Reacting to a Trains I Wanna See on SCR Video from dianboys

[@DaveDVideoMaker]

3:49 to 3:59 Holy shit - I didn't realise the silent part of that video. I apologise for this.

[@Class802IsGoated]

That’s fine mate.

[@jackthemakerguy8223]

Mistakes happen.

[@psrn1204]

It's alr bro

[@MikeyCondon-kv7cy]

It's OK, mistakes happen

[@psrn1204]

Well actually we dont need the 88. But my suggestion for the 68 is having a 5 coach variant.

[@DaveDVideoMaker]

We should have a longer MK3 version of the Class 68 on Connect, and / or the MK5A Class 68 that was used on Transpennine Express.

[@AlisRobloxTrainsAdventure]

Other 3rd rail trains that we used to suggest (not anymore) to come to SCR are: Class 701 (Originally suggested for Connect) Class 777 (Originally suggested for Waterline) Class 460 (originally suggested for AirLink) Class 450 (Originally suggested for Waterline) Class 455 (Originally suggested for Waterline) Class 456 (Originally suggested for Waterline) Class 376 (Originally suggested for Connect)

[@DaveDVideoMaker]

The Class 450, 701 and 376 have areas on the roof where a pantograph would be added, should it be necessary in the future. The Class 777 can run on electric mode, although has a reduced top speed to 100kmh. I don’t know if they’ll add any more third rail trains to the game, provided there’s an area on the roof where a pantograph would be added.

[@ECRALSE40LPS]

​@@DaveDVideoMakerWhich is a shame cause it doesn't matter if it has a Pantograph or not. Those pantographs are only useful on trains with overhead wires not for 3rd Rail, so we can still have them besides it's supposed to be realistic to real life, so who cares.

[@ethans-dk4bk]

The Difference between the Class 68 and 88 is that the Class 68 is Diesel and the Class 88 is Electric. Don't you know the Difference. If the Class 88 Comes to Connect. It will Replace the Class 68 and the Class 68 will be moved to Airlink because it has First Class. The Class 88 has no First Class and i never heard of that train Before.

[@DaveDVideoMaker]

The Class 88 is bi-modal. It can run on overhead power and diesel power.

[@Class802IsGoated]

Class 156’s are too common to be 3000 points. Good thing they come to connect but I think soonly They will also appear in waterline 😊

[@DaveDVideoMaker]

I don’t know why they cost so much, but at least I saved a shitload of points before 2.0.

[@Class802IsGoated]

@@DaveDVideoMaker ok

[@1910afiq]

Heres thing wanna see in scr 1. Check rail(Used to not make trains fall) 2. Third rail 3. Class 222 4. High street remodel 5. Starryloch remodel 6. Class 374 7. Class 378 8. Class 68 (5 Coaches) 9. Class 700 10. Train signal boxes 11. Can walk on moving trains 12. Overhead wires resets your character 13. Sliding doors 14. Manual door opening 15. An infill station (Optional) 16. Working ticket machines 17. Freecam 18. Tickets cards (Oyster for example) 19. Class 37 20. Class 67

[@DaveDVideoMaker]

1. Not happening. 2. Not happening. 3. For Express. 4. Likely to happen. 5. I expect sometime in the near future. 6. Not happening. 7. The Class 710 got rejected for SCR, so I suspect the 378 will get rejected too. 8. For Connect. 9. For Airlink. 10. We have some of these in the game. 11. Not likely. 12. Makes sense. 13. Sliding doors for what, the MK3 coaches? 14. As shown in the SCR prototype game, this is possible. 15. Unlikely. 16. Unlikely. 17. Not happening. 18. Not happening. 19. Highly unlikely. 20. For Connect.

[@1910afiq]

@@DaveDVideoMakerIsnt the class 67 125 MPH?

[@DaveDVideoMaker]

@@1910afiq The Class 67 is just better for Connect.

[@Kkplayzoffical]

Nice to see Dave uploading :)

[@DaveDVideoMaker]

More videos are coming.

[@Kkplayzoffical]

Yay!

[@SamsungGalaxyS5OTH]

I do want the 390 on Express.

[@DaveDVideoMaker]

Most of us do…

[@AliSonic]

Good to see the reaction videos back!

[@DaveDVideoMaker]

To be fair, I want to make some more videos, and I ran out of ideas, but one wanted me to do a reaction to his video, so I did it.

[@AliSonic]

@@DaveDVideoMaker oh ok, will there be more reactions videos?

[@DaveDVideoMaker]

@@AliSonic Yes, but I don’t know how many I’ll make.

[@AliSonic]

@@DaveDVideoMaker ok

[@yui4779]

I'll be making a video of Trains I want to see in SCR

[@DaveDVideoMaker]

I will react to it when it’s uploaded.

[@Train_PlaneFan123]

Honestly the 442 would be cursed with a pantograph

[@DaveDVideoMaker]

It wouldn’t look bad in my eyes, but is something that isn’t happening in SCR.

[@parisabney9]

What operator do you think the Class 150 would do best on?

[@DaveDVideoMaker]

@@parisabney9 Waterline.

[@parisabney9]

@@DaveDVideoMaker Any reasons why?

[@DaveDVideoMaker]

@@parisabney9 It just would.

[@psrn1204]

Yoo u came back on Reacting vids 😁😁

[@DaveDVideoMaker]

Yes, after almost two years.

[@DanChan-qb2ec]

I'm sure many people won't agree but I wish the 313 could be on connect as well with 3 and 6 car variant, and I still hoping the 230 on waterline (tho limit on Benton - Connolly, Greenslade and MGT only)

[@DaveDVideoMaker]

I don’t think it’s worth adding the Class 313 on Connect. But I do agree with you for the Class 230 on Waterline.

