AMD Fluid Motion Frames 2 - GTA 5 and Radeon 780M: Frame Gen With No Graphics Card

[@IronMaiden4ever]

you can also enable framegen ingame by using the "alt+shift+g" shortcut.

[@Tomazack]

Good to know, I've aways just used alt+r and toggeled it on there.

[@Momonga32]

I love you you bastard

[@TurboD16z6]

Except it keep on saying not compatible with your display

[@SidOfRivia]

​@@TurboD16z6 yeah it's stupid

[@ilovelimpfries]

My rx6600 feels like a new card.

[@RandomGaminginHD]

Awesome!

[@ALph4cro]

Big improvement over the first version?

[@nachojaimes5494]

@@ALph4cro Huge

[@epm8593]

Will try

[@ALph4cro]

@@nachojaimes5494 Can't wait for it to try it out on Helldivers 2 instead of Lossless Scaling, then. The game being so terribly optimized feels better with FG. AFMF2 should feel even better because the latency should be better.

[@peyton_uwu]

While I've come to learn to not trust companies, I really enjoy how competitive AMD is on the software side of things.

[@ajaakola2]

Competition is really good and amd coming blazing in with ryzen changed so much and helped us proggress more

[@About67Crabs]

from my own experience with amd hardware and software, they always have cut corners...either it doesn't do anything, or already has something for it but they just wanted it to add it to their "functionality" to apear better and more competitive amd went from an underdog to just "a competitor who isn't in the right path of competition" most of what they deliver is half baked and re-worked later....no wonder why they've almost gone bankrupt recently....they're just unreliable when it comes to both hardware and softwares.....and that statement from me is from a consumer of amd products since 2008 to 2023, where i just gave up on their things...too many issues the customers have to deal with and they just make things complicated and harder to fix

[@KenTWOu]

@@About67Crabs You picked the wrong year to gave up on AMD and the wrong time to tell about that considering AMD recently said it's becoming a software company already spending tons of money on that, and what Intel is experiencing right now thanks to its 13th/14th gen CPUs degradation (was known almost for 2 years and ignored by intel) and the recent stock price dropping.

[@About67Crabs]

@@KenTWOu intel's 12th gen is still a great option, from i3 to i7, got no issues on my end (yes 4-core cpu's can still compete with high end models (in gaming)...as a matter of fact, i use my i3 machine much more than my i7 machine from the same 12th gen) also i am done with amd, for good... they'll always be inferior in hardware and software to me as they've always been...they're too far behind since too long i do agree about the recent drivers being a lot better, but i'm done with them...i have no hope nor hype about AMD's future

[@KenTWOu]

@@About67Crabs They've always been? Dude, that's just some serious fanboy thing. We have x64 instruction sets today thanks to AMD. That's just one of the many moments in the past when AMD's hardware was much superior to what Intel could offer. "They're too far behind since too long" perfectly describes what's happening with Intel right now.

[@Trick-Framed]

PEOPLE when that pop up happens, send the data to AMD. If you do they can improve the drivers faster.

[@lockeeeeeee]

always actived 🗿

[@qwertykaps1042]

AMD data collection propaganda

[@hsssbjejew764]

yeah this advice is just dumb​@@qwertykaps1042

[@aksGJOANUIFIFJiufjJU21]

I dont trust any company with my data

[@JohnnyBoy-sy8jt]

@@aksGJOANUIFIFJiufjJU21 You say that typing a comment with your KZbin account linked to a Google account lmao

[@JordonAM]

5:05 I feel you there....unfortunately they've already started doing that ever since FSR and DLSS caught on a few years back. I've seen some pretty poorly optimized games and when asked about it, a few of the dev responses would be to use FSR/DLSS for better performance. Other than that, AFMF2 is great for emulators especially. Since they utilize Vulkan and OpenGL more than DirectX, I can play some of my favorite old games at 60-120fps (depending on if the game's FPS cap was 30 or 60) and make it feel like a whole different experience. I've already been using AFMF 1 with Breath of the Wild, so I'm excited to try out AFMF 2 with it when the drivers are more...stable 😅

[@virux4107]

*cough* *cough* 7 days to die.. *cough*

[@radger6392]

Wondering how GTA 4 would run enabling this 🤔 with and without DXVK as you mentioned "unoptimized titles"

[@RandomGaminginHD]

Ah that’s a good point I’ll have to try it

[@xenotone3284]

I tried it with Lossless Scaling and got 165 fps most of the time with a 5800X3D but it didn't feel smooth. Some games do, some don't.

