of them are FAQ and AMT -answered multiple times, by me in my numerous lectures, in books and blogs). 1. Read my books and blogs - Multiple times, Watch my 1000+ videos multiple times 2. Write a critique of my books (3000 to 5000 words each). Publish them in SM or otherwise. Even my trolls realize that this is a must for cheap and quick popularity. 3. Study the Bhagavad Gita daily. Must have a sadhana-path (Japa, stotra, reading...swadhyaya) 4. Start sharing my work with others. This will hone your skills in how much you have truly understood the deeper foundation of my research and its purpose and NOT JUST the outcome (dating of MB, Ramayana, Sushruta, Rigveda, Sarasvati, etc.) 5. At this stage, the person ought to be at a stage to do research on the area of one's passion. Please do it. If the area is not novel/new/challenging, it is not worth researching. Publish. If you feel the need to have validation from me for your research, you have not done original research. 6. Do the original work (and bring it out in various ways via SM, books, papers, blogs, and videos) so that I notice you, rather than you trying to coax me to have a conversation with you. 7. You will not find anyone who has done sincere original work, requested my help, and was disappointed in my response. 8. Read Voraciously. Do Purvapaksha of others in your field of passion. 9. Progress leads to additional doubts, samshay, and questions. Developing the ability to work on your studies without needing instant gratification via answers to these questions is critical. In the absence of required background knowledge, the answer is not understood. Majority of the answers come to us from the universe and/or of our own and they are the most convincing answers rather than those given by individuals. 10. If you feel desperate and eager to share your thoughts with me, do so via FB message and number them, to achieve crispness and avoid rambling. No phone calls without prior permission, even if you have secured my number.

[@asyajyotish]

सर तुमच्या ज्ञानाचे कौतुक करावे तेवढे कमी आहे... पण उत्सुकता म्हणून एक विचारतो की कर्ण जो होता तो टेस्ट्युबेबी होता का?? त्या काळा मध्ये असे काही होत होते का...?? कोणी असे म्हणतात , तर कोणी असे पण म्हणतात कि तो ऋषी दुर्वासा चा मुलगा होता..?? कारण ऋषी दुर्वासाचे वर्णन सूर्या सारखेच होते ... कृपया यावर प्रकाश टाकावा आपण...

[@NileshOak]

Namaskar Read Mahabharata in a hurry.. Everything is described clearly. No need for useless speculation. Nilesh

[@asyajyotish]

@@NileshOak Okk Dhanyawad Sir

[@prasantapathak7724]

Difficult to understand your language

[@studious_aneek017]

Ek Teesmar Khan Nilesh Oak Hai , bolta hai 7000 varsh pehle Mahabharat hua aur 14000 varsh pehle Ramayan hua , Tumlogo ko shaastro ki kaal ganana se kya appatti hai ? Jab swayam shaastro ne bataya hai ki kab Yeh sab hua toh tumlog kiu Computer aur Machine leke pahunch jate ho . Pehle ke saare Avtaari Acharya aur Abhi saare Pramanik Acharya hamesha Kehte hai ki Mahabharat 5000 varsh pehle hua aur Ramayan kalp bhed se 1 Crore se 8 lakh varsh pehle hua , toh fir tumlog apne bekar ke so called scientific methods leke kiu pahuch jate ho . Jis Acharya aur Guru Parampara se Shaastro tum tak pahuche unki baat kiu nhi mante . Shaastro ki baat Guru , Acharya aur Rishio ke mat se manoge na , tum apna dimaag kiu lagate ho , tumhare saare so called scientific equipment kaal aur galat dristikon ke adhin hai , satya sirf shaastra chakshu se jana jata hai Machine se nhi , Machine Bohot se assumption pe chalti hai jo case to case galat bhi ho sakta hai , lekin sab jante hai ki Shaastro ki baat 100% Perfect hai. Jaise koi Research Globally Recognise hone ke liye saare Top Scholars usse approval dete hai weshe hi Pehle yeh saare Nilesh Oak jaise Videsh Gaami patit hindu apna Kal ganana kisi Parampara Parpt Pramanik Acharya se certify karaye fir ham inki aage ki baat sunenge . Yeshe Nilesh Oak jeshe hi Aryabhatta bhi hua tha jo apne siddhant ko kisi Pramanik Acharya aur Rishio se Approval nhi karwa paya tha kiuki uska siddhant Galat aur Shaastro ke viruddh tha , aur unke siddhant ko Lall aur Varahmihir ne Uske anuyayi se shaastrat karke dhuast kar diya tha .Yehlog Adi Shankaracharya, Madhavacharya , Vallabhacharya se bade ho gaye kya . Ab yeh mat bolna ki 1 Crore varsh pehle Ramayan nhi ho sakti kiuki tab sab Bandar the 😂 , Yeh Evolution, Stone Age , Iron Age , Vedic Age , Middle Age , Modern Age sab scam hai , agar tum Hindu Ho toh Shaastro ke pati aastha hona padega , agar aastha hai toh yeh bhi manna hoga ki shaaatra apourushya hai , Manu Satrupa hamare Adi Mata Pita the , bandar Bhalu nhi 😂 , ham Tumlogo jaise Bandar putra nhi Isswar aur Rishio ki santane hai . Shaastro ki Kaal Ganana Janna ho toh shaastro ke siddhant se jano apna bekar ka theories mat do . Tumhare Theories Tumhare Marne ke baad Sarega koi nhi puchega jaise Arya Samaj ko koi bhi Hindu hi nhi manta kiuki woh bhi shaaatra viruddh hai .

[@nemalconsashutosh8665]

Baap re Nilesh Oak k prati apka itna gussa? Paani pi lo zara. Blood pressure se phat jaoge. Koi agar kucch prove karta hai toh ap dar kyu jate ho. Kya apki astha itni durbal hai?? Chill.