[@srbarretogd7996]

Hey dave, i gonna suggest some trains here. Its optional to make a react video. CN Class 67 with mk4 and dvt Class 90 with mk3 and dvt (no ex, because of the top speed) Class 175 Class 196 Class 231 Al Class 745 Class 68 with mk5 Double and tripe class 387 Class 350 (double and tripe) Double class 360 700 (8 and 12 coaches) Class 317 EX Class 180 (single and double) Class 222 Many couples between the class 220/221 Class 390 (9 and 11 coaches) Class 91 Class 807 (when if enter in service) Longer HST's 9 car and doube 5 car for the class 800/801 WL Class 756 Class 150 Class 153 Class 323 Class 320

[@DaveDVideoMaker]

All of these suggestions are fine; but it’s more feasible for the Class 155 to be in the game than the 153, and I'd rather have the Class 197 on Connect, and the 196 on Waterline.

[@sajidmahmood8383]

390 can go to Airlink as-well as line A and C on AWC stops at Birmingham International

[@DaveDVideoMaker]

It would only suit Express.

[@sajidmahmood8383]

@@DaveDVideoMakerfair enough but also express trains max at 125 while the 390 maxes at 140 will it just get slowed or smthing

[@DaveDVideoMaker]

@@sajidmahmood8383 140mph is its design speed, but the in-service speed is 125mph.

[@i.l.4642]

The other video was your last reaction video

[@DaveDVideoMaker]

My last reaction video was uploaded in October 2022, almost two years ago. What the hell are you talking about?

[@CarcoJr2RobloxTrainGuy]

Btw. Here are my list that is a stupid idea for it to come to SCR, Here are the list of 10 stupid ideas for SCR: 1: Stepford Connect to Greenslade it ruins the purpose of Waterline 2: Waterline to Llyn Branch ruins the purpose of Connect and Express 3: Waterline, Express and Airlink to the Whitefield Branch ruins the purpose of Connect 4: Class 390. While that train suits express, It's too long. Plus, It won't fit some of the platforms. 5: Class 395. NO! It doesnt fit express because it is too fast and it doesnt have first class on it and It won't suit connect when the max speed is 100mph on 3rd rail. 6: Express and Airlink to Greenslade ruins the purpose of Waterline 7: Connect to Connolly and Esterfield ruins the purpose of Waterline 8: Waterline to Stepford Victoria and Willowfield ruins the purpose of Connect 9: Airlink to Connolly ruins the purpose of Waterline and worst suggestion 10: Connect to Newry Branch ruins the purpose of Express and Waterline What do you have to say about these?

[@DaveDVideoMaker]

Platforms are getting extended across the network, meaning the Class 390 is likely to be added on Express.

[@CarcoJr2RobloxTrainGuy]

@@DaveDVideoMaker I see.

[@svetlanarocha]

Some other third rail trains that we used to suggest ( Not Anymore ) coming to scr Class 375 ( originally suggested for connect ) Class 378 ( originally suggested for connect or waterline ) Class 710 ( originally suggested for connect or waterline ) Class 466 ( originally suggested for waterline ) Class 507 ( not suggested but whatever )

[@DaveDVideoMaker]

The Class 375 has a variant with a pantograph (the 375/6). The Class 378 and 710 have pantograph variants, in addition to third rail units. But the Class 710 got rejected, so I think the Class 378 would get rejected too.

[@shekmarcus3797]

Tbh its kinda off topic when will the weather update i really want it

[@DaveDVideoMaker]

Not any time soon.

[@ethans-dk4bk]

He said trains from UK instead of Ireland

[@DaveDVideoMaker]

He did a video of Irish trains he wants for SCR - completely different video to the one I reacted here.

[@svetlanarocha]

Should they upgrade the signal heads Around the game?

[@DaveDVideoMaker]

It’s fine the way it is.

[@ECRALSE40LPS]

This wouldn't have happened in SCR 2.0 if they actually had a pantograph feature maybe in 2.1 with some station upgrades or something for Connect to be extended to like IDK a branch from Bodin or Coxly, as for Express we can reactivate the high speed service. The Class 442 is better on Airlink and I don't care about it. The Class 442 is an EMU plus it's 3rd Rail heck the class 707 is on connect and thats 3rd Rail so what's the issue. The Class 465 could work on electrified routes with overhead lines. New and returning rolling stock for SCR.

[@DaveDVideoMaker]

The Class 707 has an area where a pantograph would be added should it need to run on AC power. Hell, when it was being tested in Germany, it used overhead power.

[@ECRALSE40LPS]

​@@DaveDVideoMakerwhat's the issue for a pantograph. This only exclusive to Overhead trains, not trains that have 3rd rail despite them being electrified. But come on, it look cursed. After all the pantograph should be an exclusive feature not a major feature since trains with 3rd rail, don't need overhead wires.

[@UrLegendDarkBlackChaosLord]

Do you know that class 755 is now have diesel sounds

[@DaveDVideoMaker]

In the game, yes. But when the pantograph feature becomes operational, they should add electric sounds when running on overhead lines, and diesel sounds when running on diesel lines.

[@UrLegendDarkBlackChaosLord]

@@DaveDVideoMaker and class 710 suggestion is denied

[@DaveDVideoMaker]

@@UrLegendDarkBlackChaosLord I read it on the status page.

[@UrLegendDarkBlackChaosLord]

@@DaveDVideoMakerDo you think that RB line will receive overhead wire equipment

[@DaveDVideoMaker]

@@UrLegendDarkBlackChaosLord No.

[@jonnystrains]

class 707 for waterline

[@DaveDVideoMaker]

Doesn’t suit Waterline.