[@FarmerJoe-fs4nv]

I tried IV with lossless scaling at 30FPS and my native resolution & 720p. Both looked really good and ran as if it were 60FPS. I'd say if it were tested with AFMF it would look similar or even better since it's a big company making it, or maybe worse since it's a big company making it, who knows.

[@My_Old_YT_Account]

​@@FarmerJoe-fs4nvthe biggest advantage is probably that since it's fake frames, you can finish the last mission without issue

[@press-tilde]

@@RandomGaminginHD Yes please, I'm wondering myself.

[@Profetorum]

Since you mentioned emulation, just saying an Android dev (Lyb) has been developing frame gen for Android and they even released a beta version of it. Incredible to think of

[@sushimshah2896]

Whaat? How does it work, can it work with any game, how do I get it? That's actually great news because phones aren't upgradable like PCs & if I can play some of the latest heavy titles a bit more smoothly on my 3yr old phone, then I'm all for it!! Edit:- Almost forgot that devs don't particularly like or develop for MTK / Mali and so hard luck for me & my D12000 even though it's decently powerful (~SD870 / SD7G3)

[@Shahzad12357]

​@@sushimshah2896 Qualcomm already has a a super resolution tech and frame interpolation tech that only gaming phones use

[@abdou.the.heretic]

​@@sushimshah2896cries in Exynos

[@Iceman-hb3uk]

Playing 100+ FPS with high settings on an APU is insane... I know, it's not the same as native 100+ FPS, but in most games with AFMF 2 it really is smoother (unlike AFMF which was kinda bad with frame pacing and it turned off too easily with fast movements).

[@XavandSo]

AFMF 1 is a god send for my ROG Ally, it helps games hit close to 120FPS so I can take full advantage of the 120Hz screen. It's not perfect but damn it is appreciated.

[@ironeleven]

This tech seems very interesting for revisiting old games with hard-coded framerate caps.

[@ThoughtlessDestiny]

My wife likes it a lot. She has a 4k 60 monitor, and it makes the gameplay more fluid for her. I didn't tell her I turned it on, and she's like, why does my game feel smooter? lol.

[@RandomGaminginHD]

Haha nice one

[@SimplCup]

if it's only 60 hz, you and anyone won't feel difference, probably the placebo effect comes into play

[@HerZeL3iDza]

@@SimplCup Maybe they were running the game(s) sub 60FPS before he enabled it? Regardless, it only LOOKS smoother, but feels very laggy when you use any inputs which for me was worse than just having framegen off.

[@Viilap]

haha bro ur a good one made your wife happy with freakin afmf2

[@Viilap]

@@HerZeL3iDza which inputs? what u mean

[@EpicTyphlosionTV]

As an Nvidia guy, I'm super jealous. I'd kill to have something like this that works on all my games!

[@rfnddev]

you can use losless scaling ^_^

[@icerink239]

Lsfg 2.0

[@todd92371]

Man, Nvidia makes great cards. But, I moved over to a Radeon 6700xt card. I am so glad I did. I love the Adrenaline software and just love what AMD is doing right now. I thought I would NEVER leave Nvidia. But, they make great cards also.

[@keen283]

@@todd92371 nvidia have better cards with better technology, but the price for their new cards are insane lmao, AMD will be the goat for price to performance for a long time unless Intel steps in with their gpus

[@RDVGAMER888]

@@todd92371 MY BRO, You have no enemies :D

[@LiquidSnake690]

I personally would love to see you to test AFMF 2 in more games!

[@Tunnelfish2]

I'm glad that AMD puts this out to help people. I generally don't need it with my 7900 XT.

[@connivingkhajiit]

i would certainly hope not

[@RedEverything]

I have a 7900 XT, I’m most interested in using this for emulators. Playing something like Mario Sunshine at 120 FPS.

[@bb2ridder757]

​@@RedEverythingI thought emulators already allowed you to run at higher fps

[@crow5228]

@@bb2ridder757 some emulators if not most are capped at 60 fps, AFMF2 can get rid of that cap and increase it to 120fps

[@garrin1220]

You could get a high refresh rate monitor and play games at 300hz

[@greendude0420]

Digital foundry said when reviewing Elden Ring with lossless scaling not to expect the tool to fix frame pacing issues, which from softs engine is known for imo. So I don’t think developers will be getting away with bad game optimization ever

[@MirelRC]

When there is stuttering or frame pacing problems‚ frame gen will only make things worse.

[@JeanRosa-qc3mb]

just got a rx 6650 xt and a 2.5k 165hz monitor, coming from a gtx 970 and a 900p 60hz monitor. can't wait for them to arrive 😅 and fsr 3.1 along with afmf 2 came at the same time. booy i'm happy right now.

[@Grandmaster-Kush]

It's a good day to be a 6700 XT budget enjoyer

[@RandomGaminginHD]

Awesome card :)

[@heylookthatboi]

6700xt a budget card ? In what universe

[@Lex_Wolf_555]

6700xt isn't budget at all

[@Grandmaster-Kush]

@@heylookthatboi Second hand at least in my country you can find them for 250-280 euro right now, hell my 970 and Gtx 570 cost more many years ago.

[@RedEverything]

Chad midrange enjoyer

[@KianFloppa]

This is great. Just used it with RX 7600. I got no crashes and its without a doubt better than 1st version.

[@Corvidd]

Great video as always mate.

[@RandomGaminginHD]

Thanks!

[@MasterCog999]

Idk if this will help anyone else but I recommend using Enhanced Sync with AFMF 2. I have no evidence for this, but I think it helps with the frame pacing of the generated frames.

[@johnjohnhasabashat...2279]

I love this. It will help those older gpu's last longer if the bugs get ironed out. For those that don't have an AMD cpu/gpu you can also try Lossless Scaling (available on steam and also supports AMD gpu's ) and while it isn't free it's cheap and works great on my RTX 2060. Works for video media too. Works with ALL games and not just ones coded for DLSS or FSR. More artifacts than the nvidia/AMD variants since it doesn't use motion vectors but if you watch movies on your TV with a similar motion interpolation feature then you won't notice. Barely any input lag either. Digital foundry did a piece on it a couple of months ago.

[@MirelRC]

The best part of this tech is that we can make use of it in games that don't play well at over 60FPS‚ like Fallout 4 without mods. We can play it at 60FPS locked and then use AFMF2 to get higher visual fluidity‚ especially if the GPU doesn't get full usage when the game is running at 60FPS locked.

[@KimBoKastekniv47]

This is a great point, I'm going to try it later with Black Flag!

[@MirelRC]

@@KimBoKastekniv47 I am waiting for stable drivers to be released to test it on Fallout 4. But if the game will have bad frame pacing or frametime inconsistency it will not gonna help.

[@KimBoKastekniv47]

@@MirelRC Ah bummer, didn't notice it's only a technical preview driver. Hmm yeah poor frametimes or heavy artifacting is going to be a killjoy.

[@dcikaruga]

Curious to see if the crappy 6500 and 6400 will benefit from this.

[@christophermullins7163]

I love to see one of my favorite channels recommending another one of my favorite channels. ❤ Both you and ancient gameplays top tier pc gaming channels. 🎉

[@yumi.8484]

can't wait for games to implement this in so that nvidia and intel gpus can also use it amd keeping their drivers open source is possibly one of the best things to come to games lately

[@ArcadiaP]

Not that this has anything to do specifically with Fluid Motion, but I recently tried an FSR3 mod to replace DLSS Frame Generation in The Witcher 3 and it is unreal how good it feels. I'm used to, and can easily discern the difference between small and large variables in FPS (even 90-110 is noticeable to me). FSR3 mod in The Witcher 3 felt so good, so native, I genuinely had a hard time realizing there was any fake frames being generated. Even on an artifact side, the only time I'd notice anything would be on Roach sprinting through the countryside where the bottom of the screen gave a slight tell of being fake frames. As long as I kept my native frame-rate around 45-50, the effect of the generation was incredibly impressive. Technology is actually kind of insane, especially if it works incredibly optimally.

[@ChillBuilds]

This is great for games that break at high frame rates. FFXIV for instance, had cloth and other physics that would practically shut down if you didn't lock to 60fps. Now you can get smoothness without breaking things.

[@Aaronnpool23]

people can get upset but to me amd is just trying to release software that helps boost fps at add value to our graphics cards which im quite happy with. I own a 6800xt and it works great

[@alfonso5177]

I recommend you capping the fps at for example, 59 fps so you're always in the VRR range so it feels even smoother with AFMF 2 (It doubles to 118 fps)

[@RandomGaminginHD]

Good call!

[@pootispiker2866]

I git a 7800XT a few days ago. With FMF1 it gets 280FPS at 1440p on a few UE4 games and it's downright impressive to see.

[@Kendoci]

I don't think i've ever clicked faster on a KZbin notification. 🤯

[@RandomGaminginHD]

Thanks!

[@miguelnora600]

Ancient Gameplays, zWormz... I see you love Portuguese people lol You were the very first tech KZbinr I started watching (around 2018), that made me love PC's and build my own rig! Leave a like if you did, leave dislike if you didn't! :) Thank you for everything and cheers from Portugal mate!

[@AkiTsukita]

Much lower latency + less frame drops when turning around in-game. Also, being able to use with Vulkan and OpenGL is a game changer. Now almost every game are supported.

[@jonpeley]

4:51 hi Jack!

[@Decenium]

and to prevent devs from being sloppy with optimization on the consoles at least (which would hopefully influence the pc version) is if AMD demands that 60fps target is met before this tech is allowed to be used.

[@DylRicho]

5:11 Amen. That's my thought process as well.

[@RoniNiklas]

Running this with 7800xt on a 1440p, I use Radeon chill to limit games to 90 real fps and then use AFMF2 to push it to 180 displayed fps (or sometimes 60 to 120). Everything is buttery smooth and it makes the gpu run several degrees cooler because it's no longer at 100% utilization. I can also turn graphics settings higher without sacrificing fps or temps. I haven't really noticed any artifacting tbh, unlike with FSR upscaling in some titles. The only issue is that it's a bit janky, where it sometimes does not turn on when you start a game and then you have to fiddle with restarting the game or restarting AMD Adrenalin and hoping something makes it actually run. Definitely worth trying if you're running an AMD gpu.

[@hunn20004]

This really is the time of "Do you actually need a GPU?" Plaster on some onboard HBM VRAM and sure, i'd buy that handheld...

[@Destruction52]

AFMF 1 and 2 serves the porpuse to boost FPS and image fluidity in old games that didn't have FSR/DLSS nor FrameGen, in my case I am using it in AC Unity and getting 140-170FPS feels great, the only disadvantage that I have found is that for some reason a program called FanControl was causing the Adrenalin to crash after turning on AFMF 1 for some reason, even though the program is running on background.

[@MetalGamer666]

Can you try some newer games with FSR 3 and higher resolution? Like the Spider-Man games or something. Then do the same run without any frame gen, then with FSR, then with AFMF, then with FSR and AFMF. Also, the driver when set to Auto is not supposed to select HIGH setting in lower resolutions, like 1080p, so not sure why it did in your testing.

[@sandorbence2067]

This works wonders if you want to use the 780m handhelds (ROG Ally, Legion Go) with an external monitor and higher res, especially combined with FSR. I switched from a 5800X3D+RX 7900 to a Legion Go as a main PC and the gaming experience is nopw serviceable. Can't wait for the Strix Point handhelds, that should fill the gap in my titles.

[@fruitcake4910]

When I watched Adored’s videos years ago, I used to have delusional dreams where AMD would release a card like 7900XTX for like $650 and defeat Nvidia.

[@GGAK-qy8vf]

i love this, i dont need to upgrade my gpu (rx 6800xt) for over a decade hopefully

[@ElderlyAnteater]

Driver timeouts could be completely unrelated. Any AMD card I've ever had has given me occasional timeouts, and I only made it a little better (read: usable for more than 10 mins) by underclocking my system's RAM. Edit: also agree entirely with your worry about game development hinging on the use of generated frames to avoid spending resources on optimisation. It seems like DLSS has been pretty bad for game development from the standpoint of a user/customer

[@zer0366]

It's great for games that are locked to 60 fps. If it works anything like lossless scaling then it should be quite the improvement over AFMF 1

[@zenpy_]

Even for games that are locked at 30fps.

[@Apocalyptic47]

i feel the smoothness increased even in my 75hz monitor first gen afmf

[@wass77]

hello need some help ^^ do you recommend pairing an i5-9400 with an MSI GeForce GTX 1650 4GB?

[@Decenium]

it should now also work in borderless windowed mode which is a big win for me

[@Rmm1722]

Good work amd and you too mate 😄❤🎉

[@thescottishaccent]

I'm always curious to see this sort of stuff on a game like Assassin's Creed: Odyssey, if you're looking for ideas for another vid or a deeper delve. Even with a fairly decent system (R5 3600 and 3070 playing at 1440p) that game has a tendency to feel really choppy and the frame rate rollercoasters up and down constantly for me (my friend has the same on his 4090-based setup at 4k with it, too).

[@Trick-Framed]

I am using a far less powerful R7 7840hs w/780m. The unit will not take faster than 5600 MT/s DDR5. The one you are testing? Skies the limit, get the absolute fastest memory you can and it will improve framerates. That said I can still play Fortnite in performance mode maxed out 1080p 120 fps locked. And it is a great experience. I can also play 4k 60 fps locked. Although that has to be on minimum settings but is also a great experience. I do not like any type of frame gen from any company for any reason. It is useless. I prefer to run native as that will be the latency I am dealing with either way.

[@mrbobgamingmemes9558]

I would like to see this on cpu heavy games honestly

[@CrocoDylianVT]

finally, high refresh rate in GTA V without breaking it

[@Fyshtako]

Nvidia needs to make an equivalent system level upscaler, DLSS being only game by game (and even then having to be manually updated every time they update DLSS) is really annoying. Currently I'm using Lossless Scaling for my frame gen needs, mostly in older games and ones with 60fps caps. LSFG and emulation is a great mix.

[@EdoXTensei]

As long as something works properly, I don't mind using it, no matter if that's FSR or Frame Gen, even tho I have 7900XT.

[@JohnsonJohnsonJohnson-j6r]

A use someone talked about is locking your fps t 60 and using frame gen to get a smoother fps. Does nothing for latency but reduces the power needed to reach 80+.

[@LukeTheJoker]

I would love to see this used on Farming Simulator, that game tends to not run much fps no matter what hardware you have, so going from 60-120 would be nice...

[@SammyGoated]

The day we have 2 GPUs in the computer

[@Verssales]

I like to use AFMF limiting the frames at half the monitor refresh hate, then after the generation I will use only what the monitor can display and save some pennies with my energy bill. In my case my monitor displays 160, so I limit the games to 80 and after generating it reaches 160.

[@bighmm6301]

Looks cool, don't think I'll need it with my 7600 considering the games I play but maybe it'll come in handy at some point

[@balaam_7087]

My brain is swelling to the bursting point from all the acronyms I have to keep track of. Just in gaming we have JRPG’s, ARPG’s, CRPG’s, FPS’s, RTS’s, NES, SNES, N64, PS1-PS5, PSP, DS, DLSS, DLAA, XESS, FSR, FMF, FXAA, MSAA, MLAA, SSAA, TAA, TSR and probably two dozen others I can’t recall at the moment 🤯

[@wearefromserbia9714]

This is most acronyms i have seen in one sentence XD

[@MirelRC]

I would add those too: VRR‚ VRS‚ DRS‚ SSR‚ SSGI‚ SSAO‚ HBAO‚ RTGI.

[@watchulookinat271]

Well played AMD. Well played indeed

[@phatminhphan4121]

5:10 I believe that the true test here is the Physic system in GTAV ! not the AFMF two thing 🤣😂

[@Zeyad_Assem]

what about poorly optimized games like gta iv it'll be really interesting to know how far it will work?

[@Gabu_]

"I'm using a fairly oldmonitor, that reaches 120Hz" Meanwhile I'm using an LCD panel from 2005

[@Btech94]

Sad that amd leaves behind the rx 5000 series. But gladly Losses scallings frame generation works like a charm on any GPU. the latest version also introduce the low latency frame generation for that as well.

[@Mr.Genesis]

the difference between RDNA2 and RDNA is massive.. they didn't "Leave out" anything.. the infrastructure just can't support it. AFMF is also used on Consoles and we're lucky to have it on the 6000 series cause those were actually the original ones initially left out

[@Btech94]

​@@Mr.Genesis yeah compared to Nvidia AMD is miles better at providing for older generations. But AMD does lock things up in software wise. I have an gaming laptop with rx5600M graphics card and it doesn't even have HW recording, tuning and RSR from AMD software, even though my device has the required hardware to do it. Via the nimez custom AMD drivers I can enable them. So AMD does intentionally lock things out. I think even RX 5000 series can do AFMF without an issue since it has no problem handling LSFG 2.2 which is same thing as AFMF but you can use it in even videos.

[@SlickOnTop]

Good guy and strikes again.

[@The_Stolas]

Were the preview drivers overall stable in your testing? Last year I installed the 1.0. AFMF drivers as soon as they were avaliable in preview and those were mostly stable. I'm just wondering if there is any crashing with the 2.0. and so on. * edit - I watched the part about the driver timeouts. Yeah, I'll just wait for the full release then or patches for the preview.

[@hyperixz]

hey man, you should try comparing Arctic Freezer 36 with other budget cpu coolers i think it would make a great comparison. since the arctic cooler is dirty cheap right now in most countries.

[@olnnn]

Wonder if the new hybrid graphics thing mentioned in the update notes will work if you use the motherboard output and pair the 8700G with a discrete amd gpu or if it only works on laptops.

[@Rileygee0224]

The only time I cranked Frame gen and FSR was in dead space 2023 and It felt really good, smoother than any game I've played but it raised my power a lot (obviously) so I don't tend to use it.

[@matsui90]

When only Nvidia offered this technology the AMD fanboys melted in a cry of "fake frames". Hopefully now they can see how good this is.

[@Mr.Genesis]

No one cried.. no it was quite literally Nvidia fanboys screaming "OMG I ALWAYS USE FRAME GENERATION" and they boughtt a $2000+ GPU

[@kenkaneki1911]

4:25 Just AMD in general tbh. I love my 3200g still cuz it can play games like elden ring (including dlc) and cyberpunk2077 (including phantom liberty) and all new games like forbidden west. But the drivers just crash randomly. Hope they fix it soon.

[@AnonymousKev]

imo its double the overall fidelity of afmf 1 but from a 2/10, making afmf 2 like 4/10. Still a lot of room for improvement but now its relatively usable in my experience

[@febroeth]

is amd good at this point? my previous ryzen 3 2200u laptop had some terrible driver issue and randomly bluescreen whenever i use it.

[@TheMrsaintevil]

You mentioned poorly optimized games. How will it perform with GTA 4, with their notorious frame dips?

[@TheCgOrion]

It's way lower latency than Lossless Scaling, seat of the pants feeling. I use LS for video interpolation, but I still wanted to try it in a game. Plus I only have 1440p 144hz, using a 7900XTX, so I probably won't use it, except for 60 fps locked titles, possibly. I did test it in Dolphin (Vulkan) and it did work.

[@JoeyBozTito]

Quick question, if this is at a driver level, would it work with emulation? If so it could be the push some ps3 games need to hit 60 fps

[@ahmmed15806]

Bro what version/build your game is??!

[@x0vg5hs1]

Hey, Do you believe that next gen consoles will be trully next gen or I am ok with radeon 6800xt for the intire lifespan of games for ps5 and ps6? I mean like like few moths back the games were releasing for either next gen orthe mid gen-meaning xbox S, ps4+current gen ps5 and series X

[@Thakkii]

Ps5 , ye you good , ps6 idk. To be honest i still use an 6700xt and works for me , sht with all this new tech coming out i dont think i need to upgrade gpu in a few years . Rather dump my cash into car stuff.

[@x0vg5hs1]

@@Thakkii I have b350 with Ryzen 3800x and Radeon 6800xt it’s good enough for maxed out or high preset gaming in 1080p or 1440p with upscaling. I would need at least 4080 or Radeon 7900xt for 1440p or upscale 4k. I doubt your 6700xt runs unreal engine 5 games with nanite global illumination well

[@Thakkii]

@@x0vg5hs1 True , some unreal engine games are still in early stages and optimizing in games this days are either lazy or just rely on tech like fake fps generation , AI stuff etc. I think depends on the game , resolution , etc , there is alot factors

[@TerrorSyxke]

My rx7600 going from a r5 340x feels like a dang rtx 4090, everything i mean everything is just so much faster and better looking, and yea the new cpu helps too

[@ianhaylock7409]

I remember the days when he was happy to achieve 30fps. How times have changed.

[@BeerDone]

Hmm, I don't know, the GTA V footage seemed extremely artifacted for me. Maybe it's the game, maybe I just have much too keen of an eye, but it felt like every "moving" element in the world was shimmering or flickering in some way. Pedestrians blobbing out, large window reflections blinking hard, some finer-detailed things like balconies or lamp posts just sort of, snapping unnaturally... I don't think I'm on board with this, much like the rest of modern "temporal" graphics effects. This would annoy me.

[@avanmaulana3127]

What the software do you use to show real fps on the top left screen?

[@Riccccccc]

NPCs trying to crash you ain't real! NPCs trying to crush you: 4:09

[@joelshajan8706]

Feel like buying a 5500 was the worst mistake I made, absolutely none of the new bells and whistles are supported, it's like amd forgot about the 5th gen😢

[@krspy1337]

damn yall so lucky, would be nice if they actually fixed my issue which means AFMF not working, its doubling FPS but its not smoother at all compared it to being turned off, I have reported that using AMD Bug Report Tool but they dont seem to care, XFX 210 RX 6600 XT here

[@yeetyeet6015]

If a game has a problem running at above 60 will this make it run better without causing issues?

[@patientzero6325]

Hi mate, Upon checking the AMD overlay on GTA 5. why it has higher FPS compared to MSI afterburner Overlay FPS

[@BeerDone]

MSI's overlay tracks only the real frames rendered. AMD's one shows the sum total of render + Fluid Motion frames. He uses this for visible comparison of "real" framerate to "effective" framerate.

[@art_of_anarchism]

Your output monitor settings was 75hz???

[@kirisuma2186]

so what you are saying is that I should kick my RTX 3080 out of my system and get an amd card?

[@dragoonxgamer]

it doesn't show AFMF 2 in mine it only show AFMF Current Verison 24.7.1 and it shows up to date last checked 05/08/2024 GPU : RX 6950XT

[@akimbo3479]

I was using lossless scaling on 30 fps capped games and it works but the latency is bad.....and this in theory lowers the latency so it will be interesting to use it

[@MyFootballGame]

Is this going to benefit my 5800u laptop, I just play GTA V from time to time.

[@HeadRusch1]

I don't think this works on 680m or 660m equipped APU's, but is it enabled on 760 or 780m's?

[@robolivieri9915]

AFMF 2 isn't showing up for me. I tried updating my adrenalin driver but it said it's already up to date. I have a rx 7600.

[@pikachowtv]

its in beta right now! it wont be available until they fully release it.

[@TommyTonk]

They won't be releasing it fully until Q4, for now its on technical previews only, which you need to install from the website.

[@SoFRESHandSoMJ]

The AFMF2 option is not showing up for me in the Adrenaline software. I installed the preview driver. Also I have a laptop with the 6700M gpu

[@godemperormeow8591]

I think that this is a great way to fix games.

[@kaitty]

After trying out all of the frame gen technologies except AFMF 2 because I don't want to install a preview driver, I seriously do not understand the hype. AFMF 1at best made the smoothness look worse than the original framerate. Lossless Scaling has too many artifacts and also had some messed up pacing. FSR 3 FG in Call of Duty since that is the only game I have with FSR 3 FG didn't do... anything, the framerate said it was higher, it definitely wasn't visually or if it was the frame pacing there itself out of the window. DLSS FG is the only one that's done anything that I'd say is serviceable, but still doesn't feel good. I really don't understand why people like FG and I don't understand why these technologies were made in the first place.

[@ebridgewater]

Consider using a control pad whilst recording your gameplay videos. Your mouse sensitivity is high and it jolting around is not ideal for viewing.